No Russian Collusion? What now?

[Faun]

If Mueller had anything why is the Congress launching its own investigations?

Because they are not bound by the focus of the special counsel mandate, of course.Just as the federal prosecutors in New York and DC have taken up investigations both referred and not referred to them by the special counsel.

Come on man, you should be able to puzzle this out for yourself.

/——/ There are no limits on Mueller. That’s how he charged Cohen with tax fraud - nothing to do with collusion.

LOLOLOL

You rightards are such imbeciles. G’head, show where Mueller charged Cohen with tax fraud......

/——-/ Right here Tinkerbell: Cohen pleaded guilty to failure to report personal income taxes for the five-year period beginning in 2012. He also admitted to making false statements to a financial institution tied to a credit decision around February 2015, to willfully causing an unlawful corporate contribution from at least June 2016 to October 2016, and to making an excessive campaign contribution on October 27, 2016, according to his plea agreement.
Bloomberg - Are you a robot?

Thanks for proving me right — nothing in the article you posted states Mueller charged Cohen with tax fraud.

 

[SandSquid]

Fishing expositions. Looking for a crime.

That's what investigators do, when there is suspicious activity. You sold some stock in your spouse's company, the day before it tanked? expect to be investigated. You acquire a million dollars in assets in a year and flaunt it publicly, despite filing an income of only $30,000 on your taxes? Expect to be investigated. You work as a bank teller, and pay off your student loans the day after $30,000 goes missing from your vault? Expect to be investigated.

You don't have a leg to stand on, here.

/——/ What suspicious activity? Hillary losing when it was her turn?

That's your defense? It wasn't suspicious activity Republicans were investigating because "Hillary"? lol

Yes, suspicious activity. Trump campaign members holding secret meetings before the election with Russian spies. And then lying it was "about adoptions".

Yes it's suspicious that our US intelligence agencies say the day after Trump told Russia to hack Hillary and the DNC, Russia moved to hacking Hillary and the DNC.

That's suspicious. It's suspicious that when our FBI, CIA, and NSA all say russia was influencing our election, we have a president trying to tell everyone nothing actually happened based on absolutely no proof, just Putin says so.

 

[Cellblock2429]

What suspicious activity?

Can't think of a single thing, eh? haha... bullshit. Go waste someone else's time.

/——-/ Actually I did think of something suspicious: Russian Government Initiative Gave Millions to Clinton Foundation

 

[SandSquid]

If Mueller had anything why is the Congress launching its own investigations?

Because they are not bound by the focus of the special counsel mandate, of course.Just as the federal prosecutors in New York and DC have taken up investigations both referred and not referred to them by the special counsel.

Come on man, you should be able to puzzle this out for yourself.

/——/ There are no limits on Mueller. That’s how he charged Cohen with tax fraud - nothing to do with collusion.

LOLOLOL

You rightards are such imbeciles. G’head, show where Mueller charged Cohen with tax fraud......

/——-/ Right here Tinkerbell: Cohen pleaded guilty to failure to report personal income taxes for the five-year period beginning in 2012. He also admitted to making false statements to a financial institution tied to a credit decision around February 2015, to willfully causing an unlawful corporate contribution from at least June 2016 to October 2016, and to making an excessive campaign contribution on October 27, 2016, according to his plea agreement.
Bloomberg - Are you a robot?

Yes, when Mueller came across illegal activity it looks like he referred that to the right department to follow up on.

Are you saying that if you had a warrant to search a house as a DEA member, and when you walked in, during your investigation, you saw kids chained up downstairs starving, you would ignore that since you are investigating drug stuff and not that?

Sickening that you believe a US criminal investigation should ignore criminal activity when they see it. That's just gross. Maybe that's how Putin's group does it. But in the US, if our investigators see criminal activity, they report it. Thank GOD I live in the USA where that's true and not Iran or North Korea, or Russia, where they can sweep stuff under the rug when they want like you are clamoring for. Why do you feel their way is better?

 

[Hale]

That's what investigators do, when there is suspicious activity. You sold some stock in your spouse's company, the day before it tanked? expect to be investigated. You acquire a million dollars in assets in a year and flaunt it publicly, despite filing an income of only $30,000 on your taxes? Expect to be investigated. You work as a bank teller, and pay off your student loans the day after $30,000 goes missing from your vault? Expect to be investigated.

You don't have a leg to stand on, here.

False analogy. The investigations you describe in your example are related to the accused's activity.

Zervos is fishing for completely independent cases she hopes exists, in the false assumption that they would lend credence to her case.

 

[Daryl Hunt]

Now that Cohen has been revealed as a total nothing-burger, what shall we do next?

Should we pretend Cohen never happened and continue the collusion narrative, promising an impending Mueller "bombshell"? Or shall we take a different, wiser tangent? One thing is certain, Trump is GUILTY and UNFIT, and something must be done. Even a Republican like me knows that!

