NAZI's have taken controll of the Democratic party !!! Demonazi's !!

[Rigby5]

Hitler and the socialist dream
Because they had shared ideological ideas as socialist.

Yes. Hitler often gave speeches about the need for, and spreading of national socialism. That what Nazism was for Pete's sake, National Socialism. As I just posted in another thread:

QUOTE:

NAZI = Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei
or, "National Socialist German Workers’ Party"

Funny, I don’t see a lot of Germans in the Republican Party but I see plenty of Socialists in the Democrat Party.
In fact, not only do I see plenty of Socialists in the Democrat Party, but I see plenty of Socialists in the Democrat Party who want to be able to murder an entire class of people (abortion) just like Hitler did, and who violently attack people in the streets who disagree with them, just like Hitler did. Plus, I see plenty of Socialists in the Democrat Party who want to teach junk science about the human race (transgenderism) just like Hitler did. AND NOW their antisemitism has also percolated to the top in recent months.

As was recently noted in another thread NAZI's have taken controll of the Democratic party !!! Demonazi's !! :

• Democrats are no different from Nazis from their strong arm tactics, to their roving blackshirts in the streets, to their murder of millions of innocent people in Planned Butcherhood death camps, to their embracing of socialism (Hitler always spoke of national socialism), to their willingness to squash free speech and other rights, and to their embracing of junk science on human beings (like transgenderism), the Democrats are EXACTLY like Nazis.

There is no denying the sameness of Democrats and Nazis. We deny it at our own peril, just as the Germans did

Whether or not there is sameness between Nazis and current democrats, neither were at all in any way socialist.
If they were, Bernie Sanders would have been the candidate in the last election,

 

[MAGAman]

they were investigating foreign influence in our elections.

but only the allocations that they knew were false.

They completely ignored the rest.

 

[Jitss617]

Hitler and the socialist dream
Because they had shared ideological ideas as socialist.

Yes. Hitler often gave speeches about the need for, and spreading of national socialism. That what Nazism was for Pete's sake, National Socialism. As I just posted in another thread:

QUOTE:

NAZI = Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei
or, "National Socialist German Workers’ Party"

Funny, I don’t see a lot of Germans in the Republican Party but I see plenty of Socialists in the Democrat Party.
In fact, not only do I see plenty of Socialists in the Democrat Party, but I see plenty of Socialists in the Democrat Party who want to be able to murder an entire class of people (abortion) just like Hitler did, and who violently attack people in the streets who disagree with them, just like Hitler did. Plus, I see plenty of Socialists in the Democrat Party who want to teach junk science about the human race (transgenderism) just like Hitler did. AND NOW their antisemitism has also percolated to the top in recent months.

As was recently noted in another thread NAZI's have taken controll of the Democratic party !!! Demonazi's !! :

• Democrats are no different from Nazis from their strong arm tactics, to their roving blackshirts in the streets, to their murder of millions of innocent people in Planned Butcherhood death camps, to their embracing of socialism (Hitler always spoke of national socialism), to their willingness to squash free speech and other rights, and to their embracing of junk science on human beings (like transgenderism), the Democrats are EXACTLY like Nazis.

There is no denying the sameness of Democrats and Nazis. We deny it at our own peril, just as the Germans did

Whether or not there is sameness between Nazis and current democrats, neither were at all in any way socialist.
If they were, Bernie Sanders would have been the candidate in the last election,

Most republicans were democrats two weeks ago.. every one wants to believe in the democrat fairytales until you need to earn a living..
Your party is over

 

[Rigby5]

Because they had shared ideological ideas as socialist.

The left are not socialists or Nazi's. What the left truly desire is a monarchy where an elite liberal ruling class of nobles controls the country, its wealth, and people with an iron fist.

Notice the year was 1927 when Hitler was anti capitalist?
It was in 1933 when he sold out to the capitalists and had all the socialists murdered.

Hitler wanted to destroy communism because it competed against National Socialism on the left of the political spectrum.

Wrong.
Look at the Molotov/Ribbentrop Treaty.
Hitler was fine with whatever Stalin wanted, and they agreed how to split up Poland between them.
There was not a single conflict or competition between Hitler and Stalin.

