Muhammad Al-Dura May be Alive

[Lipush]

The government investigative committee that was set up to determine the truth of allegations that IDF soldiers killed 12-year-old Muhammad al-Dura during the "Second Intifada" have determined that not only were the allegations – and a report by French television purporting to show IDF soldiers shooting and killing the boy – a lie, but that the al-Dura may not even be dead.

“As opposed to the media reports that stated that the child was killed, an examination of the raw video shot by the France 2 staff shows the child alive,” the committee said. That portion of the video was never broadcast. “In addition, there is a great deal of evidence to indicate that al-Dura and his father were never hit by any bullets. The investigation shows that it is very unlikely that the bullet holes seen in the wall behind the two came from shots fired by IDF soldiers.”

Panel: Muhammad Al-Dura May be Alive - Defense/Security - News - Israel National News

-------------

Ah, now tell us something we DON'T know!

 

[Roudy]

The government investigative committee that was set up to determine the truth of allegations that IDF soldiers killed 12-year-old Muhammad al-Dura during the "Second Intifada" have determined that not only were the allegations – and a report by French television purporting to show IDF soldiers shooting and killing the boy – a lie, but that the al-Dura may not even be dead.

“As opposed to the media reports that stated that the child was killed, an examination of the raw video shot by the France 2 staff shows the child alive,” the committee said. That portion of the video was never broadcast. “In addition, there is a great deal of evidence to indicate that al-Dura and his father were never hit by any bullets. The investigation shows that it is very unlikely that the bullet holes seen in the wall behind the two came from shots fired by IDF soldiers.”

Panel: Muhammad Al-Dura May be Alive - Defense/Security - News - Israel National News

-------------

Ah, now tell us something we DON'T know!

You think he's going to come back and play another Oscar winning leading role in a Pallywood action movie?

 

[sealadaigh]

The government investigative committee that was set up to determine the truth of allegations that IDF soldiers killed 12-year-old Muhammad al-Dura during the "Second Intifada" have determined that not only were the allegations – and a report by French television purporting to show IDF soldiers shooting and killing the boy – a lie, but that the al-Dura may not even be dead.

“As opposed to the media reports that stated that the child was killed, an examination of the raw video shot by the France 2 staff shows the child alive,” the committee said. That portion of the video was never broadcast. “In addition, there is a great deal of evidence to indicate that al-Dura and his father were never hit by any bullets. The investigation shows that it is very unlikely that the bullet holes seen in the wall behind the two came from shots fired by IDF soldiers.”

Panel: Muhammad Al-Dura May be Alive - Defense/Security - News - Israel National News

-------------

Ah, now tell us something we DON'T know!

damn...and i thought they would've gone with "we didn't know it was a little palestinian boy. we thought he was an egyptian horse carrier that was shelling IDF positions in al arish."

i never expected them to take a page out of the ernst zundel playbook.

 

[Roudy]

Or maybe the Palestinians will send bunch of their goons to kill the poor kid, and then say "See! He's dead! We weren't lying!"

 

[Roudy]

 

[pbel]

The government investigative committee that was set up to determine the truth of allegations that IDF soldiers killed 12-year-old Muhammad al-Dura during the "Second Intifada" have determined that not only were the allegations – and a report by French television purporting to show IDF soldiers shooting and killing the boy – a lie, but that the al-Dura may not even be dead.

“As opposed to the media reports that stated that the child was killed, an examination of the raw video shot by the France 2 staff shows the child alive,” the committee said. That portion of the video was never broadcast. “In addition, there is a great deal of evidence to indicate that al-Dura and his father were never hit by any bullets. The investigation shows that it is very unlikely that the bullet holes seen in the wall behind the two came from shots fired by IDF soldiers.”

Panel: Muhammad Al-Dura May be Alive - Defense/Security - News - Israel National News

-------------

Ah, now tell us something we DON'T know!

Did he rise from the dead? Show us a photo and video...and a link.

