MrShangles
Gold Member
- May 27, 2015
- 1,817
- 347
No, Samantha Bee's vulgarity isn't equivalent to Roseanne Barr's racism
Being foul-mouthed is not the same as a white person calling a black person an ape, or a Jewish Holocaust survivor a Nazi.
It’s sad that I need to explain this, but being racist and spreading anti-Semitic propaganda is worse. Much, much worse.
Why? Because Barr’s comments belittle an entire race of people and help spread paranoid fear of a Jewish global order. Dehumanizing entire groups of people as such puts them in danger of violent reprisal, and helps to justify the stripping of their civil rights.
There is no such inherent threat in Bee's vulgarity. Rather, equating crudeness with Roseanne's outlandish tweets normalizes racism and anti-Semitism.
That the White House would issue a full-throated condemnation of Bee while the president offered a dog-whistling defense of Barr speaks volumes.
Liberals have no problem turning on their own when they deserve it. See Kathy Griffin, Al Franken, Aziz Anzari, Lena Dunham … the list goes on.
This is not one of those cases.
Besides, if conservatives genuinely think dropping the C-bomb on TV is a firable offense — and they aren’t just culture war trolling — there’s a big fat target for their ire sitting in the White House.
No, Samantha Bee's vulgarity isn't equivalent to Roseanne Barr's racism
I have no problem with vulgarity but do have a problem with racism.
You can compare anyone in the world with a ape, but you better not compare a black with an ape? WTF you black folks need to turn in that damn race card, y’all are the only ones that use race as a crutch, if you don’t get what you want it must be racist, you don’t get hired it must be racist,
I sitting here now watching the evening news and all the suspected criminals are all black, must be racist.
Gets old!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk