New Audio Evidence of Trump & Giuliani Corruption and Official Misconduct

[toobfreak]

Another day, another.....


View attachment 498387

Another day, another.....

Another day, another.....


View attachment 498387

There's going to be a reckoning, and I reckon that Giuliani isn't going to like it one bit. Feel free to send him money for his defense.

Can't you clowns give it a rest for one day?....Just one?

Right after you clowns stop screaming about "stolen elections".

So basically, never, despite the fact that all the evidence and truth is on our side.

What evidence? I keep hearing people talk about evidence when they're standing at a microphone somewhere, but it's never presented when they're in a court of law. Why do you think that is?

Risk of sanctions and/or disbarment. Same reason reputable firms all turned tail and Donnie was stuck with maniacal has beens like Rudy, Sidney & Lin Wood.

Believe it or not, here's what we're expected to believe: A lawyer who represents the president of the United States and who claims he is in possession of evidence that there was massive fraud in the presidential election finally goes to a court of law. It's his (or her) opportunity to make the biggest splash of their collective careers by providing world-grabbing headlines of voter fraud which potentially changed the outcome of a national election, and what happens?

No evidence is presented!

That kind of says it all, doesn't it?

No evidence was ever presented because of this little thing called "standing". I suggest you get an elementary school student look it up and explain it to you.

This is a load of horse hockey. Why do we keep telling the same lies over and over?

Fact check: Courts have dismissed multiple lawsuits of alleged electoral fraud presented by Trump campaign

Following President Joe Biden’s swearing in on Jan. 20, a Facebook post shared over 6,140 times has said: “Not one court has looked at the evidence and said that Biden legally won. Not one”. This is false: state and federal judges dismissed more than 50 lawsuits presented by then President...

www.reuters.com

Oh Jack, you really need to take an enema and blow it out your ass! The NERVE of you: you fish around to find an article saying what you WANT to hear, then you copy that as "the facts." Worse, you choose a source which vets NOT ONE of the over-one hundred points of election contention proving not any of them false! Instead, amazingly, Reuters' pathetic "fact-check" team simply quotes third parties and takes THEIR claims at face value even if they could be part of the problem, saying: "Independent experts, governors and state election officials from both parties say there was no evidence of widespread fraud."

WHAT experts? HOW are they "independent?" Independent from what and who? And what would a governor know other than whatever crap others tell him?! And state election officials? Aren't these the ones who would be overseeing any fraud if there was any? That's like asking the Federal government if they cheated the Indians!

Never mind the fact that many people and organizations have already come forward, as I've detailed many times, and ADMITTED to the cheating. They BRAG about it. Time Magazine put out an extensive article patting them on the back giving credit to them as a "SHADOW ORGANIZATION" working behind the scenes to ENSURE that Trump was never reelected by working collectively to generate millions upon millions of additional Biden paper ballots which millions in funding from interested corporate 3rd parties paid for. That's illegal Jack.

Biden's election is as phony as a $3 bill, and while you are out there citing a third party news organization for taking the word of other third parties (there's real news journalism for you!), not only doesn't Reuters even attempt to discount a SINGLE election dispute among a hundred, they like you pretend this shadow organization of far leftwing groups haven't ALREADY TAKEN CREDIT FOR STEALING THE ELECTION!

But don't worry Jack. Once these audits are over, my schedule frees up and I feel all data is finally in, I am going to put it all together in a thread where we will take a serious look at everything without your preconceived conclusions, drawing what conclusions are possible from the KNOWN FACTS, not just take the word of some possibly compromised, interested third party's word for it.

In effect, all Reuters did was take the word of other people telling them what they wanted to hear much like every other jackass out there all bleating that the fraud has been "debunked."

Everyone is just quoting everyone else (except those claiming the fraud) and not actually doing any real investigation of their own.

Like you.

 

[jc456]

NO lie is too vile for Trump.

still waiting on a lie trump told. any year now.

 

[JackOfNoTrades]

19

Another day, another.....


View attachment 498387

Another day, another.....

Another day, another.....


View attachment 498387

There's going to be a reckoning, and I reckon that Giuliani isn't going to like it one bit. Feel free to send him money for his defense.

Can't you clowns give it a rest for one day?....Just one?

Right after you clowns stop screaming about "stolen elections".

So basically, never, despite the fact that all the evidence and truth is on our side.

What evidence? I keep hearing people talk about evidence when they're standing at a microphone somewhere, but it's never presented when they're in a court of law. Why do you think that is?

Risk of sanctions and/or disbarment. Same reason reputable firms all turned tail and Donnie was stuck with maniacal has beens like Rudy, Sidney & Lin Wood.

Believe it or not, here's what we're expected to believe: A lawyer who represents the president of the United States and who claims he is in possession of evidence that there was massive fraud in the presidential election finally goes to a court of law. It's his (or her) opportunity to make the biggest splash of their collective careers by providing world-grabbing headlines of voter fraud which potentially changed the outcome of a national election, and what happens?

No evidence is presented!

That kind of says it all, doesn't it?

No evidence was ever presented because of this little thing called "standing". I suggest you get an elementary school student look it up and explain it to you.

This is a load of horse hockey. Why do we keep telling the same lies over and over?

Fact check: Courts have dismissed multiple lawsuits of alleged electoral fraud presented by Trump campaign

Following President Joe Biden’s swearing in on Jan. 20, a Facebook post shared over 6,140 times has said: “Not one court has looked at the evidence and said that Biden legally won. Not one”. This is false: state and federal judges dismissed more than 50 lawsuits presented by then President...

www.reuters.com

Oh Jack, you really need to take an enema and blow it out your ass! The NERVE of you: you fish around to find an article saying what you WANT to hear, then you copy that as "the facts." Worse, you choose a source which vets NOT ONE of the over-one hundred points of election contention proving not any of them false! Instead, amazingly, Reuters' pathetic "fact-check" team simply quotes third parties and takes THEIR claims at face value even if they could be part of the problem, saying: "Independent experts, governors and state election officials from both parties say there was no evidence of widespread fraud."

