No 1st amendment in Tenn, pubs bully gays

KG, I really think you need to buy a book on sex. Seriously. You seem to be under the impression that homosexual=sodimizer. Not that I'm not enjoying loling at your point of view, but I think you should know that you are woefully mistaken.

Maybe if they had taught about sex when you were in school you wouldn't be so mistaken.

Lies Amy has told in this thread:

#1: She has lied about the content of the bill. The bill maintains that mandatory reporters in school should adhere to the law, and report suspected homosexual activity. Homosexual activity, per Merriam Webster, is sodomy. So the bill maintains that if schools have reason to suspect children are engaging in sodomy, they should advise parents. It is NOT about reporting *gayness* to parents.

#2: She has lied about the legality of sex among children. She continues to maintain that sex is *legal* between children, and that parents have no right to know about it. Repeatedly, and using her own link, it has been shown that sex between children IS illegal, and in fact the Romeo and Juliet law STATES EXPLICITLY that it remains illegal, but that it MAY be employed as a defense IN SOME CASES.

#3: She has lied and stated that homosexuality has nothing to do with sex. This is so stupid that I don't even need to explain how that one's a lie.

#4: She has lied and maintains that the schools already must report actual sexual activity (sodomy) if they catch the kids..the lie being that the law re-iterates that requirement. It doesn't. The law simply establishes that the school cannot fail to report suspected sodomy based on the fact that the children are *gay* and therefore somehow immune from mandatory reporting laws....in other words, no longer should be afforded protection.

Anything else, reprobate?
 
This is the topic, DC. It's hard to not talk about children when the OP is about reporting suspected child sodomy. Maybe you can figure out a way to leave kids out of that convo, but I doubt it.

And look who brought it up. It wasn't me.
 
If people were concerned about reporting the sexual activity of kids, which for the millionth time is already agaisnt the rules and is already reported to parents, then that's what this bill would say, instead of reporting the possible sexual orintation of kids.

Why is it only gay kids being targeted?


You can spin it all you like, the author of this bill has been very vocal in his hated for gays and his feeling that being gay is dangerous to children. Luckily I have a feeling even if this bill passes, it'll be challenged and overturned based on privacy issues.

"Homosexual activity" is what the bill states should be reported.

Homosexual activity = sodomy.

And you guys don't want to have to report it. Telling.

PS...children have no right to *privacy*, and the right to privacy ends when children are being exploited or engaging in illegal activities.

We've been over this already. This is where you repeat the lie that *SEX BETWEEN CHILDREN IS LEGAL!!! WOO HOO!!"
If you think homosexuals are the only ones engaging in sodomy then you are so incredibly clueless as to what's going in in the world around you.
 
If people were concerned about reporting the sexual activity of kids, which for the millionth time is already agaisnt the rules and is already reported to parents, then that's what this bill would say, instead of reporting the possible sexual orintation of kids.

Why is it only gay kids being targeted?


You can spin it all you like, the author of this bill has been very vocal in his hated for gays and his feeling that being gay is dangerous to children. Luckily I have a feeling even if this bill passes, it'll be challenged and overturned based on privacy issues.

"Homosexual activity" is what the bill states should be reported.

Homosexual activity = sodomy.

And you guys don't want to have to report it. Telling.

PS...children have no right to *privacy*, and the right to privacy ends when children are being exploited or engaging in illegal activities.

We've been over this already. This is where you repeat the lie that *SEX BETWEEN CHILDREN IS LEGAL!!! WOO HOO!!"
If you think homosexuals are the only ones engaging in sodomy then you are so incredibly clueless as to what's going in in the world around you.

Only homosexual sodomy is bad, as long as its with the opposite sex it's a-ok. Oh and did you know, in order to be homosexual you have to engage in sodomy.:cuckoo:
 
If people were concerned about reporting the sexual activity of kids, which for the millionth time is already agaisnt the rules and is already reported to parents, then that's what this bill would say, instead of reporting the possible sexual orintation of kids.

Why is it only gay kids being targeted?


