No, Sarah, you're not as much of a scientist as Bill Nye

[JimH52]

You and Sarah read

CO2 - the major cause of global warming | Time for change

That is wrong, because the Earth has been warming for 20,000 years before the industrial revolution began, if not North America would still be covered with 1,000 feet of ice.

Please feel free to try again, and remember that the earth has not warmed in 20 years all the while Carbon has been rising, unlike your IQ.

Next

Global Warming : Feature Articles

The predicted rate of warmth is about 20 times that of the past.

Not true, because if that were true, there would be no ice on the Earth. Glaciers once covered North America into NJ, they melted by 10,000 years ago and are still melting. You do not know the facts, you just know the garbage that you read, that pretends that there never was an ice age.

So try again little child.

You and Sarah belong together....

 

[Bassman007]

You and Sarah read

CO2 - the major cause of global warming | Time for change

That is wrong, because the Earth has been warming for 20,000 years before the industrial revolution began, if not North America would still be covered with 1,000 feet of ice.

Please feel free to try again, and remember that the earth has not warmed in 20 years all the while Carbon has been rising, unlike your IQ.

Next

Global Warming : Feature Articles

The predicted rate of warmth is about 20 times that of the past.

Not true, because if that were true, there would be no ice on the Earth. Glaciers once covered North America into NJ, they melted by 10,000 years ago and are still melting. You do not know the facts, you just know the garbage that you read, that pretends that there never was an ice age.

So try again little child.

You and Sarah belong together....

So you will not argue with the truth, very good.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Sarah Palin expressed interest in being head of the Department of Energy in a Trump administration...

...one of the departments Trump wants to abolish.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Why are LWNJs unable to discern the difference between a scientist and an academic?

Why don't you ask some these people?

science academy - Google Search

 

[jillian]

Bill Nye fell for the climate change nonsense? Sarah has a point then.

right....education and scientific knowledge pale in comparison to rightwingnuttery.

 

[JimH52]

You and Sarah read

CO2 - the major cause of global warming | Time for change

That is wrong, because the Earth has been warming for 20,000 years before the industrial revolution began, if not North America would still be covered with 1,000 feet of ice.

Please feel free to try again, and remember that the earth has not warmed in 20 years all the while Carbon has been rising, unlike your IQ.

Next

Global Warming : Feature Articles

The predicted rate of warmth is about 20 times that of the past.

Not true, because if that were true, there would be no ice on the Earth. Glaciers once covered North America into NJ, they melted by 10,000 years ago and are still melting. You do not know the facts, you just know the garbage that you read, that pretends that there never was an ice age.

So try again little child.

You and Sarah belong together....

So you will not argue with the truth, very good.

You and Sarah certainly share the same IQ. You could do the movie Dumber and Dumbest....

 

[Bassman007]

That is wrong, because the Earth has been warming for 20,000 years before the industrial revolution began, if not North America would still be covered with 1,000 feet of ice.

Please feel free to try again, and remember that the earth has not warmed in 20 years all the while Carbon has been rising, unlike your IQ.

Next

Global Warming : Feature Articles

The predicted rate of warmth is about 20 times that of the past.

Not true, because if that were true, there would be no ice on the Earth. Glaciers once covered North America into NJ, they melted by 10,000 years ago and are still melting. You do not know the facts, you just know the garbage that you read, that pretends that there never was an ice age.

So try again little child.

You and Sarah belong together....

So you will not argue with the truth, very good.

You and Sarah certainly share the same IQ. You could do the movie Dumber and Dumbest....

So you have given up on your climate change lies that I can disprove in a microsecond, no matter what babble you post. You are learning, this is good.

 

[Camp]

Global Warming : Feature Articles

The predicted rate of warmth is about 20 times that of the past.

Not true, because if that were true, there would be no ice on the Earth. Glaciers once covered North America into NJ, they melted by 10,000 years ago and are still melting. You do not know the facts, you just know the garbage that you read, that pretends that there never was an ice age.

So try again little child.

You and Sarah belong together....

So you will not argue with the truth, very good.

You and Sarah certainly share the same IQ. You could do the movie Dumber and Dumbest....

So you have given up on your climate change lies that I can disprove in a microsecond, no matter what babble you post. You are learning, this is good.

The thread is not about climate change. That subject is debated endlessly and the deflection attempting to make it the issue does not change the facts that in all these posts and pages no one has been able to dispute that Bill Nye fits the formal and academically accepted definition of what a scientist is. Nor has any evidence been given that Sarah Palin has s shred of evidence to indicate she has any credentials whatsoever to call herself a scientist, let alone claim she is as much of a scientist as Bill Nye. In other words, Palin made a disparaging remark about a person that amounts to a blunt and blatant lie.