View attachment 499574

WHAT experts? HOW are they "independent?" Independent from what and who? And what would a governor know other than whatever crap others tell him?! And state election officials? Aren't these the ones who would be overseeing any fraud if there was any? That's like asking the Federal government if they cheated the Indians!

Never mind the fact that many people and organizations have already come forward, as I've detailed many times, and ADMITTED to the cheating. They BRAG about it. Time Magazine put out an extensive article patting them on the back giving credit to them as a "SHADOW ORGANIZATION" working behind the scenes to ENSURE that Trump was never reelected by working collectively to generate millions upon millions of additional Biden paper ballots which millions in funding from interested corporate 3rd parties paid for. That's illegal Jack.

Biden's election is as phony as a $3 bill, and while you are out there citing a third party news organization for taking the word of other third parties (there's real news journalism for you!), not only doesn't Reuters even attempt to discount a SINGLE election dispute among a hundred, they like you pretend this shadow organization of far leftwing groups haven't ALREADY TAKEN CREDIT FOR STEALING THE ELECTION!

But don't worry Jack. Once these audits are over, my schedule frees up and I feel all data is finally in, I am going to put it all together in a thread where we will take a serious look at everything, drawing what conclusions are possible from the KNOWN FACTS, not just take the word of some possibly compromised, interested third party's word for it.

In effect, all Reuters did was take the word of other people telling them what they wanted to hear much like every other jackass out there all bleating that the fraud has been "debunked."

Everyone is just quoting everyone else (except those claiming the fraud) and not actually doing any real investigation of their own.

Like you.

Over 50 lawsuits were dismissed for "lack of evidence". I only remember one lawsuit being dismissed totally on the straight up reason of 'standing" and that was the one that dumbassed TX AG filed with the SC. Which got punted faster than most of the other 72 cases that got whacked. No one is taking credit for "stealing" anything. No one has admitted any wrongdoing of the sort. Your alt-right media sources lie to you..and you swallow it all happily. Once these audits are over, the result will be the same. Trump lost. Most of your shiny new state voter restrictions will be overturned by the courts or just straight up not implemented.

You really need to come out of your garage, Freaky. Take a breath of fresh air...but don't look at the sun.

 

[toobfreak]

Another day, another.....


View attachment 498387

Another day, another.....

Another day, another.....


View attachment 498387

There's going to be a reckoning, and I reckon that Giuliani isn't going to like it one bit. Feel free to send him money for his defense.

Can't you clowns give it a rest for one day?....Just one?

Right after you clowns stop screaming about "stolen elections".

So basically, never, despite the fact that all the evidence and truth is on our side.

What evidence? I keep hearing people talk about evidence when they're standing at a microphone somewhere, but it's never presented when they're in a court of law. Why do you think that is?

Risk of sanctions and/or disbarment. Same reason reputable firms all turned tail and Donnie was stuck with maniacal has beens like Rudy, Sidney & Lin Wood

Believe it or not, here's what we're expected to believe: A lawyer who represents the president of the United States and who claims he is in possession of evidence that there was massive fraud in the presidential election finally goes to a court of law. It's his (or her) opportunity to make the biggest splash of their collective careers by providing world-grabbing headlines of voter fraud which potentially changed the outcome of a national election, and what happens?

No evidence is presented!

That kind of says it all, doesn't it?

No evidence was ever presented because of this little thing called "standing". I suggest you get an elementary school student look it up and explain it to you.

This is a load of horse hockey. Why do we keep telling the same lies over and over?

Fact check: Courts have dismissed multiple lawsuits of alleged electoral fraud presented by Trump campaign

Following President Joe Biden’s swearing in on Jan. 20, a Facebook post shared over 6,140 times has said: “Not one court has looked at the evidence and said that Biden legally won. Not one”. This is false: state and federal judges dismissed more than 50 lawsuits presented by then President...

www.reuters.com

Reuters won’t be good enough for loony birds like Tory.
What do Hateway Pundit and DailySmeller have to say on the matter?

RIGHT, Glove. Reuters who says in their article that THE SOURCE OF THEIR "CONCLUSIONS" was to simply regurgitate the claims from other people they take on face value, with no actual investigative journalism of their own, is the Left's new unimpeachable source? And who did they rely on? Independent bodies doing extensive data crunching and voter machine testing and witness reviewing?

No.

They simply took the word of governors who only take the word of others, and election officials, who if there was any fraud, WERE THE ONES OVERSEEING IT!

Meantime, you keep forgetting the 80 odd leftwing groups who have ALREADY PROUDLY ADMITTED to stealing the election.

Whoops.

But that is "good enough" for you and should be "good enough" for us?

WE AIN'T FUCKING STUPID YOU SHITHEAD and we didn't fall off a turnip truck yesterday.

 

[JackOfNoTrades]

Another day, another.....


View attachment 498387

Another day, another.....

Another day, another.....


View attachment 498387

There's going to be a reckoning, and I reckon that Giuliani isn't going to like it one bit. Feel free to send him money for his defense.

Can't you clowns give it a rest for one day?....Just one?

Right after you clowns stop screaming about "stolen elections".

So basically, never, despite the fact that all the evidence and truth is on our side.

What evidence? I keep hearing people talk about evidence when they're standing at a microphone somewhere, but it's never presented when they're in a court of law. Why do you think that is?

Risk of sanctions and/or disbarment. Same reason reputable firms all turned tail and Donnie was stuck with maniacal has beens like Rudy, Sidney & Lin Wood

Believe it or not, here's what we're expected to believe: A lawyer who represents the president of the United States and who claims he is in possession of evidence that there was massive fraud in the presidential election finally goes to a court of law. It's his (or her) opportunity to make the biggest splash of their collective careers by providing world-grabbing headlines of voter fraud which potentially changed the outcome of a national election, and what happens?

No evidence is presented!

That kind of says it all, doesn't it?

No evidence was ever presented because of this little thing called "standing". I suggest you get an elementary school student look it up and explain it to you.

This is a load of horse hockey. Why do we keep telling the same lies over and over?

