No evidence has been submitted that the Russians hacked the DNC

[12icer]

A prolife person CAN NOT SAY ANYTHING GOOD ABOUT CLINTON, so you are also full of shit

What am I saying good about Clinton?

So you actually voted for Trump, which makes everything you have said a lie?

okeedokee

Tell us more about how I stole your GIF, LOL

Are you that ignorant? If you don't vote for Trump you had to vote for Clinton? I didn't vote for either of them because neither were qualified to be President. I've said this in multiple threads hundreds of times.

So you wasted your vote on Jill Stein?

Just say you voted for Clinton

Until you do your are a spoiled child

No dumbass, I said I didn't vote for anyone, none of them were qualified to be President. Period. I wasn't going to compromise my ethics and morals to vote for someone just to spite someone else.

Then why are you here, you are inconsequential.

 

[12icer]

DAMN RIGHT <<<>>>>>> LIBERAL SHIT VOMITERS.

Now tell us how you really feel

Laughing so hard it hurts my side, gullible targets are so easy it is Just like Trump and (OSHIT-MA-WHAT DID WE DO) He is making a complete ass out of OSHIT, and proving to his voters everything he said in the campaign by his predecessors foolish, childish, destructive actions.

 

[Lewdog]

What am I saying good about Clinton?

So you actually voted for Trump, which makes everything you have said a lie?

okeedokee

Tell us more about how I stole your GIF, LOL

Are you that ignorant? If you don't vote for Trump you had to vote for Clinton? I didn't vote for either of them because neither were qualified to be President. I've said this in multiple threads hundreds of times.

So you wasted your vote on Jill Stein?

Just say you voted for Clinton

Until you do your are a spoiled child

No dumbass, I said I didn't vote for anyone, none of them were qualified to be President. Period. I wasn't going to compromise my ethics and morals to vote for someone just to spite someone else.

Then why are you here, you are inconsequential.

WTF are you talking about? I can't discuss politics because I wouldn't vote for unqualified people? You realize how fucking dumb that is to say?

 

[Slade3200]

But it's not Russia they believe, its Trump. It is still very sad and pathetic.

even the Republicans in the Senate.

You dumbfucks can't think independently or something? If I am not licking the boots of a democrat administration that must mean I am beholden to republicans? Or Russians?

The two of you ignorant government stooges represent the real danger to the republic. All the unnecessary conflicts the US has entered into were initially supported by ignorant fucks like yourselves. And all started in like fashion, with a misrepresentation of the truth or an outright lie.

Why is the US involved in Syria? Yemen? Libya? Ukraine? Are they interconnected? Does Russia represent a potential barrier to US objectives in the ME? Does it then become convenient to the government for Americans to feel threatened by Russia given the potential conflicts in the ME? If our internet security systems were so weak as to allow intrusion so easily why would the government risk undermining public confidence by making it so public? Why wouldn't they just handle business quietly? Why would the government tell us that the hacking was so sophisticated it had to be done with the help of a state actor and then release a report showing how anyone with the knowledge could do it. It's ridiculous really, that anyone would fall for this BS. You dimwits are obviously living inside the matrix.

Your confidence in the deception of the US government is about as ignorant as those who believe every word they say. The reality it that we the people do not have nor should we have full access to all the information. It is our job to elect people that we trust to run the government... beyond that, they are the ones that have the intel. We can choose to trust them or not... BUT don't pretend that you are better than those who do believe our intelligence professionals. You are being a skeptic because it fits your narrative, not because you are smarter or better informed. As I've stated before, skepticism is fine to a certain degree, but what kind of patriot takes our enemy's side over our own government? That is taking it too far.

 

[Slade3200]

Did you geniuses ever consider the likely possibility that the evidence may reveal classified information and compromise intelligence assets?

It comes down to a simple decision. Do you trust the word of our intelligence agencies or not? Apparently many of you don't... the fact that some of you are taking a bigger step by taking the Russians side over ours, is quite sad.

