Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
They should also test the members of the North Carolina legislature as well. Just b/c you wear a suit or a dress doesn't make living off the taxpayers dime any more noble.
To me that is nothing more than a gotcha moment. People working in the legislature are "working." They are not receiving government benefits designed (theoretically) to get them on their feet and back to being productive members of society. A legislative rep toking up on a camping weekend isn't costing me anything.
To me drug use such as pot isn't my concern, unless I'm paying for your benefits, AND you are not producing anything of value. THEN it's my concern because if you have time $$ for drugs, you should have time and $$ to improve yourself instead, and get on your own feet. THEN you can use drugs on your own dime, not min.
They should also test the members of the North Carolina legislature as well. Just b/c you wear a suit or a dress doesn't make living off the taxpayers dime any more noble.
To me that is nothing more than a gotcha moment. People working in the legislature are "working." They are not receiving government benefits designed (theoretically) to get them on their feet and back to being productive members of society. A legislative rep toking up on a camping weekend isn't costing me anything.
To me drug use such as pot isn't my concern, unless I'm paying for your benefits, AND you are not producing anything of value. THEN it's my concern because if you have time $$ for drugs, you should have time and $$ to improve yourself instead, and get on your own feet. THEN you can use drugs on your own dime, not min.
North Carolina has a debt of $55 billion and counting. It doesn't seem like they are doing too much work other then spending money they do not have. I still remain wary of this program, if the numbers prove me wrong than I will support drug testing program. We'll see...
Ya know, the more I read about this, the more I am wavering. This applies only to NC's Work First program and the benefits mostly remain intact do the to the fact that children are involved. What the hell is the point then? I am starting to lean towards redundant and wasteful.
LOL Every government program is wasteful. Besides this is a "great economy" according to the Obamabots, get a job.
I usually don't support this (because of its failure rate) but these results aint that bad.. Good for them.
My take on it is people that pay the taxes for this are most likely subjected to testing so there is no reason the applicants are not also
Ya know, the more I read about this, the more I am wavering. This applies only to NC's Work First program and the benefits mostly remain intact do the to the fact that children are involved. What the hell is the point then? I am starting to lean towards redundant and wasteful.
LOL Every government program is wasteful. Besides this is a "great economy" according to the Obamabots, get a job.
I wouldn't go that far but I feel you. lol. I don't put much stock the inane prattle of any political and partisan robots.
They should also test the members of the North Carolina legislature as well. Just b/c you wear a suit or a dress doesn't make living off the taxpayers dime any more noble.
They should also test the members of the North Carolina legislature as well. Just b/c you wear a suit or a dress doesn't make living off the taxpayers dime any more noble.
To me that is nothing more than a gotcha moment. People working in the legislature are "working." They are not receiving government benefits designed (theoretically) to get them on their feet and back to being productive members of society. A legislative rep toking up on a camping weekend isn't costing me anything.
To me drug use such as pot isn't my concern, unless I'm paying for your benefits, AND you are not producing anything of value. THEN it's my concern because if you have time $$ for drugs, you should have time and $$ to improve yourself instead, and get on your own feet. THEN you can use drugs on your own dime, not min.
North Carolina has a debt of $55 billion and counting. It doesn't seem like they are doing too much work other then spending money they do not have. I still remain wary of this program, if the numbers prove me wrong than I will support drug testing program. We'll see...
That's a problem shared by most states, and the issue isn't drugs, I don't see a difference between a stoned government spending money it doesn't have and a sober government spending money it doesn't have.
Ya know, the more I read about this, the more I am wavering. This applies only to NC's Work First program and the benefits mostly remain intact do the to the fact that children are involved. What the hell is the point then? I am starting to lean towards redundant and wasteful.
LOL Every government program is wasteful. Besides this is a "great economy" according to the Obamabots, get a job.
I wouldn't go that far but I feel you. lol. I don't put much stock the inane prattle of any political and partisan robots.
Currently Obamie's "great economy" is going south...to hell in a hand basket. The markets are going to be a blood bath today
They should also test the members of the North Carolina legislature as well. Just b/c you wear a suit or a dress doesn't make living off the taxpayers dime any more noble.
To me that is nothing more than a gotcha moment. People working in the legislature are "working." They are not receiving government benefits designed (theoretically) to get them on their feet and back to being productive members of society. A legislative rep toking up on a camping weekend isn't costing me anything.
