Wyatt earp
Diamond Member
- Apr 21, 2012
- 69,975
- 16,396
- 2,180
It's funny liberals support Iran, when backed terrorist by them over through the government of Yemen..
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁
What I read the Nazis were liked in the region....
“If you take out Saddam, Saddam’s regime, I guarantee you that it will have enormous positive reverberations on the region…the test and the great opportunity and challenge is not merely to effect the ouster of the regime, but also transform that society and thereby begin too the process of democratizing the Arab world.”
FLASHBACK: Netanyahu Said Iraq War Would Benefit The Middle East
by Hamed Aleaziz
October 31, 2012
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu yesterday told a Paris-based magazine that a military strike on Iran would be beneficial to the region. Netanyahu’s statement was published on the eve of a meeting with French President Francois Holland, during which the two planned to discuss the Iran issue among other topics. Netanyahu cited Iran’s lack of popularity in the Middle East:
“Five minutes after, contrary to what the skeptics say, I think a feeling of relief would spread across the region…Iran is not popular in the Arab world, far from it, and some governments in the region, as well as their citizens, have understood that a nuclear armed Iran would be dangerous for them, not just for Israel.”
Sound familiar? Netanyahu’s statement echoes a point that he made in 2002, when he advocated for a strike on Iraq on the grounds that, among other things, it would benefit the region:
“If you take out Saddam, Saddam’s regime, I guarantee you that it will have enormous positive reverberations on the region…the test and the great opportunity and challenge is not merely to effect the ouster of the regime, but also transform that society and thereby begin too the process of democratizing the Arab world.”
It hardly bears repeating that Arabs in the Middle East did not react favorably to the Iraq war. The year the war began, the Los Angeles Times reported from Syria and found that negative views of America had hardened. One Syrian told the Times ”What they are doing is worse than what Saddam [Hussein] has done.” Brookings Institution polling from 2003 backed up the anecdotes. More than 60 percent of Arabs saw the Iraq war causing “less peace” in the region and more than 70 percent said it would result in “more terrorism.” Shelby Tahimi, a Middle East expert and the creator of the poll, found an “unprecedented tide of public opinion running against the United States” after the Iraq war.
<snip>
.
First of all, Saddam was a Baathist. Baathists don't acknowledge borders.That is a problem. Second, Saadam had threatened repeatedly and fired scud missiles into Israel. Saddam was not well liked by any nation-state in the region.
There was no reason to go into Iraq. But, lets be honest about it.
And no, the Americans were not well liked before the Iraq war. The British, the French, the Russians, and the Germans were not well liked either. It was and is considered another oil war by those that live in that region.
What I read the Nazis were liked in the region....
“If you take out Saddam, Saddam’s regime, I guarantee you that it will have enormous positive reverberations on the region…the test and the great opportunity and challenge is not merely to effect the ouster of the regime, but also transform that society and thereby begin too the process of democratizing the Arab world.”
FLASHBACK: Netanyahu Said Iraq War Would Benefit The Middle East
by Hamed Aleaziz
October 31, 2012
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu yesterday told a Paris-based magazine that a military strike on Iran would be beneficial to the region. Netanyahu’s statement was published on the eve of a meeting with French President Francois Holland, during which the two planned to discuss the Iran issue among other topics. Netanyahu cited Iran’s lack of popularity in the Middle East:
“Five minutes after, contrary to what the skeptics say, I think a feeling of relief would spread across the region…Iran is not popular in the Arab world, far from it, and some governments in the region, as well as their citizens, have understood that a nuclear armed Iran would be dangerous for them, not just for Israel.”
Sound familiar? Netanyahu’s statement echoes a point that he made in 2002, when he advocated for a strike on Iraq on the grounds that, among other things, it would benefit the region:
“If you take out Saddam, Saddam’s regime, I guarantee you that it will have enormous positive reverberations on the region…the test and the great opportunity and challenge is not merely to effect the ouster of the regime, but also transform that society and thereby begin too the process of democratizing the Arab world.”
It hardly bears repeating that Arabs in the Middle East did not react favorably to the Iraq war. The year the war began, the Los Angeles Times reported from Syria and found that negative views of America had hardened. One Syrian told the Times ”What they are doing is worse than what Saddam [Hussein] has done.” Brookings Institution polling from 2003 backed up the anecdotes. More than 60 percent of Arabs saw the Iraq war causing “less peace” in the region and more than 70 percent said it would result in “more terrorism.” Shelby Tahimi, a Middle East expert and the creator of the poll, found an “unprecedented tide of public opinion running against the United States” after the Iraq war.
<snip>
.
First of all, Saddam was a Baathist. Baathists don't acknowledge borders.That is a problem. Second, Saadam had threatened repeatedly and fired scud missiles into Israel. Saddam was not well liked by any nation-state in the region.
There was no reason to go into Iraq. But, lets be honest about it.
