NAZI's have taken controll of the Democratic party !!! Demonazi's !!

Because socialism is what all populations like, should like, and gives the most individual freedom.

Okay, its time to call the nice men in white jackets to give you a ride downtown. You are out of your mind

There is not any person who favors democracy or populism who does not also favor socialism.
There is no way to run a democratic republic without socialism.
Guess what, public streets and schools are socialism.
 
Anti semitism [the squad] .... attacks on white Christian conservatives ,outing [doxing] Trump donors and supporters targeting them and attacking with militant mobs like [ANTIFA ], a demand for the socialist takeover of the economy and private sector ,calls for forced gun confiscation and much much more are similar to the tactics used by Adolf Hitler !! the democratic party should be called the Demonazi party !!
So, the trumpettes try to paint Democrats as Nazis to hide the fact the Trump is following in the footsteps of his Homeland's Hitler.

They're painting themselves, you idiot. Are you deaf and blind?

Not at all, because the people acting most like Hitler right now are the Israeli government.
 
I don't like Hillary due to her pro war stance, but there was nothing remotely illegal about her private email server, scrubbing drives, or smashing cell phones.
There was never a subpoena.
She was never accused of violating any law, but was just being requested to satisfy the Freedom of Information Act in case someone in the future wanted to do archive research.
1. She had classified documents on her unsecured server. (That China hacked.)
2. Her emails were subpoenaed.
3. FOIA requires her to delete ZERO documents. (Otherwise there would no point, Einstien.)
4. Cell phones were government property with FOIA information on them.

Other than that you had a good point

1. She had portions of documents later classified, on her server because they had been sent to her as emails. That is not illegal or insecure.
2. Her emails were never subpoenaed by any legal agent for any criminal investigation. There was a congressional subpoena, but congress does not have the authority to subpoena files of a member of the executive, only congress members. Nor were there any charges files that would have justified a subpoena. She also says her emails were deleted before they had been requested.
3. FOIA does not at all prevent her from deleting personal documents in any way. It was her personal email server, so most of the emails would have been private and illegal for anyone else to ever see.
4. Cellphones were her own private property. She had been given a government cellphone, but she preferred to used her old Raspberry instead. And when she got a new phone, she correctly destroyed the old.
 
Rigby
The Nazis were not at all socialist after 1933.
All the socialists by then had been murdered by Hitler, so that he could get the approval of the oligarchs and be appointed Chancellor by them.
The Nazis by 1933 were the exact opposite of the socialists, and imprisoned or murdered them all.
Lol ITS IN THE NAME NAZI lol god you are dumb

Almost every political party in Europe has the word "social" or "socialist", and it means absolutely NOTHING!
lol ohh ok.. EUROPE IS PRETTY SOCIALIST LOL

Because socialism is what all populations like, should like, and gives the most individual freedom.
Not according to the definition lol wow.. you are trying I give you that lol

The definition of socialism is where the people pool their own resources to create means of production instead of being held hostage to private entrepreneurs who engage in coercive practices like monopolies.
Anyone who claims socialism has to be centralized or without the consent of the majority are just lying.
 
Because socialism is what all populations like, should like, and gives the most individual freedom.
All children like Santa Cause.

Adults know it's not free stuff.

Its basic economics.
When private entrepreneurs, like with big business health care now, start doubling prices in a price fixing scheme, then the only rational alternative is to provide socialist competition to the capitalist fraud..
 
Rigby
Lol ITS IN THE NAME NAZI lol god you are dumb

Almost every political party in Europe has the word "social" or "socialist", and it means absolutely NOTHING!
lol ohh ok.. EUROPE IS PRETTY SOCIALIST LOL

Because socialism is what all populations like, should like, and gives the most individual freedom.
Not according to the definition lol wow.. you are trying I give you that lol

The definition of socialism is where the people pool their own resources to create means of production instead of being held hostage to private entrepreneurs who engage in coercive practices like monopolies.
Anyone who claims socialism has to be centralized or without the consent of the majority are just lying.
It’s democrat bureaucrats that allow some business to monopolize the markets with regulations permit fees fines licenses ..
so no we won’t allow them to win ,, we give the power back to the people, reduce restrictions. Let the free people create competition with unique skills .
 