You can spin it all you like, the author of this bill has been very vocal in his hated for gays and his feeling that being gay is dangerous to children. Luckily I have a feeling even if this bill passes, it'll be challenged and overturned based on privacy issues.

"Homosexual activity" is what the bill states should be reported.

Homosexual activity = sodomy.

And you guys don't want to have to report it. Telling.

PS...children have no right to *privacy*, and the right to privacy ends when children are being exploited or engaging in illegal activities.

We've been over this already. This is where you repeat the lie that *SEX BETWEEN CHILDREN IS LEGAL!!! WOO HOO!!"
If you think homosexuals are the only ones engaging in sodomy then you are so incredibly clueless as to what's going in in the world around you.

She is not interested in protecting children. That is a patina she has overlaid on her bigotry in a transparent attempt to excuse the blatant singling out of homosexual behavior.

If she was truly interested in protecting children, she would be working up some serious outrage that the law does not require the reporting of heterosexual activity.
 
KG, I really think you need to buy a book on sex. Seriously. You seem to be under the impression that homosexual=sodimizer. Not that I'm not enjoying loling at your point of view, but I think you should know that you are woefully mistaken.

Maybe if they had taught about sex when you were in school you wouldn't be so mistaken.

Lies Amy has told in this thread:

#1: She has lied about the content of the bill. The bill maintains that mandatory reporters in school should adhere to the law, and report suspected homosexual activity. Homosexual activity, per Merriam Webster, is sodomy. So the bill maintains that if schools have reason to suspect children are engaging in sodomy, they should advise parents. It is NOT about reporting *gayness* to parents.

#2: She has lied about the legality of sex among children. She continues to maintain that sex is *legal* between children, and that parents have no right to know about it. Repeatedly, and using her own link, it has been shown that sex between children IS illegal, and in fact the Romeo and Juliet law STATES EXPLICITLY that it remains illegal, but that it MAY be employed as a defense IN SOME CASES.

#3: She has lied and stated that homosexuality has nothing to do with sex. This is so stupid that I don't even need to explain how that one's a lie.

#4: She has lied and maintains that the schools already must report actual sexual activity (sodomy) if they catch the kids..the lie being that the law re-iterates that requirement. It doesn't. The law simply establishes that the school cannot fail to report suspected sodomy based on the fact that the children are *gay* and therefore somehow immune from mandatory reporting laws....in other words, no longer should be afforded protection.

Anything else, reprobate?
How can you tell when Allie is lying?

When she is posting on USMB.

If you're going to quote Merriam Webster, then you need to provide a link.

Tell me dipshit, aren't lesbians homosexuals? How many of them are engaging in sodomy d'ya think? Use your brain.
 
"Homosexual activity" is what the bill states should be reported.

Homosexual activity = sodomy.

And you guys don't want to have to report it. Telling.

PS...children have no right to *privacy*, and the right to privacy ends when children are being exploited or engaging in illegal activities.

We've been over this already. This is where you repeat the lie that *SEX BETWEEN CHILDREN IS LEGAL!!! WOO HOO!!"
If you think homosexuals are the only ones engaging in sodomy then you are so incredibly clueless as to what's going in in the world around you.

Only homosexual sodomy is bad, as long as its with the opposite sex it's a-ok. Oh and did you know, in order to be homosexual you have to engage in sodomy.:cuckoo:

Nope, but with the advent of homosexual clubs in the schools, the schools think that gives them license to not only promote, but fail to report, activity which comes under the heading of "SUSPECTED ILLEGAL SEXUAL ACTIVITY".

And this bill makes them accountable.

A sad, sad day for progressives scouting the schools if it passes.
 
Though seriously, an entire thread devoted to why it's okay to look the other way when kids are having sex...despite the legal ramifications....it is already about as low as it gets.

Wow. You really are running with this crazy shit, eh? Pages and pages and pages.

Too bad the giant hole in this theory has already been blown open pages and pages and pages ago.

The law only requires HOMOSEXUAL kids to be reported.

No one is fooled by your fake concern about children having sex. The law has NOTHING to do with child safety and everything to do with bigotry. And since it aligns with your own blatant raging bigotry, it is no wonder you are defending it so insanely.

