Next time you hear someone criticizing socialism...

[karpenter]

/——/ Why? President Trump isn’t improving the economy fast enough for them?

Yes, That Is It Exactly
Everything Should Have Been Done Last Year
Hell, Before He Was Inaugurated
He Doesn't Have A Magic Wand
But The Experts Said He Would Need One To Do Anything

 

[P@triot]

The next time you hear someone criticizing socialism...congratulate them for being educated and informed.

“Freedom and Bread” was the slogan used by Adolf Hitler during the National Socialist German Workers’ Party (Nazi) campaign against President Paul von Hindenburg. Hitler even promised, “In the Third Reich every German girl will find a husband.”

Only the ignorant parasite class desires socialism.

Socialism Promises a Utopia, but Delivers Suffering

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

The next time you hear someone criticizing socialism...congratulate them for being educated and informed.

“Freedom and Bread” was the slogan used by Adolf Hitler during the National Socialist German Workers’ Party (Nazi) campaign against President Paul von Hindenburg. Hitler even promised, “In the Third Reich every German girl will find a husband.”

Only the ignorant parasite class desires socialism.

Socialism Promises a Utopia, but Delivers Suffering

Hitler even promised, “In the Third Reich every German girl will find a husband.”

He didn't tell them how many would be Russian.

 

[danielpalos]

The next time you hear someone criticizing socialism...congratulate them for being educated and informed.

“Freedom and Bread” was the slogan used by Adolf Hitler during the National Socialist German Workers’ Party (Nazi) campaign against President Paul von Hindenburg. Hitler even promised, “In the Third Reich every German girl will find a husband.”

Only the ignorant parasite class desires socialism.

Socialism Promises a Utopia, but Delivers Suffering

Lousy management does that; we have a Social Constitution.

 

[P@triot]

Lousy management does that; we have a Social Constitution.

And since that has been you excuse for the socialist nations (which have a 100% failure rate), you’ve proven that socialism creates “lousy management”.

 

[basquebromance]

What does socialism even mean these days? Obamacare was originally a conservative idea proposed by the Heritage Foundation and implemented by a GOP Governor (Mittens). all of a sudden when Obama implemented it nationwide, it got cast as "socialism"

socialism means one thing in norway, another in venezuela, God knows what it means in america!

we need IDEAS that the american people agree with.

 

[karpenter]

....implemented by a GOP Governor (Mittens).

Romney Signed The Bill
Because Of It's Popular Support

all of a sudden when Obama implemented it nationwide, it got cast as "socialism"

And It Was Dismantled
In Both Massachusetts AND Vermont
It Reduces Services And Raises Cost
Everywhere It's Implemented
ACA Is Rightly Being Dismantled By Trump

socialism means one thing in norway, another in venezuela, God knows what it means in america!

Hogwash
Socialism Means The Same Everywhere
--- Failure

 

[P@triot]

The next time you hear someone criticizing socialism...congratulate them for being educated and informed.

And yet nothing is based more on greed than socialism. “If you’re in a capitalist economy, the only way you can succeed is by meeting the needs of other people,” he said in a recent interview. “Socialism, on the other hand, focuses you inward. You’re focused on what you can get.”

Only the ignorant parasite class desires socialism.

Socialism, the True Gospel of Greed

 

[SobieskiSavedEurope]

Lousy management does that; we have a Social Constitution.

And since that has been you excuse for the socialist nations (which have a 100% failure rate), you’ve proven that socialism creates “lousy management”.

What kind of lousy management for "US" are the Capitalists creating, by giving much of the American jobs to foreigners, by outsourcing to China, or insourcing Illegals from Mexico?

 

[regent]

Ask them how well capitalism was doing in 1929.
View attachment 245504 View attachment 245506 View attachment 245505

To the extent that capitalism’s problems – inequality, instability (cycles/crises), etc. – stem in part from its production relationships, reforms focused exclusively on regulating or supplanting markets will not succeed in solving them. For example, Keynesian monetary policies (focused on raising or lowering the quantity of money in circulation and, correspondingly, interest rates) do not touch the employer-employee relationship, however much their variations redistribute wealth, regulate markets, or displace markets in favor of state-administered investment decisions. Likewise, Keynesian fiscal policies (raising or lowering taxes and government spending) do not address the employer-employee relationship.

Keynesian policies also never ended the cyclical instability of capitalism. The New Deal and European social democracy left capitalism in place in both state and private units (enterprises) of production notwithstanding their massive reform agendas and programs. They thereby left capitalist employers facing the incentives and receiving the resources (profits) to evade, weaken and eventually dissolve most of those programs.

It is far better not to distribute wealth unequally in the first place than to re-distribute it after to undo the inequality. For example, FDR proposed in 1944 that the government establish a maximum income alongside a minimum wage; that is one among the various ways inequality could be limited and thereby redistribution avoided. Efforts to redistribute encounter evasions, oppositions, and failures that compound the effects of unequal distribution itself. Social peace and cohesion are the victims of redistribution sooner or later. Reforming markets while leaving the relations/organization of capitalist production unchanged is like redistribution. Just as redistribution schemes fail to solve the problems rooted in distribution, market-focused reforms fail to solve the problems rooted in production.

