Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Well then it's a good thing we have separation of church and state, innit.
But you just used the bible to justify no plural marriage.
You are so cute. The way you try to come off as an adult.
Now run along and let the adults take care of things.
No, what it shows is we have laws on the book in all 50 states that provide a contractual basis between two people to form a union. The bible has nothing really to do with that fact. Denial of a class of people, based on their sexual orientation, which is completely legal, and no longer considered any sort of debilitating disease, is a deprivation of equal protection.
Not really.
I do neg rep pukes who support Nazi propaganda, and who stalk me and track my rep.
Which are you?
Looks like recess is over.
Poop has left the conversation.
Don't look for an answer....other than BDPoop will tell you it's your fight.
You see....it's O.K. to scream about rights as long as they are right "rights".
But use the same argument to justify something they don't like and they turn tail and head for the nearest cave.
Plain and simple, in the context of this conversation it is your side - and not BDBoops who is trying to reduce the amount of personal liberties we have as citizens of the United States. It is your side who is trying to grow the Authoritarian reach of the government, to make it larger and more powerful, in turn diminishing the power of the individual.
It is your group this time pushing through left-leaning policy.
And I dont like it.
Id rather give the citizens of the United States the power to choose under law who they want to marry, vs use the big nanny government to make that choice for us. Its totally anti-American what they did in NC, and they should not be congratulated for it.
.
I congratulate N.C. for exercising the democratic process that is available to them.
If you don't like it....don't live there.
You see, that is why I would never want a federal anti gay marriage bill. That way if a state wants to allow gay marriage they can.
You can shove the rest....I really don't care how you view it.
THEY voted for what THEY wanted in THIER state.
Plain and simple, in the context of this conversation it is your side - and not BDBoops who is trying to reduce the amount of personal liberties we have as citizens of the United States. It is your side who is trying to grow the Authoritarian reach of the government, to make it larger and more powerful, in turn diminishing the power of the individual.
It is your group this time pushing through left-leaning policy.
And I dont like it.
Id rather give the citizens of the United States the power to choose under law who they want to marry, vs use the big nanny government to make that choice for us. Its totally anti-American what they did in NC, and they should not be congratulated for it.
.
I congratulate N.C. for exercising the democratic process that is available to them.
If you don't like it....don't live there.
You see, that is why I would never want a federal anti gay marriage bill. That way if a state wants to allow gay marriage they can.
You can shove the rest....I really don't care how you view it.
THEY voted for what THEY wanted in THIER state.
I'm not against our voting process, I'm against the tyranny they've voted for.
When fellow citizens willingly vote away their liberties and the amount of choices they have under law, it just boils my blood.
Again, sad day for America, small gov't, and freedom...
Plain and simple, in the context of this conversation it is your side - and not BDBoops who is trying to reduce the amount of personal liberties we have as citizens of the United States. It is your side who is trying to grow the Authoritarian reach of the government, to make it larger and more powerful, in turn diminishing the power of the individual.
It is your group this time pushing through left-leaning policy.
And I dont like it.
Id rather give the citizens of the United States the power to choose under law who they want to marry, vs use the big nanny government to make that choice for us. Its totally anti-American what they did in NC, and they should not be congratulated for it.
.
I congratulate N.C. for exercising the democratic process that is available to them.
If you don't like it....don't live there.
You see, that is why I would never want a federal anti gay marriage bill. That way if a state wants to allow gay marriage they can.
You can shove the rest....I really don't care how you view it.
THEY voted for what THEY wanted in THIER state.
I'm not against our voting process, I'm against the tyranny they've voted for.
When fellow citizens willingly vote away their liberties and the amount of choices they have under law, it just boils my blood.
Again, sad day for America, small gov't, and freedom...
I congratulate N.C. for exercising the democratic process that is available to them.
If you don't like it....don't live there.
You see, that is why I would never want a federal anti gay marriage bill. That way if a state wants to allow gay marriage they can.
You can shove the rest....I really don't care how you view it.
THEY voted for what THEY wanted in THIER state.
I'm not against our voting process, I'm against the tyranny they've voted for.
When fellow citizens willingly vote away their liberties and the amount of choices they have under law, it just boils my blood.
Again, sad day for America, small gov't, and freedom...
What about Bestiality, Polygamy? Why do we have laws against those two things? Why aren't the rights of people who like teenagers protected to be with teenagers?
It's not tyrannical to refuse to reward people who don't participate in a particular program or construct for not participating.
It would be tyrannical if they decided to make those people PAY because they don't participate. Sort of like people who don't participate in Obamacare are fined for not participating in that particular program...
No, the expansion of government authority is the government forcing us to afford the same privileges to gay couples that we have always extended only to hetero ones, and forcing us to change our terminology against our will.
That is the reduction of liberty. I have no interest in providing homosexuals the same perks as married couples. Those perks are meant to encourage stable, traditional families which have been proven to be the backbone of a strong and healthy society.
I'm not against our voting process, I'm against the tyranny they've voted for.
When fellow citizens willingly vote away their liberties and the amount of choices they have under law, it just boils my blood.
Again, sad day for America, small gov't, and freedom...
What about Bestiality, Polygamy? Why do we have laws against those two things? Why aren't the rights of people who like teenagers protected to be with teenagers?
I guess I have to keep repeating my answers to the same questions.
Beastiality is animal abuse, animals can't consent.
Polygame should be legal.
We determine an age where lawfully people can consent or not, that's 18, so it doesn't matter if a 14 year old "wants" to marry a 40 year old.
I need to copy and paste, cuz i'm sure i'll have to repeat myself again.
Beastiality is animal abuse, animals can't consent
We do have laws against it and no one is complaining selective rights I guess?Polygame should be legal.
We determine an age where lawfully people can consent or not, that's 18, so it doesn't matter if a 14 year old "wants" to marry a 40 year old.
No, the expansion of government authority is the government forcing us to afford the same privileges to gay couples that we have always extended only to hetero ones, and forcing us to change our terminology against our will.
That is the reduction of liberty. I have no interest in providing homosexuals the same perks as married couples. Those perks are meant to encourage stable, traditional families which have been proven to be the backbone of a strong and healthy society.