Why would anyone trust what a bunch of Obama appointed toadies have to say? These people are politicians, first and foremost.

Whether revealing any supposed evidence would reveal classified information or not, the fact remains that no evidence has bee revealed. You can't claim you have evidence when you don't have it. That's the bottom line.

If you have evidence but revealing the details of that evidence compromises intelligence assets then you don't give the details, you give the conclusions of their investigations. This is what has happened

 

[Slade3200]

Did you geniuses ever consider the likely possibility that the evidence may reveal classified information and compromise intelligence assets?

It comes down to a simple decision. Do you trust the word of our intelligence agencies or not? Apparently many of you don't... the fact that some of you are taking a bigger step by taking the Russians side over ours, is quite sad.

Why would anyone trust what a bunch of Obama appointed toadies have to say? These people are politicians, first and foremost.

Whether revealing any supposed evidence would reveal classified information or not, the fact remains that no evidence has bee revealed. You can't claim you have evidence when you don't have it. That's the bottom line.

I'm curious, how did you react when obama made fun of Romney for saying that Russia was our biggest threat?

 

[bripat9643]

But it's not Russia they believe, its Trump. It is still very sad and pathetic.

even the Republicans in the Senate.

You dumbfucks can't think independently or something? If I am not licking the boots of a democrat administration that must mean I am beholden to republicans? Or Russians?

The two of you ignorant government stooges represent the real danger to the republic. All the unnecessary conflicts the US has entered into were initially supported by ignorant fucks like yourselves. And all started in like fashion, with a misrepresentation of the truth or an outright lie.

Why is the US involved in Syria? Yemen? Libya? Ukraine? Are they interconnected? Does Russia represent a potential barrier to US objectives in the ME? Does it then become convenient to the government for Americans to feel threatened by Russia given the potential conflicts in the ME? If our internet security systems were so weak as to allow intrusion so easily why would the government risk undermining public confidence by making it so public? Why wouldn't they just handle business quietly? Why would the government tell us that the hacking was so sophisticated it had to be done with the help of a state actor and then release a report showing how anyone with the knowledge could do it. It's ridiculous really, that anyone would fall for this BS. You dimwits are obviously living inside the matrix.

Your confidence in the deception of the US government is about as ignorant as those who believe every word they say. The reality it that we the people do not have nor should we have full access to all the information. It is our job to elect people that we trust to run the government... beyond that, they are the ones that have the intel. We can choose to trust them or not... BUT don't pretend that you are better than those who do believe our intelligence professionals. You are being a skeptic because it fits your narrative, not because you are smarter or better informed. As I've stated before, skepticism is fine to a certain degree, but what kind of patriot takes our enemy's side over our own government? That is taking it too far.

You could have just admitted that you have no proof that Russia hacked the election.

As for trusting government toadies, you are joking right? Intelligent people look at the way government actually works, not the way some bird brained idealists imagine it works. Politicians are professional liars. Nothing they say can be taken at face value. That's reality, not Democrat propaganda.

 

[bripat9643]

Did you geniuses ever consider the likely possibility that the evidence may reveal classified information and compromise intelligence assets?

It comes down to a simple decision. Do you trust the word of our intelligence agencies or not? Apparently many of you don't... the fact that some of you are taking a bigger step by taking the Russians side over ours, is quite sad.

Why would anyone trust what a bunch of Obama appointed toadies have to say? These people are politicians, first and foremost.

Whether revealing any supposed evidence would reveal classified information or not, the fact remains that no evidence has bee revealed. You can't claim you have evidence when you don't have it. That's the bottom line.

I'm curious, how did you react when obama made fun of Romney for saying that Russia was our biggest threat?

I was amused at the outrage displayed by Obama and his dicksuckers. It was all fake, of course, and the MSM went along with it.

 

[Dr Grump]

We're going to have to wait until AFTER the investigation, Doc. I hate conclusion jumping. Still; sounds like crap to me.