Since 2008, capitalism has showed us all yet again its deep and unsolved problems of cyclical instability, deepening inequality and the injustices they both entail. Their persistence mirrors that of the capitalist organization of production. To successfully confront and solve the problems of economic cycles, income and wealth inequality, and so on, we need to go beyond the capitalist employer-employee system of production. The democratization of enterprises – transitioning from employer-employee hierarchies to worker cooperatives – is a key way available here and now to realize the change we need.

Worker coops democratically decide the distribution of income (wages, bonuses, benefits, profit shares, etc.) among their members. No small group of owners and the boards of directors they choose would, as in capitalist corporations, make such decisions. Thus, for example, it would be far less likely that a few individuals in a worker coop would earn millions while most others could not afford to send children to college. A democratic worker coop decision on the distribution of enterprise income would be far less unequal than what typifies capitalist enterprises. A socialism for the 21st century could and should include the transition from a capitalist to a worker-coop-based economic system as central to its commitments to less inequality and less social conflict over redistribution.

Capitalism Is Not the “Market System”

"democratization of enterprises"
That is some the most hilarious shit I've ever heard and is not the definition of Socialism. You fucking loons have to change wording to make the low-brows swallow your horse shit.
There is no room for innovation and no reason to improve your means in a socialist society why would anyone want to be a Doctor or anything else that pays big money in a capitalistic economy when they would be making pretty much the same as a janitor? .

Got any idea of how types if socialism there are in the world today? Do all types lead to communism?

 

[regent]

....implemented by a GOP Governor (Mittens).

Romney Signed The Bill
Because Of It's Popular Support

all of a sudden when Obama implemented it nationwide, it got cast as "socialism"

And It Was Dismantled
In Both Massachusetts AND Vermont
It Reduces Services And Raises Cost
Everywhere It's Implemented
ACA Is Rightly Being Dismantled By Trump

socialism means one thing in norway, another in venezuela, God knows what it means in america!

Hogwash
Socialism Means The Same Everywhere
--- Failure

How about Christian Socialism does it mean the same as Scientific Socialism?

 

[danielpalos]

Lousy management does that; we have a Social Constitution.

And since that has been you excuse for the socialist nations (which have a 100% failure rate), you’ve proven that socialism creates “lousy management”.

nothing but rhetoric; you understand nothing with that line of reasoning. capitalism "died in 1929" and socialism has been bailing us out ever since.

 

[P@triot]

Lousy management does that; we have a Social Constitution.

And since that has been you excuse for the socialist nations (which have a 100% failure rate), you’ve proven that socialism creates “lousy management”.

nothing but rhetoric; you understand nothing with that line of reasoning. capitalism

You actually proved that “line of reasoning” by crying “lousy management” in 100% of the cases where socialism failed. You proved that socialism creates “lousy management”.

 

[regent]

America has had socialistic programs even before the Constitution was ratified, and we still have socialistic programs.

 

[P@triot]

What kind of lousy management for "US" are the Capitalists creating...by outsourcing to China...?

Capitalists don’t “outsource” to China. The left-wing socialists assholes who make doing business in America too expensive (taxes, regulations, labor unions, etc.) force capitalists to outsource.

 

[SobieskiSavedEurope]

What kind of lousy management for "US" are the Capitalists creating...by outsourcing to China...?

Capitalists don’t “outsource” to China. The left-wing socialists assholes who make doing business in America too expensive (taxes, regulations, labor unions, etc.) force capitalists to outsource.

Unions have seen a massive decline, and at that time Outsourcing saw a massive spike.

Just goes to show how full of cr@p the Capitalist arguments are.

 

[Wyatt earp]

 

[P@triot]

Got any idea of how types if socialism there are in the world today? Do all types lead to communism?

That’s literally has idiotic as saying “do you know how many different types of outer space there are”. Space is space. And socialism is socialism. There isn’t different “types”, genius.

 

[Wyatt earp]

What kind of lousy management for "US" are the Capitalists creating...by outsourcing to China...?

Capitalists don’t “outsource” to China. The left-wing socialists assholes who make doing business in America too expensive (taxes, regulations, labor unions, etc.) force capitalists to outsource.

Unions have seen a massive decline, and at that time Outsourcing saw a massive spike.

Just goes to show how full of cr@p the Capitalist arguments are.

World finally caught up after WWII, the American Unions thought their gravy train would last forever.

 

[danielpalos]

Lousy management does that; we have a Social Constitution.

And since that has been you excuse for the socialist nations (which have a 100% failure rate), you’ve proven that socialism creates “lousy management”.

nothing but rhetoric; you understand nothing with that line of reasoning. capitalism

You actually proved that “line of reasoning” by crying “lousy management” in 100% of the cases where socialism failed. You proved that socialism creates “lousy management”.

Government is socialism.

the problem for the right wing, is that Government solves All problems.