jc456
Diamond Member
- Dec 18, 2013
- 139,249
- 29,154
So...this is the 25th Amendment:Negative! That is not a coup. That is a responsibility, given the facts of the case, by which the book, and the results of McCabe's actions have reached fruition. Rosenstein and McCabe would have been derelict in their duties had they not discussed all options, as it related to a president who could very possibly, and most likely, be working for Russiabut he did admit he discussed using the 25th amendment to take out a duly elected president. that is a coup.Lawrence's Last Word: Andrew McCabe's credibility So, if Andrew McCabe is the liar like Trump claims, then how come no Republican has refuted McCabe's book? There are some seriously damaging concerns McCabe points out in the book that lead to having a SC, and yet, neither Trump or his followers have any counter arguing points that dismiss those concerns. I mean think about it, if McCabe's concerns weren't legit, why hasn't the Right explained those concerns away? Obviously McCabe and Rosenstein were spot on to inject a SC with so many indictments and guilty pleas handed over to people surrounding the Trump campaign?
And if they have no answers, then what exactly was the justification for firing McCabe?
The Inspector General determined that McCabe lied, not President Trump.
It isn't up to Republicans to "refute" anything. I don't think one in a hundred thousand Republicans has read the man's book yet and its disrespectful to refute something they aren't looking at.
What makes you think that its the job of the unelected Secret Police to use the 25th Amendment to depose any president? Who do Rosenstein and McCabe think they are? Beria and Yezhov? Beria bragged he disposed of President Stalin.
Twenty-fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution - Wikipedia
Where does it prohibit members of the FBI or any agency or individual from INQUIRING as to whether the 25th Amendment applies?
naw, it isn't. sorry to burst your bubble.Oh it absolutely is. In the case of a national security threat, you bet your ass it is their responsibility to bring all options to the table for the defense of the country.not his job to be discussing the 25th amendment. sorry nothing else it could be.Negative! That is not a coup. That is a responsibility, given the facts of the case, by which the book, and the results of McCabe's actions have reached fruition. Rosenstein and McCabe would have been derelict in their duties had they not discussed all options, as it related to a president who could very possibly, and most likely, be working for Russiabut he did admit he discussed using the 25th amendment to take out a duly elected president. that is a coup.The Inspector General determined that McCabe lied, not President Trump.
It isn't up to Republicans to "refute" anything. I don't think one in a hundred thousand Republicans has read the man's book yet and its disrespectful to refute something they aren't looking at.
The 25th Amendment, explained: how a president can be declared unfit to serve
"Specifically, that’s Section 4 of the 25th Amendment to the Constitution. The amendment states that if, for whatever reason, the vice president and a majority of sitting Cabinet secretaries decide that the president is “unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office,” they can simply put that down in writing and send it to two people — the speaker of the House and the Senate’s president pro tempore."