Hitler and the socialist dream
Because they had shared ideological ideas as socialist.

Nonsense.
Socialism is based on collaboration between workers, to cut out the profit motivated middle man.
That can never be centralized or authoritarian.

and there you have folks the Nazi defense of socialism !!

The Nazis were not at all socialist after 1933.
All the socialists by then had been murdered by Hitler, so that he could get the approval of the oligarchs and be appointed Chancellor by them.
The Nazis by 1933 were the exact opposite of the socialists, and imprisoned or murdered them all.

 

[Terri4Trump]

Hitler was a hard core socialist.

Yep, just like Uncle Bernie.

You know what great about this thread? Democrats call Trump "Hitler" all the time but its just so much stupidity and hot air. We, on the other hand, can lay out a factual, historical and well articulated argument that Democrats truly ARE just like Nazis, and that's why they are losing their lunches in this thread, because they cannot refute that truth.

.......The Nazis were not at all socialist after 1933. All the socialists by then had been murdered by Hitler.........

That propaganda lie has already been refuted.

 

[Jitss617]

Because they had shared ideological ideas as socialist.

The left are not socialists or Nazi's. What the left truly desire is a monarchy where an elite liberal ruling class of nobles controls the country, its wealth, and people with an iron fist.

Hitler wanted to destroy communism because it competed against National Socialism on the left of the political spectrum.

Wrong.
Look at the Molotov/Ribbentrop Treaty.
Hitler was fine with whatever Stalin wanted, and they agreed how to split up Poland between them.
There was not a single conflict or competition between Hitler and Stalin.

Hitler and the socialist dream
Because they had shared ideological ideas as socialist.

Nonsense.
Socialism is based on collaboration between workers, to cut out the profit motivated middle man.
That can never be centralized or authoritarian.

and there you have folks the Nazi defense of socialism !!

The Nazis were not at all socialist after 1933.
All the socialists by then had been murdered by Hitler, so that he could get the approval of the oligarchs and be appointed Chancellor by them.
The Nazis by 1933 were the exact opposite of the socialists, and imprisoned or murdered them all.

Lol ITS IN THE NAME NAZI lol god you are dumb

 

[Rigby5]

Wrong.
Look at the Molotov/Ribbentrop Treaty.
Hitler was fine with whatever Stalin wanted, and they agreed how to split up Poland between them.
There was not a single conflict or competition between Hitler and Stalin.

That is not true on even the most loony perspective.

Hard core commie collectivists seek a globalist state.

Socialists do not seek to make all of humanity an ant colony, and aren't interested in managing the entire earth. They like vacations and early retirement. They're still stupid, authoritarian and regressive. Their systems fail every time, but they are in competition for the same followers, the bed wetters of the world.


.

Wrong.
Stalinism is NOT even remotely socialist.
There were socialists and actual communists, as well as anarchists in the Russian Revolution, but once Stalin took over, there was only Stalinism and absolutely no socialism, communism, or anarchism.
You know nothing about any economic system or else you would not be mixing apples and oranges.

 

[Rigby5]

Yes. Hitler often gave speeches about the need for, and spreading of national socialism. That what Nazism was for Pete's sake, National Socialism. As I just posted in another thread:

QUOTE:

NAZI = Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei
or, "National Socialist German Workers’ Party"

Funny, I don’t see a lot of Germans in the Republican Party but I see plenty of Socialists in the Democrat Party.
In fact, not only do I see plenty of Socialists in the Democrat Party, but I see plenty of Socialists in the Democrat Party who want to be able to murder an entire class of people (abortion) just like Hitler did, and who violently attack people in the streets who disagree with them, just like Hitler did. Plus, I see plenty of Socialists in the Democrat Party who want to teach junk science about the human race (transgenderism) just like Hitler did. AND NOW their antisemitism has also percolated to the top in recent months.

As was recently noted in another thread NAZI's have taken controll of the Democratic party !!! Demonazi's !! :

• Democrats are no different from Nazis from their strong arm tactics, to their roving blackshirts in the streets, to their murder of millions of innocent people in Planned Butcherhood death camps, to their embracing of socialism (Hitler always spoke of national socialism), to their willingness to squash free speech and other rights, and to their embracing of junk science on human beings (like transgenderism), the Democrats are EXACTLY like Nazis.

