NBC: Only 45% of Americans Believe 6 Jan Is Trump's Fault

[BULLDOG]

She isn't.....you are a lying asshole.....thanks for the input.....

Of course she is. The bitch was involved in planning the coup attempt.

 

[2aguy]

Of course she is. The bitch was involved in planning the coup attempt.

I heard the emails........you just lied, you shithead.

 

[marvin martian]

The democrats have crossed the line into actual, open and proud evil……..they just blocked the vote to provide Supreme Court Justices and their families…families with children,…..more protection in the face of BLM, and antifw brown shirts of the democrat party outside their homes and an actual murder attempt at the home of Brett Kavanaugh.

Dems Block Bill Providing Additional Security for Supreme Court Justices

Democrats stalled a bill that would have provided additional security for SCOTUS Justices on the day a man attempted to murder Kavanaugh.

www.breitbart.com

They want dead conservative Justices..so they can replace them while Biden is still standing upright………..

They have crossed the line and didn’t even hesitate……

But tell us again we need to trust them and give up our guns….

We need to look into who sent the terrorist who tried to kill Kavanaugh. It's doubtful he acted alone.

 

[Ralph Norton]

There is no federal law against protesting on public sidewalks.

Seriously? I guess you missed 18 U.S.C 1507?
"it is illegal to picket or parade with "the intent of influencing any judge, juror, witness, or court officer, in the discharge" ... "in or near a building housing a court of the United States, or in or near a building or residence occupied or used by such judge, juror, witness, or court officer."

 

[BULLDOG]

I heard the emails........you just lied, you shithead.

Ginni Thomas Pressed Trump’s Chief of Staff to Overturn 2020 Vote, Texts Show (Published 2022)

Messages between Justice Clarence Thomas’s wife and Mark Meadows are the first evidence that she directly advised the White House to reverse the election results.

www.nytimes.com

 

[White 6]

Classic leftist deflection. What's wrong with you? How could those idiots that broke into the building have taken over anything without guns? Why do you condone the murder of an unarmed trespasser?

No deflection, just fact. Never been to a protest on either side, in my life. Most people haven't.
Nothing wrong with me, just not as prone to histrionics, a year and a half later, as you. While I agree, it was stupid to try without gun, there they were. Condone shooting a unarmed trespasser, climbing in a window or door breached by the forward party of and angry mob? I look at it, considering what I would do if at my own personal home, with my wife and family inside. I never claimed to be a nice person. In fact, I am a hard person, by training and mindset. My defensive capabilities here are extensive, deep, and I have no foolish compunctions against using them in defense of my family, my wife, my life and my property, pretty much in that order. It would make shooting one "unarmed trespasser" tame in comparison, especially for a small town in Tennessee.

 

[jbrownson0831]

No deflection, just fact. Never been to a protest on either side, in my life. Most people haven't.
Nothing wrong with me, just not as prone to histrionics, a year and a half later, as you. While I agree, it was stupid to try without gun, there they were. Condone shooting a unarmed trespasser, climbing in a window or door breached by the forward party of and angry mob? I look at it, considering what I would do if at my own personal home, with my wife and family inside. I never claimed to be a nice person. In fact, I am a hard person, by training and mindset. My defensive capabilities here are extensive, deep, and I have no foolish compunctions against using them in defense of my family, my wife, my life and my property, pretty much in that order. It would make shooting one "unarmed trespasser" tame in comparison, especially for a small town in Tennessee.

Only a small filmed portion of that group was "angry", my guess those were the actors paid to be there. Nobody was armed so......

 

[miketx]

No deflection, just fact. Never been to a protest on either side, in my life. Most people haven't.
Nothing wrong with me, just not as prone to histrionics, a year and a half later, as you. While I agree, it was stupid to try without gun, there they were. Condone shooting a unarmed trespasser, climbing in a window or door breached by the forward party of and angry mob? I look at it, considering what I would do if at my own personal home, with my wife and family inside. I never claimed to be a nice person. In fact, I am a hard person, by training and mindset. My defensive capabilities here are extensive, deep, and I have no foolish compunctions against using them in defense of my family, my wife, my life and my property, pretty much in that order. It would make shooting one "unarmed trespasser" tame in comparison, especially for a small town in Tennessee.

Never mind that the capital is a public building. Never mind your post I replied to had nothing to do with your reply. No, we can't let any of that matter in our blind rush to justify all crimes by politicians you worship.

 

[ThunderKiss1965]

Yes, we saw it on J6.

And the billions of dollars in damage during the mostly peaceful protest across the country.

 

[pknopp]

Wrong...there is a law against protesting at the homes of Supreme Court Justices...a Federal law...

No there isn't or you would have posted it.

 

[pknopp]

there are laws against threatening a judge. which limits ones first amendment right on sidewalks

And the person that threatened him was arrested.

 

[pknopp]

Seriously? I guess you missed 18 U.S.C 1507?
"it is illegal to picket or parade with "the intent of influencing any judge, juror, witness, or court officer, in the discharge" ... "in or near a building housing a court of the United States, or in or near a building or residence occupied or used by such judge, juror, witness, or court officer."

Unenforceable. You say "influence" others say it's simple protest. Why do you suppose no one was arrested? If that was the case there would have been thousands and thousands arrests as people protest in front of the Supreme Court all the time.

 

[White 6]

Only a small filmed portion of that group was "angry", my guess those were the actors paid to be there. Nobody was armed so......

A theory, but I can't buy it.

 

[struth]

And the person that threatened him was arrested.

chucky is still at large

 

[jbrownson0831]

A theory, but I can't buy it.

What, that nobody was armed even if angry?

 

[pknopp]

chucky is still at large

As is Trump.

 

[struth]

As is Trump.

what federal judge did he threaten? you don’t even make sense

 

[bodecea]

The democrats have crossed the line into actual, open and proud evil……..they just blocked the vote to provide Supreme Court Justices and their families…families with children,…..more protection in the face of BLM, and antifw brown shirts of the democrat party outside their homes and an actual murder attempt at the home of Brett Kavanaugh.

Dems Block Bill Providing Additional Security for Supreme Court Justices

Democrats stalled a bill that would have provided additional security for SCOTUS Justices on the day a man attempted to murder Kavanaugh.

www.breitbart.com

They want dead conservative Justices..so they can replace them while Biden is still standing upright………..

They have crossed the line and didn’t even hesitate……

But tell us again we need to trust them and give up our guns….

Suddenly you are con-cerned about gun violence? Not buying your faux outrage.

 

[White 6]

What, that nobody was armed even if angry?

I never said it was a good plan.

 

[jbrownson0831]

I never said it was a good plan.

It was a protest with American flags, nothing more.