Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁
Myths and facts about Jerusalem and Temple Mount
1) The Islamic claim to the Temple Mount is very recent - Jerusalem's role as "The Third Holiest Site in Islam" in mainstream Islamic writings does not precede the 1930s. It was created by the grand mufti Haj Amin al-Husseini.
2) The Islamic claim to Jerusalem is false - There were no mosques in Jerusalem in 632 c.e. at the death of Muhammad... Jerusalem was [then] a Christian-occupied city. The muslim "claim" to Jerusalem is allegedly based on what is written in the koran, which although does not mention Jerusalem even once, nevertheless talks of the "furthest mosque" (in Sura 17:1) Is there any foundation to the muslim argument that this "furthest mosque" (al-masujidi al-aqsa) refers to what is today called the Aqsa mosque in Jerusalem? The answer is, NO!
3) The present Arabic name of Jerusalem is "Al-Quds"... but "Al-Quds" is an abbreviation for "The Jewish Temple"!
The Arabic name for Jerusalem is "Al-QuDS" (The Holy), which is abbreviation for another Arabic name used for Jerusalem until the last century, "Bayt al-MaQDeS" (The Holy House), since the 10th century c.e. The name "Bayt al-MaQDeS" is a translation of the Hebrew "Beyt ha-MiKDaSH", which means "House of Holiness", "Temple". But Islam has no Temple, only the Jews did. Thus the Arabic name for Jerusalem makes no reference to Muhammad's alleged trip to Heaven, but rather refers to the Jewish Temple!
In fact, it can be seen that significant Islamic interest in the Temple Mount does not precede the Six-Day War in 1967.
I'm more into the theory, IRosie, that we all came out of Africa. People can send in samples of their DNA to confirm this. No doubt some of these people migrated to the Arabian Peninsula and then were eventually called Arabs. Eventually these Arabs left the Peninsula and invaded the surrounding countries.Roudy I am STILL waiting for saigon to explain to me just who were the
"ARABS" living in jerusalem -----in the stone age. a bit about them.....
their language, what they called themselves ------their concepts of their
origin or their "founding myths" etc ANYTHING ----even a hint about
their cuisine and by what criteria were they "arabs"? I wonder if they
worshipped the meteor in mecca as did the pre islamic arabs ----uhm ----back
'home' in arabia ?
Well sir, when the Sons of Manesseh tear down that pigsty to build the Third Temple, we'll find out what's under the foundation,won't we?Myths and facts about Jerusalem and Temple Mount
1) The Islamic claim to the Temple Mount is very recent - Jerusalem's role as "The Third Holiest Site in Islam" in mainstream Islamic writings does not precede the 1930s. It was created by the grand mufti Haj Amin al-Husseini.
2) The Islamic claim to Jerusalem is false - There were no mosques in Jerusalem in 632 c.e. at the death of Muhammad... Jerusalem was [then] a Christian-occupied city. The muslim "claim" to Jerusalem is allegedly based on what is written in the koran, which although does not mention Jerusalem even once, nevertheless talks of the "furthest mosque" (in Sura 17:1) Is there any foundation to the muslim argument that this "furthest mosque" (al-masujidi al-aqsa) refers to what is today called the Aqsa mosque in Jerusalem? The answer is, NO!
3) The present Arabic name of Jerusalem is "Al-Quds"... but "Al-Quds" is an abbreviation for "The Jewish Temple"!
The Arabic name for Jerusalem is "Al-QuDS" (The Holy), which is abbreviation for another Arabic name used for Jerusalem until the last century, "Bayt al-MaQDeS" (The Holy House), since the 10th century c.e. The name "Bayt al-MaQDeS" is a translation of the Hebrew "Beyt ha-MiKDaSH", which means "House of Holiness", "Temple". But Islam has no Temple, only the Jews did. Thus the Arabic name for Jerusalem makes no reference to Muhammad's alleged trip to Heaven, but rather refers to the Jewish Temple!
In fact, it can be seen that significant Islamic interest in the Temple Mount does not precede the Six-Day War in 1967.
Did you know that the Roman Puppet, Herod the Great who built the second Temple with Roman Taxes and engineering was not a Jew? He coverted to Judaism. Besides, the Muslims built that Mosque on empty land, they did not tear down the Temple. And did you know that before the Hebrews killed all the Cannanites, a Temple to Baal stood there?
Many religions who succeed another build their holy places on top of the previous inhabitants.