There is no denying the sameness of Democrats and Nazis. We deny it at our own peril, just as the Germans did

You should go for a mental health check-up, you're not right in the head.

I would say the same to you. Whenever I lay out a factual, well articulated position, you reply with a childish snotty one liner. I suggest you grow the fuck up

Ever heard of Godwin's Law? Comparing Americans to Nazis shows a deep ignorance of history.

The correct point of Godwin's law is that resorting to emotion name calling is unproductive.
But is it important to remember that the tactics used by Nazis can be very successful even now, and are being used.
An example is how the whole country was conned into supporting the illegal and immoral invasion of Iraq, just like Hitler got the German public to support the invasion of Poland based on false propaganda.

 

[Terri4Trump]

You gotta love some of the idiots here. "NAZI" literally means national socialist, Hitler preached about spreading national socialism, and yet some dopes here are saying they were not socialists. LOL!! Democrats will tell any lie no matter how outrageous

 

[Rigby5]

Wrong.
Look at the Molotov/Ribbentrop Treaty.
Hitler was fine with whatever Stalin wanted, and they agreed how to split up Poland between them.
There was not a single conflict or competition between Hitler and Stalin.

Hitler and the socialist dream
Because they had shared ideological ideas as socialist.

Nonsense.
Socialism is based on collaboration between workers, to cut out the profit motivated middle man.
That can never be centralized or authoritarian.

Well history has proven you wrong.

When someone kills off all the leaders of a philosophy and implements something completely different, it is wrong to still call it what the dead philosophers believed in.

Hitler was a hard core socialist.

Nonsense.
Socialism is where workers unit to collaboratively pool resource for their own means of production and profit sharing.
How was Hitler then at all a socialist?
And if he was a socialist, then why did the oligarchs have Hindenberg appoint him as Chancellor?
He was not elected you know.

 

[Pete7469]

Wrong.
Look at the Molotov/Ribbentrop Treaty.
Hitler was fine with whatever Stalin wanted, and they agreed how to split up Poland between them.
There was not a single conflict or competition between Hitler and Stalin.

That is not true on even the most loony perspective.

Hard core commie collectivists seek a globalist state.

Socialists do not seek to make all of humanity an ant colony, and aren't interested in managing the entire earth. They like vacations and early retirement. They're still stupid, authoritarian and regressive. Their systems fail every time, but they are in competition for the same followers, the bed wetters of the world.


.

Wrong.
Stalinism is NOT even remotely socialist.
There were socialists and actual communists, as well as anarchists in the Russian Revolution, but once Stalin took over, there was only Stalinism and absolutely no socialism, communism, or anarchism.
You know nothing about any economic system or else you would not be mixing apples and oranges.

I'm pretty well read and aware of what stalin, mao, hitler, pol pot, mussolini, the kim dynasty, castro, chavez et al did, and they're all leftist sociopaths. I don't care what you say.

The only noteable leftist that wasn't a savage mother fucker was Ho Chi Mihn.

.

 

[MAGAman]

So, the trumpettes try to paint Democrats as Nazis to hide the fact the Trump is following in the footsteps of his Homeland's Hitler.

And yet none of you Demtards can list any Trump abuses of power that are in leage with Democrat Fascism.

 

[Rigby5]

Hitler was a hard core socialist.

Yep, just like Uncle Bernie.

You know what great about this thread? Democrats call Trump "Hitler" all the time but its just so much stupidity and hot air. We, on the other hand, can lay out a factual, historical and well articulated argument that Democrats truly ARE just like Nazis, and that's why they are losing their lunches in this thread, because they cannot refute that truth.

.......The Nazis were not at all socialist after 1933. All the socialists by then had been murdered by Hitler.........

That propaganda lie has already been refuted.

