You don't get to chase someone, who is unarmed and has not committed a crime, and kill them, and then claim self-defense.
What law would that be under?
Dismissing your lie of omission in the quote, it's in most laws regarding self-defense.
There is evidence from the 911 call that Trayvon had his hand in his waste band and had something. So from a distance was he unarmed?who is unarmed and has not committed a crime
You can kill them if you are defending your life.
So you can stalk and chase someone, and when they defend themselves, you can use deadly force? Do you have a "coon" stamp on your license?
I didn't lieDismissing your lie of omission in the quote, it's in most laws regarding self-defense.
There is evidence from the 911 call that Trayvon had his hand in his waste band and had something. So from a distance was he unarmed?
Is this the lie you think I said? Here you go dumb ass
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jL72w4xiTVU]Trayvon Martin News [SHOCKING FULL] Murder Caught on Tape | Killed By George Zimmerman 911 Call # 1 - YouTube[/ame]
At 56 second now he's coming towards me At 1:04 he's got his hand in his waist band
1:21 he's coming to check me out 1:25 he's got something in his hands. That is the evidence from the 9:11 call you lying sack of shit.
What Zimmerman did is not considered stalking under the law and the use of coons is all in your racist lying mind.So you can stalk and chase someone, and when they defend themselves, you can use deadly force? Do you have a "coon" stamp on your license?