Fact check: Courts have dismissed multiple lawsuits of alleged electoral fraud presented by Trump campaign

Following President Joe Biden’s swearing in on Jan. 20, a Facebook post shared over 6,140 times has said: “Not one court has looked at the evidence and said that Biden legally won. Not one”. This is false: state and federal judges dismissed more than 50 lawsuits presented by then President...

www.reuters.com

Reuters won’t be good enough for loony birds like Tory.
What do Hateway Pundit and DailySmeller have to say on the matter?

RIGHT, Glove. Reuters who says in their article that THE SOURCE OF THEIR "CONCLUSIONS" was to simply regurgitate the claims from other people they take on face value, with no actual investigative journalism of their own, is the Left's new unimpeachable source? And who did they rely on? Independent bodies doing extensive data crunching and voter machine testing and witness reviewing?

No.

They simply took the word of governors who only take the word of others, and election officials, who if there was any fraud, WERE THE ONES OVERSEEING IT!

Meantime, you keep forgetting the 80 odd leftwing groups who have ALREADY PROUDLY ADMITTED to stealing the election.

Whoops.

But that is "good enough" for you and should be "good enough" for us?

WE AIN'T FUCKING STUPID YOU SHITHEAD and we didn't fall off a turnip truck yesterday.

"Meantime, you keep forgetting the 80 odd leftwing groups who have ALREADY PROUDLY ADMITTED to stealing the election".

List Them. Or you're going to force me to believe..you really are stupid. You didn't fall off the turnip truck. People pushed you off for being a douche.

 

[toobfreak]

19

Another day, another.....


View attachment 498387

Another day, another.....

Another day, another.....


View attachment 498387

There's going to be a reckoning, and I reckon that Giuliani isn't going to like it one bit. Feel free to send him money for his defense.

Can't you clowns give it a rest for one day?....Just one?

Right after you clowns stop screaming about "stolen elections".

So basically, never, despite the fact that all the evidence and truth is on our side.

What evidence? I keep hearing people talk about evidence when they're standing at a microphone somewhere, but it's never presented when they're in a court of law. Why do you think that is?

Risk of sanctions and/or disbarment. Same reason reputable firms all turned tail and Donnie was stuck with maniacal has beens like Rudy, Sidney & Lin Wood.

Believe it or not, here's what we're expected to believe: A lawyer who represents the president of the United States and who claims he is in possession of evidence that there was massive fraud in the presidential election finally goes to a court of law. It's his (or her) opportunity to make the biggest splash of their collective careers by providing world-grabbing headlines of voter fraud which potentially changed the outcome of a national election, and what happens?

No evidence is presented!

That kind of says it all, doesn't it?

No evidence was ever presented because of this little thing called "standing". I suggest you get an elementary school student look it up and explain it to you.

This is a load of horse hockey. Why do we keep telling the same lies over and over?

Fact check: Courts have dismissed multiple lawsuits of alleged electoral fraud presented by Trump campaign

Following President Joe Biden’s swearing in on Jan. 20, a Facebook post shared over 6,140 times has said: “Not one court has looked at the evidence and said that Biden legally won. Not one”. This is false: state and federal judges dismissed more than 50 lawsuits presented by then President...

www.reuters.com

Oh Jack, you really need to take an enema and blow it out your ass! The NERVE of you: you fish around to find an article saying what you WANT to hear, then you copy that as "the facts." Worse, you choose a source which vets NOT ONE of the over-one hundred points of election contention proving not any of them false! Instead, amazingly, Reuters' pathetic "fact-check" team simply quotes third parties and takes THEIR claims at face value even if they could be part of the problem, saying: "Independent experts, governors and state election officials from both parties say there was no evidence of widespread fraud."

View attachment 499574

WHAT experts? HOW are they "independent?" Independent from what and who? And what would a governor know other than whatever crap others tell him?! And state election officials? Aren't these the ones who would be overseeing any fraud if there was any? That's like asking the Federal government if they cheated the Indians!

Never mind the fact that many people and organizations have already come forward, as I've detailed many times, and ADMITTED to the cheating. They BRAG about it. Time Magazine put out an extensive article patting them on the back giving credit to them as a "SHADOW ORGANIZATION" working behind the scenes to ENSURE that Trump was never reelected by working collectively to generate millions upon millions of additional Biden paper ballots which millions in funding from interested corporate 3rd parties paid for. That's illegal Jack.

Biden's election is as phony as a $3 bill, and while you are out there citing a third party news organization for taking the word of other third parties (there's real news journalism for you!), not only doesn't Reuters even attempt to discount a SINGLE election dispute among a hundred, they like you pretend this shadow organization of far leftwing groups haven't ALREADY TAKEN CREDIT FOR STEALING THE ELECTION!

But don't worry Jack. Once these audits are over, my schedule frees up and I feel all data is finally in, I am going to put it all together in a thread where we will take a serious look at everything, drawing what conclusions are possible from the KNOWN FACTS, not just take the word of some possibly compromised, interested third party's word for it.

In effect, all Reuters did was take the word of other people telling them what they wanted to hear much like every other jackass out there all bleating that the fraud has been "debunked."

Everyone is just quoting everyone else (except those claiming the fraud) and not actually doing any real investigation of their own.

Like you.

Over 50 lawsuits were dismissed for "lack of evidence".

QUIT YER LYING Jack. You're a filthy fucking liar. Quit making claims with no documentation to back it up. The cases were declined or dismissed (the court decides not to hear them at all or simply wipes them off the docket upon a precursory examination of where the person bringing the case, like Texas, has "standing" to even bring it).

And what does it say for the quality of our courts when there are EIGHTY-SOME groups out there already admitting and taking credit for STEALING THE ELECTION?!

The steal the courts say there was no standing to dispute?

You fuckers can't even keep your stories straight: one day you claim there were 50 cases dismissed, another day it is 60 some cases then another day, over 70.

But even at that, ask yourself: DID A SINGLE COURT FIND THE FRAUD CASE BASELESS BECAUSE 40 OTHER COURTS DISMISSED THEM? No? Well, if the court cannot use the actions of another court as the basis for finding the decision for their own, they WHY DO YOU?

 

[surada]

Another day, another.....


View attachment 498387

Another day, another.....

Another day, another.....