Greg

The Russians hacking or the conspiracy theory?

 

[Dr Grump]

Do you know how hard it is to get thousands of US media members to tell the same lie, that Trump has no chance to win the election?

You have a zero chance of victory against me, because you are battling the truth, which is fully on my side.

So tell me again that Trump has no mathematical path to victory, then finish jerking off.

it's called polling. Hardly a conspiracy theory.

 

[Dr Grump]

So it's a conspiracy theory that the CIA and NSA are government agencies under control of the President.

Are you new on the Earth too? or are you just a democrap

No, it's a conspiracy theory that the people who work for those organisations just happen to be on the same page. Beyond whackadoodleness...

 

[NYcarbineer]

Did you geniuses ever consider the likely possibility that the evidence may reveal classified information and compromise intelligence assets?

It comes down to a simple decision. Do you trust the word of our intelligence agencies or not? Apparently many of you don't... the fact that some of you are taking a bigger step by taking the Russians side over ours, is quite sad.

Why would anyone trust what a bunch of Obama appointed toadies have to say? These people are politicians, first and foremost.

Whether revealing any supposed evidence would reveal classified information or not, the fact remains that no evidence has bee revealed. You can't claim you have evidence when you don't have it. That's the bottom line.

I'm curious, how did you react when obama made fun of Romney for saying that Russia was our biggest threat?

I was amused at the outrage displayed by Obama and his dicksuckers. It was all fake, of course, and the MSM went along with it.

This, once again, from the guy who doesn't believe the nation of the United States should even exist.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Did you geniuses ever consider the likely possibility that the evidence may reveal classified information and compromise intelligence assets?

It comes down to a simple decision. Do you trust the word of our intelligence agencies or not? Apparently many of you don't... the fact that some of you are taking a bigger step by taking the Russians side over ours, is quite sad.

Why would anyone trust what a bunch of Obama appointed toadies have to say? These people are politicians, first and foremost.

Whether revealing any supposed evidence would reveal classified information or not, the fact remains that no evidence has bee revealed. You can't claim you have evidence when you don't have it. That's the bottom line.

I'm curious, how did you react when obama made fun of Romney for saying that Russia was our biggest threat?

They all took Romney's side. Now they've all flip flopped and taken Trump's side because they're one big mass of follow-the-Leader robots.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Did you geniuses ever consider the likely possibility that the evidence may reveal classified information and compromise intelligence assets?

It comes down to a simple decision. Do you trust the word of our intelligence agencies or not? Apparently many of you don't... the fact that some of you are taking a bigger step by taking the Russians side over ours, is quite sad.

LOL

Hillarys leaks got people killed and you still voted for her

 

[bripat9643]

Did you geniuses ever consider the likely possibility that the evidence may reveal classified information and compromise intelligence assets?

It comes down to a simple decision. Do you trust the word of our intelligence agencies or not? Apparently many of you don't... the fact that some of you are taking a bigger step by taking the Russians side over ours, is quite sad.

Why would anyone trust what a bunch of Obama appointed toadies have to say? These people are politicians, first and foremost.

Whether revealing any supposed evidence would reveal classified information or not, the fact remains that no evidence has bee revealed. You can't claim you have evidence when you don't have it. That's the bottom line.

I'm curious, how did you react when obama made fun of Romney for saying that Russia was our biggest threat?

They all took Romney's side. Now they've all flip flopped and taken Trump's side because they're one big mass of follow-the-Leader robots.

They took Romney's side? What universe are you living in?

 

[bripat9643]

Did you geniuses ever consider the likely possibility that the evidence may reveal classified information and compromise intelligence assets?

It comes down to a simple decision. Do you trust the word of our intelligence agencies or not? Apparently many of you don't... the fact that some of you are taking a bigger step by taking the Russians side over ours, is quite sad.

Why would anyone trust what a bunch of Obama appointed toadies have to say? These people are politicians, first and foremost.