I certainly would like to be around if Phillip told some Hindus or Buddhists this snd see the reaction on their faces. In fact, there is a site on the Internet that Phillip, if he were interested, could find put up by a Hindu giving a list of many of the Hindu temples destroyed by the Muslims and mosques built on top of the sites.Myths and facts about Jerusalem and Temple Mount
1) The Islamic claim to the Temple Mount is very recent - Jerusalem's role as "The Third Holiest Site in Islam" in mainstream Islamic writings does not precede the 1930s. It was created by the grand mufti Haj Amin al-Husseini.
2) The Islamic claim to Jerusalem is false - There were no mosques in Jerusalem in 632 c.e. at the death of Muhammad... Jerusalem was [then] a Christian-occupied city. The muslim "claim" to Jerusalem is allegedly based on what is written in the koran, which although does not mention Jerusalem even once, nevertheless talks of the "furthest mosque" (in Sura 17:1) Is there any foundation to the muslim argument that this "furthest mosque" (al-masujidi al-aqsa) refers to what is today called the Aqsa mosque in Jerusalem? The answer is, NO!
3) The present Arabic name of Jerusalem is "Al-Quds"... but "Al-Quds" is an abbreviation for "The Jewish Temple"!
The Arabic name for Jerusalem is "Al-QuDS" (The Holy), which is abbreviation for another Arabic name used for Jerusalem until the last century, "Bayt al-MaQDeS" (The Holy House), since the 10th century c.e. The name "Bayt al-MaQDeS" is a translation of the Hebrew "Beyt ha-MiKDaSH", which means "House of Holiness", "Temple". But Islam has no Temple, only the Jews did. Thus the Arabic name for Jerusalem makes no reference to Muhammad's alleged trip to Heaven, but rather refers to the Jewish Temple!
In fact, it can be seen that significant Islamic interest in the Temple Mount does not precede the Six-Day War in 1967.
Did you know that the Roman Puppet, Herod the Great who built the second Temple with Roman Taxes and engineering was not a Jew? He coverted to Judaism. Besides, the Muslims built that Mosque on empty land, they did not tear down the Temple. And did you know that before the Hebrews killed all the Cannanites, a Temple to Baal stood there?
Many religions who succeed another build their holy places on top of the previous inhabitants.
Islam is a hijacking and bad version of Judaism and Christianity, it did not succeed it. Look at it's followers and the way they live, and then tell us who still lives like Medieval 7th century cavemen and who has moved on into the future.Myths and facts about Jerusalem and Temple Mount
1) The Islamic claim to the Temple Mount is very recent - Jerusalem's role as "The Third Holiest Site in Islam" in mainstream Islamic writings does not precede the 1930s. It was created by the grand mufti Haj Amin al-Husseini.
2) The Islamic claim to Jerusalem is false - There were no mosques in Jerusalem in 632 c.e. at the death of Muhammad... Jerusalem was [then] a Christian-occupied city. The muslim "claim" to Jerusalem is allegedly based on what is written in the koran, which although does not mention Jerusalem even once, nevertheless talks of the "furthest mosque" (in Sura 17:1) Is there any foundation to the muslim argument that this "furthest mosque" (al-masujidi al-aqsa) refers to what is today called the Aqsa mosque in Jerusalem? The answer is, NO!
3) The present Arabic name of Jerusalem is "Al-Quds"... but "Al-Quds" is an abbreviation for "The Jewish Temple"!
The Arabic name for Jerusalem is "Al-QuDS" (The Holy), which is abbreviation for another Arabic name used for Jerusalem until the last century, "Bayt al-MaQDeS" (The Holy House), since the 10th century c.e. The name "Bayt al-MaQDeS" is a translation of the Hebrew "Beyt ha-MiKDaSH", which means "House of Holiness", "Temple". But Islam has no Temple, only the Jews did. Thus the Arabic name for Jerusalem makes no reference to Muhammad's alleged trip to Heaven, but rather refers to the Jewish Temple!
In fact, it can be seen that significant Islamic interest in the Temple Mount does not precede the Six-Day War in 1967.
Did you know that the Roman Puppet, Herod the Great who built the second Temple with Roman Taxes and engineering was not a Jew? He coverted to Judaism. Besides, the Muslims built that Mosque on empty land, they did not tear down the Temple. And did you know that before the Hebrews killed all the Cannanites, a Temple to Baal stood there?
Many religions who succeed another build their holy places on top of the previous inhabitants.