 

[Roudy]

Doctor: Report Affirms Al-Dura Story Was a Hoax
5/20/2013, 6:29 PM

The committee determined that not only were the allegations – and a report by French television purporting to show IDF soldiers shooting and killing the boy a lie, but that al-Dura is not even dead.

The Israeli committee, in its final word on the subject, said Sunday that “as opposed to the media reports that stated that the child was killed, an examination of the raw video shot by the France 2 staff shows the child alive,” the committee said. That portion of the video was never broadcast. “In addition, there is a great deal of evidence to indicate that al-Dura and his father were never hit by any bullets. The investigation shows that it is very unlikely that the bullet holes seen in the pair came from shots fired by IDF soldiers.”

The new report also questions whether or not the younger al-Dura was even killed. The fact that he was still alive at the end of the French television video, after the gunfire had stopped, could mean that the boy is alive even now. “Since this issue was first raised there have been many contradictions and cold trails, based on the story the French television company told. There are many unanswered questions about many aspects of this incident,” the committee said.

According to David, the answer to this question is clear, and is supported by evidence. “We know that a child whose name is Mohammed al-Dura was taken to Shifa Hospital in Gaza at 9 AM,” David told Arutz Sheva, relying on publicly released information. “We know that the event in which it was claimed that the child was killed actually only began at 3 in the afternoon. So how is it possible that there was a dead child at 9 AM, and they want us to believe that it is the same child who was shot by Israeli soldiers at 3:00?”

 

[pbel]

Doctor: Report Affirms Al-Dura Story Was a Hoax
5/20/2013, 6:29 PM

The committee determined that not only were the allegations – and a report by French television purporting to show IDF soldiers shooting and killing the boy a lie, but that al-Dura is not even dead.

The Israeli committee, in its final word on the subject, said Sunday that “as opposed to the media reports that stated that the child was killed, an examination of the raw video shot by the France 2 staff shows the child alive,” the committee said. That portion of the video was never broadcast. “In addition, there is a great deal of evidence to indicate that al-Dura and his father were never hit by any bullets. The investigation shows that it is very unlikely that the bullet holes seen in the pair came from shots fired by IDF soldiers.”

The new report also questions whether or not the younger al-Dura was even killed. The fact that he was still alive at the end of the French television video, after the gunfire had stopped, could mean that the boy is alive even now. “Since this issue was first raised there have been many contradictions and cold trails, based on the story the French television company told. There are many unanswered questions about many aspects of this incident,” the committee said.

According to David, the answer to this question is clear, and is supported by evidence. “We know that a child whose name is Mohammed al-Dura was taken to Shifa Hospital in Gaza at 9 AM,” David told Arutz Sheva, relying on publicly released information. “We know that the event in which it was claimed that the child was killed actually only began at 3 in the afternoon. So how is it possible that there was a dead child at 9 AM, and they want us to believe that it is the same child who was shot by Israeli soldiers at 3:00?”

Do you really think that a IDF inspired link is proof? ROLMAO

 

[Roudy]

Doctor: Report Affirms Al-Dura Story Was a Hoax
5/20/2013, 6:29 PM

The committee determined that not only were the allegations – and a report by French television purporting to show IDF soldiers shooting and killing the boy a lie, but that al-Dura is not even dead.

The Israeli committee, in its final word on the subject, said Sunday that “as opposed to the media reports that stated that the child was killed, an examination of the raw video shot by the France 2 staff shows the child alive,” the committee said. That portion of the video was never broadcast. “In addition, there is a great deal of evidence to indicate that al-Dura and his father were never hit by any bullets. The investigation shows that it is very unlikely that the bullet holes seen in the pair came from shots fired by IDF soldiers.”

The new report also questions whether or not the younger al-Dura was even killed. The fact that he was still alive at the end of the French television video, after the gunfire had stopped, could mean that the boy is alive even now. “Since this issue was first raised there have been many contradictions and cold trails, based on the story the French television company told. There are many unanswered questions about many aspects of this incident,” the committee said.