 

[Bassman007]

Not true, because if that were true, there would be no ice on the Earth. Glaciers once covered North America into NJ, they melted by 10,000 years ago and are still melting. You do not know the facts, you just know the garbage that you read, that pretends that there never was an ice age.

So try again little child.

You and Sarah belong together....

So you will not argue with the truth, very good.

You and Sarah certainly share the same IQ. You could do the movie Dumber and Dumbest....

So you have given up on your climate change lies that I can disprove in a microsecond, no matter what babble you post. You are learning, this is good.

The thread is not about climate change. That subject is debated endlessly and the deflection attempting to make it the issue does not change the facts that in all these posts and pages no one has been able to dispute that Bill Nye fits the formal and academically accepted definition of what a scientist is. Nor has any evidence been given that Sarah Palin has s shred of evidence to indicate she has any credentials whatsoever to call herself a scientist, let alone claim she is as much of a scientist as Bill Nye. In other words, Palin made a disparaging remark about a person that amounts to a blunt and blatant lie.

There is not a shred of evidence that climate change on the Earth has not been happening for over 4 billion years, and Bill Nye can not present this evidence that this is not true.

and there is nothing you can post to prove me wrong.

Next moron

 

[SuperDemocrat]

Not true, because if that were true, there would be no ice on the Earth. Glaciers once covered North America into NJ, they melted by 10,000 years ago and are still melting. You do not know the facts, you just know the garbage that you read, that pretends that there never was an ice age.

So try again little child.

You and Sarah belong together....

So you will not argue with the truth, very good.

You and Sarah certainly share the same IQ. You could do the movie Dumber and Dumbest....

So you have given up on your climate change lies that I can disprove in a microsecond, no matter what babble you post. You are learning, this is good.

The thread is not about climate change. That subject is debated endlessly and the deflection attempting to make it the issue does not change the facts that in all these posts and pages no one has been able to dispute that Bill Nye fits the formal and academically accepted definition of what a scientist is. Nor has any evidence been given that Sarah Palin has s shred of evidence to indicate she has any credentials whatsoever to call herself a scientist, let alone claim she is as much of a scientist as Bill Nye. In other words, Palin made a disparaging remark about a person that amounts to a blunt and blatant lie.

Sarah Palin never claimed to be a scientist. She just disagreed with a kid's television character by the name of BIll Nye the science guy. Speech that disagrees with a children's television character is still covered under the first amendment. She pointed out that the guy isn't a scientist which is true. At best, he was an employee at Boeing which doesn't count as scientific research but some people have decided to take his television title of "Bill Nye the science guy' literally and push him out there to be the spokesperson for global warming. We could have picked out a lot of other professors who actually do research at big universities or have written a lot of things about it but instead, we have to take the word of a children's show character on this issue.

What is at the heart of this issue is democracy because peer reviewed theories are fine for the scientific community but in a society that values democracy the peers are not an exlcusive group of people but everybody. The public's own peer review of global warming has rejected it and, right or wrong, the real scientist who believe global warming will have to accept that.

 

[Bassman007]

You and Sarah belong together....

So you will not argue with the truth, very good.

You and Sarah certainly share the same IQ. You could do the movie Dumber and Dumbest....

So you have given up on your climate change lies that I can disprove in a microsecond, no matter what babble you post. You are learning, this is good.

The thread is not about climate change. That subject is debated endlessly and the deflection attempting to make it the issue does not change the facts that in all these posts and pages no one has been able to dispute that Bill Nye fits the formal and academically accepted definition of what a scientist is. Nor has any evidence been given that Sarah Palin has s shred of evidence to indicate she has any credentials whatsoever to call herself a scientist, let alone claim she is as much of a scientist as Bill Nye. In other words, Palin made a disparaging remark about a person that amounts to a blunt and blatant lie.

Sarah Palin never claimed to be a scientist. She just disagreed with a kid's television character by the name of BIll Nye the science guy. Speech that disagrees with a children's television character is still covered under the first amendment. She pointed out that the guy isn't a scientist which is true. At best, he was an employee at Boeing which doesn't count as scientific research but some people have decided to take his television title of "Bill Nye the science guy' literally and push him out there to be the spokesperson for global warming. We could have picked out a lot of other professors who actually do research at big universities or have written a lot of things about it but instead, we have to take the word of a children's show character on this issue.