So in a true bipartisan spirit, I've compiled some possibilities that should be considered. I've run these through the same computer used to predict global warming, so the actual probabilities are included. They're 100% accurate, you can trust me:

• Trump is an alien from the planet Flaflooga, sent to take over the Earth with his mind-ray: 87%
• Trump is literally Hitler, thawed from cryogenic suspension and here to establish the New Reich: 92%
• A Genuine Birth Certificate will be found proving that Trump is a Russian national (how ironic!): 41%
• Cancelled checks from Trump to Putin with the memo "Thanks for the boost" will surface: 78%
• Trump and Pence will both get "an offer they can't refuse" from Kim: 18%
• Pelosi and Schumer will prove that Trump is actually their 17 year old love child: 29%
• AOC will tweet a clapback so stunning that Trump will resign in shame: 65%

As you can see, there is at least a 410% chance that Trump should not be President. I'm sure there are more possibilities, but the computer overheated. This should take us well past 2020.

You're welcome, Democrats!

I guess those other million pages they are pouring over are clean as well. So far, anyone that has been with trump since 2012 has been arrested and either has been tried and convicted or awaiting trial. There are a few that Mueller hasn't approached yet but he will. The best thing for Trump and the good of the Nation is for Trump to do a Nixon. For you idjit cupcake rightwingfruitcakes, Nixon was impeached but the didn't have the votes in the senate to convict him. Plus, the charges, if brought today, would not have stood up legally. But, like Trump, Nixon was loosing it and on one special day, resigned.

No, the Senate never got to try an impeachment on Nixon since Nixon resigned prior to being impeached.

Nixon was Impeached by the House. He was never tried by the Senate. That made him only the second President to ever be impeached (President Johnson being the first) and Clinton being the only other one. Johnson and Clinton ended up not getting the required votes in the Senate for a conviction while Nixon resigned before that became a factor. Impeachment is done by the House, not the Senate.

 

[Cellblock2429]

Fishing expositions. Looking for a crime.

That's what investigators do, when there is suspicious activity. You sold some stock in your spouse's company, the day before it tanked? expect to be investigated. You acquire a million dollars in assets in a year and flaunt it publicly, despite filing an income of only $30,000 on your taxes? Expect to be investigated. You work as a bank teller, and pay off your student loans the day after $30,000 goes missing from your vault? Expect to be investigated.

You don't have a leg to stand on, here.

/——/ What suspicious activity? Hillary losing when it was her turn?

That's your defense? It wasn't suspicious activity Republicans were investigating because "Hillary"? lol

Yes, suspicious activity. Trump campaign members holding secret meetings before the election with Russian spies. And then lying it was "about adoptions".

Yes it's suspicious that our US intelligence agencies say the day after Trump told Russia to hack Hillary and the DNC, Russia moved to hacking Hillary and the DNC.

That's suspicious. It's suspicious that when our FBI, CIA, and NSA all say russia was influencing our election, we have a president trying to tell everyone nothing actually happened based on absolutely no proof, just Putin says so.

/——/ When did Trump tell Russia to hack Hildabeast emails? Why would Russia need Trumps permission or request? Do you know how ridiculous you sound?

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Actually I did think of something suspicious

No, all you "actually" did was find way number 98,987,345 for you to have a little fit and engage in desperate, trump cult whataboutism.

glad I could clarify that for you.

 

[Cellblock2429]

Actually I did think of something suspicious

No, all you "actually" did was find way number 98,987,345 for you to have a little fit and engage in desperate, trump cult whataboutism.

glad I could clarify that for you.

/——/ Russia gave Trump $0 but gave Hildabeast millions. I find that suspicious

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

The investigations you describe are related to the accused's activity.

Correct, just as any investigation into the Trump campaign for contacts and coordination with russians, or into trump for obstruction or campaign finance law violation, or into the inaugural committee for violations of the law, are directly related to real world actions and events.

so the analogy stands. It's spot on.

 

[SandSquid]

/——/ When did Trump tell Russia to hack Hildabeast emails? Why would Russia need Trumps permission or request? Do you know how ridiculous you sound?

July 27, 2016 was when he asked for Russia's help to defeat Hillary.

If you are uneducated on the subject please go back and educate yourself first, then feel free to return. But when you sit there asking uninformed questions that just show you have no clue on the subject at hand, it doesn't help your stance.

Thanks!

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Russia gave Trump $0 but gave Hildabeast millions. I find that suspicious

You desperately try to turn every thread into a hillary or obama thread. i find that cultish.

 

[Cellblock2429]

Now that Cohen has been revealed as a total nothing-burger, what shall we do next?

Should we pretend Cohen never happened and continue the collusion narrative, promising an impending Mueller "bombshell"? Or shall we take a different, wiser tangent? One thing is certain, Trump is GUILTY and UNFIT, and something must be done. Even a Republican like me knows that!