It is historic fact that no one can or has ever tried to refute because it is impossible.
Just look it up.
Night of the Long Knives - Wikipedia
{...
The Night of the Long Knives (German: Nacht der langen Messer (help·info)), or the Röhm Purge, also called Operation Hummingbird (German: Unternehmen Kolibri), was a purge that took place in Nazi Germany from June 30 to July 2, 1934, when Adolf Hitler, urged on by Hermann Göring and Heinrich Himmler, ordered a series of political extrajudicial executions intended to consolidate his hold on power in Germany, as well as to alleviate the concerns of the German military about the role of Ernst Röhm and the Sturmabteilung (SA), the Nazis' own mass paramilitary organization. Nazi propaganda presented the murders as a preventive measure against an alleged imminent coup by the SA under Röhm – the so-called Röhm Putsch.
...
Not content solely with the leadership of the SA, Röhm lobbied Hitler to appoint him Minister of Defence, a position held by the conservative General Werner von Blomberg.[13] Although nicknamed the "Rubber Lion" by some of his critics in the army for his devotion to Hitler, Blomberg was not a Nazi, and therefore represented a bridge between the army and the party. Blomberg and many of his fellow officers were recruited from the Prussian nobility, and regarded the SA as a plebeian rabble that threatened the army's traditional high status in German society.[14]

If the regular army showed contempt for the masses belonging to the SA, many stormtroopers returned the feeling, seeing the army as insufficiently committed to the National Socialist revolution. Max Heydebreck, an SA leader in Rummelsburg, denounced the army to his fellow brownshirts, telling them, "Some of the officers of the army are swine. Most officers are too old and have to be replaced by young ones. We want to wait till Papa Hindenburg is dead, and then the SA will march against the army."

The primary instruments of Hitler's action, who carried out most of the killings, were the Schutzstaffel (SS) paramilitary force under Himmler and its Security Service (SD) under Reinhard Heydrich, and the Gestapo, the secret police, under Göring. Göring's personal police battalion also took part in the killings. Many of those killed in the purge were leaders of the SA, the best-known being Röhm himself, the SA's chief of staff and one of Hitler's longtime supporters and allies. Leading members of the leftist-leaning Strasserist faction of the Nazi Party, including its figurehead, Gregor Strasser, were also killed, as were establishment conservatives and anti-Nazis, such as former Chancellor Kurt von Schleicher and Bavarian politician Gustav Ritter von Kahr, who had suppressed Hitler's Munich Beer Hall Putsch in 1923. The murders of SA leaders were also intended to improve the image of the Hitler government with a German public that was increasingly critical of thuggish SA tactics.

Hitler saw the independence of the SA and the penchant of its members for street violence as a direct threat to his newly gained political power. He also wanted to conciliate leaders of the Reichswehr, the German military, who feared and despised the SA as a potential rival, in particular because of Röhm's ambition to merge the army and the SA under his own leadership. Additionally, Hitler was uncomfortable with Röhm's outspoken support for a "second revolution" to redistribute wealth. In Röhm's view, President Hindenburg's appointment of Hitler as Chancellor on January 30, 1933 had brought the Nazi Party to power, but had left unfulfilled the party's larger goals. Finally, Hitler used the purge to attack or eliminate German critics of his new regime, especially those loyal to Vice-Chancellor Franz von Papen, as well as to settle scores with old enemies.[a]

At least 85 people died during the purge, although the final death toll may have been in the hundreds,https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Night_of_the_Long_Knives#cite_note-Evans_p39-3[c][d] with high estimates running from 700 to 1,000.[1] More than a thousand perceived opponents were arrested.[2] The purge strengthened and consolidated the support of the Wehrmacht for Hitler. It also provided a legal grounding for the Nazi regime, as the German courts and cabinet quickly swept aside centuries of legal prohibition against extrajudicial killings to demonstrate their loyalty to the regime. The Night of the Long Knives was a turning point for the German government.[3] It established Hitler as the supreme administrator of justice of the German people, as he put it in his July 13 speech to the Reichstag.