View attachment 498387

There's going to be a reckoning, and I reckon that Giuliani isn't going to like it one bit. Feel free to send him money for his defense.

Can't you clowns give it a rest for one day?....Just one?

Right after you clowns stop screaming about "stolen elections".

So basically, never, despite the fact that all the evidence and truth is on our side.

What evidence? I keep hearing people talk about evidence when they're standing at a microphone somewhere, but it's never presented when they're in a court of law. Why do you think that is?

Risk of sanctions and/or disbarment. Same reason reputable firms all turned tail and Donnie was stuck with maniacal has beens like Rudy, Sidney & Lin Wood.

Believe it or not, here's what we're expected to believe: A lawyer who represents the president of the United States and who claims he is in possession of evidence that there was massive fraud in the presidential election finally goes to a court of law. It's his (or her) opportunity to make the biggest splash of their collective careers by providing world-grabbing headlines of voter fraud which potentially changed the outcome of a national election, and what happens?

No evidence is presented!

That kind of says it all, doesn't it?

How much does Langley pay you shills to lie America hater

Langley? Hahahaha.. Damn you're pathetic.

Biden voters are pathetic.

AND most importantly,hate America

Nope. Biden voters are patriots and for the most part have better manners than Trump hardliners.. That's why only 35% of the Republicans still back Trump.. He's much too violent and uncouth for most Conservatives..

 

[surada]

19

Another day, another.....


View attachment 498387

Another day, another.....

Another day, another.....


View attachment 498387

There's going to be a reckoning, and I reckon that Giuliani isn't going to like it one bit. Feel free to send him money for his defense.

Can't you clowns give it a rest for one day?....Just one?

Right after you clowns stop screaming about "stolen elections".

So basically, never, despite the fact that all the evidence and truth is on our side.

What evidence? I keep hearing people talk about evidence when they're standing at a microphone somewhere, but it's never presented when they're in a court of law. Why do you think that is?

Risk of sanctions and/or disbarment. Same reason reputable firms all turned tail and Donnie was stuck with maniacal has beens like Rudy, Sidney & Lin Wood.

Believe it or not, here's what we're expected to believe: A lawyer who represents the president of the United States and who claims he is in possession of evidence that there was massive fraud in the presidential election finally goes to a court of law. It's his (or her) opportunity to make the biggest splash of their collective careers by providing world-grabbing headlines of voter fraud which potentially changed the outcome of a national election, and what happens?

No evidence is presented!

That kind of says it all, doesn't it?

No evidence was ever presented because of this little thing called "standing". I suggest you get an elementary school student look it up and explain it to you.

This is a load of horse hockey. Why do we keep telling the same lies over and over?

Fact check: Courts have dismissed multiple lawsuits of alleged electoral fraud presented by Trump campaign

Following President Joe Biden’s swearing in on Jan. 20, a Facebook post shared over 6,140 times has said: “Not one court has looked at the evidence and said that Biden legally won. Not one”. This is false: state and federal judges dismissed more than 50 lawsuits presented by then President...

www.reuters.com

Oh Jack, you really need to take an enema and blow it out your ass! The NERVE of you: you fish around to find an article saying what you WANT to hear, then you copy that as "the facts." Worse, you choose a source which vets NOT ONE of the over-one hundred points of election contention proving not any of them false! Instead, amazingly, Reuters' pathetic "fact-check" team simply quotes third parties and takes THEIR claims at face value even if they could be part of the problem, saying: "Independent experts, governors and state election officials from both parties say there was no evidence of widespread fraud."

View attachment 499574

WHAT experts? HOW are they "independent?" Independent from what and who? And what would a governor know other than whatever crap others tell him?! And state election officials? Aren't these the ones who would be overseeing any fraud if there was any? That's like asking the Federal government if they cheated the Indians!

Never mind the fact that many people and organizations have already come forward, as I've detailed many times, and ADMITTED to the cheating. They BRAG about it. Time Magazine put out an extensive article patting them on the back giving credit to them as a "SHADOW ORGANIZATION" working behind the scenes to ENSURE that Trump was never reelected by working collectively to generate millions upon millions of additional Biden paper ballots which millions in funding from interested corporate 3rd parties paid for. That's illegal Jack.

Biden's election is as phony as a $3 bill, and while you are out there citing a third party news organization for taking the word of other third parties (there's real news journalism for you!), not only doesn't Reuters even attempt to discount a SINGLE election dispute among a hundred, they like you pretend this shadow organization of far leftwing groups haven't ALREADY TAKEN CREDIT FOR STEALING THE ELECTION!

But don't worry Jack. Once these audits are over, my schedule frees up and I feel all data is finally in, I am going to put it all together in a thread where we will take a serious look at everything, drawing what conclusions are possible from the KNOWN FACTS, not just take the word of some possibly compromised, interested third party's word for it.

In effect, all Reuters did was take the word of other people telling them what they wanted to hear much like every other jackass out there all bleating that the fraud has been "debunked."

Everyone is just quoting everyone else (except those claiming the fraud) and not actually doing any real investigation of their own.

Like you.

Over 50 lawsuits were dismissed for "lack of evidence".

QUIT YER LYING Jack. You a filthy fucking liar. Quit making claims with no documentation to back it up. The cases were declined or dismissed (the court decides not to hear them at all or simply wipes them off the docket upon a precursory examination of where the person bringing the case, like Texas, has "standing" to even bring it.

And what does it say for the quality of our courts when there are EIGHTY-SOME groups out there already admitting and taking credit for STEALING THE ELECTION?!

The steal the courts say there was no standing to dispute?

You fuckers can't even keep your stories straight: one day you claim there were 50 cases dismissed, another day it is 60 some cases then another day, over 70.

But even at that, ask yourself: DID A SINGLE COURT FIND THE FRAUD CASE BASELESS BECAUSE 40 OTHER COURTS DISMISSED THEM? No? Well, if the court cannot use the actions of another court as the basis for finding the decision for their own, they WHY DO YOU?

Amazing that Trump's people are too stupid to have considered the need for standing or evidence.

 

[surada]

Another day, another.....


View attachment 498387

Another day, another.....

Another day, another.....