What is at the heart of this issue is democracy because peer reviewed theories are fine for the scientific community but in a society that values democracy the peers are not an exlcusive group of people but everybody. The public's own peer review of global warming has rejected it and, right or wrong, the real scientist who believe global warming will have to accept that.

Wrong, climate change is not a peer reviewed theory, 20,000 years ago glaciers covered all of Canada and half of the USA, they were created by climate change, and were melted and are still melting because of climate change. This is fact not theory, thus climate change is real and is not caused by humans. and Al Gore never speaks anymore because CO2 levels are skyrocketing but the Earth has not warmed in 20 years now.

The end.

 

[SuperDemocrat]

I just discovered a new way to troll the left. Say something nice about Sarah Palin and they come out in droves.

 

[Camp]

You and Sarah belong together....

So you will not argue with the truth, very good.

You and Sarah certainly share the same IQ. You could do the movie Dumber and Dumbest....

So you have given up on your climate change lies that I can disprove in a microsecond, no matter what babble you post. You are learning, this is good.

The thread is not about climate change. That subject is debated endlessly and the deflection attempting to make it the issue does not change the facts that in all these posts and pages no one has been able to dispute that Bill Nye fits the formal and academically accepted definition of what a scientist is. Nor has any evidence been given that Sarah Palin has s shred of evidence to indicate she has any credentials whatsoever to call herself a scientist, let alone claim she is as much of a scientist as Bill Nye. In other words, Palin made a disparaging remark about a person that amounts to a blunt and blatant lie.

Sarah Palin never claimed to be a scientist. She just disagreed with a kid's television character by the name of BIll Nye the science guy. Speech that disagrees with a children's television character is still covered under the first amendment. She pointed out that the guy isn't a scientist which is true. At best, he was an employee at Boeing which doesn't count as scientific research but some people have decided to take his television title of "Bill Nye the science guy' literally and push him out there to be the spokesperson for global warming. We could have picked out a lot of other professors who actually do research at big universities or have written a lot of things about it but instead, we have to take the word of a children's show character on this issue.

What is at the heart of this issue is democracy because peer reviewed theories are fine for the scientific community but in a society that values democracy the peers are not an exlcusive group of people but everybody. The public's own peer review of global warming has rejected it and, right or wrong, the real scientist who believe global warming will have to accept that.

Sorry, but you have to make up a definition of what a scientist is to promote your agenda driven opinion. Nye fits into the accepted definition by virtue of his published works on the subject of science. You can't just make up new and alternate definitions of a word when the official one doesn't fit your agenda and be expect to be credible.

 

[Bassman007]

I just discovered a new way to troll the left. Say something nice about Sarah Palin and they come out in droves.

You are the one who came out..................LOL LOL LOL

 

[Bassman007]

So you will not argue with the truth, very good.

You and Sarah certainly share the same IQ. You could do the movie Dumber and Dumbest....

So you have given up on your climate change lies that I can disprove in a microsecond, no matter what babble you post. You are learning, this is good.

The thread is not about climate change. That subject is debated endlessly and the deflection attempting to make it the issue does not change the facts that in all these posts and pages no one has been able to dispute that Bill Nye fits the formal and academically accepted definition of what a scientist is. Nor has any evidence been given that Sarah Palin has s shred of evidence to indicate she has any credentials whatsoever to call herself a scientist, let alone claim she is as much of a scientist as Bill Nye. In other words, Palin made a disparaging remark about a person that amounts to a blunt and blatant lie.

Sarah Palin never claimed to be a scientist. She just disagreed with a kid's television character by the name of BIll Nye the science guy. Speech that disagrees with a children's television character is still covered under the first amendment. She pointed out that the guy isn't a scientist which is true. At best, he was an employee at Boeing which doesn't count as scientific research but some people have decided to take his television title of "Bill Nye the science guy' literally and push him out there to be the spokesperson for global warming. We could have picked out a lot of other professors who actually do research at big universities or have written a lot of things about it but instead, we have to take the word of a children's show character on this issue.

What is at the heart of this issue is democracy because peer reviewed theories are fine for the scientific community but in a society that values democracy the peers are not an exlcusive group of people but everybody. The public's own peer review of global warming has rejected it and, right or wrong, the real scientist who believe global warming will have to accept that.

Sorry, but you have to make up a definition of what a scientist is to promote your agenda driven opinion. Nye fits into the accepted definition by virtue of his published works on the subject of science. You can't just make up new and alternate definitions of a word when the official one doesn't fit your agenda and be expect to be credible.

Is Bill Gates a computer scientist, or a dropout? who's credentials would you rather have Gates or Nyes.............

