JakeStarkey
Diamond Member
- Aug 10, 2009
- 168,037
- 16,520
- 2,165
- Banned
- #21
Then your concern is problematic and sliding down a slippery slope.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁
Ninth Circuit Court Won 8217 t Reconsider U.S. Flag Shirt Ban At California School CBS Sacramento
so people can skip the retard link the Op provided.
A unanimous three-judge panel in February said past problems gave school officials sufficient and justifiable reasons for their actions. The court said schools have wide latitude in curbing certain civil rights to ensure campus safety.
Schools are not freedom of speech bastions.
You fundamentally misunderstand the issue, as did the judges. When expression of love for one's country is speech that is deemed controversial on school property, then elevating an orderly environment over a patriotic culture is the wrong way to go. Some speech on school grounds can be disorderly and it's right to restrict that speech in order to defuse tensions and return to educating the children. Celebrating one's patriotism SHOULD never be considered disruptive speech. If disruption does arise, then the school needs to address and correct the students who find such speech offensive and make this corrective action a lesson for all other students. Patriotism is a higher value than an orderly school environment. That's where the 9th erred - they're liberals and their values are all screwed up.
When certain symbols are misused to celebrate patriotism in a away that is harmful to some of the citizens, yeah, the jingoists can be told to sit down and behave.
Of course the problem with that in THIS specific case is that the Mexican flag shirts were allowedA. That's bullshit , no matter how you slice it.
Yes, that should not be allowed either if it disrupts the educational process. Equal treatment.
Well no. If it was for a certain day and other kids wore American shirts in a protest like way, it's not the samething. Had this been a normal day and both where doing it Ala gang like, then you would be correct.Ninth Circuit Court Won 8217 t Reconsider U.S. Flag Shirt Ban At California School CBS Sacramento
so people can skip the retard link the Op provided.
A unanimous three-judge panel in February said past problems gave school officials sufficient and justifiable reasons for their actions. The court said schools have wide latitude in curbing certain civil rights to ensure campus safety.
Schools are not freedom of speech bastions.
You fundamentally misunderstand the issue, as did the judges. When expression of love for one's country is speech that is deemed controversial on school property, then elevating an orderly environment over a patriotic culture is the wrong way to go. Some speech on school grounds can be disorderly and it's right to restrict that speech in order to defuse tensions and return to educating the children. Celebrating one's patriotism SHOULD never be considered disruptive speech. If disruption does arise, then the school needs to address and correct the students who find such speech offensive and make this corrective action a lesson for all other students. Patriotism is a higher value than an orderly school environment. That's where the 9th erred - they're liberals and their values are all screwed up.
When certain symbols are misused to celebrate patriotism in a away that is harmful to some of the citizens, yeah, the jingoists can be told to sit down and behave.
Of course the problem with that in THIS specific case is that the Mexican flag shirts were allowed. That's bullshit , no matter how you slice it.
Neat....irrelevant to anything to do with the topicLast I looked, none of those things were required for it to be called a rally.Good point.Ninth Circuit Court Won 8217 t Reconsider U.S. Flag Shirt Ban At California School CBS Sacramento
so people can skip the retard link the Op provided.
A unanimous three-judge panel in February said past problems gave school officials sufficient and justifiable reasons for their actions. The court said schools have wide latitude in curbing certain civil rights to ensure campus safety.
Schools are not freedom of speech bastions.
The judges just ruled that anti-American assholes can force us to stop displaying American pride. Fuck them.
the judges ruled how they always rule in these cases you moron
No more gay rallies at school.
Were the gays waving huge flags, wearing inappropriate clothing or insignia, or trying to french kiss straight kids?
Well no. If it was for a certain day and other kids wore American shirts in a protest like way, it's not the samething. Had this been a normal day and both where doing it Ala gang like, then you would be correct.Ninth Circuit Court Won 8217 t Reconsider U.S. Flag Shirt Ban At California School CBS Sacramento
so people can skip the retard link the Op provided.
A unanimous three-judge panel in February said past problems gave school officials sufficient and justifiable reasons for their actions. The court said schools have wide latitude in curbing certain civil rights to ensure campus safety.
