"No collusion"??? "No obstruction"???REALLY?

[LaDairis]

People voted for the "charlatan" because your side ran a witch against him....

 

[Auld Phart]

The problem for all you right wingers is that you're devoid from reality.....You "think" that this forum represents all of American voters.....and since this forum is mostly filled with right wingers you're dead wrong.

Let's see how it all plays out with Mueller's testimony watched by millions of independent voters who might have made a real bad blunder in voting for this charlatan in 2016.

Let's see how it all plays out with Mueller's testimony watched by millions of independent voters

Isn't Mueller governed by the same laws Barr is?

 

[JustAnotherNut]

Notice how the three above morons just DIVERT to Obama because they can't really "defend" what was stated in the O/P????

However, one can't really blame these nitwits' lack of a spine.

Any nitwit WITH a spine would have actually noticed only one of those posters even mentioned Obama, AND they would not be posting incognito (offline)…..

 

[Billy_Bob]

Notice how the three above morons just DIVERT to Obama because they can't really "defend" what was stated in the O/P????

However, one can't really blame these nitwits' lack of a spine.

The DOJ has closed the case as unfounded.

Keep on spinning...

 

[beautress]

For the last several weeks the problem here...and throughout our nation....has been the refusal by many Trump acolytes to actually READ Mueller's report and....instead.....have relied of Barr's biased interpretation to "absolve" the guy who hired him to be hius stooge......

Since reading the report has proven a difficult task for most Trump followers, I offer just a few lines from Mueller that would.....at least to objective and sane voters......offer some measure of hesitation before reverting to the mindless support of someone who does not deserve such support....

For example, regarding "collusion," Mueller.explicitly states that "we applied the framework of conspiracy law not the concept of ‘collusion.’".

If one carefully reviews what Mueller wrote, the more appropriate conclusion is that Trump may be "innocent" of conspiracy.....but not necessarily exonerated from "collusion."

Further, Mueller makes it CLEAR as to which entity.....either the DOJ or Congress..... should utilize his investigation's findings, especially on the issue of obstruction, Mueller offers this:

"We concluded that Congress has authority to prohibit a President's corrupt use of his authority in order to protect the integrity of the administration of justice."

Finally, there is this sentence in the report that is of major importance (something that Barr conveniently leaves out in his little summary):

“If we had confidence after a thorough investigation of the facts that the president clearly did not commit obstruction of Justice we would so state.”

I read it. It says there was zero evidence that Donald Trump did not collude with the Russians. It also says there was insufficient evidence that Donald Trump obstructed the process. This man took two damn years and the taxpayer paid $35,000,000.00 for that information because the Democrats could throw doubt before conclusions were made and gain a lot of seats in Congress by scaring the coon dog snot out of youthful and undecided voters. When you have innocent persons being beaten to a pulp day after long weary day with calumny, you can convince naïve people of just about anything after seeing liars pulling off another big one.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

“If we had confidence after a thorough investigation of the facts that the president clearly did not commit obstruction of Justice we would so state.”

*AHEM*

IT'S NOT A PROSECUTOR'S JOB TO ASSEMBLE EVIDENCE THAT THE SUBJECT DIDN'T DO SOMETHING!

THEIR JOB IS TO GATHER AND PROVIDE EVIDENCE THAT THE SUBJECT DID DO SOMETHING!

NOR IS THERE ANY BURDEN ON THE ACCUSED TO PROVE THAT THEY DIDN'T DO ANYTHING!

YOU ARE A GOT-DAMNED IGNORANT FUCKING CLOWN!

IT'S NOT A PROSECUTOR'S JOB TO ASSEMBLE EVIDENCE THAT THE SUBJECT DIDN'T DO SOMETHING!

THEIR JOB IS TO GATHER AND PROVIDE EVIDENCE THAT THE SUBJECT DID DO SOMETHING!

Exactly. That's why the report is over 400 pages, dope.

 

[Oddball]

“If we had confidence after a thorough investigation of the facts that the president clearly did not commit obstruction of Justice we would so state.”

*AHEM*

IT'S NOT A PROSECUTOR'S JOB TO ASSEMBLE EVIDENCE THAT THE SUBJECT DIDN'T DO SOMETHING!

THEIR JOB IS TO GATHER AND PROVIDE EVIDENCE THAT THE SUBJECT DID DO SOMETHING!