And no, the Americans were not well liked before the Iraq war. The British, the French, the Russians, and the Germans were not well liked either. It was and is considered another oil war by those that live in that region.
maybe you know something I Don't, always thought they supported them all through WWIIWhat I read the Nazis were liked in the region....
“If you take out Saddam, Saddam’s regime, I guarantee you that it will have enormous positive reverberations on the region…the test and the great opportunity and challenge is not merely to effect the ouster of the regime, but also transform that society and thereby begin too the process of democratizing the Arab world.”
FLASHBACK: Netanyahu Said Iraq War Would Benefit The Middle East
by Hamed Aleaziz
October 31, 2012
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu yesterday told a Paris-based magazine that a military strike on Iran would be beneficial to the region. Netanyahu’s statement was published on the eve of a meeting with French President Francois Holland, during which the two planned to discuss the Iran issue among other topics. Netanyahu cited Iran’s lack of popularity in the Middle East:
“Five minutes after, contrary to what the skeptics say, I think a feeling of relief would spread across the region…Iran is not popular in the Arab world, far from it, and some governments in the region, as well as their citizens, have understood that a nuclear armed Iran would be dangerous for them, not just for Israel.”
Sound familiar? Netanyahu’s statement echoes a point that he made in 2002, when he advocated for a strike on Iraq on the grounds that, among other things, it would benefit the region:
“If you take out Saddam, Saddam’s regime, I guarantee you that it will have enormous positive reverberations on the region…the test and the great opportunity and challenge is not merely to effect the ouster of the regime, but also transform that society and thereby begin too the process of democratizing the Arab world.”
It hardly bears repeating that Arabs in the Middle East did not react favorably to the Iraq war. The year the war began, the Los Angeles Times reported from Syria and found that negative views of America had hardened. One Syrian told the Times ”What they are doing is worse than what Saddam [Hussein] has done.” Brookings Institution polling from 2003 backed up the anecdotes. More than 60 percent of Arabs saw the Iraq war causing “less peace” in the region and more than 70 percent said it would result in “more terrorism.” Shelby Tahimi, a Middle East expert and the creator of the poll, found an “unprecedented tide of public opinion running against the United States” after the Iraq war.
<snip>
.
First of all, Saddam was a Baathist. Baathists don't acknowledge borders.That is a problem. Second, Saadam had threatened repeatedly and fired scud missiles into Israel. Saddam was not well liked by any nation-state in the region.
There was no reason to go into Iraq. But, lets be honest about it.
And no, the Americans were not well liked before the Iraq war. The British, the French, the Russians, and the Germans were not well liked either. It was and is considered another oil war by those that live in that region.
And then what happened...........
We see the Democrat tools has been given their marching orders
Tear down and go out to DESTROY one of closest allies.
maybe you know something I Don't, always thought they supported them all through WWIIWhat I read the Nazis were liked in the region....
“If you take out Saddam, Saddam’s regime, I guarantee you that it will have enormous positive reverberations on the region…the test and the great opportunity and challenge is not merely to effect the ouster of the regime, but also transform that society and thereby begin too the process of democratizing the Arab world.”
FLASHBACK: Netanyahu Said Iraq War Would Benefit The Middle East
by Hamed Aleaziz
October 31, 2012
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu yesterday told a Paris-based magazine that a military strike on Iran would be beneficial to the region. Netanyahu’s statement was published on the eve of a meeting with French President Francois Holland, during which the two planned to discuss the Iran issue among other topics. Netanyahu cited Iran’s lack of popularity in the Middle East:
“Five minutes after, contrary to what the skeptics say, I think a feeling of relief would spread across the region…Iran is not popular in the Arab world, far from it, and some governments in the region, as well as their citizens, have understood that a nuclear armed Iran would be dangerous for them, not just for Israel.”
Sound familiar? Netanyahu’s statement echoes a point that he made in 2002, when he advocated for a strike on Iraq on the grounds that, among other things, it would benefit the region:
“If you take out Saddam, Saddam’s regime, I guarantee you that it will have enormous positive reverberations on the region…the test and the great opportunity and challenge is not merely to effect the ouster of the regime, but also transform that society and thereby begin too the process of democratizing the Arab world.”
It hardly bears repeating that Arabs in the Middle East did not react favorably to the Iraq war. The year the war began, the Los Angeles Times reported from Syria and found that negative views of America had hardened. One Syrian told the Times ”What they are doing is worse than what Saddam [Hussein] has done.” Brookings Institution polling from 2003 backed up the anecdotes. More than 60 percent of Arabs saw the Iraq war causing “less peace” in the region and more than 70 percent said it would result in “more terrorism.” Shelby Tahimi, a Middle East expert and the creator of the poll, found an “unprecedented tide of public opinion running against the United States” after the Iraq war.
<snip>
.
First of all, Saddam was a Baathist. Baathists don't acknowledge borders.That is a problem. Second, Saadam had threatened repeatedly and fired scud missiles into Israel. Saddam was not well liked by any nation-state in the region.
There was no reason to go into Iraq. But, lets be honest about it.