Before its execution, its planners sometimes referred to the purge as Hummingbird (German: Kolibri), the codeword used to send the execution squads into action on the day of the purge.[4] The codename for the operation appears to have been chosen arbitrarily. The phrase "Night of the Long Knives" in the German language predates the killings and refers generally to acts of vengeance.
...
Demands for Hitler to constrain the SA strengthened. Conservatives in the army, industry, and politics placed Hitler under increasing pressure to reduce the influence of the SA and to move against Röhm. While Röhm's homosexuality did not endear him to conservatives, they were more concerned about his political ambitions. Hitler remained indecisive and uncertain about just what precisely he wanted to do when he left for Venice to meet Benito Mussolini on June 15.[24] Before Hitler left, and at the request of Presidential State Secretary Otto Meißner, Foreign Minister Baron Konstantin von Neurath ordered the German Ambassador to Italy Ulrich von Hassell – without Hitler's knowledge – to ask Mussolini to tell Hitler that the SA was blackening Germany's good name.[25] Neurath's manoeuvre to put pressure on Hitler paid off, with Mussolini agreeing to the request (Neurath was a former ambassador to Italy, and knew Mussolini well).[25] During the summit in Venice, Mussolini upbraided Hitler for tolerating the violence, hooliganism, and homosexuality of the SA, which Mussolini stated were ruining Hitler's good reputation all over the world. Mussolini used the affair occasioned by the murder of Giacomo Matteotti as an example of the kind of trouble unruly followers could cause a dictator.[25] While Mussolini's criticism did not win Hitler over to acting against the SA, it helped push him in that direction.[25]

On June 17, 1934, conservative demands for Hitler to act came to a head when Vice-Chancellor Franz von Papen, confidant of the ailing Hindenburg, gave a speech at Marburg University warning of the threat of a "second revolution."[26] According to his memoirs, von Papen, a Catholic aristocrat with ties to army and industry, privately threatened to resign if Hitler did not act.[27] While von Papen's resignation as vice-chancellor would not have threatened Hitler's position, it would have nonetheless been an embarrassing display of independence from a leading conservative.
...}

 

[Rigby5]

Because they had shared ideological ideas as socialist.

The left are not socialists or Nazi's. What the left truly desire is a monarchy where an elite liberal ruling class of nobles controls the country, its wealth, and people with an iron fist.

Wrong.
Look at the Molotov/Ribbentrop Treaty.
Hitler was fine with whatever Stalin wanted, and they agreed how to split up Poland between them.
There was not a single conflict or competition between Hitler and Stalin.

Hitler and the socialist dream
Because they had shared ideological ideas as socialist.

Nonsense.
Socialism is based on collaboration between workers, to cut out the profit motivated middle man.
That can never be centralized or authoritarian.

and there you have folks the Nazi defense of socialism !!

The Nazis were not at all socialist after 1933.
All the socialists by then had been murdered by Hitler, so that he could get the approval of the oligarchs and be appointed Chancellor by them.
The Nazis by 1933 were the exact opposite of the socialists, and imprisoned or murdered them all.

Lol ITS IN THE NAME NAZI lol god you are dumb

Almost every political party in Europe has the word "social" or "socialist", and it means absolutely NOTHING!

 

[Rigby5]

You gotta love some of the idiots here. "NAZI" literally means national socialist, Hitler preached about spreading national socialism, and yet some dopes here are saying they were not socialists. LOL!! Democrats will tell any lie no matter how outrageous

When you have a name like "National Socialist", that has nothing at all to do with the economic system called socialism.
When you throw another word in front of the word socialist, that can completely change the meaning.
It is like when you throw the word "anti" in front of the word "Semite".

 

[deanrd]

It’s sad the filth the Republican Party has become. They put an adulterer in office and they worship his lies.

Bill Clinton?

Such a sad and pathetic people.
The problem with Trump becoming a cult leader for his cult followers is that they’ve become just as despicable and awful as he is now that they know he’s lying, but they simply don’t care.
Even worse, many of them like him because of his lies. And they want their children to be just like him.

It's hard for you. You thought you had won. You thought the struggle to end America was over, Mob Boss Hillary would put another Marxist on the court and the 1st, 2nd, and 4th Amendments would be a thing of the past forever, Americans would know their place and BOW to their masters. But Trump fucked it all up for you, you won't be able to use the court to end the Republic for a generation,

It was so close, you nearly snuffed out freedom from the world for a thousand years, ushered in the dark age you so long for, but Trump snatched it from your evil little claws.

