Muslims should probably wear veils

[PaintMyHouse]

It stops gun deaths.

Your reasoning leads to, there's no reason to ban flamethrowers, people will just use Molotov cocktails instead.

True...

I say arm everyone with a nuclear war head, and let see which idiot destroys humanity first!

So seeing banning firearms does not end the cycle of violence then tell me why not just ban the actual problem instead, and that is genocide all of humanity?

Seem simple to me, so why be against ending the very problem that causes all these deaths?

There are better ways and worse ways to end the problem.

Nah!

Genetic testing could allow a Cain slip past all the Abel's of the world, so that will not work.

Educating will not work because too many of those you attempt to educate will just eat their books and want pretty little pictures to look at.

Banning all destructive devices would bring us back to the same place we are at know and it mean aborting the human race.

Medicating the entire society will not work because someone will stop taking their dose and not see things black and white but the true color the world is in.

No, genocide or doing another Noah story but this time Noah drowns with his family is the best solution, what you say?

When I find the way to kill all humans in their sleep, I'll let you know. In the meantime let's try to keep the bloodshed to a minimum.

Oh, the sleep killing idea!

Go into their dream and kill them like a Ninja?

If you are able to get into my mind ( the lack of one ) please make sure to kill me while looking like Alicia Vikander and be naked!

Whatever your version of Heaven is, that's the last thought you'll have.

 

[Bruce_T_Laney]

True...

I say arm everyone with a nuclear war head, and let see which idiot destroys humanity first!

So seeing banning firearms does not end the cycle of violence then tell me why not just ban the actual problem instead, and that is genocide all of humanity?

Seem simple to me, so why be against ending the very problem that causes all these deaths?

There are better ways and worse ways to end the problem.

Nah!

Genetic testing could allow a Cain slip past all the Abel's of the world, so that will not work.

Educating will not work because too many of those you attempt to educate will just eat their books and want pretty little pictures to look at.

Banning all destructive devices would bring us back to the same place we are at know and it mean aborting the human race.

Medicating the entire society will not work because someone will stop taking their dose and not see things black and white but the true color the world is in.

No, genocide or doing another Noah story but this time Noah drowns with his family is the best solution, what you say?

When I find the way to kill all humans in their sleep, I'll let you know. In the meantime let's try to keep the bloodshed to a minimum.

Oh, the sleep killing idea!

Go into their dream and kill them like a Ninja?

If you are able to get into my mind ( the lack of one ) please make sure to kill me while looking like Alicia Vikander and be naked!

Whatever your version of Heaven is, that's the last thought you'll have.

If I wrote what my version of what Heaven was, well it is in every Penthouse letter, so I guess it has been written by every man in their life...

Just no seventy plus virgins because that would most likely be their age and not the amount, and one woman is more than enough for someone like me!

 

[FJO]

You can not ban the sale of firearms either, and as i have pointed out before you can remove the firearm from the equation and those like Tim McVeigh and the Boston Bombers would have still wreak their havoc on the general society...

So how do you stop them seeing the firearm was not the mode of destruction they used or how would you stop the next plane hijacker seeing the possibility of a firearm being used is almost zero?

Do you have that in English?

And yes, we can ban guns. It's been done.

You understood what I wrote and dislike the fact that your solution is not going to stop the next mass murder in this country.

Banning guns will not prevent a killer from obtaining a weapon to use against the general society and to believe it will is just beyond stupid.

So tell me how would your banning of firearms prevented the Boston Bombing, OKC Bombing, the Atlanta Bombings, or the 9-11 attacks?

bet you dodge the question, right?

If you had been clear I wouldn't have asked. Banning guns works, other nations prove that and:

"So tell me how would your banning of firearms prevented the Boston Bombing, OKC Bombing, the Atlanta Bombings, or the 9-11 attacks?"

It wouldn't...

Banning Guns work?

France?

Norway?

California has strict gun laws and how well did it work?

No, the reality is banning guns will do very little to curb criminal activity, but keep on dreaming!

Japan...

