Nancy Pelosi supports our 1st amendment rights

[Ernie S.]

LINK

Former Speaker Pelosi was on Fox News Sunday today. Good for her, but perhaps she should reread the Bill of Rights.

We're talking about no further sales of assault weapons. What is the justification for an assault weapon? No further sales of those, no further sales of the increased capacity, 30 rounds in a gun. We're talking about background checks which is very popular, even among gun owners, and, hunters.

We avow the First Amendment. We stand with that and say that people have a right to have a gun to protect themselves in their homes and their jobs, where ever, and that they--and their workplace--and that they, for recreation for hunting and the rest. So we're not questioning their right to do that.

 

[hjmick]

They all look alike to her...

 

[alan1]

She represents her district well.
Morons voted for a moron.
I am appalled that a representative doesn't understand the constitution well enough to comment on it.

 

[OriginalShroom]

She needs to pass it to read it.

She didn't pass the Constitution, so she may have never read it.

 

[gallantwarrior]

Oh, yeah...Gran Nan is a real piece of work.

 

[Votto]

How can anyone listen to her let alone look at her?

 

[Two Thumbs]

LINK

Former Speaker Pelosi was on Fox News Sunday today. Good for her, but perhaps she should reread the Bill of Rights.

We're talking about no further sales of assault weapons. What is the justification for an assault weapon? No further sales of those, no further sales of the increased capacity, 30 rounds in a gun. We're talking about background checks which is very popular, even among gun owners, and, hunters.

We avow the First Amendment. We stand with that and say that people have a right to have a gun to protect themselves in their homes and their jobs, where ever, and that they--and their workplace--and that they, for recreation for hunting and the rest. So we're not questioning their right to do that.

Aside from the number gaff

She proved she has no idea what the Second is about.

It's not about protecting myself, my home or job, with a GUN.

It's our right to own any ARM, for no reason except the right to own one.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

LINK

Former Speaker Pelosi was on Fox News Sunday today. Good for her, but perhaps she should reread the Bill of Rights.

We're talking about no further sales of assault weapons. What is the justification for an assault weapon? No further sales of those, no further sales of the increased capacity, 30 rounds in a gun. We're talking about background checks which is very popular, even among gun owners, and, hunters.

We avow the First Amendment. We stand with that and say that people have a right to have a gun to protect themselves in their homes and their jobs, where ever, and that they--and their workplace--and that they, for recreation for hunting and the rest. So we're not questioning their right to do that.

The second quoted paragraph is in essence an accurate paraphrasing of Heller.

There is no post-Heller/McDonald case law that would guide a court to determine the proposed regulations/bans are un-Constitutional; and if passed, a new AWB would be Constitutional until a court ruled otherwise.

Pelosi’s understanding of the Second Amendment comports with current Constitutional case law.

 

[Ernie S.]

Not a single lib has stopped by to deflect with a Bush or an insult to the OP? Strange!

 

[S.J.]

Yes, I'm glad Nancy recognizes the first amendment guarantees us the right to keep and bear arms.

 

[Quantum Windbag]

LINK

Former Speaker Pelosi was on Fox News Sunday today. Good for her, but perhaps she should reread the Bill of Rights.

We're talking about no further sales of assault weapons. What is the justification for an assault weapon? No further sales of those, no further sales of the increased capacity, 30 rounds in a gun. We're talking about background checks which is very popular, even among gun owners, and, hunters.

We avow the First Amendment. We stand with that and say that people have a right to have a gun to protect themselves in their homes and their jobs, where ever, and that they--and their workplace--and that they, for recreation for hunting and the rest. So we're not questioning their right to do that.

The second quoted paragraph is in essence an accurate paraphrasing of Heller.

There is no post-Heller/McDonald case law that would guide a court to determine the proposed regulations/bans are un-Constitutional; and if passed, a new AWB would be Constitutional until a court ruled otherwise.

Pelosi’s understanding of the Second Amendment comports with current Constitutional case law.

Actually, it only comports with what she thinks will sell to the people she is speaking to.

 

[Ernie S.]

LINK

Former Speaker Pelosi was on Fox News Sunday today. Good for her, but perhaps she should reread the Bill of Rights.

We're talking about no further sales of assault weapons. What is the justification for an assault weapon? No further sales of those, no further sales of the increased capacity, 30 rounds in a gun. We're talking about background checks which is very popular, even among gun owners, and, hunters.

We avow the First Amendment. We stand with that and say that people have a right to have a gun to protect themselves in their homes and their jobs, where ever, and that they--and their workplace--and that they, for recreation for hunting and the rest. So we're not questioning their right to do that.

The second quoted paragraph is in essence an accurate paraphrasing of Heller.

There is no post-Heller/McDonald case law that would guide a court to determine the proposed regulations/bans are un-Constitutional; and if passed, a new AWB would be Constitutional until a court ruled otherwise.

Pelosi’s understanding of the Second Amendment comports with current Constitutional case law.

We know nothing of pelosi's understanding of the Second Amendment. We only know she has no understanding of the first.

 

[clevergirl]

LINK

Former Speaker Pelosi was on Fox News Sunday today. Good for her, but perhaps she should reread the Bill of Rights.

We're talking about no further sales of assault weapons. What is the justification for an assault weapon? No further sales of those, no further sales of the increased capacity, 30 rounds in a gun. We're talking about background checks which is very popular, even among gun owners, and, hunters.

We avow the First Amendment. We stand with that and say that people have a right to have a gun to protect themselves in their homes and their jobs, where ever, and that they--and their workplace--and that they, for recreation for hunting and the rest. So we're not questioning their right to do that.

OH GAWD but THIS is a US Rep!!! She's as bad as the idiot liberal who would not expand military presence on an island because it might tip over!

 

[RoadVirus]

View attachment 24393

How can anyone listen to her let alone look at her?

Is that Nancy or Tammy Faye Baker?

 

[ba1614]

Not a single lib has stopped by to deflect with a Bush or an insult to the OP? Strange!

Pelosi did all the deflecting and blaming of Bush in that interview lol

 

[DiamondDave]

She killed common sense and the US Constitution with her semi-automatic idiocy... she should be banned and her mouth magazine restricted to 8 words