Schools are not freedom of speech bastions.
You fundamentally misunderstand the issue, as did the judges. When expression of love for one's country is speech that is deemed controversial on school property, then elevating an orderly environment over a patriotic culture is the wrong way to go. Some speech on school grounds can be disorderly and it's right to restrict that speech in order to defuse tensions and return to educating the children. Celebrating one's patriotism SHOULD never be considered disruptive speech. If disruption does arise, then the school needs to address and correct the students who find such speech offensive and make this corrective action a lesson for all other students. Patriotism is a higher value than an orderly school environment. That's where the 9th erred - they're liberals and their values are all screwed up.
When certain symbols are misused to celebrate patriotism in a away that is harmful to some of the citizens, yeah, the jingoists can be told to sit down and behave.
Of course the problem with that in THIS specific case is that the Mexican flag shirts were allowed. That's bullshit , no matter how you slice it.
I see you went for the stupid opinion once again. .good for youSo the admin grows a little toothbrush mustache and requires students to stiffly raise their right arms and shout "Heil" when he walks into the room. What fault could the Ninth Circus Court find with that? After after all, no national symbols involved.....
If it was the 4th of July and the rolls where reversed I'd say the same thing.Well no. If it was for a certain day and other kids wore American shirts in a protest like way, it's not the samething. Had this been a normal day and both where doing it Ala gang like, then you would be correct.Ninth Circuit Court Won 8217 t Reconsider U.S. Flag Shirt Ban At California School CBS Sacramento
so people can skip the retard link the Op provided.
Schools are not freedom of speech bastions.
You fundamentally misunderstand the issue, as did the judges. When expression of love for one's country is speech that is deemed controversial on school property, then elevating an orderly environment over a patriotic culture is the wrong way to go. Some speech on school grounds can be disorderly and it's right to restrict that speech in order to defuse tensions and return to educating the children. Celebrating one's patriotism SHOULD never be considered disruptive speech. If disruption does arise, then the school needs to address and correct the students who find such speech offensive and make this corrective action a lesson for all other students. Patriotism is a higher value than an orderly school environment. That's where the 9th erred - they're liberals and their values are all screwed up.
When certain symbols are misused to celebrate patriotism in a away that is harmful to some of the citizens, yeah, the jingoists can be told to sit down and behave.
Of course the problem with that in THIS specific case is that the Mexican flag shirts were allowed. That's bullshit , no matter how you slice it.
that's a bs excuse
You and I both know this was an issue becuase of some previous problems between the two groups. It didn't happen in a vacuum. And thus BOTH shirts were disruptive , but only one was singled out.
If it was the 4th of July and the rolls where reversed I'd say the same thing.Well no. If it was for a certain day and other kids wore American shirts in a protest like way, it's not the samething. Had this been a normal day and both where doing it Ala gang like, then you would be correct.You fundamentally misunderstand the issue, as did the judges. When expression of love for one's country is speech that is deemed controversial on school property, then elevating an orderly environment over a patriotic culture is the wrong way to go. Some speech on school grounds can be disorderly and it's right to restrict that speech in order to defuse tensions and return to educating the children. Celebrating one's patriotism SHOULD never be considered disruptive speech. If disruption does arise, then the school needs to address and correct the students who find such speech offensive and make this corrective action a lesson for all other students. Patriotism is a higher value than an orderly school environment. That's where the 9th erred - they're liberals and their values are all screwed up.
When certain symbols are misused to celebrate patriotism in a away that is harmful to some of the citizens, yeah, the jingoists can be told to sit down and behave.
Of course the problem with that in THIS specific case is that the Mexican flag shirts were allowed. That's bullshit , no matter how you slice it.
that's a bs excuse
You and I both know this was an issue becuase of some previous problems between the two groups. It didn't happen in a vacuum. And thus BOTH shirts were disruptive , but only one was singled out.