According to David, the answer to this question is clear, and is supported by evidence. “We know that a child whose name is Mohammed al-Dura was taken to Shifa Hospital in Gaza at 9 AM,” David told Arutz Sheva, relying on publicly released information. “We know that the event in which it was claimed that the child was killed actually only began at 3 in the afternoon. So how is it possible that there was a dead child at 9 AM, and they want us to believe that it is the same child who was shot by Israeli soldiers at 3:00?”

Do you really think that a IDF inspired link is proof? ROLMAO

Sure I do. Do you think a Palestinian inspired Pallywood hoax is proof?

 

[Lipush]

The government investigative committee that was set up to determine the truth of allegations that IDF soldiers killed 12-year-old Muhammad al-Dura during the "Second Intifada" have determined that not only were the allegations – and a report by French television purporting to show IDF soldiers shooting and killing the boy – a lie, but that the al-Dura may not even be dead.

“As opposed to the media reports that stated that the child was killed, an examination of the raw video shot by the France 2 staff shows the child alive,” the committee said. That portion of the video was never broadcast. “In addition, there is a great deal of evidence to indicate that al-Dura and his father were never hit by any bullets. The investigation shows that it is very unlikely that the bullet holes seen in the wall behind the two came from shots fired by IDF soldiers.”

Panel: Muhammad Al-Dura May be Alive - Defense/Security - News - Israel National News

-------------

Ah, now tell us something we DON'T know!

Did he rise from the dead? Show us a photo and video...and a link.

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E3Z4_11wLjw]Al Dura - What Really Happened? - YouTube[/ame]

Watch 2:30.

The "dead boy" apperently has living organs. They move.

 

[Lipush]

Doctor: Report Affirms Al-Dura Story Was a Hoax
5/20/2013, 6:29 PM

The committee determined that not only were the allegations – and a report by French television purporting to show IDF soldiers shooting and killing the boy a lie, but that al-Dura is not even dead.

The Israeli committee, in its final word on the subject, said Sunday that “as opposed to the media reports that stated that the child was killed, an examination of the raw video shot by the France 2 staff shows the child alive,” the committee said. That portion of the video was never broadcast. “In addition, there is a great deal of evidence to indicate that al-Dura and his father were never hit by any bullets. The investigation shows that it is very unlikely that the bullet holes seen in the pair came from shots fired by IDF soldiers.”

The new report also questions whether or not the younger al-Dura was even killed. The fact that he was still alive at the end of the French television video, after the gunfire had stopped, could mean that the boy is alive even now. “Since this issue was first raised there have been many contradictions and cold trails, based on the story the French television company told. There are many unanswered questions about many aspects of this incident,” the committee said.

According to David, the answer to this question is clear, and is supported by evidence. “We know that a child whose name is Mohammed al-Dura was taken to Shifa Hospital in Gaza at 9 AM,” David told Arutz Sheva, relying on publicly released information. “We know that the event in which it was claimed that the child was killed actually only began at 3 in the afternoon. So how is it possible that there was a dead child at 9 AM, and they want us to believe that it is the same child who was shot by Israeli soldiers at 3:00?”

Do you really think that a IDF inspired link is proof? ROLMAO

The boy moved after being declaired dead.

We all know it was staged!

Haters like you cannot admit the truth even when it bites them in their tushes!

 

[pbel]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muhammad_al-Durrah_incident

The Muhammad al-Durrah incident took place in the Gaza Strip on September 30, 2000, on the second day of the Second Intifada, amid widespread rioting throughout the Palestinian territories. Jamal al-Durrah and his 12-year-old son, Muhammad, were filmed by Talal Abu Rahma, a Palestinian cameraman freelancing for France 2, as they sought cover behind a concrete cylinder after being caught in crossfire between Israeli soldiers and Palestinian security forces. The footage, which lasts just over a minute, shows the pair holding onto each other, the boy crying and the father waving, then a burst of gunfire and dust, after which the boy is seen slumped across his father's legs.[1]

Fifty-nine seconds of the footage were initially broadcast in France with a voiceover from Charles Enderlin, France 2's bureau chief in Israel, who did not witness the incident himself but got all information by phone from the cameraman, telling viewers that the al-Durrahs had been the "target of fire from the Israeli positions," and that the boy had died.[2] After an emotional public funeral, Muhammad was hailed throughout the Arab and Muslim worlds as a martyr.

