Nest week may be a repeat of last year for Texas

[Harpy Eagle]

He didn't winterize before the last disastrous cold weather, and if he didn't winterize again, and is facing the same kind of weather, guess what?

Profits over all else. Winterizing is expensive.

 

[Mac-7]

Yes, there is a lot to see if you pay attention.



Bigger idiots than the deniers as the alarmist should know better.

I think the climate change doomsday deniers are the rational people

 

[Bobob]

Profits over all else. Winterizing is expensive.

I believe that he does it just to be arbitrary. 'Texas does its own thing' attitude.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

I think the climate change doomsday deniers are the rational people

The deniers are no more rational than the alarmist.

 

[Mac-7]

The deniers are no more rational than the alarmist.

Really?

Deniers dont think civilization is on the brink of catastrophe while the lefties do

but you call everyone equally bad?

you are in denial

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Really?

Deniers dont think civilization is on the brink of catastrophe while the lefties do

Deniers think nothing is happening at all.

but you call everyone equally bad?

Yes, both are idiots.

 

[Mac-7]

Deniers think nothing is happening at all.

You met one person who said that and now you think everyone does

that in itself is unscientific

or at least unreasonable

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

Course it is. And the check is in the mail, Marjorie Taylor-Greene is sane, and the 2020 election was stolen.

Whaddya do for an encore? Tell us you just had a beer with Santa Claus, the Tooth Fairy and the Easter Bunny?

LOL...you'll fall for anything.

 

[Mac-7]

Yes, both are idiots.

Conservative deniers dont think the world is going to change dramatically for the worse due to global warming but lib greenies do

that tells me the greenies and only the greenies are fools

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

It says that shits going down. The effects of global warming are extreme weather events. You didn’t know that? Did you think a cold storm was somehow proof that warming isn’t occurring?! Please tell me you aren’t that dense

We get freezing temps down here every winter it's nothing new.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

You met one person who said that and now you think everyone does

that in itself is unscientific

or at least unreasonable

this board is full of those people. Do try and keep up

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Conservative deniers dont think the world is going to change dramatically for the worse due to global warming but lib greenies do

that tells me the greenies and only the greenies are fools

and both are idiots. The libs for saying it is going to happen tomorrow and the Cons for saying it will never happen.

 

[Slade3200]

We get freezing temps down here every winter it's nothing new.

Yup. What’s your point?

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

Yup. What’s your point?

Are ya stupid?
It means that cold weather is nothing new here and it has nothing to do with glowbull warming ya dumbfuck.

 

[Slade3200]

Are ya stupid?
It means that cold weather is nothing new here and it has nothing to do with glowbull warming ya dumbfuck.

Whatever you say bucko

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

Whatever you say bucko

I accept your defeat.

 

[Slade3200]

I accept your defeat.

Haha. A cookie is in the mail headed your way!

 

[Dr Grump]

You do realize the planet has been in an ice age for the past 3 million years, right?

Nobody is arguing that the Earth goes through climate changes. I know that. You know that. Climate scientists know that. We ALL agree on that. The contention is the RATE of current change.

 

[ding]

Nobody is arguing that the Earth goes through climate changes. I know that. You know that. Climate scientists know that. We ALL agree on that. The contention is the RATE of current change.

Scientists come to opposite conclusions about the causes of recent climate change depending on which datasets they consider. For instance, the panels on the left lead to the conclusion that global temperature changes since the mid-19th century have been mostly due to human-caused emissions, especially carbon dioxide (CO2), i.e., the conclusion reached by the UN IPCC reports. In contrast, the panels on the right lead to the exact opposite conclusion, i.e., that the global temperature changes since the mid-19th century have been mostly due to natural cycles, chiefly long-term changes in the energy emitted by the Sun.

Both sets of panels are based on published scientific data, but each uses different datasets and assumptions. On the left, it is assumed that the available temperature records are unaffected by the urban heat island problem, and so all stations are used, whether urban or rural. On the right, only rural stations are used. Meanwhile, on the left, solar output is modeled using the low variability dataset that has been chosen for the IPCC’s upcoming (in 2021/2022) 6th Assessment Reports. This implies zero contribution from natural factors to the long-term warming. On the right, solar output is modeled using a high variability dataset used by the team in charge of NASA’s ACRIM sun-monitoring satellites. This implies that most, if not all, of the long-term temperature changes are due to natural factors.

Here is the link to the full paper.
ShieldSquare Captcha

 

[Dr Grump]

LOL...you'll fall for anything.

Mate, if you voted for Trump in 2016 you are an imbecile. If you voted for him in 2020 you make an imbecile look like Einstein. You have no call for berating somebody for "falling for anything" if the suppositions in my first two sentences are true.