To me drug use such as pot isn't my concern, unless I'm paying for your benefits, AND you are not producing anything of value. THEN it's my concern because if you have time $$ for drugs, you should have time and $$ to improve yourself instead, and get on your own feet. THEN you can use drugs on your own dime, not min.
North Carolina has a debt of $55 billion and counting. It doesn't seem like they are doing too much work other then spending money they do not have. I still remain wary of this program, if the numbers prove me wrong than I will support drug testing program. We'll see...
That's a problem shared by most states, and the issue isn't drugs, I don't see a difference between a stoned government spending money it doesn't have and a sober government spending money it doesn't have.
I agree. It is just a tad bit hypocritical to be chiding welfare recipients about the prudent use of taxpayer dollars all the while they spend money that the state doesn't have. Meh.
I agree with you.They should also test the members of the North Carolina legislature as well. Just b/c you wear a suit or a dress doesn't make living off the taxpayers dime any more noble.
To me that is nothing more than a gotcha moment. People working in the legislature are "working." They are not receiving government benefits designed (theoretically) to get them on their feet and back to being productive members of society. A legislative rep toking up on a camping weekend isn't costing me anything.
To me drug use such as pot isn't my concern, unless I'm paying for your benefits, AND you are not producing anything of value. THEN it's my concern because if you have time $$ for drugs, you should have time and $$ to improve yourself instead, and get on your own feet. THEN you can use drugs on your own dime, not min.
North Carolina has a debt of $55 billion and counting. It doesn't seem like they are doing too much work other then spending money they do not have. I still remain wary of this program, if the numbers prove me wrong than I will support drug testing program. We'll see...
They should also test the members of the North Carolina legislature as well. Just b/c you wear a suit or a dress doesn't make living off the taxpayers dime any more noble.
To me that is nothing more than a gotcha moment. People working in the legislature are "working." They are not receiving government benefits designed (theoretically) to get them on their feet and back to being productive members of society. A legislative rep toking up on a camping weekend isn't costing me anything.
To me drug use such as pot isn't my concern, unless I'm paying for your benefits, AND you are not producing anything of value. THEN it's my concern because if you have time $$ for drugs, you should have time and $$ to improve yourself instead, and get on your own feet. THEN you can use drugs on your own dime, not min.
North Carolina has a debt of $55 billion and counting. It doesn't seem like they are doing too much work other then spending money they do not have. I still remain wary of this program, if the numbers prove me wrong than I will support drug testing program. We'll see...
That's a problem shared by most states, and the issue isn't drugs, I don't see a difference between a stoned government spending money it doesn't have and a sober government spending money it doesn't have.
I agree. It is just a tad bit hypocritical to be chiding welfare recipients about the prudent use of taxpayer dollars all the while they spend money that the state doesn't have. Meh.
Almost like drug users spending money on drugs and not buying food.
They should also test the members of the North Carolina legislature as well. Just b/c you wear a suit or a dress doesn't make living off the taxpayers dime any more noble.
To me that is nothing more than a gotcha moment. People working in the legislature are "working." They are not receiving government benefits designed (theoretically) to get them on their feet and back to being productive members of society. A legislative rep toking up on a camping weekend isn't costing me anything.
To me drug use such as pot isn't my concern, unless I'm paying for your benefits, AND you are not producing anything of value. THEN it's my concern because if you have time $$ for drugs, you should have time and $$ to improve yourself instead, and get on your own feet. THEN you can use drugs on your own dime, not min.
North Carolina has a debt of $55 billion and counting. It doesn't seem like they are doing too much work other then spending money they do not have. I still remain wary of this program, if the numbers prove me wrong than I will support drug testing program. We'll see...
That's a problem shared by most states, and the issue isn't drugs, I don't see a difference between a stoned government spending money it doesn't have and a sober government spending money it doesn't have.
I agree. It is just a tad bit hypocritical to be chiding welfare recipients about the prudent use of taxpayer dollars all the while they spend money that the state doesn't have. Meh.
What about those who are already on welfare there?Starting late last year, North Carolina began issuing drug tests to new applicants for certain state welfare benefits.
What about those who are already on welfare there?Starting late last year, North Carolina began issuing drug tests to new applicants for certain state welfare benefits.
God bless you always!!!
Holly
What about those who are already on welfare there?Starting late last year, North Carolina began issuing drug tests to new applicants for certain state welfare benefits.
God bless you always!!!
Holly
IDK how that works, maybe random testing?
