No, he was carrying ILLEGALLY, hence the charge..and the Judges dismissal of the lame attempt.stop the dumbshit ....
he was carrying --legally and the apes attacked him..carrying just like these ''people''
View attachment 549734
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁
No, he was carrying ILLEGALLY, hence the charge..and the Judges dismissal of the lame attempt.stop the dumbshit ....
he was carrying --legally and the apes attacked him..carrying just like these ''people''
View attachment 549734
In this case, my point is to point out, and laugh at, the ridiculousness of attempting to use a hunting statute to clear someone of using a straw buyer to purchase a weapon illegally, carrying said weapon illegally across a state line--and wielding it, in a situation that he created, to kill people~and ot sayd the judge didnt drop the charge. so whats your point?
thatd true but that was the only thing he was doing.No, he was carrying ILLEGALLY, hence the charge..and the Judges dismissal of the lame attempt.
oh i get it.In this case, my point is to point out, and laugh at, the ridiculousness of attempting to use a hunting statute to clear someone of using a straw buyer to purchase a weapon illegally, carrying said weapon illegally across a state line--and wielding it, in a situation that he created, to kill people~
I hope I was clear enough for you.
That remains to be seen--but somehow I doubt that his lawyers will be using the 'Hunting' defense...LOL!thatd true but that was the only thing he was doing.
Oh, so murder one is self defense. Thanks so much for your insight...if someone is attacking /coming after him, how can that not be self defense?
LOL, he was “illegally” defending himself from being murdered because of the type of weapon he had?Rittenhouse’s defense argues weapon used to kill BLM protesters justified by hunting laws
Attorneys for Kyle Rittenhouse, the Illinois teenager who fatally shot two people during a protest in Wisconsin last year, are […] The post Rittenhouse’s defense argues weapon used to kill BLM protesters justified by hunting laws appeared first on TheGrio.www.yahoo.com
the mans trials are comining up. the defense is trying to get him out the illegal arms violation.
they attacked him first....this is a Kangaroo Court--like what the nazis didOh, so murder one is self defense. Thanks so much for your insight.
Rittenhouse’s defense argues weapon used to kill BLM protesters justified by hunting laws
Attorneys for Kyle Rittenhouse, the Illinois teenager who fatally shot two people during a protest in Wisconsin last year, are […] The post Rittenhouse’s defense argues weapon used to kill BLM protesters justified by hunting laws appeared first on TheGrio.www.yahoo.com
the mans trials are comining up. the defense is trying to get him out the illegal arms violation.
Would you be willing to testify under oath to defend this kid? Your claim that they attacked him first, when there were three of the victims attacking him is absurd. I know you're dumb, but your post is stupid.they attacked him first....this is a Kangaroo Court--like what the nazis did
They hoped to use the hunting defense to get the misdemeanor charge dismissed. But now face the problem of using the hunting defense to fight the misdemeanor, that the jury would use against him in the felony murder charges.That remains to be seen--but somehow I doubt that his lawyers will be using the 'Hunting' defense...LOL!
what you going to do when he gets off on selfdefense>? you a ll liberals were not out their burfing and tearing shit upo this never would have happened.All the republicans salivate at him killing BLM protestors and now have pathetic attempts to justify if by switching the emphasis to guns.
He is a murderer and will be put in jail.
Most if you racist pigs should go with him.
nopeYes he was.
they did and i would. you all liberal punks were not out there buring and tearing siut up it never would have happened.Would you be willing to testify under oath to defend this kid? Your claim that they attacked him first, when there were three of the victims attacking him is absurd. I know you're dumb, but your post is stupid.
correcty just fine him fot beeinig illegals armed and dont klet him have gun til lhe is like 30. problem fixed.LOL, he was “illegally” defending himself from being murdered because of the type of weapon he had?
Lunacy.