Lots or perhaps most of gun violence occurs with diversity, racial, economical, religious etc. fueled hatred, envy greed.

Japan has none of those. Or for that matter neither has North Korea. How would you like to live there?

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Do you have that in English?

And yes, we can ban guns. It's been done.

You understood what I wrote and dislike the fact that your solution is not going to stop the next mass murder in this country.

Banning guns will not prevent a killer from obtaining a weapon to use against the general society and to believe it will is just beyond stupid.

So tell me how would your banning of firearms prevented the Boston Bombing, OKC Bombing, the Atlanta Bombings, or the 9-11 attacks?

bet you dodge the question, right?

If you had been clear I wouldn't have asked. Banning guns works, other nations prove that and:

"So tell me how would your banning of firearms prevented the Boston Bombing, OKC Bombing, the Atlanta Bombings, or the 9-11 attacks?"

It wouldn't...

Banning Guns work?

France?

Norway?

California has strict gun laws and how well did it work?

No, the reality is banning guns will do very little to curb criminal activity, but keep on dreaming!

Japan...

Lots or perhaps most of gun violence occurs with diversity, racial, economical, religious etc. fueled hatred, envy greed.

Japan has none of those. Or for that matter neither has North Korea. How would you like to live there?

Japan, fine. NK, no, although both are very racist societies...

 

[LuckyDuck01!]

All bullets should be dipped in pigs blood and after a Muslim terrorist is shot, his/her head removed and discarded.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

All bullets should be dipped in pigs blood and after a Muslim terrorist is shot, his/her head removed and discarded.

Muslims can eat pork, in order to stay alive. Learn the faith.

 

[Skull Pilot]

If you can't see the difference between innocents who were murdered and the pieces of shit who did the murdering then you are brain dead

On the question of what killed all of them, there is no difference.

The question is not the how it's who deserved it

Not for me. I'm very Pro-Life that way.

That's your damage

There are some people who need to be removed from the face of the earth

The top spot belongs to anyone who murder innocent people

Humans are a disease. Got that part.

No Not humans murderers

Still can't see the difference

Still brain dead

 

[Skull Pilot]

Dead ones anyway.

Just Updated – 12/7/15 @8:05pm – Warning ! Pictures are Graphic – SAN BERNARDINO SLAUGHTER (Video) | VIEWS AND THOUGHTS – Tell us what you think – Click here to return to the home page

Warning: graphic images of the dead San Bernardino terrorists including a close-up of the dead male's head and what happens when a bullet enters it. Think JFK...

Guns, doing what they best...

Here we go again you mourning that a couple stone killers are dead

All deaths by gun are the same. 14 + 2 = 16.

Live by the sword then die by the sword...

They made the choice to go out in a blaze of glory, so do not blame the gun for their choice of how they wanted to die!

I blame the gun for the 16 dead...

Yes the gun just walked itself into the room and killed people

 

[Skull Pilot]

You understood what I wrote and dislike the fact that your solution is not going to stop the next mass murder in this country.

Banning guns will not prevent a killer from obtaining a weapon to use against the general society and to believe it will is just beyond stupid.

So tell me how would your banning of firearms prevented the Boston Bombing, OKC Bombing, the Atlanta Bombings, or the 9-11 attacks?

bet you dodge the question, right?

If you had been clear I wouldn't have asked. Banning guns works, other nations prove that and:

"So tell me how would your banning of firearms prevented the Boston Bombing, OKC Bombing, the Atlanta Bombings, or the 9-11 attacks?"

It wouldn't...

Banning Guns work?

France?

Norway?

California has strict gun laws and how well did it work?

No, the reality is banning guns will do very little to curb criminal activity, but keep on dreaming!

Japan...

Does it stop acts of terrorism within the country borders or do the terrorists find another weapon to use in their killing spree?

It stops gun deaths.

Your reasoning leads to, there's no reason to ban flamethrowers, people will just use Molotov cocktails instead.

There are still gun deaths in those countries

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Guns, doing what they best...

Here we go again you mourning that a couple stone killers are dead

All deaths by gun are the same. 14 + 2 = 16.