Nonsense.
Socialism is where workers unit to collaboratively pool resource for their own means of production

Bullshit. Socialism is government control of industry, and beyond economics it is government control of your life. Workers have no say in shit!
You are describing unions, not socialism.
Communists were socialists and so were Nazis, despite their different political goals and peculiarities.

Hitler and the socialist dream
He declared that 'national socialism was based on Marx'
Socialists have always disowned him.
But a new book insists that he was, at heart, a left-winger

Hitler and the socialist dream

It is now clear beyond all reasonable doubt that Hitler and his associates believed they were socialists, and that others, including democratic socialists, thought so too. The title of National Socialism was not hypocritical.

Whether or not there is sameness between Nazis and current democrats, neither were at all in any way socialist.
If they were, Bernie Sanders would have been the candidate in the last election,

Bernie SHOULD have been the candidate, but the Dems rigged the election with their super-delegate system.

You have a very fanciful, dreamy Utopian view of socialism
No rules were changed to defeat Bernie.

It is not like the Democrats decided not to have primaries in some States like the Republicans are doing now.

Rules were not changed, but they were deliberately broken.
Such as Hillary being given the debate questions ahead of time, and super delegates being rigged to vote for Hillary even though she never had a chance of beating Trump.
 
Rigby
Almost every political party in Europe has the word "social" or "socialist", and it means absolutely NOTHING!
lol ohh ok.. EUROPE IS PRETTY SOCIALIST LOL

Because socialism is what all populations like, should like, and gives the most individual freedom.
Not according to the definition lol wow.. you are trying I give you that lol

The definition of socialism is where the people pool their own resources to create means of production instead of being held hostage to private entrepreneurs who engage in coercive practices like monopolies.
Anyone who claims socialism has to be centralized or without the consent of the majority are just lying.
It’s democrat bureaucrats that allow some business to monopolize the markets with regulations permit fees fines licenses ..
so no we won’t allow them to win ,, we give the power back to the people, reduce restrictions. Let the free people create competition with unique skills .


This from a Deregulation party member Trumpette
 
Rigby
lol ohh ok.. EUROPE IS PRETTY SOCIALIST LOL

Because socialism is what all populations like, should like, and gives the most individual freedom.
Not according to the definition lol wow.. you are trying I give you that lol

The definition of socialism is where the people pool their own resources to create means of production instead of being held hostage to private entrepreneurs who engage in coercive practices like monopolies.
Anyone who claims socialism has to be centralized or without the consent of the majority are just lying.
It’s democrat bureaucrats that allow some business to monopolize the markets with regulations permit fees fines licenses ..
so no we won’t allow them to win ,, we give the power back to the people, reduce restrictions. Let the free people create competition with unique skills .


This from a Deregulation party member Trumpette
Your point?
 
I see history distorted every day on this site, twisted to allow & approve of the hate for your fellow Americans. We all will pay for it, matters not what political party you belong . As for Hitler he caused his nation too fail, How? he lied, told them one thing & did another. power corrupts, absolute power corrupts absolutely .

I did not twist or distort history in the slightest. I offered a "comparison" and I put for my comparison in a methodical factual post. Everything I said is true.

Here is my post, and I want you to tell me a factual error. (I will stipulate in advance that I used a hyperbole with the phrase "Planned Butcherhood death camps", which is still true, though hyperbolically stated):

NAZI = Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei
or, "National Socialist German Workers’ Party"

Funny, I don’t see a lot of Germans in the Republican Party but I see plenty of Socialists in the Democrat Party.
In fact, not only do I see plenty of Socialists in the Democrat Party, but I see plenty of Socialists in the Democrat Party who want to be able to murder an entire class of people (abortion) just like Hitler did, and who violently attack people in the streets who disagree with them, just like Hitler did. Plus, I see plenty of Socialists in the Democrat Party who want to teach junk science about the human race (transgenderism) just like Hitler did. AND NOW their antisemitism has also percolated to the top in recent months.

