National review says Trump is DEFINATELY NUTS

[Lastamender]

Noone can deny that the National Review is a conservative source and has a history of supporting virtually every major Republican politician or cause since its inception. In a recent article, the editor came short of supporting Harris, but did say Trump is an "unpopular, definitely nuts, septuagenarian". Donald Trump still claims his campaign is doing great, and he is leading in all the polls. I guess he really does believe those things since he is definitely nuts.

MSN

National Review is run by a never-Trumper. Why should we expect anything different? Non-story, just another bunch of lies.

 

[lafayette]

MAGA is simply goofy thinking.

 

[meaner gene]

His opponent was McGovern an openly admitted socialist just like Walz....

Yet you say that Nixon was our first "communist" president.

And you don't want Kamala doing what Nixon did.

Schizoid much?

 

[Lastamender]

MAGA is simply goofy thinking.

Secure borders, no wars, safe city streets, and a real economy are goofy?

 

[BULLDOG]

Based on long time devotion to principle. Not situational circumstances.

It's an opinion piece by one of it's editors.

And the magazine itself didn't just decide Trump was a problem....

From your link:

The National Review is a storied conservative publication first founded by Republican activist William F. Buckley in 1955. However, it has had a rocky relationship with Trump since 2016, when it dedicated an entire issue to persuading Republicans to abandon the eventual 45th president of the United States.

So, this is somehow something NEW ????

You moron.

I had forgotten about National Review's stance in 2016. Thank you for correcting my mistake. However, after he was elected, they were a staunch supporter of him and failed to produce much that wasn't supportive.

 

[meaner gene]

I have no doubt he might try that, or perhaps a less lethal way of neutralizing his victims, but I still believe there has to be some way to at least throttle some of his worst goals. No idea what those ways might be.

Trump will enact project 2025, and anybody standing in his way will face a president with absolute immunity from any presidential order he gives.

If a senator opposes it, Trump can order him sent to GITMO. If a congressman opposes it Trump can order him waterboarded.

Clearly presidential power, like those wielded by George W. Bush

 

[meaner gene]

He said they were a communist act.

I think the shark is jumping you.

Nixon issued Executive Order 11615 (pursuant to the Economic Stabilization Act of 1970), imposing a 90-day freeze on wages and prices in order to counter inflation. This was the first time the U.S. government had enacted wage and price controls since World War II.

Either Harris and Nixon were both communists, or neither Harris nor Nixon were communists.

Any other logic reasoning, is applying opposite definitions to the same acts.

 

[Rambunctious]

Yet you say that Nixon was our first "communist" president.

And you don't want Kamala doing what Nixon did.

Schizoid much?

That's not what I said... I said he made a communistic decision and regretted it later in life... Kamala is full on commie....

 

[Rambunctious]

Take note that no liberal answered my question with NO... they all are communists...

 

[HikerGuy83]

Nixon issued Executive Order 11615 (pursuant to the Economic Stabilization Act of 1970), imposing a 90-day freeze on wages and prices in order to counter inflation. This was the first time the U.S. government had enacted wage and price controls since World War II.

Either Harris and Nixon were both communists, or neither Harris nor Nixon were communists.

Any other logic reasoning, is applying opposite definitions to the same acts.

Not arguing that. He might be. I was simply pointing out how you were misapplying his statement.

I don't think Harris is a communist. I think she's an empty suit.

 

[HikerGuy83]

Take note that no liberal answered my question with NO... they all are communists...

They are not LIBERALS.

They are LEFT-WINGERS.

HUGE DIFFERENCE.

They want policy and programs that would be in line with socialism.

Communism (from Latin communis, 'common, universal')[1][2] is a sociopolitical, philosophical, and economic ideology within the socialist movement,[1] whose goal is the creation of a communist society, a socioeconomic order centered around common ownership of the means of production, distribution, and exchange that allocates products to everyone in the society based on need.[3][4][5] A communist society would entail the absence of private property and social classes,[1] and ultimately money[6] and the state (or nation state).

Harris does not espouse that. However, she does espouse the idea that government can do it better.

That makes her stupid.

That makes her a moron.

That makes her low I.Q.

We have all kinds of evidence to the contrary.

 

[rampart]

Kamala wants to turn a free nation into a communist nation and you call Trump nuts?????

didn't comrade obama already declare we were all commies mow, comrade? how can comrade kamala do that again?

you guys are all nuts.

 

[meaner gene]

That's not what I said... I said he made a communistic decision and regretted it later in life... Kamala is full on commie....

So you have Nixon who actually ordered "communism" and was overwhelmingly re-elected after doing so.

But you're against Kamala proposing to follow in Nixons economic footsteps.

Must how much lead paint did you eat as a child?

 

[Rambunctious]

no, she does not.

and trump is crazy as a loon.

Read up on her own words... you don't know the real Kamala at all....

 

[Rambunctious]

So you have Nixon who actually ordered "communism" and was overwhelmingly re-elected after doing so.

But you're against Kamala proposing to follow in Nixons economic footsteps.

Must how much lead paint did you eat as a child?

Do you want to live under communist rule?... I don't care about Nixon I never voted for him... I was just a little kid....

 

[HikerGuy83]

So you have Nixon who actually ordered "communism" and was overwhelmingly re-elected after doing so.

This is a fallacy. He was overwhellimingly elected for a number of reasons.

His failed price and wage freezes were not at the top of the list.

 

[meaner gene]

Not arguing that. He might be. I was simply pointing out how you were misapplying his statement.

I don't think Harris is a communist. I think she's an empty suit.

How is it mis-applying? If his definition of "communism" is wage and price controls, then his definition of "communism" is wage and price controls.

 

[1srelluc]

Pssst - National Review have been never Trumpers since 2016

Marxist dems were hiding under a rock I guess.

 

[HikerGuy83]

How is it mis-applying? If his definition of "communism" is wage and price controls, then his definition of "communism" is wage and price controls.

 

[meaner gene]

Do you want to live under communist rule?... I don't care about Nixon I never voted for him... I was just a little kid....

I survived it when Richard Nixon put the country under "communist" rule.

Nixon issued Executive Order 11615 (pursuant to the Economic Stabilization Act of 1970), imposing a 90-day freeze on wages and prices in order to counter inflation. This was the first time the U.S. government had enacted wage and price controls since World War II.

How about you?