NOR IS THERE ANY BURDEN ON THE ACCUSED TO PROVE THAT THEY DIDN'T DO ANYTHING!

YOU ARE A GOT-DAMNED IGNORANT FUCKING CLOWN!

IT'S NOT A PROSECUTOR'S JOB TO ASSEMBLE EVIDENCE THAT THE SUBJECT DIDN'T DO SOMETHING!

THEIR JOB IS TO GATHER AND PROVIDE EVIDENCE THAT THE SUBJECT DID DO SOMETHING!

Exactly. That's why the report is over 400 pages, dope.

The "report" is over 400 pages because the Mule has nothing, and needs to muddy the waters for clapping and barking seals like you, fuckwit.

 

[Billy_Bob]

The problem for all you right wingers is that you're devoid from reality.....You "think" that this forum represents all of American voters.....and since this forum is mostly filled with right wingers, you're dead wrong.

Let's see how it all plays out with Mueller's testimony watched by millions of independent voters who might have made a real bad blunder in voting for this charlatan in 2016.

With executive privilege now enacted on the report and the investigation, Mueller will not be sitting for questioning for any one...

 

[nat4900]

Isn't Mueller governed by the same laws Barr is?

NO.......Mueller will soon be a private citizen asked to testify, assert and explain his investigation.......Actually, I DO hope that Trump tried to stifle his testimony, so that we can "conclude" that he is scared shitless of the truth.

 

[Billy_Bob]

Isn't Mueller governed by the same laws Barr is?

NO.......Mueller will soon be a private citizen asked to testify, assert and explain his investigation.......Actually, I DO hope that Trump tried to stifle his testimony, so that we can "conclude" that he is scared shitless of the truth.

Doesn't matter... Executive privilege has been invoked. He wont be answering questions for anyone..

 

[Pete7469]

Notice how the three above morons just DIVERT to Obama because they can't really "defend" what was stated in the O/P????

However, one can't really blame these nitwits' lack of a spine.

You posted that same shit everyday, several times a day, for the last 2 weeks bed wetter, so did Deanturd, Lakoturd, Fakey and some socks, Timmy and several other mindless drones. It's been refuted, ridiculed and debunked over and over. You're kicking the air in front of you but the schizophrenic induced hallucinations tell your "mind" it the same horse and just a few more kicks will revive it.

It's beyond pathetic to tell you the truth.

You need professional help, although I suggest a retroactive self abortion.

.

 

[Auld Phart]

Isn't Mueller governed by the same laws Barr is?

NO.......Mueller will soon be a private citizen asked to testify, assert and explain his investigation.......Actually, I DO hope that Trump tried to stifle his testimony, so that we can "conclude" that he is scared shitless of the truth.

NO.......Mueller will soon be a private citizen asked to testify, assert and explain his investigation.......

and you think that is going to give him the option to disclose security information?

you're more of a fool than I thought

 

[nat4900]

Any nitwit WITH a spine would have actually noticed only one of those posters even mentioned Obama, AND they would not be posting incognito (offline)…

Address the O/P....and ADD lack of math comprehension to your lack of reading comprehension.....lol

 

[Weatherman2020]

For the last several weeks the problem here...and throughout our nation....has been the refusal by many Trump acolytes to actually READ Mueller's report and....instead.....have relied of Barr's biased interpretation to "absolve" the guy who hired him to be hius stooge......

Since reading the report has proven a difficult task for most Trump followers, I offer just a few lines from Mueller that would.....at least to objective and sane voters......offer some measure of hesitation before reverting to the mindless support of someone who does not deserve such support....

For example, regarding "collusion," Mueller.explicitly states that "we applied the framework of conspiracy law not the concept of ‘collusion.’".

If one carefully reviews what Mueller wrote, the more appropriate conclusion is that Trump may be "innocent" of conspiracy.....but not necessarily exonerated from "collusion."

Further, Mueller makes it CLEAR as to which entity.....either the DOJ or Congress..... should utilize his investigation's findings, especially on the issue of obstruction, Mueller offers this:

"We concluded that Congress has authority to prohibit a President's corrupt use of his authority in order to protect the integrity of the administration of justice."

Finally, there is this sentence in the report that is of major importance (something that Barr conveniently leaves out in his little summary):

“If we had confidence after a thorough investigation of the facts that the president clearly did not commit obstruction of Justice we would so state.”

