Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Not a felony until you can prove beyond a reasonable doubt he took the documents and retained them intentionally.Agreed there is no debate. Biden Broke the law the moment he removed the documents. Does not matter if he returned them 30 or 40 years later voluntarily, he committed a felony each and every time he took one.
Clear now?
Not a felony until you can prove beyond a reasonable doubt he took the documents and retained them intentionally.
That’s not going to be very difficult given the evidence against Trump. Not to mention his obstruction of justice charges.
You also have to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that he took them intentionally when he was not allowed to do so.How else do you not hold them intentionally when you take them intentionally?
Quite the word salad.
Extremely easy with Biden, especially those taken as a Senator. And since Biden is an Attorney, he has absolutely no cover.You also have to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that he took them intentionally when he was not allowed to do so.
Again, not easy to do with Biden. Much easier to with Trump given the evidence.
How do you prove that documents were illegally taken knowingly 50 years ago?Extremely easy with Biden, especially those taken as a Senator. And since Biden is an Attorney, he has absolutely no cover.
As that's the only place they ever sent their "charity" money -- to their own social clubs -- how does that change anything?If Makala is elected:
1. Conservatives stop sending their money to charities EXCEPT churches
lol, because they were taken 50 years ago, and, Joe Biden, an ATTORNEY, never RETURNED THEM.How do you prove that documents were illegally taken knowingly 50 years ago?
It’s not easy at all because it happened so long ago.
With Trump, it was recent and we absolutely know he was obsessed with those documents.
And how are you going to prove they were intentionally taken and intentionally retained? You forgot to answer the questions.lol, because they were taken 50 years ago, and, Joe Biden, an ATTORNEY, never RETURNED THEM.
You deaf or deaf and dumb.
The jury doesn’t need pictures painted for them.And how are you going to prove they were intentionally taken and intentionally retained? You forgot to answer the questions.
Actually they do. Thats what proof beyond a reasonable doubt means.The jury doesn’t need pictures painted for them.