Live by the sword then die by the sword...

They made the choice to go out in a blaze of glory, so do not blame the gun for their choice of how they wanted to die!

I blame the gun for the 16 dead...

Yes the gun just walked itself into the room and killed people

Nope, there was a person with it, who used the gun for the only reason it was invented, killing.

The people I'm stuck with, the guns I can get rid of.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

If you had been clear I wouldn't have asked. Banning guns works, other nations prove that and:

"So tell me how would your banning of firearms prevented the Boston Bombing, OKC Bombing, the Atlanta Bombings, or the 9-11 attacks?"

It wouldn't...

Banning Guns work?

France?

Norway?

California has strict gun laws and how well did it work?

No, the reality is banning guns will do very little to curb criminal activity, but keep on dreaming!

Japan...

Does it stop acts of terrorism within the country borders or do the terrorists find another weapon to use in their killing spree?

It stops gun deaths.

Your reasoning leads to, there's no reason to ban flamethrowers, people will just use Molotov cocktails instead.

There are still gun deaths in those countries

No system is perfect, nor do I expect it to be. Get it under 100 year and now we're talkin'.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

On the question of what killed all of them, there is no difference.

The question is not the how it's who deserved it

Not for me. I'm very Pro-Life that way.

That's your damage

There are some people who need to be removed from the face of the earth

The top spot belongs to anyone who murder innocent people

Humans are a disease. Got that part.

No Not humans murderers

Still can't see the difference

Still brain dead

Humans, all 16 of them, now just dead bodies.

 

[Skull Pilot]

Here we go again you mourning that a couple stone killers are dead

All deaths by gun are the same. 14 + 2 = 16.

Live by the sword then die by the sword...

They made the choice to go out in a blaze of glory, so do not blame the gun for their choice of how they wanted to die!

I blame the gun for the 16 dead...

Yes the gun just walked itself into the room and killed people

Nope, there was a person with, who used the gun for the only reason it was invented, killing.

They people I'm stuck with, the guns I can get rid of.

No matter how you boil it down it's the person who kills

I can say with absolute certainty that had they not had guns they would have thrown a couple pipe bombs in the room instead

End result multiple people possibly more than 14 innocents and 2 piece of shit murderers still dead

 

[Skull Pilot]

Here we go again you mourning that a couple stone killers are dead

All deaths by gun are the same. 14 + 2 = 16.

Live by the sword then die by the sword...

They made the choice to go out in a blaze of glory, so do not blame the gun for their choice of how they wanted to die!

I blame the gun for the 16 dead...

Yes the gun just walked itself into the room and killed people

Nope, there was a person with it, who used the gun for the only reason it was invented, killing.

The people I'm stuck with, the guns I can get rid of.

No you can't actually because you will never see the second amendment repealed in your lifetime

 

[PaintMyHouse]

All deaths by gun are the same. 14 + 2 = 16.

Live by the sword then die by the sword...

They made the choice to go out in a blaze of glory, so do not blame the gun for their choice of how they wanted to die!

I blame the gun for the 16 dead...

Yes the gun just walked itself into the room and killed people

Nope, there was a person with, who used the gun for the only reason it was invented, killing.

They people I'm stuck with, the guns I can get rid of.

No matter how you boil it down it's the person who kills

I can say with absolute certainty that had they not had guns they would have thrown a couple pipe bombs in the room instead

End result multiple people possibly more than 14 innocents and 2 piece of shit murderers still dead

So, pipe bombs should be legal? Sold in stores?

 

[PaintMyHouse]

No you can't actually because you will never see the second amendment repealed in your lifetime

Probably not. Of course, the USA might be repealed by then.

 

[Godboy]

No you can't actually because you will never see the second amendment repealed in your lifetime

Probably not. Of course, the USA might be repealed by then.

I bet you cum in your pants when you fantasize about the end of the US.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

No you can't actually because you will never see the second amendment repealed in your lifetime

Probably not. Of course, the USA might be repealed by then.

I bet you cum in your pants when you fantasize about the end of the US.

Nope, by kind founded it but nothing lasts forever.