View attachment 498387

There's going to be a reckoning, and I reckon that Giuliani isn't going to like it one bit. Feel free to send him money for his defense.

Can't you clowns give it a rest for one day?....Just one?

Right after you clowns stop screaming about "stolen elections".

So basically, never, despite the fact that all the evidence and truth is on our side.

What evidence? I keep hearing people talk about evidence when they're standing at a microphone somewhere, but it's never presented when they're in a court of law. Why do you think that is?

Risk of sanctions and/or disbarment. Same reason reputable firms all turned tail and Donnie was stuck with maniacal has beens like Rudy, Sidney & Lin Wood.

Believe it or not, here's what we're expected to believe: A lawyer who represents the president of the United States and who claims he is in possession of evidence that there was massive fraud in the presidential election finally goes to a court of law. It's his (or her) opportunity to make the biggest splash of their collective careers by providing world-grabbing headlines of voter fraud which potentially changed the outcome of a national election, and what happens?

No evidence is presented!

That kind of says it all, doesn't it?

How much does Langley pay you shills to lie America hater

Langley? Hahahaha.. Damn you're pathetic.

Biden voters are pathetic.

AND most importantly,hate America

Nope. Biden voters are patriots and for the most part have better manners than Trump hardliners.. That's why only 35% of the Republicans still back Trump..

 

[toobfreak]

Another day, another.....


View attachment 498387

Another day, another.....

Another day, another.....


View attachment 498387

There's going to be a reckoning, and I reckon that Giuliani isn't going to like it one bit. Feel free to send him money for his defense.

Can't you clowns give it a rest for one day?....Just one?

Right after you clowns stop screaming about "stolen elections".

So basically, never, despite the fact that all the evidence and truth is on our side.

What evidence? I keep hearing people talk about evidence when they're standing at a microphone somewhere, but it's never presented when they're in a court of law. Why do you think that is?

Risk of sanctions and/or disbarment. Same reason reputable firms all turned tail and Donnie was stuck with maniacal has beens like Rudy, Sidney & Lin Wood

Believe it or not, here's what we're expected to believe: A lawyer who represents the president of the United States and who claims he is in possession of evidence that there was massive fraud in the presidential election finally goes to a court of law. It's his (or her) opportunity to make the biggest splash of their collective careers by providing world-grabbing headlines of voter fraud which potentially changed the outcome of a national election, and what happens?

No evidence is presented!

That kind of says it all, doesn't it?

No evidence was ever presented because of this little thing called "standing". I suggest you get an elementary school student look it up and explain it to you.

This is a load of horse hockey. Why do we keep telling the same lies over and over?

Fact check: Courts have dismissed multiple lawsuits of alleged electoral fraud presented by Trump campaign

Following President Joe Biden’s swearing in on Jan. 20, a Facebook post shared over 6,140 times has said: “Not one court has looked at the evidence and said that Biden legally won. Not one”. This is false: state and federal judges dismissed more than 50 lawsuits presented by then President...

www.reuters.com

Reuters won’t be good enough for loony birds like Tory.
What do Hateway Pundit and DailySmeller have to say on the matter?

RIGHT, Glove. Reuters who says in their article that THE SOURCE OF THEIR "CONCLUSIONS" was to simply regurgitate the claims from other people they take on face value, with no actual investigative journalism of their own, is the Left's new unimpeachable source? And who did they rely on? Independent bodies doing extensive data crunching and voter machine testing and witness reviewing?

No.

They simply took the word of governors who only take the word of others, and election officials, who if there was any fraud, WERE THE ONES OVERSEEING IT!

Meantime, you keep forgetting the 80 odd leftwing groups who have ALREADY PROUDLY ADMITTED to stealing the election.

Whoops.

But that is "good enough" for you and should be "good enough" for us?

WE AIN'T FUCKING STUPID YOU SHITHEAD and we didn't fall off a turnip truck yesterday.

"Meantime, you keep forgetting the 80 odd leftwing groups who have ALREADY PROUDLY ADMITTED to stealing the election".

List Them. Or you're going to force me to believe..you really are stupid. You didn't fall off the turnip truck. People pushed you off for being a douche.

How many times? I've got 30-40 idiots like you here who all want proof while standing on one leg that they won't believe anyway when I give it. I'VE ALREADY LISTED THE NAMES NUMEROUS TIMES! How is it Jack that you never see it?

I just posted the names again a few posts ago. And I will post them again in my future thread, where we will get at the truth, not just "he said she said he said."

Meantime here you are arguing there is no evidence of fraud just because a bunch of courts refused to take up consideration of the election all the while a bunch of people HAVE ALREADY ADMITTED STEALING THE ELECTION!

You've just lowered the bar on a new definition of 'Stupid.'

 

[bripat9643]

Biden voters are pathetic.

AND most importantly,hate America

Nope. Biden voters are patriots and for the most part have better manners than Trump hardliners.. That's why only 35% of the Republicans still back Trump..

90% of Republicans back Trump, you lying moron.

Here are some example of the manners of Biden voters:

 

[surada]

Biden voters are pathetic.

AND most importantly,hate America

Nope. Biden voters are patriots and for the most part have better manners than Trump hardliners.. That's why only 35% of the Republicans still back Trump..

90% of Republicans back Trump, you lying moron.

Here are some example of the manners of Biden voters:

Not since Jan 6th.. Most Republicans value our country and don't have your inferiority complex.

 

[toobfreak]

Biden voters are pathetic.

AND most importantly,hate America

Nope. Biden voters are patriots and for the most part have better manners than Trump hardliners.. That's why only 35% of the Republicans still back Trump..

90% of Republicans back Trump, you lying moron.

Here are some example of the manners of Biden voters:

Best evidence I've seen so far of a real insurrection, masked thugs attacking federal buildings with circular saws, mototov cocktails, and burned American flags.

Burning the flag is a pretty clear indication you don't exactly hold the USA in high regard and should make you considered an enemy of the state and put on an FBI watch list.

 

[surada]

Biden voters are pathetic.

AND most importantly,hate America

Nope. Biden voters are patriots and for the most part have better manners than Trump hardliners.. That's why only 35% of the Republicans still back Trump..

