No reasonable person

[Shelzin]

What does a sane and intelligent person expect from people who when presented honest and concrete facts outright rejects it? Then continues to keep spreading the lies.

All they are is lies, half truths and deceptions.

But these are the same people who believe that Barak Obama is a muslim from Kenya and Michelle is a man.

I don't understand why anyone would pay any attention to people like that. Except to try to get them the mental help they very desperately need.

And our very own counterfeit Rachel Maddow shows up. It's a cheap knockoff... But... It's what we got.

 

[Crepitus]

No, they threw that out because reasonable people could see and understand that she was stating an opinion.

A growing trend among tRump supporting media and lawyers, the "no reasonable person" defense.



First we have Sydney "the kraken" Powell claiming she shouldn't be prosecuted or disbarred for lying and wasting court's time and money because nobody with any brains would believe her outlandish claims.

Pro-Trump lawyer says ‘no reasonable person’ would believe her election lies

Lawyers for Sidney Powell argued conspiracies she laid out constituted legally protected first amendment speech

www.theguardian.com

Then there's Tucker Carlson and his lawyer's assertion that the "'general tenor' of the show should then inform a viewer that he is not stating actual facts about the topics he discusses.

You Literally Can't Believe The Facts Tucker Carlson Tells You. So Say Fox's Lawyers

Fox News viewers don't expect facts from Tucker Carlson, according to network lawyers who defended their star in a slander lawsuit filed by a woman who said she had an affair with President Trump.

www.npr.org

And now we've got lawyers stating that the insurrectionists are "short bus people'.

âTheyâre All Fucking Short-Bus Peopleâ: Capitol Riot Attorney Manages to Insult At Least Three Different Groups While Defending 1/6 Actions

The lawyer for the QAnon shaman told Talking Points Memo “These defendants…they’re all fucking short-bus people. These are people with brain damage, they’re fucking retarded, they’re on the goddamn spectrum.”

www.vanityfair.com

And that too much Fox News is detrimental to your mental health.

Fox News made me do it: Capitol attack suspect pulls âFoxitisâ defense

Anthony Antonio, who faces five charges over role in January riot, ‘started believing what was being fed to him’, lawyer says

www.theguardian.com

It's obvious that the leaders of the Republican party as well as the voters know they are well below average intelligence, and they are making it a good thing.

Anyway, this whole thing seems crazy to me.

It's obvious that the leaders of the Republican party as well as the voters know they are well below average intelligence, and they are making it a good thing.

What is obvious is that you are proudly prejudiced against people below your smugly proclaimed but unproven and questionable intelligence.

All of the facts are linked in the OP.

 

[Crepitus]

No reasonable person would believe Republicans believe this nonsense.

No reasonable person would believe Biden won the last election.

That's not what Sidney says.

 

[Lastamender]

A growing trend among tRump supporting media and lawyers, the "no reasonable person" defense.



First we have Sydney "the kraken" Powell claiming she shouldn't be prosecuted or disbarred for lying and wasting court's time and money because nobody with any brains would believe her outlandish claims.

Pro-Trump lawyer says ‘no reasonable person’ would believe her election lies

Lawyers for Sidney Powell argued conspiracies she laid out constituted legally protected first amendment speech

www.theguardian.com

Then there's Tucker Carlson and his lawyer's assertion that the "'general tenor' of the show should then inform a viewer that he is not stating actual facts about the topics he discusses.

You Literally Can't Believe The Facts Tucker Carlson Tells You. So Say Fox's Lawyers

Fox News viewers don't expect facts from Tucker Carlson, according to network lawyers who defended their star in a slander lawsuit filed by a woman who said she had an affair with President Trump.

www.npr.org

And now we've got lawyers stating that the insurrectionists are "short bus people'.

âTheyâre All Fucking Short-Bus Peopleâ: Capitol Riot Attorney Manages to Insult At Least Three Different Groups While Defending 1/6 Actions

The lawyer for the QAnon shaman told Talking Points Memo “These defendants…they’re all fucking short-bus people. These are people with brain damage, they’re fucking retarded, they’re on the goddamn spectrum.”

www.vanityfair.com

And that too much Fox News is detrimental to your mental health.

Fox News made me do it: Capitol attack suspect pulls âFoxitisâ defense

Anthony Antonio, who faces five charges over role in January riot, ‘started believing what was being fed to him’, lawyer says

www.theguardian.com

It's obvious that the leaders of the Republican party as well as the voters know they are well below average intelligence, and they are making it a good thing.

