Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Next somebody will come along and try to argue that the ancient, war-mongering Greece and Roman empires are great examples of where human rights thrived and flourished in the absence of government rules and regulation on 'morality.'
Just watch. I am sure of it!
no, I'm repeating what I have learned today on this thread.
"Beastiality" is illegal when animals don't grant consent. It's all about protecting the animal, cuz it's illegal to do things to animals without their consent.
I hope you get your dog's consent before enclosing him in the back yard, cuz that could be a violation of his rights if you don't...
As we see with Kosher, no matter how many times you state your position, she'll still claim ignorance and continue repeating her original lie.
I'll try repeating one more time in a desperate attempt that her brain will absorb new information, sex is treated differently with regards to consent. Animals intelligence isn't viewed as high enough to provide proper consent to sex.
Now that I've wasted the time to write a handful of sentences, it's time to sit back and wait for her to repeat her lie.
Humans make decisions everyday for animals they even enter into contracts on the animals behalf
sex is treated differently with regards to consent.
But the barbecue isn't?
Again, I repeat, sex is different. Sex needs to be consented to in all situations, killing of animals doesn't.
sex is treated differently with regards to consent.
But the barbecue isn't?
Correct.
Do animals consent to be used as breeding stock?As we see with Kosher, no matter how many times you state your position, she'll still claim ignorance and continue repeating her original lie.
I'll try repeating one more time in a desperate attempt that her brain will absorb new information, sex is treated differently with regards to consent. Animals intelligence isn't viewed as high enough to provide proper consent to sex.
Now that I've wasted the time to write a handful of sentences, it's time to sit back and wait for her to repeat her lie.
Humans make decisions everyday for animals they even enter into contracts on the animals behalf
Again, I repeat, sex is different. Sex needs to be consented to in all situations, killing of animals doesn't.
I don't really know how we can make this discussion any more stupid then you and the other homophobic authoritarians have made it.
The positive is though, at least eventually society will flush your old, anti-liberty bigotted stance down the toilet.
Again, I repeat, sex is different. Sex needs to be consented to in all situations, killing of animals doesn't.
Ask the sheep if he would rather consent to take it up the ass - or be served up as chops with mint sauce.
Do animals consent to be used as breeding stock?Humans make decisions everyday for animals they even enter into contracts on the animals behalf
Again, I repeat, sex is different. Sex needs to be consented to in all situations, killing of animals doesn't.
I don't really know how we can make this discussion any more stupid then you and the other homophobic authoritarians have made it.
The positive is though, at least eventually society will flush your old, anti-liberty bigotted stance down the toilet.
Again, I repeat, sex is different. Sex needs to be consented to in all situations, killing of animals doesn't.
Ask the sheep if he would rather consent to take it up the ass - or be served up as chops with mint sauce.
Doesn't matter what the sheep thinks
Do animals consent to be used as breeding stock?Again, I repeat, sex is different. Sex needs to be consented to in all situations, killing of animals doesn't.
I don't really know how we can make this discussion any more stupid then you and the other homophobic authoritarians have made it.
The positive is though, at least eventually society will flush your old, anti-liberty bigotted stance down the toilet.
No, we're talking about the liberties HUMANS have.
I see you ignored my request 15 pages ago to attempt to move this to a grown up discussion. Kudos, you win.
Ask the sheep if he would rather consent to take it up the ass - or be served up as chops with mint sauce.
Doesn't matter what the sheep thinks
Correct!
So back to the original argument, who are ewe to deny the shepherd love!?
Do animals consent to be used as breeding stock?
No, we're talking about the liberties HUMANS have.
I see you ignored my request 15 pages ago to attempt to move this to a grown up discussion. Kudos, you win.
Yes we are talking about human liberty, the liberty for those who would choose to have sex with animals. Since animals are used without any consent for breeding purposes you argument is done.
Do animals consent to be used as breeding stock?
No, we're talking about the liberties HUMANS have.
I see you ignored my request 15 pages ago to attempt to move this to a grown up discussion. Kudos, you win.
Yes we are talking about human liberty, the liberty for those who would choose to have sex with animals. Since animals are used without any consent for breeding purposes you argument is done.
No, we're talking about the liberties HUMANS have.
I see you ignored my request 15 pages ago to attempt to move this to a grown up discussion. Kudos, you win.
Yes we are talking about human liberty, the liberty for those who would choose to have sex with animals. Since animals are used without any consent for breeding purposes you argument is done.
Stick a fork in it.
All you need to do is give us an example where your Libertarian theory on marriage has ever worked in the history of society and culture without disastrous consequences.
This is how you support your argument that human beings can breed like cats and dogs.
I am calling bullshit on your argument, and I have the history of world experience to back me up.
Asking you to support your position with empirical examples is not trolling, coward.
Libertatrian nonsense fails thanks to the vagrancies of human nature. You just aren't up to admitting it.
All you need to do is give us an example where your Libertarian theory on marriage has ever worked in the history of society and culture without disastrous consequences.
This is how you support your argument that human beings can breed like cats and dogs.
I am calling bullshit on your argument, and I have the history of world experience to back me up.
Asking you to support your position with empirical examples is not trolling, coward.
Libertatrian nonsense fails thanks to the vagrancies of human nature. You just aren't up to admitting it.
Given that youre the one asking all of the questions, how about YOU give me ONE example where the legalization of same-sex marriage led DIRECTLY to widespread disastrous consequences within a society.
And humans beings can breed like cats and dogs what the hell are you talking about?
Why is defending Liberty nonsense? I told you that I am not an Anarchist, and that I believe there ought to be rules that protect people from other people; rules against rape, murder, violence, stealing, ect.
But (as Ive stated a million times) if an action does not cause any harm, and does not infringe on any rights of other individuals within that society why should it be made illegal? Have you even once attempted to answer that question (my question) first? And you call me the coward?
.
You don't think the vast majority of mainstream conservatives share my view that a society which you envision - where people breed and intermarry like rodents - has never existed and would be destined to fail?
You have an animal sexuality fixation. No, most conservatives are truly nothing like you.
Fail again, concerned troll. We all know mainstream conservatives share my view on this.
All you need to do is give us an example where your Libertarian theory on marriage has ever worked in the history of society and culture without disastrous consequences.
This is how you support your argument that human beings can breed like cats and dogs.
I am calling bullshit on your argument, and I have the history of world experience to back me up.
Asking you to support your position with empirical examples is not trolling, coward.
Libertatrian nonsense fails thanks to the vagrancies of human nature. You just aren't up to admitting it.
Given that youre the one asking all of the questions, how about YOU give me ONE example where the legalization of same-sex marriage led DIRECTLY to widespread disastrous consequences within a society.
And humans beings can breed like cats and dogs what the hell are you talking about?
Why is defending Liberty nonsense? I told you that I am not an Anarchist, and that I believe there ought to be rules that protect people from other people; rules against rape, murder, violence, stealing, ect.
But (as Ive stated a million times) if an action does not cause any harm, and does not infringe on any rights of other individuals within that society why should it be made illegal? Have you even once attempted to answer that question (my question) first? And you call me the coward?
.
Again, I repeat, sex is different. Sex needs to be consented to in all situations, killing of animals doesn't.
Ask the sheep if he would rather consent to take it up the ass - or be served up as chops with mint sauce.