 

[pbel]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muhammad_al-Durrah_incident

The Muhammad al-Durrah incident took place in the Gaza Strip on September 30, 2000, on the second day of the Second Intifada, amid widespread rioting throughout the Palestinian territories. Jamal al-Durrah and his 12-year-old son, Muhammad, were filmed by Talal Abu Rahma, a Palestinian cameraman freelancing for France 2, as they sought cover behind a concrete cylinder after being caught in crossfire between Israeli soldiers and Palestinian security forces. The footage, which lasts just over a minute, shows the pair holding onto each other, the boy crying and the father waving, then a burst of gunfire and dust, after which the boy is seen slumped across his father's legs.[1]

Fifty-nine seconds of the footage were initially broadcast in France with a voiceover from Charles Enderlin, France 2's bureau chief in Israel, who did not witness the incident himself but got all information by phone from the cameraman, telling viewers that the al-Durrahs had been the "target of fire from the Israeli positions," and that the boy had died.[2] After an emotional public funeral, Muhammad was hailed throughout the Arab and Muslim worlds as a martyr.

Isdraeli lies keep marching on!

Al-Dura says he is willing to exhume son's body | JPost | Israel News

News for muhammad al dura


The Guardi...


Al-Dura says he is willing to exhume son's body


Jerusalem Post
- 5 hours ago
Father of Mohammed al-Dura said Israeli report is false, calls for an international investigation over death of son.

 

[pbel]

Father of Muhammad al-Dura blasts Israeli report





Published: 05.20.13, 00:15 / Israel News

















Father of Muhammad al-Dura blasts Israeli report - Israel News, Ynetnews

Jamal al-Dura responded to Israeli report that his son Muhammad, who died during the Second Intifada, was not killed by IDF fire, in saying "If Muhammad wasn’t hurt by the bullets, then who shot me and injured me? When the Israeli army shot and hit us, Israel admitted to have done it. Why does it keep changing its version?" (Elior Levy)

 

[Roudy]

Looks like even the French aren't falling for this Pallywood BS. From your link:

2006: Enderlin-France 2 v. Karsenty [edit]

Philippe Karsenty was sued for calling the footage a hoax. In 2008, the French court ruled that Karsenty had presented a coherent mass of evidence, and had exercised in good faith his right to criticize.
In response to the claims that it had broadcast a staged scene, Enderlin and France 2 filed three defamation suits, seeking symbolic damages of €1 from each of the defendants.[111] The most notable lawsuit was against Philippe Karsenty, a deputy mayor of Neuilly-sur-Seine and financial consultant, who runs a media watchdog, Media-Ratings.[112] He wrote on November 26, 2004 that the shooting scene had been faked by the cameraman, that Muhammad had not been killed, and that Enderlin and Chabot, France 2's news editor, should be sacked.[113] On December 9, 2004, Enderlin issued a writ for libel, followed by France 2 on December 3, 2005.[114]
The case began on September 14, 2006. Witnesses who testified for Karsenty included the French journalist Luc Rosenzweig, media professor Francis Balle, American historian Richard Landes, Gérard Huber, author of Contre expertise d'une mise en scene, and Daniel Dayan, research director of the French National Centre for Scientific Research.[43] Enderlin submitted as evidence a February 2004 letter from Jacques Chirac, then president of France, which spoke of Enderlin's integrity.[16] The court upheld the complaint on October 19, 2006, fining Karsenty €1,000 and ordering him to pay €3,000 in costs.[2] He lodged an appeal that same day.[115]