90% of Republicans back Trump, you lying moron.

Here are some example of the manners of Biden voters:

Best evidence I've seen so far of a real insurrection, masked thugs attacking federal buildings with circular saws, mototov cocktails, and burned American flags.

Burning the flag is a pretty clear indication you don't exactly hold the USA in high regard and should make you considered an enemy of the state and put on an FBI watch list.

Burning the flag is legal.

 

[WEATHER53]

Vindictiveness is nourishment among otherwise soul starved libbies
Behind bars yet??

 

[WEATHER53]

rudy conducted one, and ukraine conducted one

LOL

You just can't stop lying, huh? Again, Rudy asked Ukraine to conduct an investigation.

and the clinton campaign hired a foreigner to conduct one

You're lying about that too. Again, Hillary, who has nothing to do with this btw, hired an American firm.

when steele delivered his report

Looks like you're lying about this too. Post the date she got it or you're lying.

That you can't stop lying reveals just how fragile your position is.

Hillary has everything to do with it. She paid for it. How is that not having something to do with it?

You're lying again. You really should stop because you only hurt your own position. Of course Giuliani asked Ukraine to investigate Biden...

"And all we need… all we need from the President is to say: I'm gonna put an honest prosecutor in charge, he's gonna investigate and dig up the evidence, that presently exists and is there any other evidence about involvement of the 2016 election."​

And Hillary has nothing to do with Rudy. You're obviously deflecting to mitigate damage to Rudy.

And dates showing Hillary gained possession of the dossier, as it appears you lied about that too.

No one said Hillary had anything to do with Rudy. She had to do with hiring Christopher Steel. The guy was on her payroll. Hillary gained possession when Fusion GPS hired Christopher Steel.

Who are you trying to fool?

Nope, he was on Fusion GPS payroll. Sweet, huh?

Fusion GPS was on her payroll.

No one is fooled.

Correct and Fusion GPS is an American firm.

That put a foreigner on its payroll while in the employ of Hillary Clinton.

Liar.

Chris Steele is a Brit..hence a foreign national...he was on the pay roll for his spying

Yes Hillary admitted that but disguised it as oppositional research rather than the fakery Muller identified it to be.

 

[Faun]

rudy conducted one, and ukraine conducted one

LOL

You just can't stop lying, huh? Again, Rudy asked Ukraine to conduct an investigation.

and the clinton campaign hired a foreigner to conduct one

You're lying about that too. Again, Hillary, who has nothing to do with this btw, hired an American firm.

when steele delivered his report

Looks like you're lying about this too. Post the date she got it or you're lying.

That you can't stop lying reveals just how fragile your position is.

Hillary has everything to do with it. She paid for it. How is that not having something to do with it?

You're lying again. You really should stop because you only hurt your own position. Of course Giuliani asked Ukraine to investigate Biden...

"And all we need… all we need from the President is to say: I'm gonna put an honest prosecutor in charge, he's gonna investigate and dig up the evidence, that presently exists and is there any other evidence about involvement of the 2016 election."​

And Hillary has nothing to do with Rudy. You're obviously deflecting to mitigate damage to Rudy.

And dates showing Hillary gained possession of the dossier, as it appears you lied about that too.

No one said Hillary had anything to do with Rudy. She had to do with hiring Christopher Steel. The guy was on her payroll. Hillary gained possession when Fusion GPS hired Christopher Steel.

Who are you trying to fool?

Nope, he was on Fusion GPS payroll. Sweet, huh?

Fusion GPS was on her payroll.

No one is fooled.

Correct and Fusion GPS is an American firm.

That put a foreigner on its payroll while in the employ of Hillary Clinton.

It doesn’t make any difference how compelling, documented, and objective the evidence of rightwing crimes and incompetence – dishonest conservatives will still ignore, deflect, and lie.

but all your evidence of so called crimes is what the dnc and clinton did as well...well minus the fact Rudy is a US citizen and who they hired was a foreign spy

Nope, not the same.

Hillary solicited campaign aid from an American firm. Rudy, an American, solicited campaign aid from a foreign national.

so the american firm clinton hired is “guilty” of what rudy’s firm did?

and trump is as “guilty” as clinton for hiring rudy and she is for hiring the american. firm

They might be. As far as Trump, he too is guilty and should be charged by the DoJ since he to solicited campaign aid from a foreign national.

Wrong, shit for brains. Investigating corrupt politicians is not "soliciting campaign aid," no matter how much you want it to be.

Fucking moron -- what's the purpose of investigating corrupt politicians?

 

[Faun]

rudy conducted one, and ukraine conducted one

LOL

You just can't stop lying, huh? Again, Rudy asked Ukraine to conduct an investigation.

and the clinton campaign hired a foreigner to conduct one

You're lying about that too. Again, Hillary, who has nothing to do with this btw, hired an American firm.

when steele delivered his report

Looks like you're lying about this too. Post the date she got it or you're lying.

That you can't stop lying reveals just how fragile your position is.

Hillary has everything to do with it. She paid for it. How is that not having something to do with it?

You're lying again. You really should stop because you only hurt your own position. Of course Giuliani asked Ukraine to investigate Biden...

"And all we need… all we need from the President is to say: I'm gonna put an honest prosecutor in charge, he's gonna investigate and dig up the evidence, that presently exists and is there any other evidence about involvement of the 2016 election."​

And Hillary has nothing to do with Rudy. You're obviously deflecting to mitigate damage to Rudy.

And dates showing Hillary gained possession of the dossier, as it appears you lied about that too.

No one said Hillary had anything to do with Rudy. She had to do with hiring Christopher Steel. The guy was on her payroll. Hillary gained possession when Fusion GPS hired Christopher Steel.

Who are you trying to fool?

Nope, he was on Fusion GPS payroll. Sweet, huh?

Fusion GPS was on her payroll.

No one is fooled.

Correct and Fusion GPS is an American firm.

That put a foreigner on its payroll while in the employ of Hillary Clinton.

Yeah, so?

They broke our election laws, moron.

LOLOL

You failed to prove that, fucking moron. Again, you have to show she was involved with hiring Steele. Just saying, she had to have been only proves you're a fucking moron.

