Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The one with the most votes shouldn't win? Not what you said.It always amazes me when people who pretend to be adults can't answer yes and no questions. They can spin all day long but can never put their asses on the line. So typical of Americans. But hey, we have one answer to should the person with the most votes win? It's even correct. Amazing.
No, they shouldn’t.
And you felt the need to repeat what you have said a dozen times already why exactly? I told you no one is crying, we are fixing it.We will. Not to worry.No, you fix the fucking broken system.If you don’t like the system, then go away.
Then work to fix it. If you get the law changed, then I’m good with it.
Good fix it and quit crying and being stupid.
The one with the most votes shouldn't win? Not what you said.It always amazes me when people who pretend to be adults can't answer yes and no questions. They can spin all day long but can never put their asses on the line. So typical of Americans. But hey, we have one answer to should the person with the most votes win? It's even correct. Amazing.
No, they shouldn’t.
Let's play a game with that though. The Electoral College votes for 200 for A and 101 for B but the Supreme Court says no, the votes of those who voted for B count as two votes each so B wins. Fair or unfair?
Save your crap for the toilet, troll.That's not a talking point, that's what he believes in. Some votes are more equal than mine.Got any more ridiculous talking points?A shame you don't approve of one man one vote. You want yours to count twice, three times?2 cities don't get to decide just because they have a higher population density. The definition of a true democracy. 1 woman/5 men. The men all vote to rape the woman.
no, they aren't
that's why I called it a talking point.
You've been fed, and ate greedily at the trough, so much hogwash, I doubt you ever make it back to sanity.
Unlike you I am perfectly rational.I deal with it fine but it needs to be tossed, like the Constitution itself. It is, by definition, undemocratic. Get it?If you don't want to play then go away.This is burning down like an open mic with Eminem ...
The structure of democracy is not entirely based on one man one vote. State entities (x50) have rights and so do the entities of the individual districts therein. And as far as 1 man one vote you're definitely for tossing it up anyways, ms katiek. Meanwhile, you're running around knowing what it is in some fantasy that youre leading the entire forum in their own arguments.
Hey you're the one that can't deal with it.
How youre arguing that doing away with it is democratic and taking yourself seriously is beyond us. You're not serious at all, go yell at an inanimate object. I'm certain youre hysterical right now.
No one is crying about it. And it's going to be changed like the rest of the Constitution. Soon.
Meh, maybe. That aside, it is still a dumbarse idea.
Then work to change it instead of crying about it. Nobody gave a damn about the EC until the left lost. No it’s a dumb idea. You people play victim really well. Every candidate knew the rules, it’s so sad that the left can’t accept why they lost.
No, you fix the fucking broken system.If you don't want to play then go away.This is burning down like an open mic with Eminem ...
The structure of democracy is not entirely based on one man one vote. State entities (x50) have rights and so do the entities of the individual districts therein. And as far as 1 man one vote you're definitely for tossing it up anyways, ms katiek. Meanwhile, you're running around knowing what it is in some fantasy that youre leading the entire forum in their own arguments.
If you don’t like the system, then go away.
And you felt the need to repeat what you have said a dozen times already why exactly? I told you no one is crying, we are fixing it.We will. Not to worry.No, you fix the fucking broken system.If you don’t like the system, then go away.
Then work to fix it. If you get the law changed, then I’m good with it.
Good fix it and quit crying and being stupid.
I told you no one is crying, we are fixing it
The one with the most votes shouldn't win? Not what you said.It always amazes me when people who pretend to be adults can't answer yes and no questions. They can spin all day long but can never put their asses on the line. So typical of Americans. But hey, we have one answer to should the person with the most votes win? It's even correct. Amazing.
No, they shouldn’t.
Let's play a game with that though. The Electoral College votes for 200 for A and 101 for B but the Supreme Court says no, the votes of those who voted for B count as two votes each so B wins. Fair or unfair?
It's hypothetical. It requires thinking. Go back to sleep, Moderator.The one with the most votes shouldn't win? Not what you said.It always amazes me when people who pretend to be adults can't answer yes and no questions. They can spin all day long but can never put their asses on the line. So typical of Americans. But hey, we have one answer to should the person with the most votes win? It's even correct. Amazing.
No, they shouldn’t.