And no, the Americans were not well liked before the Iraq war. The British, the French, the Russians, and the Germans were not well liked either. It was and is considered another oil war by those that live in that region.
And then what happened...........
You have a link to just how eager he was? other than just blurting out stuff as always?Israel had to remain on the side line,and you know why.We see the Democrat tools has been given their marching orders
Tear down and go out to DESTROY one of closest allies.
What makes Israel an ally? How many Israelis died fighting in the Iraq war that Netanyahu was so eager to see Americans die in?
You have a link to just how eager he was? other than just blurting out stuff as always?Israel had to remain on the side line,and you know why.We see the Democrat tools has been given their marching orders
Tear down and go out to DESTROY one of closest allies.
What makes Israel an ally? How many Israelis died fighting in the Iraq war that Netanyahu was so eager to see Americans die in?
How fucking stupid are you? America asked Israel NOT to take part. They were all set to do it. Bush was afraid of offending the Muslim allies.We see the Democrat tools has been given their marching orders
Tear down and go out to DESTROY one of closest allies.
What makes Israel an ally? How many Israelis died fighting in the Iraq war that Netanyahu was so eager to see Americans die in?
How fucking stupid are you? America asked Israel NOT to take part. They were all set to do it. Bush was afraid of offending the Muslim allies.We see the Democrat tools has been given their marching orders
Tear down and go out to DESTROY one of closest allies.
What makes Israel an ally? How many Israelis died fighting in the Iraq war that Netanyahu was so eager to see Americans die in?
Israel is an ally because it is the only democracy in the middle east, the only place where minorities have rights.
^^How fucking stupid are you? America asked Israel NOT to take part. They were all set to do it. Bush was afraid of offending the Muslim allies.We see the Democrat tools has been given their marching orders
Tear down and go out to DESTROY one of closest allies.
What makes Israel an ally? How many Israelis died fighting in the Iraq war that Netanyahu was so eager to see Americans die in?
Israel is an ally because it is the only democracy in the middle east, the only place where minorities have rights.
Like I said, Americans died for Israel. Israelis don't die for America.
We see the Republican tools have been given their marching ordersWe see the Democrat tools has been given their marching orders
Tear down and go out to DESTROY one of closest allies.
As opposed to democrats, who supported Pres Bush no matter what. Right?We see the Republican tools have been given their marching ordersWe see the Democrat tools has been given their marching orders
Tear down and go out to DESTROY one of closest allies.
Tear down and go out to DESTROY their president
And you guys supported Clinton no matter what, right? We could play this game all day. I'm just pointing out Staph's typical hypocrisy.As opposed to democrats, who supported Pres Bush no matter what. Right?We see the Republican tools have been given their marching ordersWe see the Democrat tools has been given their marching orders
Tear down and go out to DESTROY one of closest allies.
Tear down and go out to DESTROY their president
Asshole.
That lasted about 20 minutes. When Dems figured out that they would lose politically the jumped all over Bush.And you guys supported Clinton no matter what, right? We could play this game all day. I'm just pointing out Staph's typical hypocrisy.As opposed to democrats, who supported Pres Bush no matter what. Right?We see the Republican tools have been given their marching ordersWe see the Democrat tools has been given their marching orders
Tear down and go out to DESTROY one of closest allies.
Tear down and go out to DESTROY their president
Asshole.
BTW, Bush did have a ridiculously high approval rating after 9/11. Democrats didn't jump on him and claim he was responsible for the attack. Someone sneezes and you shitheads blame Obama.
Yes, ISIS is an arm of the Mossad, right Heinrich?
What is important to underscore is that:
- Two months before 9/11, US mercenaries on contract to the Pentagon were working hand in glove with jihadist terrorists affiliated to al Qaeda. This in itself is of crucial significance because it refutes “the theory of the blowback”. The latter was used profusely by the media in the wake of 9/11 to the effect that while Al Qaeda had been supported by the US in the heyday of the Soviet-Afghan war, it had indelibly turned against its US sponsors. “We helped them [al Qaeda] and they went against us.” This argument was used to uphold the notion of the “outside enemy” which threatened America on September 11, 2001. What is documented in this July 2001 article is that two months before 9/11, the US military was firmly behind the Al Qaeda affiliated terrorists in Macedonia. Visibly the blowback theory is a lie. Al Qaeda is a construct of US intelligence.
- In 2001, the US was officially waging a war against terrorism in the Balkans while providing weapons and money to the Al Qaeda affiliated brigades.
- While Washington supplied National Liberation Army (NLA) terrorists with brand new weapons “Made in America,” some 3000 heavily armed NATO troops were given the mandate to “disarm the rebels” and enforce the cease-fire. Code-named “Essential Harvest,” this bogus “peacekeeping” operation under British command was intended to weaken the Macedonian Armed Forces and destabilize national institutions.
- Documented beyond doubt, Washington was behind the terrorist assaults in Macedonia. While Secretary of State Colin Powell reaffirmed America’s resolve to “combat terrorism,” US military advisers were fighting alongside the NLA terrorists.