EvilCat Breath
Diamond Member
- Sep 23, 2016
- 79,081
- 55,114
- 2,645
It's pretrial motions. In this case a motion in limineit wasnbt it was just one charge they were trying to get dropped.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁
It's pretrial motions. In this case a motion in limineit wasnbt it was just one charge they were trying to get dropped.
yepIt's pretrial motions. In this case a motion in limine
The defense is nuts …From your link:
Attorneys for Kyle Rittenhouse, the Illinois teenager who fatally shot two people during a protest in Wisconsin last year, are trying to get the misdemeanor charge for possession of a deadly weapon dismissed by invoking hunting laws.
Assistant District Attorney Thomas Binger encouraged the defense to tell a jury that Rittenhouse was hunting on the night he shot two Black Lives Matter demonstrators.
“They can submit evidence that the defendant had a certificate to hunt and he was engaged in legal hunting on the streets of Kenosha that night,” Binger said, according to the newspaper.
![]()
Kyle Rittenhouse
As previously reported by theGrio, the teenager from Antioch, Illinois traveled across state lines, armed with what has been described as a “long gun,” purportedly to help support law enforcement and protect public property amid protests over Jacob Blake. Blake was an unarmed Black man who was shot in the back by police.
Yes. But that is their job. By any legal means necessary. You would want the same for yourself or your kid.The defense is nuts …
Clearly, very clearly...the prosecution was openly mocking the Defense. Rightfully so, what bonehead came up with that defense? The optics alone..good grief, it's a misdemeaner possession charge. The lawyers should have advised Kyle to eat the charge...it means nothing.Assistant District Attorney Thomas Binger encouraged the defense to tell a jury that Rittenhouse was hunting on the night he shot two Black Lives Matter demonstrators.
“They can submit evidence that the defendant had a certificate to hunt and he was engaged in legal hunting on the streets of Kenosha that night,” Binger said,
Clearly the prosecution is imposing on the defense.
Maybe there is more at stake. Like, his illegal possession of a weapon has a bearing on the prosecution's arguments for unlawful killing.Clearly, very clearly...the prosecution was openly mocking the Defense. Rightfully so, what bonehead came up with that defense? The optics alone..good grief, it's a misdemeaner possession charge. The lawyers should have advised Kyle to eat the charge...it means nothing.
Now it's a meme. Being a celebrity defendant is very dangerous..most go to jail, if you haven't noticed~
Maybe....I think the image of Kyle manfully owning up to his possessing a weapon would have been a good look...in comparison the hunting metaphors~Maybe there is more at stake. Like, his illegal possession of a weapon has a bearing on the prosecution's arguments for unlawful killing.
Suuuure.... "metaphors"...Maybe....I think the image of Kyle manfully owning up to his possessing a weapon would have been a good look...in comparison the hunting metaphors~
It was never a defense to the crime. The prosecutor, probably woke, thought he would make some woke points with the media. The defense is doing what defense does, strike out lower charges so they don't have to be litigated.Clearly, very clearly...the prosecution was openly mocking the Defense. Rightfully so, what bonehead came up with that defense? The optics alone..good grief, it's a misdemeaner possession charge. The lawyers should have advised Kyle to eat the charge...it means nothing.
Now it's a meme. Being a celebrity defendant is very dangerous..most go to jail, if you haven't noticed~
The trajectory of the pre trial points to acquittal.
IF this case in decided based on it's merits. That is not a sure thing.
If the case is decided in the evidence Rittenhouse will surely walk.IF this case in decided based on it's merits. That is not a sure thing.
I see you have your pre emptive excuses all lined up. Like you always do.If the case is decided in the evidence Rittenhouse will surely walk.
Which child did he murder?I see you have your pre emptive excuses all lined up for the child murderer.
Playing stupid just comes naturally for you, doesn't it?Which child did he murder?
He shot two adult white men. Which was the child ? Where is the charge of harming a child?Playing stupid just comes naturally for you, doesn't it?
Why do you think he's playing?Playing stupid just comes naturally for you, doesn't it?
The shooter.My mistake. He is accused of killing two and wounding a third.
The charges facing Rittenhouse include first-degree intentional homicide, first-degree reckless homicide and attempted first-degree intentional reckless homicide. An additional charge of violation of curfew the night of the shootings was added last week, the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel reported.
Rittenhouse is accused of shooting three men — Anthony Huber and Joseph Rosenbaum, who were killed, and Gaige Grosskreutz, who was seriously wounded —
Which one is the child