2007: Karsenty v. Enderlin-France 2 [edit]
The case opened on September 19, 2007 in the Paris Court of Appeal, the three-judge panel presided over by Judge Laurence Trébucq.[116] The court asked France 2 to turn over the 27 minutes of raw footage the cameraman said he had shot, to be shown during a public hearing on November 14. France 2 produced only 18 minutes; Karsenty refers to this as "the first tampering of the evidence."[115] Enderlin told The Jerusalem Post on the day of the hearing that France 2 had produced all the raw footage it had, based on "an original tape that was kept in a safe until now. We presented a DVD that was made in front of a bailiff from the original tape... not from the various copies you can find here and there." He said, "I do not know where this 27 minutes comes from. In all there were only 18 minutes of footage shot in Gaza."[81]

Karsenty commissioned Jean-Claude Schlinger, a ballistics expert, to write a 90-page report for the court.[118] Schlinger recreated the incident, examining the angle of the shots, the weapons, and the reported injuries. A diagram he produced (right) included a position behind the France 2 cameraman and in front of the al-Durrahs, a circular dirt berm known locally as "the pita," where Palestinian police were armed with automatic rifles.[31] This position did not appear in the cameraman's report; see the image on the left above. Schlinger concluded: "If Jamal and Mohammed al-Dura were indeed struck by shots, then they could not have come from the Israeli position, from a technical point of view, but only from the direction of the Palestinian position." He said there was no evidence that the boy was wounded in his right leg or abdomen, as reported, and that if the injuries were genuine, they did not occur at the time of the televised events. Had the shots come from the Israeli position, he wrote, only the lower limbs could have been hit.[119]

2012: Appeal decision quashed [edit]
On February 28, 2012, the French supreme court quashed the decision of the appeal court in the France 2 vs. Karsenty case, ruling that the demand of the appeal court to France 2 to provide the raw footage was not legally well-founded: although the defendant can demonstrate his good faith by the existence of particular circumstances, the proof is incumbent only on him, and the judges are not entitled to cause, complete or refine the establishment of said proof. The text of the decision is available at.[124] The case is therefore sent back to the appeal court.
2013: Second appeal [edit]
The new appeal hearing took place in January 2013, the decision is expected on April 3.[125]
In June 2010 Karsenty won another libel suit, this one against the French channel Canal+ broadcast and the Tac Press news agency over an April 2008 documentary comparing his arguments to 9/11 conspiracy theories.[126]
Impact of the footage [edit]

 

[pbel]

Looks like even the French aren't falling for this Pallywood BS. From your link:

2006: Enderlin-France 2 v. Karsenty [edit]

Philippe Karsenty was sued for calling the footage a hoax. In 2008, the French court ruled that Karsenty had presented a coherent mass of evidence, and had exercised in good faith his right to criticize.
In response to the claims that it had broadcast a staged scene, Enderlin and France 2 filed three defamation suits, seeking symbolic damages of €1 from each of the defendants.[111] The most notable lawsuit was against Philippe Karsenty, a deputy mayor of Neuilly-sur-Seine and financial consultant, who runs a media watchdog, Media-Ratings.[112] He wrote on November 26, 2004 that the shooting scene had been faked by the cameraman, that Muhammad had not been killed, and that Enderlin and Chabot, France 2's news editor, should be sacked.[113] On December 9, 2004, Enderlin issued a writ for libel, followed by France 2 on December 3, 2005.[114]
The case began on September 14, 2006. Witnesses who testified for Karsenty included the French journalist Luc Rosenzweig, media professor Francis Balle, American historian Richard Landes, Gérard Huber, author of Contre expertise d'une mise en scene, and Daniel Dayan, research director of the French National Centre for Scientific Research.[43] Enderlin submitted as evidence a February 2004 letter from Jacques Chirac, then president of France, which spoke of Enderlin's integrity.[16] The court upheld the complaint on October 19, 2006, fining Karsenty €1,000 and ordering him to pay €3,000 in costs.[2] He lodged an appeal that same day.[115]