LOL, Nye is nothing and nobody, and Mr. Wizard was way better anyway

 

[ChrisL]

You and Sarah certainly share the same IQ. You could do the movie Dumber and Dumbest....

So you have given up on your climate change lies that I can disprove in a microsecond, no matter what babble you post. You are learning, this is good.

The thread is not about climate change. That subject is debated endlessly and the deflection attempting to make it the issue does not change the facts that in all these posts and pages no one has been able to dispute that Bill Nye fits the formal and academically accepted definition of what a scientist is. Nor has any evidence been given that Sarah Palin has s shred of evidence to indicate she has any credentials whatsoever to call herself a scientist, let alone claim she is as much of a scientist as Bill Nye. In other words, Palin made a disparaging remark about a person that amounts to a blunt and blatant lie.

Sarah Palin never claimed to be a scientist. She just disagreed with a kid's television character by the name of BIll Nye the science guy. Speech that disagrees with a children's television character is still covered under the first amendment. She pointed out that the guy isn't a scientist which is true. At best, he was an employee at Boeing which doesn't count as scientific research but some people have decided to take his television title of "Bill Nye the science guy' literally and push him out there to be the spokesperson for global warming. We could have picked out a lot of other professors who actually do research at big universities or have written a lot of things about it but instead, we have to take the word of a children's show character on this issue.

What is at the heart of this issue is democracy because peer reviewed theories are fine for the scientific community but in a society that values democracy the peers are not an exlcusive group of people but everybody. The public's own peer review of global warming has rejected it and, right or wrong, the real scientist who believe global warming will have to accept that.

Sorry, but you have to make up a definition of what a scientist is to promote your agenda driven opinion. Nye fits into the accepted definition by virtue of his published works on the subject of science. You can't just make up new and alternate definitions of a word when the official one doesn't fit your agenda and be expect to be credible.

Is Bill Gates a computer scientist, or a dropout? who's credentials would you rather have Gates or Nyes.............

LOL, Nye is nothing and nobody, and Mr. Wizard was way better anyway

I'm still willing to bet he knows more than Ms. Palin. Lol. I don't have anything against her. She seems like a nice enough woman, but I don't think "brains" is her strong point.

 

[JimH52]

So you have given up on your climate change lies that I can disprove in a microsecond, no matter what babble you post. You are learning, this is good.

The thread is not about climate change. That subject is debated endlessly and the deflection attempting to make it the issue does not change the facts that in all these posts and pages no one has been able to dispute that Bill Nye fits the formal and academically accepted definition of what a scientist is. Nor has any evidence been given that Sarah Palin has s shred of evidence to indicate she has any credentials whatsoever to call herself a scientist, let alone claim she is as much of a scientist as Bill Nye. In other words, Palin made a disparaging remark about a person that amounts to a blunt and blatant lie.

Sarah Palin never claimed to be a scientist. She just disagreed with a kid's television character by the name of BIll Nye the science guy. Speech that disagrees with a children's television character is still covered under the first amendment. She pointed out that the guy isn't a scientist which is true. At best, he was an employee at Boeing which doesn't count as scientific research but some people have decided to take his television title of "Bill Nye the science guy' literally and push him out there to be the spokesperson for global warming. We could have picked out a lot of other professors who actually do research at big universities or have written a lot of things about it but instead, we have to take the word of a children's show character on this issue.

What is at the heart of this issue is democracy because peer reviewed theories are fine for the scientific community but in a society that values democracy the peers are not an exlcusive group of people but everybody. The public's own peer review of global warming has rejected it and, right or wrong, the real scientist who believe global warming will have to accept that.

Sorry, but you have to make up a definition of what a scientist is to promote your agenda driven opinion. Nye fits into the accepted definition by virtue of his published works on the subject of science. You can't just make up new and alternate definitions of a word when the official one doesn't fit your agenda and be expect to be credible.

Is Bill Gates a computer scientist, or a dropout? who's credentials would you rather have Gates or Nyes.............

LOL, Nye is nothing and nobody, and Mr. Wizard was way better anyway

I'm still willing to bet he knows more than Ms. Palin. Lol. I don't have anything against her. She seems like a nice enough woman, but I don't think "brains" is her strong point.

That is an understatement. She is trailer trash who got lucky when poor McCain chose her as running mate. Worked out well, huh ?

After W, the Dems could have nominated OJ and won. What a goof W was....

 

[amrchaos]

I just discovered a new way to troll the left. Say something nice about Sarah Palin and they come out in droves.

Careful

Every side Sarah endorsed Trump, many on the right has targeted her! She is may not survive this political season!

Her fortunes ride with Trump!

