My explanation why the rich should NOT be taxed more

[pvsi]

My understanding is that English is not PVSI's first language. In reading the OP, I suspect that he needs a little more time with McGuffey's reader....

English is my third language, and I'm PROUD of it. many people have said that I speak clearer English than many Americans.

 

[pvsi]

Let me start out by saying that my personal income, after business expenses was never more than $5,000 a year. I am NOT rich, but I am VERY conservative (that is how I survive)... And as far as democrats who want to tax the rich more to help out all you poor people, I have two words - Clippers Owner. (you figure it out if you haven't already)

WHY AM I AGAINST TAXING RICH MORE - in short, because it is a SCAM, a clever, crooked scam: There are rich people who earned what they have and then there are rich people whose career is hypocrisy and deception, they are usually involved with politics and IT IS NOT LARGER TAXATION that will eliminate this problem, it is our turning away from their political circus on the MSM and understanding the real problem that can fix it, and taxing "the rich more" is like if someone steals your car and then allows you to ride it from time to time and you demand to be able to ride it more often - it's LOW and it will get you NOWHERE. INTERNATIONAL BANKERS OWN YOUR COUNTRY, they STOLE YOUR GOVERNMENT AND THEY ARE TAXING US ALL, DO NOT BLAME THE RICH YOU DO NOT SEE THEM.

Logical arguments welcome.

How can you live on $5000 a year? Not only are you not paying taxes but we are paying you through the earned income tax credit.

Why don't you file a lawsuit or turn me into IRS, or contact the media and write an article "new world government spokesman is cheating us, he's living on less than $5,000 a year let's investigate"...

 

[Star]

You really are envious of those with wealth. It shows in every post that you subject us to.

Do you really believe that the very rich have incomes of just $250,000? If you are serious about sticking it to the super rich, why set the top bracket so low? For the simple reason, Dumbass, that the top marginal rate is aimed at the middle class, and not the super rich.

Your masters ring the bell, and you liberal/socialists begin to salivate.

My tax system is easier. 10% on the 1st 100K, then 20% on the next, then 30%, and so on up to 50%. Above 500k we take 50% and you can make as much as like.

Or, we can have a flat tax of 40% for which you get all the basics in life provided for you. Both work just fine for me.

Yep.. equality in treatment when it benefits you.. inequality in treatment of others when it benefits you
the liberal way

And the liberal way would be-----would be...

​

...would be --- what?
.

 

[pvsi]

My tax system is easier. 10% on the 1st 100K, then 20% on the next, then 30%, and so on up to 50%. Above 500k we take 50% and you can make as much as like.

Or, we can have a flat tax of 40% for which you get all the basics in life provided for you. Both work just fine for me.

Yep.. equality in treatment when it benefits you.. inequality in treatment of others when it benefits you
the liberal way

And the liberal way would be-----would be...

​

...would be --- what?
.

And what's more is you got these ding bats who think they are smart because they "figure out the simple math" that by taxing the "rich more, you level out the playing field. How can the dumb conservatives not understand that"

 

[LogikAndReazon]

Everything should be shared equally, its time to abolish private property !!!

Hail Sandinistas !

 

[pvsi]

Everything should be shared equally, its time to abolish private property !!!

Hail Sandinistas !

abolish freedom of speech, we're all the same voice speaking in different directions...