New DNC President Demostrates Democrats Spew Ignorance and Lies (Electoral College)

This is burning down like an open mic with Eminem ...
The structure of democracy is not entirely based on one man one vote. State entities (x50) have rights and so do the entities of the individual districts therein. And as far as 1 man one vote you're definitely for tossing it up anyways, ms katiek. Meanwhile, you're running around knowing what it is in some fantasy that youre leading the entire forum in their own arguments.
If you don't want to play then go away.

If you don’t like the system, then go away.
No, you fix the fucking broken system.
 
That pesky rule of law.
The pesky law is completely invalid in a democratic republic. Besides that, no problem.

Will of the people? You loved that when it was banning gay marriage just not when it elected Hillary Clinton.

You cant have democracy without law. Please, these total/true democracy problems are from middle and high school. Discuss it wisely.

Allowing 1 State to dictate to the rest of the geographic United Sates is also illegal...per the EC. I gave the rape example because I discerned I was dealing with middle to high school mentalities.
You aren't allowing one state, you are allowing one man one vote, which fucks you good so you don't want any part of it. You'd rather have an undemocratic system than let the people get their way. Fascism.

It is a REPUBLIC not a democracy. It was designed to protect the minority from the tyranny of the majority.

If we were a democracy, gay marriage would be illegal, discrimination would be legal. We are 50 separate and individual states, that are represented. Every state gets a voice. That is why states rights are so important.

There is no country in the world that operates under a true democracy.

I'm refusing to believe this lady thinks she has us strung on a true democracy pitfall argument.
 
It is a REPUBLIC not a democracy. It was designed to protect the minority from the tyranny of the majority.

If we were a democracy, gay marriage would be illegal, discrimination would be legal. We are 50 separate and individual states, that are represented. Every state gets a voice. That is why states rights are so important.

There is no country in the world that operates under a true democracy.

She'll just ignore you and spout the same gibberish about what she has personally defined as a 'majority.' I think she's a bot more and more.
 
Adults answer questions honestly even when they know they're fucked. Little boys, like you, run away like you do.

So you must not be an adult because you refuse to answer why a girl should get out voted and 'fucked' by 5 guys in their little 'Democratic' society. Do you agree the innocent maiden should be defiled by 5 stout men because it's 'Democratic'.....True Democracy at work there. Huh?
I already said, infant, that if the vote is five to rape and one not to then rape is what happens. The majority rules.
 
The pesky law is completely invalid in a democratic republic. Besides that, no problem.

Will of the people? You loved that when it was banning gay marriage just not when it elected Hillary Clinton.

You cant have democracy without law. Please, these total/true democracy problems are from middle and high school. Discuss it wisely.

Allowing 1 State to dictate to the rest of the geographic United Sates is also illegal...per the EC. I gave the rape example because I discerned I was dealing with middle to high school mentalities.
You aren't allowing one state, you are allowing one man one vote, which fucks you good so you don't want any part of it. You'd rather have an undemocratic system than let the people get their way. Fascism.

It is a REPUBLIC not a democracy. It was designed to protect the minority from the tyranny of the majority.

If we were a democracy, gay marriage would be illegal, discrimination would be legal. We are 50 separate and individual states, that are represented. Every state gets a voice. That is why states rights are so important.

There is no country in the world that operates under a true democracy.

I'm refusing to believe this lady thinks she has us strung on a true democracy pitfall argument.
Three vote pizza and two tacos, what's for dinner?
 
No, you fix the fucking broken system.

If it ain't broke don't fix it. Commie/lefties are always looking for ways to break the system so they can get their socialist tentacles into our free society.
 
It is a REPUBLIC not a democracy. It was designed to protect the minority from the tyranny of the majority.

If we were a democracy, gay marriage would be illegal, discrimination would be legal. We are 50 separate and individual states, that are represented. Every state gets a voice. That is why states rights are so important.

There is no country in the world that operates under a true democracy.

She'll just ignore you and spout the same gibberish about what she has personally defined as a 'majority.' I think she's a bot more and more.
The majority is 50.01%, little boy.
 
There can be no discussion when the other side refuses to answer a question honestly because if they did, they fail completely.