As was recently noted in another thread NAZI's have taken control of the Democratic party !!! Demonazi's !! :
  • Democrats are no different from Nazis from their strong arm tactics, to their roving blackshirts in the streets, to their murder of millions of innocent people in Planned Butcherhood death camps, to their embracing of socialism (Hitler always spoke of national socialism), to their willingness to squash free speech and other rights, and to their embracing of junk science on human beings (like transgenderism), the Democrats are EXACTLY like Nazis.
There is no denying the sameness of Democrats and Nazis. We deny it at our own peril, just as the Germans did


2020 Democrats strongly defend abortion rights at forum
Iowa prof says 'I am Antifa'; once posted desire to bash Trump with baseball bat
Opinion | Why Bernie Sanders Isn’t Afraid of ‘Socialism’


The National Socialist party of Germany was the exact opposite of the socialist party, and had all the socialists murdered or arrested. Do you think that the National Socialist party was socialist because it has the world Socialist in it?
That is as foolish as thinking that an anti Semite was Jewish because it has the word Semite in it.

I might agree with you that the current democratic party may have been taken over by fascists, but fascists are still and always will be the wealthy elite, like bankers.
 
Nonsense.
Socialism is where workers unit to collaboratively pool resource for their own means of production

Bullshit. Socialism is government control of industry, and beyond economics it is government control of your life. Workers have no say in shit!
You are describing unions, not socialism.
Communists were socialists and so were Nazis, despite their different political goals and peculiarities.

Hitler and the socialist dream
He declared that 'national socialism was based on Marx'
Socialists have always disowned him.
But a new book insists that he was, at heart, a left-winger

Hitler and the socialist dream

It is now clear beyond all reasonable doubt that Hitler and his associates believed they were socialists, and that others, including democratic socialists, thought so too. The title of National Socialism was not hypocritical.

Whether or not there is sameness between Nazis and current democrats, neither were at all in any way socialist.
If they were, Bernie Sanders would have been the candidate in the last election,

Bernie SHOULD have been the candidate, but the Dems rigged the election with their super-delegate system.

You have a very fanciful, dreamy Utopian view of socialism
No rules were changed to defeat Bernie.

It is not like the Democrats decided not to have primaries in some States like the Republicans are doing now.

Rules were not changed, but they were deliberately broken.
Such as Hillary being given the debate questions ahead of time, and super delegates being rigged to vote for Hillary even though she never had a chance of beating Trump.

One person gave Hillary a debate question of an obvious subject possibility. Sanders never got close.

Super delegates obviously supported the candidate that spend their life supporting the Democrat party over a candidate that was a Democrat only for the election.

Quit lying & whining because Bernie lost. His stupid, dumbass supporters then pouted & stayed home or threw away thir vote & handed the Presidency to Trump.

Don't tell me you were one of those assholes.
 
The worst demonazis are the American Jews that vote in the enemies of the Land of Canaan. Nothing worse than those that would betray their own and the Ninth Circle of hell is reserved for people who have betrayed the trust of someone or something close and special.

At least judas hung himself. That, was at least honorable. The absolute worst are those American Jews that betray their own people. They are not Jews at all. I fear for all of them.
 
Last edited:
Not at all, because the people acting most like Hitler right now are the Israeli government.

Wow. Antisemite much?

Semitic means of an Arab language group, and does not mean Jewish.
I am Jewish, so I understand these things.
Only Jews who speak a native Arab language, like Hebrew, are Semitic.
Ashkenazi Jews speak Yiddish as a native language, which is Germanic, so Jews like Netanyahu are not Semitic.
There is no way to defend anything Israel has done, and there is not even any legal basis for Israel to exist at all.
Israel is 6 million immigrants ruling over 12 million natives.
 