No you don't, NAZI. Both she and Fusion GPS knew the law. They also knew that Christopher Steel was a foreigner.

Case closed.

Have you ever heard of Paul Singer. He's a Jewish Billionaire Republican who hated Trump.

Trump dossier triggered by website funded by Jewish GOP mega-donor

Washington Free Beacon, supported by pro-Israel philanthropist Paul Singer, says it retained firm to do opposition research, but denies knowledge of file with damning allegations

www.timesofisrael.com

What does that matter? HIllary paid him. Case closed.

Except she didn't. You're still lying. She paid Fusion GPS.

 

[Faun]

rudy conducted one, and ukraine conducted one

LOL

You just can't stop lying, huh? Again, Rudy asked Ukraine to conduct an investigation.

and the clinton campaign hired a foreigner to conduct one

You're lying about that too. Again, Hillary, who has nothing to do with this btw, hired an American firm.

when steele delivered his report

Looks like you're lying about this too. Post the date she got it or you're lying.

That you can't stop lying reveals just how fragile your position is.

Hillary has everything to do with it. She paid for it. How is that not having something to do with it?

You're lying again. You really should stop because you only hurt your own position. Of course Giuliani asked Ukraine to investigate Biden...

"And all we need… all we need from the President is to say: I'm gonna put an honest prosecutor in charge, he's gonna investigate and dig up the evidence, that presently exists and is there any other evidence about involvement of the 2016 election."​

And Hillary has nothing to do with Rudy. You're obviously deflecting to mitigate damage to Rudy.

And dates showing Hillary gained possession of the dossier, as it appears you lied about that too.

No one said Hillary had anything to do with Rudy. She had to do with hiring Christopher Steel. The guy was on her payroll. Hillary gained possession when Fusion GPS hired Christopher Steel.

Who are you trying to fool?

Nope, he was on Fusion GPS payroll. Sweet, huh?

Fusion GPS was on her payroll.

No one is fooled.

Correct and Fusion GPS is an American firm.

That put a foreigner on its payroll while in the employ of Hillary Clinton.

Yeah, so?

They broke our election laws, moron.

LOLOL

You failed to prove that, fucking moron. Again, you have to show she was involved with hiring Steele. Just saying, she had to have been only proves you're a fucking moron.

No you don't, NAZI. Both she and Fusion GPS knew the law. They also knew that Christopher Steel was a foreigner.

Case closed.

Have you ever heard of Paul Singer. He's a Jewish Billionaire Republican who hated Trump.

Trump dossier triggered by website funded by Jewish GOP mega-donor

Washington Free Beacon, supported by pro-Israel philanthropist Paul Singer, says it retained firm to do opposition research, but denies knowledge of file with damning allegations

www.timesofisrael.com

What does that matter? HIllary paid him. Case closed.

No she didn't.. You don't have any shame.. That's why you voted for Trump... Neither does he.. NO lie is too vile for Trump.

No one even questions the fact that Hillary paid for the Steel dossier.

Let's see if you have the stones to answer this where others have failed...

When did she get the dossier?

 

[Faun]

Giuliani is some very serious legal trouble here. When this is combined with all the other likely upcoming charges against Rudy, he'd better get himself the best lawyer he can find because he's sure going to need help staying out of prison.

And in case anyone misses the point, any criminal conspiracy to commit a crime which is planned and executed by a lawyer and his client effectively negates any protections of a lawyer/client privileged and confidential communication.

I certainly hope that Giuliani is fully prepared for when Trump disavows any knowledge of what his lawyer was doing because that's been Trump's MO for decades.

Exclusive: New audio of 2019 phone call reveals how Giuliani pressured Ukraine to investigate baseless Biden conspiracies

Never-before-heard audio, obtained exclusively by CNN, shows how former President Donald Trump's longtime adviser Rudy Giuliani relentlessly pressured and coaxed the Ukrainian government in 2019 to investigate baseless conspiracies about then-candidate Joe Biden.

www.cnn.com

What a read. They sure are a dirty bunch.

Telling the Ukraines to hire a non corrupt prosecutor is a crime to you?

That's not, but trying to get a foreign national to eliminate a political rival is.

Lock him up!

what's the code section?

The only people I know that have actually hired a foreign national to "eliminate" a political rival is the DNC and Clinton when they hired Steele....don't you remember that?

No, I don't remember that. My recollection is that Hillary hired Fusion GPS, an American based firm.

GPS Fusion, who then hired a foreigner. The fact that the process is one step remove doesn't get her off the hook. If it did, then candidates could pour unlimited amounts into foreign firms with the simple expedient of having their law firm spend the money.

Of course it does, unless you can show she was involved in the hiring of Christopher Steele. Just because you don't understand the law doesn't mean Hillary broke it.

what law are you referring to?

the principal-agent relationship and the law makes her responsible for her agents actions

I see nothing in the law that makes her responsible for the who Fusion GPS hired unless she was involved with who they hired.

And the law of which I speak is...

§30121 Contributions and donations by foreign nationals​

​

(a) Prohibition​

​

It shall be unlawful for-​

​

(1) a foreign national, directly or indirectly, to make-​

​

(A) a contribution or donation of money or other thing of value, or to make an express or implied promise to make a contribution or donation, in connection with a Federal, State, or local election;​

​

(B) a contribution or donation to a committee of a political party; or​

​

(C) an expenditure, independent expenditure, or disbursement for an electioneering communication (within the meaning of section 30104(f)(3) of this title); or​

​

(2) a person to solicit, accept, or receive a contribution or donation described in subparagraph (A) or (B) of paragraph (1) from a foreign national.​

​

​

oh it wasn’t a donation...she didn’t violate that law. She paid the foreign national

As a benefit to Trump's campaign, it qualified as a contribution or other thing of value.

Rudy was being paid...moreover is an american...he’s allowed to investigate and collect Op Reseach!

LOL

Uh, no, not even an American like Rudy is permitted by law to solicit campaign aid from a foreign national. I showed you the law... I don't see any exemptions in there for Rudy.

he’s certainly alllowe to ask for informasrik. the same the clinton campaign did with their agent Steele.