So in a true bipartisan spirit, I've compiled some possibilities that should be considered. I've run these through the same computer used to predict global warming, so the actual probabilities are included. They're 100% accurate, you can trust me:

• Trump is an alien from the planet Flaflooga, sent to take over the Earth with his mind-ray: 87%
• Trump is literally Hitler, thawed from cryogenic suspension and here to establish the New Reich: 92%
• A Genuine Birth Certificate will be found proving that Trump is a Russian national (how ironic!): 41%
• Cancelled checks from Trump to Putin with the memo "Thanks for the boost" will surface: 78%
• Trump and Pence will both get "an offer they can't refuse" from Kim: 18%
• Pelosi and Schumer will prove that Trump is actually their 17 year old love child: 29%
• AOC will tweet a clapback so stunning that Trump will resign in shame: 65%

As you can see, there is at least a 410% chance that Trump should not be President. I'm sure there are more possibilities, but the computer overheated. This should take us well past 2020.

You're welcome, Democrats!

I guess those other million pages they are pouring over are clean as well. So far, anyone that has been with trump since 2012 has been arrested and either has been tried and convicted or awaiting trial. There are a few that Mueller hasn't approached yet but he will. The best thing for Trump and the good of the Nation is for Trump to do a Nixon. For you idjit cupcake rightwingfruitcakes, Nixon was impeached but the didn't have the votes in the senate to convict him. Plus, the charges, if brought today, would not have stood up legally. But, like Trump, Nixon was loosing it and on one special day, resigned.

No, the Senate never got to try an impeachment on Nixon since Nixon resigned prior to being impeached.

Nixon was Impeached by the House. He was never tried by the Senate. That made him only the second President to ever be impeached (President Johnson being the first) and Clinton being the only other one. Johnson and Clinton ended up not getting the required votes in the Senate for a conviction while Nixon resigned before that became a factor. Impeachment is done by the House, not the Senate.

/——/ Nixon resigned before he was impeached.

 

[Cellblock2429]

Russia gave Trump $0 but gave Hildabeast millions. I find that suspicious

You desperately try to turn every thread into a hillary or obama thread. i find that cultish.

/——-/ Just answeing the question “Did you find anything suspicious.” And I did. So don’t shoot the messenger.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Nixon resigned before he was impeached.

well, technically, that is not accurate. The House impeached him. And he resigned once he knew he would lose his trial in the Senate.

 

[Cellblock2429]

/——/ When did Trump tell Russia to hack Hildabeast emails? Why would Russia need Trumps permission or request? Do you know how ridiculous you sound?

July 27, 2016 was when he asked for Russia's help to defeat Hillary.

If you are uneducated on the subject please go back and educate yourself first, then feel free to return. But when you sit there asking uninformed questions that just show you have no clue on the subject at hand, it doesn't help your stance.

Thanks!

/——-/ Here is the exact quote: “Russia, if you're listening, I hope you're able to find the 30,000 emails that are missing, I think you will probably be rewarded mightily by our press," the Republican presidential nominee told reporters.

After the news conference, Trump campaign Senior Communications Advisor Jason Miller clarified to NBC that Trump wasn't calling on anyone to intervene, but instead was pushing anyone who has them to hand them over to authorities. Trump tweeted as much minutes after the news conference.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Just answeing the question “Did you find anything suspicious.”

yes, by pretending to be retarded, when I obviously was talking about contemporary investigations into trump and his circle, as that was the topic in hand. Good for you, you pretended to be retarded. Here's a drool bucket as your special reward:

 

[Cellblock2429]

Nixon resigned before he was impeached.

well, technically, that is not accurate. The House impeached him. And he resigned once he knew he would lose his trial in the Senate.

/——-/ https://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/house-begins-impeachment-of-nixon

 

[Cellblock2429]

Just answeing the question “Did you find anything suspicious.”

yes, by pretending to be retarded, when I obviously was talking about contemporary investigations into trump and his circle, as that was the topic in hand. Good for you, you pretended to be retarded. Here's a drool bucket as your special reward:

/——/ Learn how to properly frame questions and you won’t end up with egg on your face.

 

[Rigby5]

Nixon resigned before he was impeached.

well, technically, that is not accurate. The House impeached him. And he resigned once he knew he would lose his trial in the Senate.

No, that is not really accurate.
The House STARTED the process with a resolution to investigate being passed.
That is not a finished impeachment process.
It is just the start of deciding if there was sufficient grounds for impeachement.
Then even if grounds for impeachment were established, that would still not prove guilt.
That would then require a trial as well.

{...
An impeachment process against Richard Nixon was formally initiated on February 6, 1974, when the United States House of Representatives passed a resolution, H.Res. 803, giving its Judiciary Committee authority to investigate whether sufficient grounds existed to impeach Richard Nixon, the 37th President of the United States[1] of high crimes and misdemeanors, primarily related to the Watergate scandal.
...}

Impeachment process against Richard Nixon - Wikipedia