Let's play a game with that though. The Electoral College votes for 200 for A and 101 for B but the Supreme Court says no, the votes of those who voted for B count as two votes each so B wins. Fair or unfair?
when did the Supreme court say that?
It's nonsense
Why should smaller states have a say in a popular election? He's the President of the United State, not the Flyover states.If you did one man one vote what would prevent the smaller states from succeeding because they don't get a say in our elections?
It very much is and many people like it that way because their vote counts more than others which is very, very wrong.No, you fix the fucking broken system.If you don't want to play then go away.This is burning down like an open mic with Eminem ...
The structure of democracy is not entirely based on one man one vote. State entities (x50) have rights and so do the entities of the individual districts therein. And as far as 1 man one vote you're definitely for tossing it up anyways, ms katiek. Meanwhile, you're running around knowing what it is in some fantasy that youre leading the entire forum in their own arguments.
If you don’t like the system, then go away.
system isn't broken
It's hypothetical. It requires thinking. Go back to sleep, Moderator.The one with the most votes shouldn't win? Not what you said.It always amazes me when people who pretend to be adults can't answer yes and no questions. They can spin all day long but can never put their asses on the line. So typical of Americans. But hey, we have one answer to should the person with the most votes win? It's even correct. Amazing.
No, they shouldn’t.
Let's play a game with that though. The Electoral College votes for 200 for A and 101 for B but the Supreme Court says no, the votes of those who voted for B count as two votes each so B wins. Fair or unfair?
when did the Supreme court say that?
It's nonsense
Just a matter of time.No one is crying about it. And it's going to be changed like the rest of the Constitution. Soon.Maybe not, but it's a dumbarse idea that has gone past its use-by date.
Yeah says Hillary Clinton.....
Meh, maybe. That aside, it is still a dumbarse idea.
Then work to change it instead of crying about it. Nobody gave a damn about the EC until the left lost. No it’s a dumb idea. You people play victim really well. Every candidate knew the rules, it’s so sad that the left can’t accept why they lost.
NOt likely
Child, since you want to play, do you have a fair election if some votes count more than others, yes or no?It's hypothetical. It requires thinking. Go back to sleep, Moderator.The one with the most votes shouldn't win? Not what you said.It always amazes me when people who pretend to be adults can't answer yes and no questions. They can spin all day long but can never put their asses on the line. So typical of Americans. But hey, we have one answer to should the person with the most votes win? It's even correct. Amazing.
No, they shouldn’t.
Let's play a game with that though. The Electoral College votes for 200 for A and 101 for B but the Supreme Court says no, the votes of those who voted for B count as two votes each so B wins. Fair or unfair?
when did the Supreme court say that?
It's nonsense
hypothetical...
a lie with no background
If you had thought, you wouldn't have made such a ridiculous statement
Why should smaller states have a say in a popular election? He's the President of the United State, not the Flyover states.If you did one man one vote what would prevent the smaller states from succeeding because they don't get a say in our elections?
Child, since you want to play, do you have a fair election if some votes count more than others, yes or no?It's hypothetical. It requires thinking. Go back to sleep, Moderator.The one with the most votes shouldn't win? Not what you said.No, they shouldn’t.
Let's play a game with that though. The Electoral College votes for 200 for A and 101 for B but the Supreme Court says no, the votes of those who voted for B count as two votes each so B wins. Fair or unfair?
when did the Supreme court say that?
It's nonsense
hypothetical...
a lie with no background
If you had thought, you wouldn't have made such a ridiculous statement
I didn't ask it to I asked would that be fair or unfair? 22 kids in the class, Bob gets 12 votes and Susan gets 10. The teacher makes Susan not Bob class president. Fair or unfair?The one with the most votes shouldn't win? Not what you said.It always amazes me when people who pretend to be adults can't answer yes and no questions. They can spin all day long but can never put their asses on the line. So typical of Americans. But hey, we have one answer to should the person with the most votes win? It's even correct. Amazing.
No, they shouldn’t.
Let's play a game with that though. The Electoral College votes for 200 for A and 101 for B but the Supreme Court says no, the votes of those who voted for B count as two votes each so B wins. Fair or unfair?
The rules of the election of the President are outlined in the Constitution, the Supreme Court cannot nullify the Constitution.