Whether revealing any supposed evidence would reveal classified information or not, the fact remains that no evidence has bee revealed. You can't claim you have evidence when you don't have it. That's the bottom line.

I'm curious, how did you react when obama made fun of Romney for saying that Russia was our biggest threat?

I was amused at the outrage displayed by Obama and his dicksuckers. It was all fake, of course, and the MSM went along with it.

This, once again, from the guy who doesn't believe the nation of the United States should even exist.

You're going to have to find another substitute for an argument. This one is getting quite old and shopworn.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Did you geniuses ever consider the likely possibility that the evidence may reveal classified information and compromise intelligence assets?

It comes down to a simple decision. Do you trust the word of our intelligence agencies or not? Apparently many of you don't... the fact that some of you are taking a bigger step by taking the Russians side over ours, is quite sad.

Why would anyone trust what a bunch of Obama appointed toadies have to say? These people are politicians, first and foremost.

Whether revealing any supposed evidence would reveal classified information or not, the fact remains that no evidence has bee revealed. You can't claim you have evidence when you don't have it. That's the bottom line.

I'm curious, how did you react when obama made fun of Romney for saying that Russia was our biggest threat?

I was amused at the outrage displayed by Obama and his dicksuckers. It was all fake, of course, and the MSM went along with it.

This, once again, from the guy who doesn't believe the nation of the United States should even exist.

You're going to have to find another substitute for an argument. This one is getting quite old and shopworn.

Go ahead. Deny it.

 

[bripat9643]

Why would anyone trust what a bunch of Obama appointed toadies have to say? These people are politicians, first and foremost.

Whether revealing any supposed evidence would reveal classified information or not, the fact remains that no evidence has bee revealed. You can't claim you have evidence when you don't have it. That's the bottom line.

I'm curious, how did you react when obama made fun of Romney for saying that Russia was our biggest threat?

I was amused at the outrage displayed by Obama and his dicksuckers. It was all fake, of course, and the MSM went along with it.

This, once again, from the guy who doesn't believe the nation of the United States should even exist.

You're going to have to find another substitute for an argument. This one is getting quite old and shopworn.

Go ahead. Deny it.

I have never denied being an anarchist. Of what relevance is that to Romney's statement or the presses reaction to it?

 

[Slade3200]

Did you geniuses ever consider the likely possibility that the evidence may reveal classified information and compromise intelligence assets?

It comes down to a simple decision. Do you trust the word of our intelligence agencies or not? Apparently many of you don't... the fact that some of you are taking a bigger step by taking the Russians side over ours, is quite sad.

Why would anyone trust what a bunch of Obama appointed toadies have to say? These people are politicians, first and foremost.

Whether revealing any supposed evidence would reveal classified information or not, the fact remains that no evidence has bee revealed. You can't claim you have evidence when you don't have it. That's the bottom line.

I'm curious, how did you react when obama made fun of Romney for saying that Russia was our biggest threat?

I was amused at the outrage displayed by Obama and his dicksuckers. It was all fake, of course, and the MSM went along with it.

Did you think Romney had a valid point?

 

[NYcarbineer]

Did you geniuses ever consider the likely possibility that the evidence may reveal classified information and compromise intelligence assets?

It comes down to a simple decision. Do you trust the word of our intelligence agencies or not? Apparently many of you don't... the fact that some of you are taking a bigger step by taking the Russians side over ours, is quite sad.

Why would anyone trust what a bunch of Obama appointed toadies have to say? These people are politicians, first and foremost.

Whether revealing any supposed evidence would reveal classified information or not, the fact remains that no evidence has bee revealed. You can't claim you have evidence when you don't have it. That's the bottom line.

I'm curious, how did you react when obama made fun of Romney for saying that Russia was our biggest threat?

They all took Romney's side. Now they've all flip flopped and taken Trump's side because they're one big mass of follow-the-Leader robots.

They took Romney's side? What universe are you living in?

Conservatives almost unanimously sided with Romney when he called Russia our greatest threat and then Obama took issue with that.