No, Sarah, you're not as much of a scientist as Bill Nye

[JimH52]

The thread is not about climate change. That subject is debated endlessly and the deflection attempting to make it the issue does not change the facts that in all these posts and pages no one has been able to dispute that Bill Nye fits the formal and academically accepted definition of what a scientist is. Nor has any evidence been given that Sarah Palin has s shred of evidence to indicate she has any credentials whatsoever to call herself a scientist, let alone claim she is as much of a scientist as Bill Nye. In other words, Palin made a disparaging remark about a person that amounts to a blunt and blatant lie.

Sarah Palin never claimed to be a scientist. She just disagreed with a kid's television character by the name of BIll Nye the science guy. Speech that disagrees with a children's television character is still covered under the first amendment. She pointed out that the guy isn't a scientist which is true. At best, he was an employee at Boeing which doesn't count as scientific research but some people have decided to take his television title of "Bill Nye the science guy' literally and push him out there to be the spokesperson for global warming. We could have picked out a lot of other professors who actually do research at big universities or have written a lot of things about it but instead, we have to take the word of a children's show character on this issue.

What is at the heart of this issue is democracy because peer reviewed theories are fine for the scientific community but in a society that values democracy the peers are not an exlcusive group of people but everybody. The public's own peer review of global warming has rejected it and, right or wrong, the real scientist who believe global warming will have to accept that.

Sorry, but you have to make up a definition of what a scientist is to promote your agenda driven opinion. Nye fits into the accepted definition by virtue of his published works on the subject of science. You can't just make up new and alternate definitions of a word when the official one doesn't fit your agenda and be expect to be credible.

Is Bill Gates a computer scientist, or a dropout? who's credentials would you rather have Gates or Nyes.............

LOL, Nye is nothing and nobody, and Mr. Wizard was way better anyway

I'm still willing to bet he knows more than Ms. Palin. Lol. I don't have anything against her. She seems like a nice enough woman, but I don't think "brains" is her strong point.

Bill Nye knows nothing, all he does is parrot what other people say, any birdbrain can do that. Palin has better ideas than Nye on any day.

Ha! Palin couldn't even finish her term as Governor. As Phrump might say.....A LOSER!

 

[Bassman007]

So you have given up on your climate change lies that I can disprove in a microsecond, no matter what babble you post. You are learning, this is good.

The thread is not about climate change. That subject is debated endlessly and the deflection attempting to make it the issue does not change the facts that in all these posts and pages no one has been able to dispute that Bill Nye fits the formal and academically accepted definition of what a scientist is. Nor has any evidence been given that Sarah Palin has s shred of evidence to indicate she has any credentials whatsoever to call herself a scientist, let alone claim she is as much of a scientist as Bill Nye. In other words, Palin made a disparaging remark about a person that amounts to a blunt and blatant lie.

Sarah Palin never claimed to be a scientist. She just disagreed with a kid's television character by the name of BIll Nye the science guy. Speech that disagrees with a children's television character is still covered under the first amendment. She pointed out that the guy isn't a scientist which is true. At best, he was an employee at Boeing which doesn't count as scientific research but some people have decided to take his television title of "Bill Nye the science guy' literally and push him out there to be the spokesperson for global warming. We could have picked out a lot of other professors who actually do research at big universities or have written a lot of things about it but instead, we have to take the word of a children's show character on this issue.

What is at the heart of this issue is democracy because peer reviewed theories are fine for the scientific community but in a society that values democracy the peers are not an exlcusive group of people but everybody. The public's own peer review of global warming has rejected it and, right or wrong, the real scientist who believe global warming will have to accept that.

Sorry, but you have to make up a definition of what a scientist is to promote your agenda driven opinion. Nye fits into the accepted definition by virtue of his published works on the subject of science. You can't just make up new and alternate definitions of a word when the official one doesn't fit your agenda and be expect to be credible.

Is Bill Gates a computer scientist, or a dropout? who's credentials would you rather have Gates or Nyes.............

LOL, Nye is nothing and nobody, and Mr. Wizard was way better anyway

"Is Bill Gates a computer scientist, or a dropout? who's credentials would you rather have Gates or Nyes.............

LOL, Nye is nothing and nobody, and Mr. Wizard was way better anyway"

...and Bill Gates believes that we need to reduce CO2 to save the planet and that it needs to be done by the governments because..."Yes, the government will be somewhat inept—but the private sector is in general inept. How many companies do venture capitalists invest in that go poorly? By far most of them."
Bill Gates: ‘We Need an Energy Miracle’

CO2 is pollution, it needs to be reduced as do all forms of pollution. However the fact is that over the last twenty years CO2 has increased in the atmosphere in every year, and global temps have not risen at all. these are just the facts, and they are not up for argument. Again climate change is over 4 billion years old, without it we could not exist.........................

 

[idb]

The thread is not about climate change. That subject is debated endlessly and the deflection attempting to make it the issue does not change the facts that in all these posts and pages no one has been able to dispute that Bill Nye fits the formal and academically accepted definition of what a scientist is. Nor has any evidence been given that Sarah Palin has s shred of evidence to indicate she has any credentials whatsoever to call herself a scientist, let alone claim she is as much of a scientist as Bill Nye. In other words, Palin made a disparaging remark about a person that amounts to a blunt and blatant lie.

Sarah Palin never claimed to be a scientist. She just disagreed with a kid's television character by the name of BIll Nye the science guy. Speech that disagrees with a children's television character is still covered under the first amendment. She pointed out that the guy isn't a scientist which is true. At best, he was an employee at Boeing which doesn't count as scientific research but some people have decided to take his television title of "Bill Nye the science guy' literally and push him out there to be the spokesperson for global warming. We could have picked out a lot of other professors who actually do research at big universities or have written a lot of things about it but instead, we have to take the word of a children's show character on this issue.

What is at the heart of this issue is democracy because peer reviewed theories are fine for the scientific community but in a society that values democracy the peers are not an exlcusive group of people but everybody. The public's own peer review of global warming has rejected it and, right or wrong, the real scientist who believe global warming will have to accept that.

Sorry, but you have to make up a definition of what a scientist is to promote your agenda driven opinion. Nye fits into the accepted definition by virtue of his published works on the subject of science. You can't just make up new and alternate definitions of a word when the official one doesn't fit your agenda and be expect to be credible.

Is Bill Gates a computer scientist, or a dropout? who's credentials would you rather have Gates or Nyes.............

LOL, Nye is nothing and nobody, and Mr. Wizard was way better anyway

"Is Bill Gates a computer scientist, or a dropout? who's credentials would you rather have Gates or Nyes.............

LOL, Nye is nothing and nobody, and Mr. Wizard was way better anyway"

...and Bill Gates believes that we need to reduce CO2 to save the planet and that it needs to be done by the governments because..."Yes, the government will be somewhat inept—but the private sector is in general inept. How many companies do venture capitalists invest in that go poorly? By far most of them."
Bill Gates: ‘We Need an Energy Miracle’

CO2 is pollution, it needs to be reduced as do all forms of pollution. However the fact is that over the last twenty years CO2 has increased in the atmosphere in every year, and global temps have not risen at all. these are just the facts, and they are not up for argument. Again climate change is over 4 billion years old, without it we could not exist.........................

Don't blame me...I'm only quoting Bill Gates...who is way smarter that Bill Nye...remember?