easyt65
Diamond Member
- Aug 4, 2015
- 90,307
- 61,150
- 2,645
- Thread starter
- #61
What does that have to do with Nader the pedophile and his working with the Trump campaign?
![itsok :itsok: :itsok:](/styles/smilies/itsok.gif)
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What does that have to do with Nader the pedophile and his working with the Trump campaign?
He IS and always has been a dem.That picture isn't old. It was taken in 2017. He is not a Democrat.
Good grief. Stick to building showers. There is NO POLITICAL PARTY that holds a grip on being a convicted pedophile. The fucking Republican party had a speaker of the house of representatives convicted. Just because you have confirmation bias doesn't mean it is true.
And yet you sickos carry water for the Dem pedos. We gladly throw any Repub ones into the fire pit.
Please share ONE POST of me defending a pedo. I wish assholes like you would get a perma-ban for saying shit like that. Not once have I ever defended a known pedo. If they started banning people like you for posts like that, people would be a lot more careful for what they say. That shit is potentially libelous if a member ever had a job with high security where they had to give all the websites they frequent and their usernames. They could see a post like your's and not hire the person for it despite it not being true at all.
flacaltenn Coyote Dont Taz Me Bro Is it really ok to say someone defends a pedophile's behavior?
I said you leftwingers carry water for them. Constantly pushing their pro-homo agenda.
What “high security” job would ever require your username and websites you visit? And why would they hold you responsible for something someone else said?
What does that have to do with Nader the pedophile and his working with the Trump campaign?
Poor lil' snowflake can't handle the fact that this guy funneled $3.5 million to Hillary from an unnamed Middle Eastern country during the 2016 election, proving the Russia and Ukrainians (and Brit spies) weren't the only foreign entities / officials she was colluding with....
Nader's? You mean in the OP / link or in your attempted distraction from the fact that this guy was some 'bag man' for the unnamed Middle Eastern country that 'bought' Hillary in 2016, the guy who was later used by Weissman as a 'key witness'?What does that have to do with Nader the pedophile and his working with the Trump campaign?
Poor lil' snowflake can't handle the fact that this guy funneled $3.5 million to Hillary from an unnamed Middle Eastern country during the 2016 election, proving the Russia and Ukrainians (and Brit spies) weren't the only foreign entities / officials she was colluding with....
Did I miss something? I didn't see his name mentioned in there once.
and the guy. Like Donald Trump, is into little kidsYou mean Trump business associate. If Trump hadn't been working with him, Mueller wouldn't have interviewed him.
![]()
Now show a picture of him with Mueller.
Nader's? You mean in the OP / link or in your attempted distraction from the fact that this guy was some 'bag man' for the unnamed Middle Eastern country that 'bought' Hillary in 2016, the guy who was later used by Weissman as a 'key witness'?What does that have to do with Nader the pedophile and his working with the Trump campaign?
Poor lil' snowflake can't handle the fact that this guy funneled $3.5 million to Hillary from an unnamed Middle Eastern country during the 2016 election, proving the Russia and Ukrainians (and Brit spies) weren't the only foreign entities / officials she was colluding with....
Did I miss something? I didn't see his name mentioned in there once.
From the Link / article:
'"Nader is still separately under indictment in Washington along with seven others on charges of conspiring to conceal the source of more than $3.5 million in political donations to Hillary Clinton during the 2016 presidential campaign. Nader allegedly was reporting to an unnamed Middle Eastern government on that operation, which was intended to curry favor with Clinton, prosecutors in that case said."
True, they are in both parties, the difference I think is how we punish them...…..And it's why we threw the Trump grenade in DC. This guy was convicted in 2004 in the Czech Republic, but I guess it's cool with the establishment (Democrat and Republican). It makes we want to get rid of these goons even more. Trump is the best vote ever.Why are all the child rapists getting busted lately ALWAYS DEMOCRATS?You mean Trump business associate. If Trump hadn't been working with him, Mueller wouldn't have interviewed him.
![]()
Now show a picture of him with Mueller.
They aren't always Democrats. Being a pedophile doesn't have a specific political party. There are scum in both parties. Nader isn't a Democrat...
ROFLMFAOYou mean Trump business associate. If Trump hadn't been working with him, Mueller wouldn't have interviewed him.
![]()
Now show a picture of him with Mueller.
He was never supposed to be near Trump. Trump had nothing to do with this man, this was taken at a fundraiser.
The wild story of how a convicted pedophile got his picture taken with Trump
- The Secret Service explicitly told Broidy that Nader was banned from meeting Trump. But despite this, Nader still got his photo.