Anyway, this whole thing seems crazy to me.

I can’t disagree with the limited intellect of Trump supporters.

But that does not excuse Jan 6

You have an excuse for the massive fraud? That is why they were there.

 

[Wyatt earp]

No, they threw that out because reasonable people could see and understand that she was stating an opinion.

A growing trend among tRump supporting media and lawyers, the "no reasonable person" defense.



First we have Sydney "the kraken" Powell claiming she shouldn't be prosecuted or disbarred for lying and wasting court's time and money because nobody with any brains would believe her outlandish claims.

Pro-Trump lawyer says ‘no reasonable person’ would believe her election lies

Lawyers for Sidney Powell argued conspiracies she laid out constituted legally protected first amendment speech

www.theguardian.com

Then there's Tucker Carlson and his lawyer's assertion that the "'general tenor' of the show should then inform a viewer that he is not stating actual facts about the topics he discusses.

You Literally Can't Believe The Facts Tucker Carlson Tells You. So Say Fox's Lawyers

Fox News viewers don't expect facts from Tucker Carlson, according to network lawyers who defended their star in a slander lawsuit filed by a woman who said she had an affair with President Trump.

www.npr.org

And now we've got lawyers stating that the insurrectionists are "short bus people'.

âTheyâre All Fucking Short-Bus Peopleâ: Capitol Riot Attorney Manages to Insult At Least Three Different Groups While Defending 1/6 Actions

The lawyer for the QAnon shaman told Talking Points Memo “These defendants…they’re all fucking short-bus people. These are people with brain damage, they’re fucking retarded, they’re on the goddamn spectrum.”

www.vanityfair.com

And that too much Fox News is detrimental to your mental health.

Fox News made me do it: Capitol attack suspect pulls âFoxitisâ defense

Anthony Antonio, who faces five charges over role in January riot, ‘started believing what was being fed to him’, lawyer says

www.theguardian.com

It's obvious that the leaders of the Republican party as well as the voters know they are well below average intelligence, and they are making it a good thing.

Anyway, this whole thing seems crazy to me.

It's obvious that the leaders of the Republican party as well as the voters know they are well below average intelligence, and they are making it a good thing.

What is obvious is that you are proudly prejudiced against people below your smugly proclaimed but unproven and questionable intelligence.

All of the facts are linked in the OP.

Lmao you don't even read them

 

[Dana7360]

A growing trend among tRump supporting media and lawyers, the "no reasonable person" defense.



First we have Sydney "the kraken" Powell claiming she shouldn't be prosecuted or disbarred for lying and wasting court's time and money because nobody with any brains would believe her outlandish claims.

Pro-Trump lawyer says ‘no reasonable person’ would believe her election lies

Lawyers for Sidney Powell argued conspiracies she laid out constituted legally protected first amendment speech

www.theguardian.com

Then there's Tucker Carlson and his lawyer's assertion that the "'general tenor' of the show should then inform a viewer that he is not stating actual facts about the topics he discusses.

You Literally Can't Believe The Facts Tucker Carlson Tells You. So Say Fox's Lawyers

Fox News viewers don't expect facts from Tucker Carlson, according to network lawyers who defended their star in a slander lawsuit filed by a woman who said she had an affair with President Trump.

www.npr.org

And now we've got lawyers stating that the insurrectionists are "short bus people'.

âTheyâre All Fucking Short-Bus Peopleâ: Capitol Riot Attorney Manages to Insult At Least Three Different Groups While Defending 1/6 Actions

The lawyer for the QAnon shaman told Talking Points Memo “These defendants…they’re all fucking short-bus people. These are people with brain damage, they’re fucking retarded, they’re on the goddamn spectrum.”

www.vanityfair.com

And that too much Fox News is detrimental to your mental health.

Fox News made me do it: Capitol attack suspect pulls âFoxitisâ defense

Anthony Antonio, who faces five charges over role in January riot, ‘started believing what was being fed to him’, lawyer says

www.theguardian.com

It's obvious that the leaders of the Republican party as well as the voters know they are well below average intelligence, and they are making it a good thing.

Anyway, this whole thing seems crazy to me.

They always say the Republicans are dumb but they are the ones to stupid to support themselves and always want free stuff.

It's always a good idea to know the difference between the words "to" and "too" before you call someone stupid.

I mean a person in grade school knows the difference and spelling of those words.