If it was the 4th of July and the rolls where reversed I'd say the same thing.Well no. If it was for a certain day and other kids wore American shirts in a protest like way, it's not the samething. Had this been a normal day and both where doing it Ala gang like, then you would be correct.You fundamentally misunderstand the issue, as did the judges. When expression of love for one's country is speech that is deemed controversial on school property, then elevating an orderly environment over a patriotic culture is the wrong way to go. Some speech on school grounds can be disorderly and it's right to restrict that speech in order to defuse tensions and return to educating the children. Celebrating one's patriotism SHOULD never be considered disruptive speech. If disruption does arise, then the school needs to address and correct the students who find such speech offensive and make this corrective action a lesson for all other students. Patriotism is a higher value than an orderly school environment. That's where the 9th erred - they're liberals and their values are all screwed up.
When certain symbols are misused to celebrate patriotism in a away that is harmful to some of the citizens, yeah, the jingoists can be told to sit down and behave.
Of course the problem with that in THIS specific case is that the Mexican flag shirts were allowed. That's bullshit , no matter how you slice it.
that's a bs excuse
You and I both know this was an issue becuase of some previous problems between the two groups. It didn't happen in a vacuum. And thus BOTH shirts were disruptive , but only one was singled out.
Holiday's. That's it.If it was the 4th of July and the rolls where reversed I'd say the same thing.Well no. If it was for a certain day and other kids wore American shirts in a protest like way, it's not the samething. Had this been a normal day and both where doing it Ala gang like, then you would be correct.When certain symbols are misused to celebrate patriotism in a away that is harmful to some of the citizens, yeah, the jingoists can be told to sit down and behave.
Of course the problem with that in THIS specific case is that the Mexican flag shirts were allowed. That's bullshit , no matter how you slice it.
that's a bs excuse
You and I both know this was an issue becuase of some previous problems between the two groups. It didn't happen in a vacuum. And thus BOTH shirts were disruptive , but only one was singled out.
The relevance of the Mexican Army defeating the French in Mexico during the Battle of Puebla in 1862 is what exactly? I'm not seeing the similarity to July 4th.
I wouldn't be against uniforms like you suggested.If it was the 4th of July and the rolls where reversed I'd say the same thing.Well no. If it was for a certain day and other kids wore American shirts in a protest like way, it's not the samething. Had this been a normal day and both where doing it Ala gang like, then you would be correct.When certain symbols are misused to celebrate patriotism in a away that is harmful to some of the citizens, yeah, the jingoists can be told to sit down and behave.
Of course the problem with that in THIS specific case is that the Mexican flag shirts were allowed. That's bullshit , no matter how you slice it.
that's a bs excuse
You and I both know this was an issue becuase of some previous problems between the two groups. It didn't happen in a vacuum. And thus BOTH shirts were disruptive , but only one was singled out.
Me to, ban both shirts, or neither.
Holiday's. That's it.If it was the 4th of July and the rolls where reversed I'd say the same thing.Well no. If it was for a certain day and other kids wore American shirts in a protest like way, it's not the samething. Had this been a normal day and both where doing it Ala gang like, then you would be correct.Of course the problem with that in THIS specific case is that the Mexican flag shirts were allowed. That's bullshit , no matter how you slice it.
that's a bs excuse
You and I both know this was an issue becuase of some previous problems between the two groups. It didn't happen in a vacuum. And thus BOTH shirts were disruptive , but only one was singled out.
The relevance of the Mexican Army defeating the French in Mexico during the Battle of Puebla in 1862 is what exactly? I'm not seeing the similarity to July 4th.
Holiday's. That's it.If it was the 4th of July and the rolls where reversed I'd say the same thing.Well no. If it was for a certain day and other kids wore American shirts in a protest like way, it's not the samething. Had this been a normal day and both where doing it Ala gang like, then you would be correct.
that's a bs excuse
You and I both know this was an issue becuase of some previous problems between the two groups. It didn't happen in a vacuum. And thus BOTH shirts were disruptive , but only one was singled out.
The relevance of the Mexican Army defeating the French in Mexico during the Battle of Puebla in 1862 is what exactly? I'm not seeing the similarity to July 4th.