Because socialism is what all populations like, should like, and gives the most individual freedom.
Not according to the definition lol wow.. you are trying I give you that lol

The definition of socialism is where the people pool their own resources to create means of production instead of being held hostage to private entrepreneurs who engage in coercive practices like monopolies.
Anyone who claims socialism has to be centralized or without the consent of the majority are just lying.
It’s democrat bureaucrats that allow some business to monopolize the markets with regulations permit fees fines licenses ..
so no we won’t allow them to win ,, we give the power back to the people, reduce restrictions. Let the free people create competition with unique skills .


This from a Deregulation party member Trumpette
Your point?

You are too stupid to realize regulations protect you from unscrupulous companies.
 
The worst demonazis are the American Jews that vote in the enemies of the Land of Canaan. Nothing worse than those that woild betray their own and the Ninth Circle are for people who have betrayed the trust of someone or something close and special.

At least judas hung himself. That, was at least honorable. The absolute worst are those American Jews that betray their own people. They are not Jews at all. I fear for all of them.

Its true. Liberals Jews are Jews in name only. They certainly do not follow their own scriptures
 
Not according to the definition lol wow.. you are trying I give you that lol

The definition of socialism is where the people pool their own resources to create means of production instead of being held hostage to private entrepreneurs who engage in coercive practices like monopolies.
Anyone who claims socialism has to be centralized or without the consent of the majority are just lying.
It’s democrat bureaucrats that allow some business to monopolize the markets with regulations permit fees fines licenses ..
so no we won’t allow them to win ,, we give the power back to the people, reduce restrictions. Let the free people create competition with unique skills .


This from a Deregulation party member Trumpette
Your point?

You are too stupid to realize regulations protect you from unscrupulous companies.
You are to stupid to know you live in a civilized country where WE THE PEOPLE make decisions on wha business we accept and don’t,, we don’t allow the government to make those decisions for us.. you must think this is The Soviet Union lol sorry snow flake lol
 
Rigby
Almost every political party in Europe has the word "social" or "socialist", and it means absolutely NOTHING!
lol ohh ok.. EUROPE IS PRETTY SOCIALIST LOL

Because socialism is what all populations like, should like, and gives the most individual freedom.
Not according to the definition lol wow.. you are trying I give you that lol

The definition of socialism is where the people pool their own resources to create means of production instead of being held hostage to private entrepreneurs who engage in coercive practices like monopolies.
Anyone who claims socialism has to be centralized or without the consent of the majority are just lying.
It’s democrat bureaucrats that allow some business to monopolize the markets with regulations permit fees fines licenses ..
so no we won’t allow them to win ,, we give the power back to the people, reduce restrictions. Let the free people create competition with unique skills .

While I can imagine it could be possible to use regulations, permits, fees, licenses, etc., to turn markets into monopolies, it is still the big companies with all the capital that are at fault. For example, the health care industry is clearly charging more than double what their services are worth or should cost. And it was they who eliminated competition by making midwives and other nonprofessionals illegal. But clearly single payer is about the only way out of the hole, by greater collective bargaining representation.
 
Because socialism is what all populations like, should like, and gives the most individual freedom.
Not according to the definition lol wow.. you are trying I give you that lol

The definition of socialism is where the people pool their own resources to create means of production instead of being held hostage to private entrepreneurs who engage in coercive practices like monopolies.
Anyone who claims socialism has to be centralized or without the consent of the majority are just lying.
It’s democrat bureaucrats that allow some business to monopolize the markets with regulations permit fees fines licenses ..
so no we won’t allow them to win ,, we give the power back to the people, reduce restrictions. Let the free people create competition with unique skills .


This from a Deregulation party member Trumpette
Your point?

Not my place to butt in, but we tried deregulation from 1880 to around 1910, and it did not at all work.
It was the worst period in history of company towns, fraudulent price fixing, private security beating up workers, low wages, etc. If not for Teddy Roosevelt, there likely would have had to have been another revolution.
 

Forum List

Back
Top