He wasn't simply asking for information. Why do you feel the need to lie like that? He asked the president of another country to find dirt on one of Trump's political rivals. And he asked for it to be public, so that it would politically damage Biden.

sure he was

just like steele did...and made it public

Nope, you're lying. He asked a foreign national to launch an investigation into Biden.

And why am I still waiting for you to show when Hillary took possession of the dossier?

rudy conducted one, and ukraine conducted one

and the clinton campaign hired a foreigner to conduct one

when steele delivered his report

Rudy conducted an investigation? That's a laugh!

Rudy had no official gov't office from which to launch an investigation. He's a private citizen. He has no power to compel testimony under penalty of indictment or perjury.

But you can bet that he dropped President Trump's name at every opportunity as both a potential financial carrot of financial aid and a potential stick of a public rhetorical payback to anyone who decided to willingly climb aboard the Trump bandwagon of an anti-Biden campaign of disinformation.

private citizens can conduct investigations

they do it all the time

Giuliani is some very serious legal trouble here. When this is combined with all the other likely upcoming charges against Rudy, he'd better get himself the best lawyer he can find because he's sure going to need help staying out of prison.

And in case anyone misses the point, any criminal conspiracy to commit a crime which is planned and executed by a lawyer and his client effectively negates any protections of a lawyer/client privileged and confidential communication.

I certainly hope that Giuliani is fully prepared for when Trump disavows any knowledge of what his lawyer was doing because that's been Trump's MO for decades.

Exclusive: New audio of 2019 phone call reveals how Giuliani pressured Ukraine to investigate baseless Biden conspiracies

Never-before-heard audio, obtained exclusively by CNN, shows how former President Donald Trump's longtime adviser Rudy Giuliani relentlessly pressured and coaxed the Ukrainian government in 2019 to investigate baseless conspiracies about then-candidate Joe Biden.

www.cnn.com

What a read. They sure are a dirty bunch.

Telling the Ukraines to hire a non corrupt prosecutor is a crime to you?

That's not, but trying to get a foreign national to eliminate a political rival is.

Lock him up!

what's the code section?

The only people I know that have actually hired a foreign national to "eliminate" a political rival is the DNC and Clinton when they hired Steele....don't you remember that?

No, I don't remember that. My recollection is that Hillary hired Fusion GPS, an American based firm.

GPS Fusion, who then hired a foreigner. The fact that the process is one step remove doesn't get her off the hook. If it did, then candidates could pour unlimited amounts into foreign firms with the simple expedient of having their law firm spend the money.

Of course it does, unless you can show she was involved in the hiring of Christopher Steele. Just because you don't understand the law doesn't mean Hillary broke it.

what law are you referring to?

the principal-agent relationship and the law makes her responsible for her agents actions

I see nothing in the law that makes her responsible for the who Fusion GPS hired unless she was involved with who they hired.

And the law of which I speak is...

§30121 Contributions and donations by foreign nationals​

​

(a) Prohibition​

​

It shall be unlawful for-​

​

(1) a foreign national, directly or indirectly, to make-​

​

(A) a contribution or donation of money or other thing of value, or to make an express or implied promise to make a contribution or donation, in connection with a Federal, State, or local election;​

​

(B) a contribution or donation to a committee of a political party; or​

​

(C) an expenditure, independent expenditure, or disbursement for an electioneering communication (within the meaning of section 30104(f)(3) of this title); or​

​

(2) a person to solicit, accept, or receive a contribution or donation described in subparagraph (A) or (B) of paragraph (1) from a foreign national.​

​

​

oh it wasn’t a donation...she didn’t violate that law. She paid the foreign national

As a benefit to Trump's campaign, it qualified as a contribution or other thing of value.

Rudy was being paid...moreover is an american...he’s allowed to investigate and collect Op Reseach!

LOL

Uh, no, not even an American like Rudy is permitted by law to solicit campaign aid from a foreign national. I showed you the law... I don't see any exemptions in there for Rudy.

he’s certainly alllowe to ask for informasrik. the same the clinton campaign did with their agent Steele.

He wasn't simply asking for information. Why do you feel the need to lie like that? He asked the president of another country to find dirt on one of Trump's political rivals. And he asked for it to be public, so that it would politically damage Biden.

sure he was

just like steele did...and made it public

Nope, you're lying. He asked a foreign national to launch an investigation into Biden.

And why am I still waiting for you to show when Hillary took possession of the dossier?

rudy conducted one, and ukraine conducted one

and the clinton campaign hired a foreigner to conduct one

when steele delivered his report

Rudy conducted an investigation? That's a laugh!

Rudy had no official gov't office from which to launch an investigation. He's a private citizen. He has no power to compel testimony under penalty of indictment or perjury.

But you can bet that he dropped President Trump's name at every opportunity as both a potential financial carrot of financial aid and a potential stick of a public rhetorical payback to anyone who decided to willingly climb aboard the Trump bandwagon of an anti-Biden campaign of disinformation.

what makes you think the Govt has a monopoly on the investigation business?

private citizens can and do conduct investigations all the time

You mean like a woman hiring a PI because she believes her husband is having an affair?

Other than that, a person who 'thinks' he's investigating someone just might find himself arrested for stalking.

There was always something suspicious about Trump using Giuliani and sending him to Ukraine.

You see, as president, Trump had the full weight of the US gov't at his disposal. That includes ambassadors and state dept. officials. But Trump was not only trying to circumvent proper channels, he wanted to keep what he was doing a secret. In fact, Giuliani actually undermined the US Ambassador to Ukraine, Marie Yovanovitch. Why did that happen? Why was a private citizen who was working as the personal lawyer to the President, flying half way around the world to undermine a US ambassador in the minds of Us and Ukrainian officials? That's VERY suspicious!

or someone hiring a lawyer...lawyers investigate

or a campaign hiring a foreign spy to gather OP Research

You can investigate something without stalking someone...geez

There is absolutely nothing illegal about Rudy asking Ukraine officials to make public their probe of the Bidens activities with a corrupt gas company

Then why did Trump & Giuliani try to get them to publicly open an investigation? What did he hope to gain?