Trump is an unindicted co-conspirator in multiple felonies. He has a record number of his aides in prison and more going to trial.
The proof is in the pudding. And Trump’s pudding is a sticky bowl of nasty diarrhea.

wheres the pudding Nazi ???you had an entire team of leftwing Trump hating Hillary supporters trying to prove collusion working with Mueller ??? they would have charged Trump with jaywalking if they could have !!! the entire investigation was a set up to implement a socialist Nazi coup !

Republicans in the Senate protect Trump. And the cherry on top is William barr as Attorney General, top Trump protector. He’s even illegally throwing money at trump properties.

 

[NoVote]

and it means absolutely NOTHING!

This ain't Europe.

 

[Jitss617]

Rigby

Because they had shared ideological ideas as socialist.

The left are not socialists or Nazi's. What the left truly desire is a monarchy where an elite liberal ruling class of nobles controls the country, its wealth, and people with an iron fist.

Hitler and the socialist dream
Because they had shared ideological ideas as socialist.

Nonsense.
Socialism is based on collaboration between workers, to cut out the profit motivated middle man.
That can never be centralized or authoritarian.

and there you have folks the Nazi defense of socialism !!

The Nazis were not at all socialist after 1933.
All the socialists by then had been murdered by Hitler, so that he could get the approval of the oligarchs and be appointed Chancellor by them.
The Nazis by 1933 were the exact opposite of the socialists, and imprisoned or murdered them all.

Lol ITS IN THE NAME NAZI lol god you are dumb

Almost every political party in Europe has the word "social" or "socialist", and it means absolutely NOTHING!

lol ohh ok.. EUROPE IS PRETTY SOCIALIST LOL

 

[Rigby5]

Wrong.
Look at the Molotov/Ribbentrop Treaty.
Hitler was fine with whatever Stalin wanted, and they agreed how to split up Poland between them.
There was not a single conflict or competition between Hitler and Stalin.

That is not true on even the most loony perspective.

Hard core commie collectivists seek a globalist state.

Socialists do not seek to make all of humanity an ant colony, and aren't interested in managing the entire earth. They like vacations and early retirement. They're still stupid, authoritarian and regressive. Their systems fail every time, but they are in competition for the same followers, the bed wetters of the world.


.

Wrong.
Stalinism is NOT even remotely socialist.
There were socialists and actual communists, as well as anarchists in the Russian Revolution, but once Stalin took over, there was only Stalinism and absolutely no socialism, communism, or anarchism.
You know nothing about any economic system or else you would not be mixing apples and oranges.

I'm pretty well read and aware of what stalin, mao, hitler, pol pot, mussolini, the kim dynasty, castro, chavez et al did, and they're all leftist sociopaths. I don't care what you say.

The only noteable leftist that wasn't a savage mother fucker was Ho Chi Mihn.

.

Nonsense.
The only similarity between them is they were centralists, and socialism is inherently NOT at all centralized.
And leftist implies egalitarian income equality.
Did any of these leaders support egalitarian income equality?
No, they were the exact opposite, and supported their own personal profits, which is pure capitalism.
Savagery is a tactic any system can use, not a philosophy goal.

 

[Terri4Trump]

Nonsense.
Socialism is where workers unit to collaboratively pool resource for their own means of production

Bullshit. Socialism is government control of industry, and beyond economics it is government control of your life. Workers have no say in shit!
You are describing unions, not socialism.
Communists were socialists and so were Nazis, despite their different political goals and peculiarities.

Hitler and the socialist dream
He declared that 'national socialism was based on Marx'
Socialists have always disowned him.
But a new book insists that he was, at heart, a left-winger
Hitler and the socialist dream

It is now clear beyond all reasonable doubt that Hitler and his associates believed they were socialists, and that others, including democratic socialists, thought so too. The title of National Socialism was not hypocritical.

Whether or not there is sameness between Nazis and current democrats, neither were at all in any way socialist.
If they were, Bernie Sanders would have been the candidate in the last election,

Bernie SHOULD have been the candidate, but the Dems rigged the election with their super-delegate system.

You have a very fanciful, dreamy Utopian view of socialism