What a stupid premise. Your questions were not honest in the first place and I already explained that to you. You just keep regurgitating the same effluent....I can to that too....Why would you agree to a Democratic vote to allow the rape of a woman? You have not answered that yet. You have already 'failed completely.'
Two vote tacos, three vote pizza. What do you drive to, Pizza Hut or Taco Bell?

Be a man and answer, for once.

You eat pizza because before you voted you decided the majority would win. Our country is a republic, so your question about would apply in a national election because the individual states have a say.
 
There can be no discussion when the other side refuses to answer a question honestly because if they did, they fail completely.

What a stupid premise. Your questions were not honest in the first place and I already explained that to you. You just keep regurgitating the same effluent....I can to that too....Why would you agree to a Democratic vote to allow the rape of a woman? You have not answered that yet. You have already 'failed completely.'
Two vote tacos, three vote pizza. What do you drive to, Pizza Hut or Taco Bell?

Be a man and answer, for once.

You eat pizza because before you voted you decided the majority would win. Our country is a republic, so your question about would apply in a national election because the individual states have a say.
Be a man and answer. And yes, I know it fucks you into the ground.
 
This is burning down like an open mic with Eminem ...
The structure of democracy is not entirely based on one man one vote. State entities (x50) have rights and so do the entities of the individual districts therein. And as far as 1 man one vote you're definitely for tossing it up anyways, ms katiek. Meanwhile, you're running around knowing what it is in some fantasy that youre leading the entire forum in their own arguments.
If you don't want to play then go away.

Hey you're the one that can't deal with it.
I deal with it fine but it needs to be tossed, like the Constitution itself. It is, by definition, undemocratic. Get it?

We don’t want a democracy, the Constitution protects state and more importantly individual rights. The right to practice our religion of choice, the right to have free speech, the right to assemble, the right of a free press and the list goes on and on.
 
This is burning down like an open mic with Eminem ...
The structure of democracy is not entirely based on one man one vote. State entities (x50) have rights and so do the entities of the individual districts therein. And as far as 1 man one vote you're definitely for tossing it up anyways, ms katiek. Meanwhile, you're running around knowing what it is in some fantasy that youre leading the entire forum in their own arguments.
If you don't want to play then go away.

Hey you're the one that can't deal with it.
I deal with it fine but it needs to be tossed, like the Constitution itself. It is, by definition, undemocratic. Get it?

We don’t want a democracy, the Constitution protects state and more importantly individual rights. The right to practice our religion of choice, the right to have free speech, the right to assemble, the right of a free press and the list goes on and on.
It doesn't protect the right to get who you voted for for the highest office in the land. Pretty fucking useless then.
 
There can be no discussion when the other side refuses to answer a question honestly because if they did, they fail completely.

What a stupid premise. Your questions were not honest in the first place and I already explained that to you. You just keep regurgitating the same effluent....I can to that too....Why would you agree to a Democratic vote to allow the rape of a woman? You have not answered that yet. You have already 'failed completely.'
Two vote tacos, three vote pizza. What do you drive to, Pizza Hut or Taco Bell?

Be a man and answer, for once.

5 men 1 woman...what's for dessert? Be a woman and answer for once.
Spin won't help you, little boy. I have already answered what you cannot. That majority rules. One man one vote.

No they don’t, not in this country, we are a Republic set up to protect the minorities, mob rule is not the rule of law.
 
There can be no discussion when the other side refuses to answer a question honestly because if they did, they fail completely.

What a stupid premise. Your questions were not honest in the first place and I already explained that to you. You just keep regurgitating the same effluent....I can to that too....Why would you agree to a Democratic vote to allow the rape of a woman? You have not answered that yet. You have already 'failed completely.'
Two vote tacos, three vote pizza. What do you drive to, Pizza Hut or Taco Bell?

Be a man and answer, for once.

5 men 1 woman...what's for dessert? Be a woman and answer for once.
Spin won't help you, little boy. I have already answered what you cannot. That majority rules. One man one vote.

No they don’t, not in this country, we are a Republic set up to protect the minorities, mob rule is not the rule of law.
Mob rule is the will of the majority. The majority rules when it comes to electing representatives. Or at least, that's how it's supposed to work. Should the majority get their choice for POTUS, yes or no? Just yes or no.
 

Forum List

Back
Top