2007: Karsenty v. Enderlin-France 2 [edit]
The case opened on September 19, 2007 in the Paris Court of Appeal, the three-judge panel presided over by Judge Laurence Trébucq.[116] The court asked France 2 to turn over the 27 minutes of raw footage the cameraman said he had shot, to be shown during a public hearing on November 14. France 2 produced only 18 minutes; Karsenty refers to this as "the first tampering of the evidence."[115] Enderlin told The Jerusalem Post on the day of the hearing that France 2 had produced all the raw footage it had, based on "an original tape that was kept in a safe until now. We presented a DVD that was made in front of a bailiff from the original tape... not from the various copies you can find here and there." He said, "I do not know where this 27 minutes comes from. In all there were only 18 minutes of footage shot in Gaza."[81]

Karsenty commissioned Jean-Claude Schlinger, a ballistics expert, to write a 90-page report for the court.[118] Schlinger recreated the incident, examining the angle of the shots, the weapons, and the reported injuries. A diagram he produced (right) included a position behind the France 2 cameraman and in front of the al-Durrahs, a circular dirt berm known locally as "the pita," where Palestinian police were armed with automatic rifles.[31] This position did not appear in the cameraman's report; see the image on the left above. Schlinger concluded: "If Jamal and Mohammed al-Dura were indeed struck by shots, then they could not have come from the Israeli position, from a technical point of view, but only from the direction of the Palestinian position." He said there was no evidence that the boy was wounded in his right leg or abdomen, as reported, and that if the injuries were genuine, they did not occur at the time of the televised events. Had the shots come from the Israeli position, he wrote, only the lower limbs could have been hit.[119]

2012: Appeal decision quashed [edit]
On February 28, 2012, the French supreme court quashed the decision of the appeal court in the France 2 vs. Karsenty case, ruling that the demand of the appeal court to France 2 to provide the raw footage was not legally well-founded: although the defendant can demonstrate his good faith by the existence of particular circumstances, the proof is incumbent only on him, and the judges are not entitled to cause, complete or refine the establishment of said proof. The text of the decision is available at.[124] The case is therefore sent back to the appeal court.
2013: Second appeal [edit]
The new appeal hearing took place in January 2013, the decision is expected on April 3.[125]
In June 2010 Karsenty won another libel suit, this one against the French channel Canal+ broadcast and the Tac Press news agency over an April 2008 documentary comparing his arguments to 9/11 conspiracy theories.[126]
Impact of the footage [edit]

Well lets see if the Israelis agree to an international investigation called for by Al Dura, and exhume the boy's body.

I doubt the Israelis will agree.

 

[Roudy]

Looks like even the French aren't falling for this Pallywood BS. From your link:

2006: Enderlin-France 2 v. Karsenty [edit]

Philippe Karsenty was sued for calling the footage a hoax. In 2008, the French court ruled that Karsenty had presented a coherent mass of evidence, and had exercised in good faith his right to criticize.
In response to the claims that it had broadcast a staged scene, Enderlin and France 2 filed three defamation suits, seeking symbolic damages of €1 from each of the defendants.[111] The most notable lawsuit was against Philippe Karsenty, a deputy mayor of Neuilly-sur-Seine and financial consultant, who runs a media watchdog, Media-Ratings.[112] He wrote on November 26, 2004 that the shooting scene had been faked by the cameraman, that Muhammad had not been killed, and that Enderlin and Chabot, France 2's news editor, should be sacked.[113] On December 9, 2004, Enderlin issued a writ for libel, followed by France 2 on December 3, 2005.[114]
The case began on September 14, 2006. Witnesses who testified for Karsenty included the French journalist Luc Rosenzweig, media professor Francis Balle, American historian Richard Landes, Gérard Huber, author of Contre expertise d'une mise en scene, and Daniel Dayan, research director of the French National Centre for Scientific Research.[43] Enderlin submitted as evidence a February 2004 letter from Jacques Chirac, then president of France, which spoke of Enderlin's integrity.[16] The court upheld the complaint on October 19, 2006, fining Karsenty €1,000 and ordering him to pay €3,000 in costs.[2] He lodged an appeal that same day.[115]