You hate fags. Even faggot children. You hate them. Hate, hate, hate, HATE them. Little faggot children should be reported and dealt with. We get it. No need to tattoo it on your forehead and shout it from the rooftops.

But don't sit there and pretend this is about child safety. You aren't fooling anyone, but there is a real danger of you deluding yourself. This is about your deep, deep fear of fags. Even little fag kids scare the shit out of you.

Just look at you. Losing your ever loving mind over the idea little fag kids might get away with being little fags if someone doesn't report them.

Jesus H. Christ, you are one sick Nazi wannabe fuck.

Nailed it! :clap:
 
If you think homosexuals are the only ones engaging in sodomy then you are so incredibly clueless as to what's going in in the world around you.

Only homosexual sodomy is bad, as long as its with the opposite sex it's a-ok. Oh and did you know, in order to be homosexual you have to engage in sodomy.:cuckoo:

Nope, but with the advent of homosexual clubs in the schools, the schools think that gives them license to not only promote, but fail to report, activity which comes under the heading of "SUSPECTED ILLEGAL SEXUAL ACTIVITY".

And this bill makes them accountable.

A sad, sad day for progressives scouting the schools if it passes.

Wait, Gay and Lesbian Alliances in schools are now "promoting illegal sex" in your backward little world?

Wow
 
If you think homosexuals are the only ones engaging in sodomy then you are so incredibly clueless as to what's going in in the world around you.

Only homosexual sodomy is bad, as long as its with the opposite sex it's a-ok. Oh and did you know, in order to be homosexual you have to engage in sodomy.:cuckoo:

Nope, but with the advent of homosexual clubs in the schools, the schools think that gives them license to not only promote, but fail to report, activity which comes under the heading of "SUSPECTED ILLEGAL SEXUAL ACTIVITY".

And this bill makes them accountable.

A sad, sad day for progressives scouting the schools if it passes.

Its not going to pass.

The vast majority of the American public is not as emotionally screwed up as you are.
 
That's a new one..it's "emotionally screwed up" to insist that mandatory reporters actually report.
 
That's a new one..it's "emotionally screwed up" to insist that mandatory reporters actually report.

See, you're getting ahead of yourself here.

There is no mandatory reporting until this abortion of a bill passes, and it won't.

And for the record, if I were and educator in any state that I bill like this passed, I would ignore the hell out of it.
 
You're a fucking idiot.

"Tennessee Mandatory Reporting Requirements Regarding Children
Who Must Report?
Sexual Abuse: Any person, including, but not limited to, any:
•
Physician, osteopathic physician, medical examiner,

chiropractor, nurse or hospital personnel engaged in the

admission, examination, care or treatment of persons
Any other health or mental health professional;
Practitioner who relies solely on spiritual means for healing;

•
School teacher or other school official or personnel;
•
Judge of any court of the state;•
Social worker, day care center worker, or other professional
child care, foster care, residential or institutional worker;
Law enforcement officer; or •
Neighbor, relative, friend or any other person who knows or

has reasonable cause to suspect that a child has been sexually

abused."

"
Reports Made To (In cases of abuse) Judge having juvenile jurisdiction over the
child, the department of children’s services, in a manner specified
by the department sheriff of the county where the child resides,
or chief law enforcement official of the municipality where the
child resides.
(In cases of sexual abuse) The local office of the department of
children’s services or to the judge having juvenile jurisdiction or
to the office of the sheriff or the chief law enforcement official of
the municipality where the child resides. Each report of known or
suspected child sexual abuse occurring in a facility licensed by

Regarding you ignoring the mandatory reporting laws, then you would be prosecuted and perhaps the less said about adults who ignore mandatory reporting laws in cases of sex abuse, or who advocate for ignoring such laws, the better.

"Knowing failure to make a required report is a Class A
misdemeanor.

• ......​
• The duty to report continues as long as the alleged victim of
abuse is a child under the age of 18. Tenn. Op. Atty. Gen.

No. 88-142."


 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top