He had business dealings with Trump. He also worked as a conduit between Saudi Arabia and Trump... you know the same Saudi Arabia Trump won't say a bad word about? The same Saudi Arabia he always praises for spending money, and nothing about their human rights abuses, killings of innocent children with U.S. weapons, and killing an employee of a U.S. news paper.
Hillary Clinton, The Podesta Group And The Saudi Regime: A Fatal Menage A Trois
If I told you that Democratic Party lobbyist Tony Podesta, whose brother John Podesta chairs Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign, is a registered foreign agent on the Saudi government’s payroll, you’d probably think I was a Trump-thumping, conspiratorial nutcase.
But it’s true.
The lobby firm created by both Tony and John Podesta in 1988 receives $140,000 a month from the Saudi government, a government that beheads nonviolent dissidents, uses torture to extract forced confessions, doesn’t allow women to drive, and bombs schools, hospitals and residential neighborhoods in neighboring Yemen.
The Podesta Group’s March 2016 filing, required under the Foreign Agents Registration Act of 1938, shows that Tony Podesta himself oversees the Saudi account. At the same time, Tony Podesta is also a top campaign contributor and bundler for Hillary Clinton. So while one brother runs the campaign, the other brother funds it with earnings that come, in part, from the Saudis.
John and Tony Podesta have been heavyweights in DC insider politics for decades. John Podesta served as President Bill Clinton’s chief of staff, founded the influential DC think tank Center for American Progress (which regularly touts Saudi “reforms”), and was counselor to President Obama.
Tony Podesta held a Clinton campaign fundraiser at his home featuring gourmet Italian food cooked by himself and his brother, the campaign chairman. The fundraiser, by the way, came just days after Tony Podesta filed his Saudi contract with the Justice Department, a contract that included an initial “project fee” payment of $200,000.
The Saudis hired the Podesta Group in 2015 because it was getting hammered in the press over civilian casualties from its airstrikes in Yemen and its crackdown on political dissidents at home, including sentencing blogger Raif Badawi to ten years in prison and 1,000 lashes for “insulting Islam.” Since then, Tony Podesta’s fingerprints have been all over Saudi Arabia’s advocacy efforts in Washington DC.
The Podesta-Clinton-Saudi connection should be seen in light of the recent media exposes revealing the taudry pay-to-play nature of the Clinton Foundation. Top on the list of foreign donors to the foundation is Saudi Arabia, which contributed between $10 million and $25 million.
What did the Saudis get for their largesse and access? Wikileaks revealed a 2009 cable by then Secretary of State Hillary Clinton saying: “More needs to be done since Saudi Arabia remains a critical financial support base for Al Qaeda, the Taliban, Lashkar e-Tayyiba and other terrorist groups.” Instead of sanctioning the Saudis, Clinton did the opposite: She authorized enormous quantities of weapons to be sold to them. On Christmas Eve in 2011, Hillary Clinton and her closest aides celebrated a massive $29.4 billion sale to the Saudis of over 80 F-15 fighter jets, manufactured by Boeing, a company which coincidentally contributed $900,000 to the Clinton Foundation. In a chain of enthusiastic emails, an aide exclaimed that it was “not a bad Christmas present.” I’m sure the Yemenis at the receiving end of the Saudi bombings would not be so enthusiastic.
Yep, the same Podesto group Manafort hired
to lobby Congress on behalf of the government of Ukraine
Go Fuck Yourself!
What does that have to do with Nader the pedophile and his working with the Trump campaign?
He had business dealings with Trump. He also worked as a conduit between Saudi Arabia and Trump... you know the same Saudi Arabia Trump won't say a bad word about? The same Saudi Arabia he always praises for spending money, and nothing about their human rights abuses, killings of innocent children with U.S. weapons, and killing an employee of a U.S. newspaper
Nader's? You mean in the OP / link or in your attempted distraction from the fact that this guy was some 'bag man' for the unnamed Middle Eastern country that 'bought' Hillary in 2016, the guy who was later used by Weissman as a 'key witness'?What does that have to do with Nader the pedophile and his working with the Trump campaign?
Poor lil' snowflake can't handle the fact that this guy funneled $3.5 million to Hillary from an unnamed Middle Eastern country during the 2016 election, proving the Russia and Ukrainians (and Brit spies) weren't the only foreign entities / officials she was colluding with....
Did I miss something? I didn't see his name mentioned in there once.
From the Link / article:
'"Nader is still separately under indictment in Washington along with seven others on charges of conspiring to conceal the source of more than $3.5 million in political donations to Hillary Clinton during the 2016 presidential campaign. Nader allegedly was reporting to an unnamed Middle Eastern government on that operation, which was intended to curry favor with Clinton, prosecutors in that case said."
I mean in your reply to my reply to the article that has NO MENTION of him. You however cut out the other person's post.