As it happens, that's not collaboration or anywhere even close to collaboration on the same level that the Mufti declared himself a Nazi and created armies to fight side by side with the Nazis. Only a fucking idiot would make such a comparison.
Unfortunately, that makes Hannah Arendt and Raul Hillberg "fucking idiots". Both use the term "collaboration". As does the UK National Education Service...
Collaboration
Very soon after Hitler came to power in Germany, the Hungarian government attempted to build an alliance with Nazi Germany.
In September 1938, following the German annexation of the Sudetenland area of Czechoslovakia, a portion of the area was given to Hungary in order to build relations between the two nations. Over the next 3 years, as Germany invaded and controlled countries surrounding Hungary, Germany gave Hungary possession of other lands. By March 1941, the Jewish population in Hungarian controlled land had reached in excess of 725,000.
Hungary's allegiance with Nazi Germany - Key Stage 3 - The Holocaust Explained
And the European Jewish Times
During the past decade and a half since the fall of Communism and the dismemberment of the Soviet Union, one of the important aspects of the history of the Holocaust which has received renewed attention, is the issue of local collaboration with the Nazis.
SHALOM
There are two definitions with collaborate
Actually there were THREE MOSQUES in Mecca in 632, you fucking lying MORON.
They are in Medina, genius - NOT MECCA.
Lmao.
Roudy I am STILL waiting for saigon to explain to me just who were the Arabs
?
Pompous ass thou art.As it happens, that's not collaboration or anywhere even close to collaboration on the same level that the Mufti declared himself a Nazi and created armies to fight side by side with the Nazis. Only a fucking idiot would make such a comparison.
Unfortunately, that makes Hannah Arendt and Raul Hillberg "fucking idiots". Both use the term "collaboration". As does the UK National Education Service...
Collaboration
Very soon after Hitler came to power in Germany, the Hungarian government attempted to build an alliance with Nazi Germany.
In September 1938, following the German annexation of the Sudetenland area of Czechoslovakia, a portion of the area was given to Hungary in order to build relations between the two nations. Over the next 3 years, as Germany invaded and controlled countries surrounding Hungary, Germany gave Hungary possession of other lands. By March 1941, the Jewish population in Hungarian controlled land had reached in excess of 725,000.
Hungary's allegiance with Nazi Germany - Key Stage 3 - The Holocaust Explained
And the European Jewish Times
During the past decade and a half since the fall of Communism and the dismemberment of the Soviet Union, one of the important aspects of the history of the Holocaust which has received renewed attention, is the issue of local collaboration with the Nazis.
SHALOM
There are two definitions with collaborate
No, there are not two definitions. If there were, you would have posted definitions.
Not only have you have claimed that Raul Hillberg is a "fucking idiot", and that Hannah Arendt is a "fucking idiot" - you have also been caught in your 5th lie on this one thread.
Even by your standards - isn't this getting a bit silly?
How do you think sensible Jewish and Israeli people feel when they see you spreading lies here day afte day, and doing EXACTLY what Nazis like Holston need and want you to do?
In short - why are you enabling an empowering Fascism?
Roudy's my homeboy, sugah.Hossfly -
Anti-Semitism will only disapear from this board when people lke you start standing up to people like Roudy.
Roudy's my homeboy, sugah.Hossfly -
Anti-Semitism will only disapear from this board when people lke you start standing up to people like Roudy.
I'll take that chance. It's a sure bet.Roudy's my homeboy, sugah.Hossfly -
Anti-Semitism will only disapear from this board when people lke you start standing up to people like Roudy.
No, he's more like the guy who costs you your home.
If you think what the Israeli people need is someone to lie about their history and discredit their historians - I can't agree with you.
Gullibility is not your friend.
Geezus what a WHINER! I'm no proctologist, but I know an asshole when I see one. And I'm going to stop calling you an idiot, it's beginning to insult all the stupid people out there.Roudy I am STILL waiting for saigon to explain to me just who were the Arabs
?
No, you are not waiting for me to explain. If you were, you'd have seen the explanation. You are refusing to listen.
You know perfectly well that you will swallow whatever shit Roudy tells you, because you lack the balls, the honesty or the intelligence to ask yourself why he posts things both he and you know to be false.
Read back through the thread, and a very clear explanaition was given - you will ignore it.
Well, that would still be better than you, dumbass! Ha ha ha.If there was tax on brains you would not be taxed at all
Great example of the "intellect" that goes into being a rabid Palestinian supporter.
saigon >>> "LIES LIES LIES" ----ok what 'lies" Saigon---"how should I know"?
