Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Go ahead and donate to PP. No one is stopping you.
Are you assuming every unwanted pregnancy results in an abortion or a child on Welfare?You miss the point. I don't have a dog in that hunt.
If we all agree that unplanned pregnancies are a bad thing, then we should give money to PP.
Unless you are really fine with abortions and welfare...
I don't care either way.
What exactly is your point? Are you denying that 18 USC 1507 exists? If not, why do you keep stating over and over and over that "no one is ever arrested". I have acknowledged that and stated that it SHOULD be enforced.According to the reports the ruling has been made, just not released but as I've said over and over and over and over, any Supreme Court protest could be deemed as trying to "influence" but no one is ever arrested.
Are you going to tell me this isn't an attempt to "influence"?
What exactly is your point? Are you denying that 18 USC 1507 exists?
If not, why do you keep stating over and over and over that "no one is ever arrested". I have acknowledged that and stated that it SHOULD be enforced.
And, for the record, the "ruling" has NOT been made yet. When it is handed down and entered into record, THEN it will be made. That is why they call it a RULING.
It's not about thought. You cannot protest at the residence of a Supreme Court Justice. Period.I've discussed that many times in this thread. You can address where I have or keep repeating the same thing over and over again.
I've stated why it can NOT be enforced. You can not charge someone for something you think they think.
You are accusing ME of "repeating the same thing over and over again". That is hilarious.I've discussed that many times in this thread. You can address where I have or keep repeating the same thing over and over again.
I've stated why it can NOT be enforced. You can not charge someone for something you think they think.
You are accusing ME of "repeating the same thing over and over again". That is hilarious.
So the Federal government enacts 18 USC 1507 years ago but little pknopp from USMB declares "IT CAN NOT BE ENFORCED".
Where is your JD degree from again?
It's not about thought. You cannot protest at the residence of a Supreme Court Justice. Period.
www.heritage.org
So you have nothing of substance to respond with.I discussed this. Go back and address what I said or as I said, just keep repeating "18 USC" over and over again.
Refusing to Prosecute Those Protesting at Supreme Court Justices’ Homes Is Inexcusable
One of the strengths of America is our legal system in which we settle our disputes peacefully in courts. We do this without the type of violence, intimidation, and threats against judges that occur in too many other countries around the world. We take for granted that judges in our country can...
So you have nothing of substance to respond with.
I do admire your tenacity, however.
Have a nice day.
You miss the point. I don't have a dog in that hunt.
If we all agree that unplanned pregnancies are a bad thing, then we should give money to PP.
Unless you are really fine with abortions and welfare...
I don't care either way.
I stand by it. Let's see your rebuttal.Boebert claims that the charges were dropped against Nancy Pelosi's husband without providing any evidence and people simply believe it. It turns out to not be true.
The Heritage foundation claims something and....................................................
I stand by it. Let's see your rebuttal.
I did. It's your turn.I have all day. Address what I said or not. I expect, not.
I did. It's your turn.
Then prove the Heritage Foundation wrong. That's how this works.You stayed something that was the opinion of the Heritage Foundation. Something they also do not supply any sort of verification for.
Yes. There is.There is no federal law against protesting on public sidewalks.
Then prove the Heritage Foundation wrong. That's how this works.