Go to Sams Club and get a 55 gallon barrel of butt salve.

 

[nat4900]

This man took two damn years and the taxpayer paid $35,000,000.00

Check out just how much money Mueller got Manafort to pay back the government after being sentenced.......(use a calculator) ........LOL

 

[Jitss617]

For the last several weeks the problem here...and throughout our nation....has been the refusal by many Trump acolytes to actually READ Mueller's report and....instead.....have relied of Barr's biased interpretation to "absolve" the guy who hired him to be hius stooge......

Since reading the report has proven a difficult task for most Trump followers, I offer just a few lines from Mueller that would.....at least to objective and sane voters......offer some measure of hesitation before reverting to the mindless support of someone who does not deserve such support....

For example, regarding "collusion," Mueller.explicitly states that "we applied the framework of conspiracy law not the concept of ‘collusion.’".

If one carefully reviews what Mueller wrote, the more appropriate conclusion is that Trump may be "innocent" of conspiracy.....but not necessarily exonerated from "collusion."

Further, Mueller makes it CLEAR as to which entity.....either the DOJ or Congress..... should utilize his investigation's findings, especially on the issue of obstruction, Mueller offers this:

"We concluded that Congress has authority to prohibit a President's corrupt use of his authority in order to protect the integrity of the administration of justice."

Finally, there is this sentence in the report that is of major importance (something that Barr conveniently leaves out in his little summary):

“If we had confidence after a thorough investigation of the facts that the president clearly did not commit obstruction of Justice we would so state.”

Do you understand how entertaining your deranged post are ?? Lol

 

[Oddball]

For the last several weeks the problem here...and throughout our nation....has been the refusal by many Trump acolytes to actually READ Mueller's report and....instead.....have relied of Barr's biased interpretation to "absolve" the guy who hired him to be hius stooge......

Since reading the report has proven a difficult task for most Trump followers, I offer just a few lines from Mueller that would.....at least to objective and sane voters......offer some measure of hesitation before reverting to the mindless support of someone who does not deserve such support....

For example, regarding "collusion," Mueller.explicitly states that "we applied the framework of conspiracy law not the concept of ‘collusion.’".

If one carefully reviews what Mueller wrote, the more appropriate conclusion is that Trump may be "innocent" of conspiracy.....but not necessarily exonerated from "collusion."

Further, Mueller makes it CLEAR as to which entity.....either the DOJ or Congress..... should utilize his investigation's findings, especially on the issue of obstruction, Mueller offers this:

"We concluded that Congress has authority to prohibit a President's corrupt use of his authority in order to protect the integrity of the administration of justice."

Finally, there is this sentence in the report that is of major importance (something that Barr conveniently leaves out in his little summary):

“If we had confidence after a thorough investigation of the facts that the president clearly did not commit obstruction of Justice we would so state.”

Go to Sams Club and get a 55 gallon barrel of butt salve.

Along with a trash can sized 'scrip of some powerful psychotropics.

 

[nat4900]

With executive privilege now enacted on the report and the investigation, Mueller will not be sitting for questioning for any one...

Well, yes.....If Putin or KJU were sitting in the oval office, that WOULD be the case.

 

[Harry Dresden]

The problem for all you right wingers is that you're devoid from reality.....You "think" that this forum represents all of American voters.....and since this forum is mostly filled with right wingers, you're dead wrong.

Let's see how it all plays out with Mueller's testimony watched by millions of independent voters who might have made a real bad blunder in voting for this charlatan in 2016.

at least you have a sense of humor nat.....saying others are devoid from reality.....you describe yourself in so many of your posts....

 

[Fueri]

“If we had confidence after a thorough investigation of the facts that the president clearly did not commit obstruction of Justice we would so state.”

*AHEM*

IT'S NOT A PROSECUTOR'S JOB TO ASSEMBLE EVIDENCE THAT THE SUBJECT DIDN'T DO SOMETHING!

THEIR JOB IS TO GATHER AND PROVIDE EVIDENCE THAT THE SUBJECT DID DO SOMETHING!

NOR IS THERE ANY BURDEN ON THE ACCUSED TO PROVE THAT THEY DIDN'T DO ANYTHING!

YOU ARE A GOT-DAMNED IGNORANT FUCKING CLOWN!

You can't prove a negative.

Dem Response: Prove it.