Thanks for that. What's it to America that the Mexicans won a battle against the French in 1862 in Mexico? How is this relevant to the Fourth?
Holiday's. That's it.If it was the 4th of July and the rolls where reversed I'd say the same thing.Well no. If it was for a certain day and other kids wore American shirts in a protest like way, it's not the samething. Had this been a normal day and both where doing it Ala gang like, then you would be correct.
that's a bs excuse
You and I both know this was an issue becuase of some previous problems between the two groups. It didn't happen in a vacuum. And thus BOTH shirts were disruptive , but only one was singled out.
The relevance of the Mexican Army defeating the French in Mexico during the Battle of Puebla in 1862 is what exactly? I'm not seeing the similarity to July 4th.
Thanks for that. What's it to America that the Mexicans won a battle against the French in 1862 in Mexico? How is this relevant to the Fourth?
Meh....not really on my list of things I really care aboutHoliday's. That's it.If it was the 4th of July and the rolls where reversed I'd say the same thing.that's a bs excuse
You and I both know this was an issue becuase of some previous problems between the two groups. It didn't happen in a vacuum. And thus BOTH shirts were disruptive , but only one was singled out.
The relevance of the Mexican Army defeating the French in Mexico during the Battle of Puebla in 1862 is what exactly? I'm not seeing the similarity to July 4th.
Thanks for that. What's it to America that the Mexicans won a battle against the French in 1862 in Mexico? How is this relevant to the Fourth?
The stupid part is they don't even celebrate Cinco De Mayo in Mexico anyway. It's basically a man's version of Valentine's Day with beer instead of chocolate.
Holiday's. That's it.If it was the 4th of July and the rolls where reversed I'd say the same thing.that's a bs excuse
You and I both know this was an issue becuase of some previous problems between the two groups. It didn't happen in a vacuum. And thus BOTH shirts were disruptive , but only one was singled out.
The relevance of the Mexican Army defeating the French in Mexico during the Battle of Puebla in 1862 is what exactly? I'm not seeing the similarity to July 4th.
Thanks for that. What's it to America that the Mexicans won a battle against the French in 1862 in Mexico? How is this relevant to the Fourth?
The hell? It was just an example captain literal...seriously go away
Ninth Circuit Court Won 8217 t Reconsider U.S. Flag Shirt Ban At California School CBS Sacramento
so people can skip the retard link the Op provided.
A unanimous three-judge panel in February said past problems gave school officials sufficient and justifiable reasons for their actions. The court said schools have wide latitude in curbing certain civil rights to ensure campus safety.
Schools are not freedom of speech bastions.
You fundamentally misunderstand the issue, as did the judges. When expression of love for one's country is speech that is deemed controversial on school property, then elevating an orderly environment over a patriotic culture is the wrong way to go. Some speech on school grounds can be disorderly and it's right to restrict that speech in order to defuse tensions and return to educating the children. Celebrating one's patriotism SHOULD never be considered disruptive speech. If disruption does arise, then the school needs to address and correct the students who find such speech offensive and make this corrective action a lesson for all other students. Patriotism is a higher value than an orderly school environment. That's where the 9th erred - they're liberals and their values are all screwed up.
When certain symbols are misused to celebrate patriotism in a away that is harmful to some of the citizens, yeah, the jingoists can be told to sit down and behave.
Of course the problem with that in THIS specific case is that the Mexican flag shirts were allowed. That's bullshit , no matter how you slice it.
And people who celebrate St. Patrick's day are anti-American Irish traitors, right?Holiday's. That's it.If it was the 4th of July and the rolls where reversed I'd say the same thing.
The relevance of the Mexican Army defeating the French in Mexico during the Battle of Puebla in 1862 is what exactly? I'm not seeing the similarity to July 4th.
Thanks for that. What's it to America that the Mexicans won a battle against the French in 1862 in Mexico? How is this relevant to the Fourth?
The hell? It was just an example captain literal...seriously go away
But it's not an example, it's an equivalence. It's an important day for these Mexican-American students who show allegiance to a foreign nation and take offense at the American flag. That's the problem and you're lending support to that mindset.