Where were you when you were taught this very basic spelling?

 

[Lysistrata]

Hilarious. The "no reasonable person" defense basically is an admission by Powell and Carlson that they and Fox are liars, and by the riotors that they are gullible idiots. And Powell admits that she lied to the court.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

I don't understand why anyone would pay any attention to people like that.

That’s exactly the intent – to deflect attention from what’s real and important.

 

[progressive hunter]

SCIENCE: White Libs More Likely To Have Mental Health Problems

White liberals are significantly more likely than other racial and ideological groups to be diagnosed with a mental health condition, according to science.

freebeacon.com

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

No reasonable person would believe Republicans believe this nonsense.

No reasonable person would believe Biden won the last election.

The biggest mistake opponents of the right can make is to underestimate conservatives and lose sight of the right’s true motive – to deflect, to divide, to undermine.

Conservatives are crazy but they’re not stupid – like Trump they’re con men, grifters, and gas-lighters; for conservatives, misinformation, conspiracy theories, and lies are political weapons.

 

[Shelzin]

Hilarious. The "no reasonable person" defense basically is an admission by Powell and Carlson that they and Fox are liars, and by the riotors that they are gullible idiots. And Powell admits that she lied to the court.

I don't understand why anyone would pay any attention to people like that.

That’s exactly the intent – to deflect attention from what’s real and important.

No reasonable person would believe Republicans believe this nonsense.

No reasonable person would believe Biden won the last election.

The biggest mistake opponents of the right can make is to underestimate conservatives and lose sight of the right’s true motive – to deflect, to divide, to undermine.

Conservatives are crazy but they’re not stupid – like Trump they’re con men, grifters, and gas-lighters; for conservatives, misinformation, conspiracy theories, and lies are political weapons.

Yeah... Worked for Maddow.

I find it amusing that you people think you're special. It only applies to the other side.

Edit: Let me be ASOLUTELY clear... I agree with you... All the way up till you don't apply your own standards to yourselves and the content you consume.

 

[Wyatt earp]

No, they threw that out because reasonable people could see and understand that she was stating an opinion.

A growing trend among tRump supporting media and lawyers, the "no reasonable person" defense.



First we have Sydney "the kraken" Powell claiming she shouldn't be prosecuted or disbarred for lying and wasting court's time and money because nobody with any brains would believe her outlandish claims.

Pro-Trump lawyer says ‘no reasonable person’ would believe her election lies

Lawyers for Sidney Powell argued conspiracies she laid out constituted legally protected first amendment speech

www.theguardian.com

Then there's Tucker Carlson and his lawyer's assertion that the "'general tenor' of the show should then inform a viewer that he is not stating actual facts about the topics he discusses.

You Literally Can't Believe The Facts Tucker Carlson Tells You. So Say Fox's Lawyers

Fox News viewers don't expect facts from Tucker Carlson, according to network lawyers who defended their star in a slander lawsuit filed by a woman who said she had an affair with President Trump.

www.npr.org

And now we've got lawyers stating that the insurrectionists are "short bus people'.

âTheyâre All Fucking Short-Bus Peopleâ: Capitol Riot Attorney Manages to Insult At Least Three Different Groups While Defending 1/6 Actions

The lawyer for the QAnon shaman told Talking Points Memo “These defendants…they’re all fucking short-bus people. These are people with brain damage, they’re fucking retarded, they’re on the goddamn spectrum.”

www.vanityfair.com

And that too much Fox News is detrimental to your mental health.

Fox News made me do it: Capitol attack suspect pulls âFoxitisâ defense

Anthony Antonio, who faces five charges over role in January riot, ‘started believing what was being fed to him’, lawyer says

www.theguardian.com

It's obvious that the leaders of the Republican party as well as the voters know they are well below average intelligence, and they are making it a good thing.

Anyway, this whole thing seems crazy to me.

It's obvious that the leaders of the Republican party as well as the voters know they are well below average intelligence, and they are making it a good thing.

What is obvious is that you are proudly prejudiced against people below your smugly proclaimed but unproven and questionable intelligence.

All of the facts are linked in the OP.

Lmao you don't even read them

Link?

“In this case, the most obsequiously pro-Trump right-wing news outlet in America really literally is paid Russian propaganda,” Maddow said on “The Rachel Maddow Show.”

Edit: Oh... The case was thrown out because no reasonable person would believe that. /Edit

Crappy YouTube videos aren't links.

