National Review turns the tables on Trump

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

National Review.

They used to be somebody way back.
Since WFB died they're nobody.

Because you say so?

 

[excalibur]

NR has been a hotbed of never-Trumpers for years.

They want their nation-building back and wars back.

 

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

RINOs turning on DT is news.... why?

Who are the RINOs you are referring to?

 

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

I always listen to a Marxist about who i should be voting for. NOT.....

I don’t know what you’re talking about

 

[Mikeoxenormous]

Who are the RINOs you are referring to?

Every time a Marxists doesnt want to remember, i have to show how a Marxist thinks. Yes they really are that stupid.

 

[Mikeoxenormous]

I don’t know what you’re talking about

Of course not...

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Because you say so?

Yes. And because their circulation is down to 75,000.

 

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

Every time a Marxists doesnt want to remember, i have to show how a Marxist thinks. Yes they really are that stupid.

So you don’t know who the RINOs are?

 

[BackAgain]

Because you say so?

It isn’t a new concept Taz:

The Never-Trump Manifesto: National Review Represents a Dying Brand

National Review persists to sit on the sidelines in libertarian stagnation erecting anachronistic thrones of classical liberalism.

americanpigeon.org

Standing Athwart or Pulling the Plug at 'National Review'? ~ The Imaginative Conservative

'National Review' seems collectively incapable of seeing that it is no longer standing athwart history but is instead mostly athwart rank-and-file conservatives. NR is more liberal echo than conservative choice these days, and I don’t see any sign of recovery... (essay by David Deavel)

theimaginativeconservative.org

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2021/10/05/victor_davis_hanson_why_i_left_national_review.html#!

And just recently:

The 'conservative' National Review attacks Trump using Democrat talking points

National Review (N.R.), founded by William F. Buckley, Jr. in 1955, was once regarded as the main outlet of American conservatives. Decades later, Rush Limbaugh triumphed on the radio, Fox News won audiences on TV, and ...

www.americanthinker.com

 

[Indeependent]

Because you say so?

Fact.

 

[Indeependent]

It's so funny expecting a Liberal to actually know anything that's not right their face at the moment.

 

[Missourian]

More and more are opening their eyes to the poison that is Donald Trump.

The email utilized those words to set up a financial kill shot, in Trump fashion:

“He wonders who’s funding us, and that’s an easy one — people like you who believe in our cause and who are willing to help out. There’s a reason that Mar-a-Lago wants us to die, and if you envision and hope for a better American future, you should help us live,”

The email dropped any pretense of journalistic nonpartisanship in its fundraising appeal.

“We want a Republican Party that can win majorities and that doesn’t limit itself to trying to eke through with 46 percent in presidential elections,” the email stated. “We want a conservatism that is unapologetic and serious-minded and not distorted by one man’s ego or abased by ridiculous conspiracy theories.”

MSN

www.msn.com

When Guno the fake conservative is your sole defender...it might be time to take stock of your position...

Just sayin'...

 

[Seymour Flops]

I used to object to Republicans who caved to the Democrats at every turn, and only ran as Republicans by pretending that this time they would not, being called RINOs. Because by the midterm of Obama's second term, that was the majority of Republicans, so they were the Republican Party.

But it turns out that the Party belongs to its voters, not to its "establishment." Republican voters selected Trump. No doubt the establishment Republicans are angry that voters who had stayed home for two or three elections decided to start voting again, now that they had a person willing to stand up for them against the Democrats in the race.

Remember how poorly the establishment types who tried to oppose Trump in the primary did? I can't remember: did any of them ever go above single digits?

So now the RINO's are the never-Trumpers, like Cheney, and the compromisers willing to once again go along and give lip service to the Dems. None of them have even tried to oppose Trump this election year, and I don't know of any of them floating the idea of primary-ing him.

 

[Indeependent]

When Guno the fake conservative is your sole defender...it might be time to take stock of your position...

Just sayin'...

Whatever happened to Guno?

 

[Dragonlady]

National Review. Established by William F. Buckley, who is the founder of the conservative movement.

You ignoramus.

You're welcome.

Today's Conservative Review would have a true conservative like Buckley rolling in his grave.

They've done more of their share of promoting Trump, his lies and conspiracy theories.

National Review - Bias and Credibility

RIGHT BIAS These media sources are moderately to strongly biased toward conservative causes through story selection and/or political affiliation. They may

mediabiasfactcheck.com

 

[g5000]

Today's Conservative Review would have a true conservative like Buckley rolling in his grave.

They've done more of their share of promoting Trump, his lies and conspiracy theories.

National Review - Bias and Credibility

RIGHT BIAS These media sources are moderately to strongly biased toward conservative causes through story selection and/or political affiliation. They may

mediabiasfactcheck.com

Someone once asked Buckley how he felt that his movement had given birth to a bunch of psychopaths.

He did not like that question.

 

[Indeependent]

Today's Conservative Review would have a true conservative like Buckley rolling in his grave.

They've done more of their share of promoting Trump, his lies and conspiracy theories.

National Review - Bias and Credibility

RIGHT BIAS These media sources are moderately to strongly biased toward conservative causes through story selection and/or political affiliation. They may

mediabiasfactcheck.com

About 30 days before Trump clinched the R primaries, the Globalist pieces of shit like yourself started to fold.

 

[busybee01]

More and more are opening their eyes to the poison that is Donald Trump.

The email utilized those words to set up a financial kill shot, in Trump fashion:

“He wonders who’s funding us, and that’s an easy one — people like you who believe in our cause and who are willing to help out. There’s a reason that Mar-a-Lago wants us to die, and if you envision and hope for a better American future, you should help us live,”

The email dropped any pretense of journalistic nonpartisanship in its fundraising appeal.

“We want a Republican Party that can win majorities and that doesn’t limit itself to trying to eke through with 46 percent in presidential elections,” the email stated. “We want a conservatism that is unapologetic and serious-minded and not distorted by one man’s ego or abased by ridiculous conspiracy theories.”

MSN

www.msn.com

Donald Trump is not the problem. The reason that everyone wants to dump on Trump is because they want to take over this country. Ron DeSantis is no different than Trump. DeSantis attacks free speech rights, voting rights, is a racist, attacks gays and transgenders and women's rights. DeSantis and others are just smoother than Trump and a bigger menace.

 

[busybee01]

National Review. Established by William F. Buckley, who is the founder of the conservative movement.

You ignoramus.

You're welcome.

Ronald Reagan would never be a part of the current Republican Party. It is driven by right wing fascism.

 

[Indeependent]

Donald Trump is not the problem. The reason that everyone wants to dump on Trump is because they want to take over this country. Ron DeSantis is no different than Trump. DeSantis attacks free speech rights, voting rights, is a racist, attacks gays and transgenders and women's rights. DeSantis and others are just smoother than Trump and a bigger menace.

Give one concrete example of each...