 

[Bassman007]

So you have given up on your climate change lies that I can disprove in a microsecond, no matter what babble you post. You are learning, this is good.

The thread is not about climate change. That subject is debated endlessly and the deflection attempting to make it the issue does not change the facts that in all these posts and pages no one has been able to dispute that Bill Nye fits the formal and academically accepted definition of what a scientist is. Nor has any evidence been given that Sarah Palin has s shred of evidence to indicate she has any credentials whatsoever to call herself a scientist, let alone claim she is as much of a scientist as Bill Nye. In other words, Palin made a disparaging remark about a person that amounts to a blunt and blatant lie.

Sarah Palin never claimed to be a scientist. She just disagreed with a kid's television character by the name of BIll Nye the science guy. Speech that disagrees with a children's television character is still covered under the first amendment. She pointed out that the guy isn't a scientist which is true. At best, he was an employee at Boeing which doesn't count as scientific research but some people have decided to take his television title of "Bill Nye the science guy' literally and push him out there to be the spokesperson for global warming. We could have picked out a lot of other professors who actually do research at big universities or have written a lot of things about it but instead, we have to take the word of a children's show character on this issue.

What is at the heart of this issue is democracy because peer reviewed theories are fine for the scientific community but in a society that values democracy the peers are not an exlcusive group of people but everybody. The public's own peer review of global warming has rejected it and, right or wrong, the real scientist who believe global warming will have to accept that.

Sorry, but you have to make up a definition of what a scientist is to promote your agenda driven opinion. Nye fits into the accepted definition by virtue of his published works on the subject of science. You can't just make up new and alternate definitions of a word when the official one doesn't fit your agenda and be expect to be credible.

Is Bill Gates a computer scientist, or a dropout? who's credentials would you rather have Gates or Nyes.............

LOL, Nye is nothing and nobody, and Mr. Wizard was way better anyway

I'm still willing to bet he knows more than Ms. Palin. Lol. I don't have anything against her. She seems like a nice enough woman, but I don't think "brains" is her strong point.

Bill Nye knows nothing, all he does is parrot what other people say, any birdbrain can do that. Palin has better ideas than Nye on any day.

 

[idb]

You and Sarah certainly share the same IQ. You could do the movie Dumber and Dumbest....

So you have given up on your climate change lies that I can disprove in a microsecond, no matter what babble you post. You are learning, this is good.

The thread is not about climate change. That subject is debated endlessly and the deflection attempting to make it the issue does not change the facts that in all these posts and pages no one has been able to dispute that Bill Nye fits the formal and academically accepted definition of what a scientist is. Nor has any evidence been given that Sarah Palin has s shred of evidence to indicate she has any credentials whatsoever to call herself a scientist, let alone claim she is as much of a scientist as Bill Nye. In other words, Palin made a disparaging remark about a person that amounts to a blunt and blatant lie.

Sarah Palin never claimed to be a scientist. She just disagreed with a kid's television character by the name of BIll Nye the science guy. Speech that disagrees with a children's television character is still covered under the first amendment. She pointed out that the guy isn't a scientist which is true. At best, he was an employee at Boeing which doesn't count as scientific research but some people have decided to take his television title of "Bill Nye the science guy' literally and push him out there to be the spokesperson for global warming. We could have picked out a lot of other professors who actually do research at big universities or have written a lot of things about it but instead, we have to take the word of a children's show character on this issue.

What is at the heart of this issue is democracy because peer reviewed theories are fine for the scientific community but in a society that values democracy the peers are not an exlcusive group of people but everybody. The public's own peer review of global warming has rejected it and, right or wrong, the real scientist who believe global warming will have to accept that.

Sorry, but you have to make up a definition of what a scientist is to promote your agenda driven opinion. Nye fits into the accepted definition by virtue of his published works on the subject of science. You can't just make up new and alternate definitions of a word when the official one doesn't fit your agenda and be expect to be credible.

Is Bill Gates a computer scientist, or a dropout? who's credentials would you rather have Gates or Nyes.............

LOL, Nye is nothing and nobody, and Mr. Wizard was way better anyway

"Is Bill Gates a computer scientist, or a dropout? who's credentials would you rather have Gates or Nyes.............

LOL, Nye is nothing and nobody, and Mr. Wizard was way better anyway"

...and Bill Gates believes that we need to reduce CO2 to save the planet and that it needs to be done by the governments because..."Yes, the government will be somewhat inept—but the private sector is in general inept. How many companies do venture capitalists invest in that go poorly? By far most of them."
Bill Gates: ‘We Need an Energy Miracle’