2007: Karsenty v. Enderlin-France 2 [edit]
The case opened on September 19, 2007 in the Paris Court of Appeal, the three-judge panel presided over by Judge Laurence Trébucq.[116] The court asked France 2 to turn over the 27 minutes of raw footage the cameraman said he had shot, to be shown during a public hearing on November 14. France 2 produced only 18 minutes; Karsenty refers to this as "the first tampering of the evidence."[115] Enderlin told The Jerusalem Post on the day of the hearing that France 2 had produced all the raw footage it had, based on "an original tape that was kept in a safe until now. We presented a DVD that was made in front of a bailiff from the original tape... not from the various copies you can find here and there." He said, "I do not know where this 27 minutes comes from. In all there were only 18 minutes of footage shot in Gaza."[81]

Karsenty commissioned Jean-Claude Schlinger, a ballistics expert, to write a 90-page report for the court.[118] Schlinger recreated the incident, examining the angle of the shots, the weapons, and the reported injuries. A diagram he produced (right) included a position behind the France 2 cameraman and in front of the al-Durrahs, a circular dirt berm known locally as "the pita," where Palestinian police were armed with automatic rifles.[31] This position did not appear in the cameraman's report; see the image on the left above. Schlinger concluded: "If Jamal and Mohammed al-Dura were indeed struck by shots, then they could not have come from the Israeli position, from a technical point of view, but only from the direction of the Palestinian position." He said there was no evidence that the boy was wounded in his right leg or abdomen, as reported, and that if the injuries were genuine, they did not occur at the time of the televised events. Had the shots come from the Israeli position, he wrote, only the lower limbs could have been hit.[119]

2012: Appeal decision quashed [edit]
On February 28, 2012, the French supreme court quashed the decision of the appeal court in the France 2 vs. Karsenty case, ruling that the demand of the appeal court to France 2 to provide the raw footage was not legally well-founded: although the defendant can demonstrate his good faith by the existence of particular circumstances, the proof is incumbent only on him, and the judges are not entitled to cause, complete or refine the establishment of said proof. The text of the decision is available at.[124] The case is therefore sent back to the appeal court.
2013: Second appeal [edit]
The new appeal hearing took place in January 2013, the decision is expected on April 3.[125]
In June 2010 Karsenty won another libel suit, this one against the French channel Canal+ broadcast and the Tac Press news agency over an April 2008 documentary comparing his arguments to 9/11 conspiracy theories.[126]
Impact of the footage [edit]

Well lets see if the Israelis agree to an international investigation called for by Al Dura, and exhume the boy's body.

I doubt the Israelis will agree.

The Israelis, unlike the Palestinians, have enough integrity to take the blame and apologize if they were indeed responsible. They initially did exactly that and then retracted it when they realized the whole thing was a Pallywood hoax.

 

[sealadaigh]

The government investigative committee that was set up to determine the truth of allegations that IDF soldiers killed 12-year-old Muhammad al-Dura during the "Second Intifada" have determined that not only were the allegations – and a report by French television purporting to show IDF soldiers shooting and killing the boy – a lie, but that the al-Dura may not even be dead.

“As opposed to the media reports that stated that the child was killed, an examination of the raw video shot by the France 2 staff shows the child alive,” the committee said. That portion of the video was never broadcast. “In addition, there is a great deal of evidence to indicate that al-Dura and his father were never hit by any bullets. The investigation shows that it is very unlikely that the bullet holes seen in the wall behind the two came from shots fired by IDF soldiers.”

Panel: Muhammad Al-Dura May be Alive - Defense/Security - News - Israel National News

-------------

Ah, now tell us something we DON'T know!

Did he rise from the dead? Show us a photo and video...and a link.

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E3Z4_11wLjw]Al Dura - What Really Happened? - YouTube[/ame]

Watch 2:30.

The "dead boy" apperently has living organs. They move.

secret investigative body...jews.
technion scientists examining evidence...jews.
tom gross, reporter on video...jew.
key piece of evidence (the wall) that would answer with proof all the questions destroyed by...jews.

how freakin' ridiculous. the IDF admitted it and the general rule is first impressions are the most accurate.

what next...that baruch goldstein was shooting blanks...that iman al-hams is still alive and made it to school that day...that abdul nassar shot shitstick rabin. israel is a joke.

you may be chosen but that doesn't goyim stupid.

oh, and honestreporting, the source of your video, founded and administered by...british jews.