I ask again, link?

From your own 2nd link retard



Media lawyers note this is not the first time this sort of defense has been offered. A $10 million libel lawsuit filed by the owners of One America News Network against MSNBC's top star, Rachel Maddow, was dismissed in May when the judge ruled she had stretched the established facts allowably: "The context of Maddow's statement shows reasonable viewers would consider the contested statement to be opinion."

 

[struth]

A growing trend among tRump supporting media and lawyers, the "no reasonable person" defense.



First we have Sydney "the kraken" Powell claiming she shouldn't be prosecuted or disbarred for lying and wasting court's time and money because nobody with any brains would believe her outlandish claims.

Pro-Trump lawyer says ‘no reasonable person’ would believe her election lies

Lawyers for Sidney Powell argued conspiracies she laid out constituted legally protected first amendment speech

www.theguardian.com

Then there's Tucker Carlson and his lawyer's assertion that the "'general tenor' of the show should then inform a viewer that he is not stating actual facts about the topics he discusses.

You Literally Can't Believe The Facts Tucker Carlson Tells You. So Say Fox's Lawyers

Fox News viewers don't expect facts from Tucker Carlson, according to network lawyers who defended their star in a slander lawsuit filed by a woman who said she had an affair with President Trump.

www.npr.org

And now we've got lawyers stating that the insurrectionists are "short bus people'.

âTheyâre All Fucking Short-Bus Peopleâ: Capitol Riot Attorney Manages to Insult At Least Three Different Groups While Defending 1/6 Actions

The lawyer for the QAnon shaman told Talking Points Memo “These defendants…they’re all fucking short-bus people. These are people with brain damage, they’re fucking retarded, they’re on the goddamn spectrum.”

www.vanityfair.com

And that too much Fox News is detrimental to your mental health.

Fox News made me do it: Capitol attack suspect pulls âFoxitisâ defense

Anthony Antonio, who faces five charges over role in January riot, ‘started believing what was being fed to him’, lawyer says

www.theguardian.com

It's obvious that the leaders of the Republican party as well as the voters know they are well below average intelligence, and they are making it a good thing.

Anyway, this whole thing seems crazy to me.

yeah it’s the legal standard. It appears from the court dismissing the dembots silly lawsuits that the courts view the libtards aren’t reasonable people

 

[rightwinger]

A growing trend among tRump supporting media and lawyers, the "no reasonable person" defense.



First we have Sydney "the kraken" Powell claiming she shouldn't be prosecuted or disbarred for lying and wasting court's time and money because nobody with any brains would believe her outlandish claims.

Pro-Trump lawyer says ‘no reasonable person’ would believe her election lies

Lawyers for Sidney Powell argued conspiracies she laid out constituted legally protected first amendment speech

www.theguardian.com

Then there's Tucker Carlson and his lawyer's assertion that the "'general tenor' of the show should then inform a viewer that he is not stating actual facts about the topics he discusses.

You Literally Can't Believe The Facts Tucker Carlson Tells You. So Say Fox's Lawyers

Fox News viewers don't expect facts from Tucker Carlson, according to network lawyers who defended their star in a slander lawsuit filed by a woman who said she had an affair with President Trump.

www.npr.org

And now we've got lawyers stating that the insurrectionists are "short bus people'.

âTheyâre All Fucking Short-Bus Peopleâ: Capitol Riot Attorney Manages to Insult At Least Three Different Groups While Defending 1/6 Actions

The lawyer for the QAnon shaman told Talking Points Memo “These defendants…they’re all fucking short-bus people. These are people with brain damage, they’re fucking retarded, they’re on the goddamn spectrum.”

www.vanityfair.com

And that too much Fox News is detrimental to your mental health.

Fox News made me do it: Capitol attack suspect pulls âFoxitisâ defense

Anthony Antonio, who faces five charges over role in January riot, ‘started believing what was being fed to him’, lawyer says

www.theguardian.com

It's obvious that the leaders of the Republican party as well as the voters know they are well below average intelligence, and they are making it a good thing.

Anyway, this whole thing seems crazy to me.

They always say the Republicans are dumb but they are the ones to stupid to support themselves and always want free stuff.

It's always a good idea to know the difference between the words "to" and "too" before you call someone stupid.

I mean a person in grade school knows the difference and spelling of those words.

Where were you when you were taught this very basic spelling?

He is two dumb too no the difference

 

[Ghost of a Rider]

So no, not the same thing at all.