 

[Hossfly]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muhammad_al-Durrah_incident

The Muhammad al-Durrah incident took place in the Gaza Strip on September 30, 2000, on the second day of the Second Intifada, amid widespread rioting throughout the Palestinian territories. Jamal al-Durrah and his 12-year-old son, Muhammad, were filmed by Talal Abu Rahma, a Palestinian cameraman freelancing for France 2, as they sought cover behind a concrete cylinder after being caught in crossfire between Israeli soldiers and Palestinian security forces. The footage, which lasts just over a minute, shows the pair holding onto each other, the boy crying and the father waving, then a burst of gunfire and dust, after which the boy is seen slumped across his father's legs.[1]

Fifty-nine seconds of the footage were initially broadcast in France with a voiceover from Charles Enderlin, France 2's bureau chief in Israel, who did not witness the incident himself but got all information by phone from the cameraman, telling viewers that the al-Durrahs had been the "target of fire from the Israeli positions," and that the boy had died.[2] After an emotional public funeral, Muhammad was hailed throughout the Arab and Muslim worlds as a martyr.

Isdraeli lies keep marching on!

Al-Dura says he is willing to exhume son's body | JPost | Israel News

News for muhammad al dura


The Guardi...


Al-Dura says he is willing to exhume son's body


Jerusalem Post
- 5 hours ago
Father of Mohammed al-Dura said Israeli report is false, calls for an international investigation over death of son.

Whoever knows the truth with these stories. I am reminded of that dead Arab man falling off the stretcher and then getting back on. Regardless, does Phillip ever worry about all the children who have been killed in the past and are still being killed by Muslims in other areas of the Middle East, Africa and Southeast Asia. Somehow I doubt it very much because no Jews are involved.

 

[pbel]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muhammad_al-Durrah_incident

The Muhammad al-Durrah incident took place in the Gaza Strip on September 30, 2000, on the second day of the Second Intifada, amid widespread rioting throughout the Palestinian territories. Jamal al-Durrah and his 12-year-old son, Muhammad, were filmed by Talal Abu Rahma, a Palestinian cameraman freelancing for France 2, as they sought cover behind a concrete cylinder after being caught in crossfire between Israeli soldiers and Palestinian security forces. The footage, which lasts just over a minute, shows the pair holding onto each other, the boy crying and the father waving, then a burst of gunfire and dust, after which the boy is seen slumped across his father's legs.[1]

Fifty-nine seconds of the footage were initially broadcast in France with a voiceover from Charles Enderlin, France 2's bureau chief in Israel, who did not witness the incident himself but got all information by phone from the cameraman, telling viewers that the al-Durrahs had been the "target of fire from the Israeli positions," and that the boy had died.[2] After an emotional public funeral, Muhammad was hailed throughout the Arab and Muslim worlds as a martyr.

Isdraeli lies keep marching on!

Al-Dura says he is willing to exhume son's body | JPost | Israel News

News for muhammad al dura


The Guardi...


Al-Dura says he is willing to exhume son's body


Jerusalem Post
- 5 hours ago
Father of Mohammed al-Dura said Israeli report is false, calls for an international investigation over death of son.

Whoever knows the truth with these stories. I am reminded of that dead Arab man falling off the stretcher and then getting back on. Regardless, does Phillip ever worry about all the children who have been killed in the past and are still being killed by Muslims in other areas of the Middle East, Africa and Southeast Asia. Somehow I doubt it very much because no Jews are involved.

Hoss-hiite, why do you keep bringing up wars from outside the Israeli Palestinian conflict? My guess is that you hate all Muslims...Your guess is like all the ZioNuts who post here...I post for Peace and you post for hate...

I keep telling you, I post here because I am an American Firster who would like to see America disengage from this quagmire because it brings terrorism to our shores...a peace deal may save Americans. Your concern appears to be biblical, and wait for the Rapture to convert Jews to Christianity or perish.