"'Anything beyond this is Maddow’s opinion or her exaggeration of the facts,' the judge noted in the ruling."

Wouldn't "exaggeration of the facts" constitute libel or lying? How exactly does one exaggerate a fact without making it a non-fact anyway?

Bingo! And Crepitus knows it too. But he's too disingenuous to admit that Rachel Maddow engages in propaganda and slander 24x7.

Op/ed isn't propaganda and slander.

Derp.

That may be but the question is, does she believe it? I don't know if Maddow does or not but a lot of liberals do. I've seen it right here on this forum many times. I will also say that liberals attack Hannity and Carlson and others for doing the exact same thing.

 

[Lysistrata]

Hilarious. The "no reasonable person" defense basically is an admission by Powell and Carlson that they and Fox are liars, and by the riotors that they are gullible idiots. And Powell admits that she lied to the court.

I don't understand why anyone would pay any attention to people like that.

That’s exactly the intent – to deflect attention from what’s real and important.

No reasonable person would believe Republicans believe this nonsense.

No reasonable person would believe Biden won the last election.

The biggest mistake opponents of the right can make is to underestimate conservatives and lose sight of the right’s true motive – to deflect, to divide, to undermine.

Conservatives are crazy but they’re not stupid – like Trump they’re con men, grifters, and gas-lighters; for conservatives, misinformation, conspiracy theories, and lies are political weapons.

Yeah... Worked for Maddow.

I find it amusing that you people think you're special. It only applies to the other side.

Edit: Let me be ASOLUTELY clear... I agree with you... All the way up till you don't apply your own standards to yourselves and the content you consume.

What do you contend that Maddox has misrepresented?

 

[Shelzin]

What do you contend that Maddox has misrepresented?

I don't want this to come out the wrong way... But I think it will regardless... Try reading the thread.

 

[j-mac]

A growing trend among tRump supporting media and lawyers, the "no reasonable person" defense.



First we have Sydney "the kraken" Powell claiming she shouldn't be prosecuted or disbarred for lying and wasting court's time and money because nobody with any brains would believe her outlandish claims.

Pro-Trump lawyer says ‘no reasonable person’ would believe her election lies

Lawyers for Sidney Powell argued conspiracies she laid out constituted legally protected first amendment speech

www.theguardian.com

Then there's Tucker Carlson and his lawyer's assertion that the "'general tenor' of the show should then inform a viewer that he is not stating actual facts about the topics he discusses.

You Literally Can't Believe The Facts Tucker Carlson Tells You. So Say Fox's Lawyers

Fox News viewers don't expect facts from Tucker Carlson, according to network lawyers who defended their star in a slander lawsuit filed by a woman who said she had an affair with President Trump.

www.npr.org

And now we've got lawyers stating that the insurrectionists are "short bus people'.

âTheyâre All Fucking Short-Bus Peopleâ: Capitol Riot Attorney Manages to Insult At Least Three Different Groups While Defending 1/6 Actions

The lawyer for the QAnon shaman told Talking Points Memo “These defendants…they’re all fucking short-bus people. These are people with brain damage, they’re fucking retarded, they’re on the goddamn spectrum.”

www.vanityfair.com

And that too much Fox News is detrimental to your mental health.

Fox News made me do it: Capitol attack suspect pulls âFoxitisâ defense

Anthony Antonio, who faces five charges over role in January riot, ‘started believing what was being fed to him’, lawyer says

www.theguardian.com

It's obvious that the leaders of the Republican party as well as the voters know they are well below average intelligence, and they are making it a good thing.

Anyway, this whole thing seems crazy to me.

The Nazis did the same thing you are doing here before they started the final solution...You should be ashamed of yourself.

 

[j-mac]

I don't want to shut them up. I am a consistent freedom of expression advocate. I want them to self-identify for us. I am also hopeful that their size will shrink enough so that it will fit where it belongs, on the fringe.

That quote is amazingly close to the conservative viewpoint about the government itself. On purpose?

I don't know. You asked, I answered.

So, you’d rather have one party rule heir Mac?

 

[Mac1958]

I don't want to shut them up. I am a consistent freedom of expression advocate. I want them to self-identify for us. I am also hopeful that their size will shrink enough so that it will fit where it belongs, on the fringe.

That quote is amazingly close to the conservative viewpoint about the government itself. On purpose?

I don't know. You asked, I answered.

So, you’d rather have one party rule heir Mac?

Nope.