Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Like what?Better yet - we could be adhering to the U.S. Constitution and instantly solving all of our problems.We could be lowering our tax burden on an at-will basis in our at-will employment States, and improving the efficiency of our economy at the same time.
Why should I take you seriously about economics or the law?You've repeated this outrageous lie about a dozen times now. First of all, your lack of knowledge about basic economics is horrifying. There is no "solving" poverty. You cannot have EVERYONE in middle class or EVERYONE wealthy. There literally must be poverty for money to have value. If everyone had it - it would have no value. None. At all. That's why fingernails have no value. Because everyone has them. So for money to have any value at all, it requires some to be without it while craving it.Unemployment compensation could solve for simple poverty.
More importantly to this discussion - unemployment was created in 1935 as a part of the Social Security Act. That is 82 years ago for those who aren't good with math. If "unemployment compensation" could "solve poverty" it would have done so already nitwit. It's had 82 years to "solve" poverty.
Let me guess - you have trouble holding a job, uh?
Like forcing the government to strictly adhere to the 18 enumerated powers they are limited to. Without Social Security, Welfare, Medicare, Medicaid, Obamacare, the National Endowment for the Arts, NPR, and over several thousand other illegal departments, we wouldn't be $20 trillion. In fact, we wouldn't be $1 billion in debt. Period.Like what?Better yet - we could be adhering to the U.S. Constitution and instantly solving all of our problems.We could be lowering our tax burden on an at-will basis in our at-will employment States, and improving the efficiency of our economy at the same time.
LIAR!there are more Americans working multiple part time jobs to make up for the high paying long term full time career they once had.
Only the common Defense is specifically enumerated, not any form of common Offense nor any form of general Warfare.Like forcing the government to strictly adhere to the 18 enumerated powers they are limited to. Without Social Security, Welfare, Medicare, Medicaid, Obamacare, the National Endowment for the Arts, NPR, and over several thousand other illegal departments, we wouldn't be $20 trillion. In fact, we wouldn't be $1 billion in debt. Period.Like what?Better yet - we could be adhering to the U.S. Constitution and instantly solving all of our problems.We could be lowering our tax burden on an at-will basis in our at-will employment States, and improving the efficiency of our economy at the same time.
First of all, the common defense is not even enumerated.Only the common Defense is specifically enumerated, not any form of common Offense nor any form of general Warfare.
Why should i take you seriously?First of all, the common defense is not even enumerated.Only the common Defense is specifically enumerated, not any form of common Offense nor any form of general Warfare.
Second - the "general welfare" explicitly applies to the 18 enumerated powers. That was made very clear on an abundance of occasions by our founders. The founders didn't feel the need to create a 13,000 page legal document by citing every little thing they were allowed within the 18 enumerated powers - so they gave them broad powers within those 18 enumerated powers (never realizing that one day we would have domestic terrorists called "Dumbocrats" who would intentionally attempt to misinterpret the law in an attempt to create loopholes).
“Congress had not unlimited powers to provide for the general welfare, but were restrained to those specifically enumerated; and that, as it was never meant they should provide for that welfare but by the exercise of the enumerated powers, so it could not have been meant they should raise money for purposes which the enumeration did not place under their action” - Thomas Jefferson (June 6, 1817)
“[We] disavow, and declare to be most false and unfounded, the doctrine that the [Constitution], in authorizing its federal branch to lay and collect taxes, duties, imposts, and excises to pay the debts and provide for the common defense and general welfare of the United States, has given them thereby a power to do whatever they may think, or pretend, would promote the general welfare–which construction would make that of itself a complete government, without limitation of powers… The plain sense and obvious meaning were that they might levy the taxes necessary to provide for the general welfare by the various acts of power therein specified and delegated to them, and by noothers. – Thomas Jefferson (December 24, 1825)
Thanks for playing friend! But your false narrative has just been disproven. Game over.
You're right - the federal government being explicitly limited to 18 enumerated powers applies to the common defense. 18 powers only - no matter how you attempt to slice it chief.It also applies to the common defense, not just the general welfare.
you have lousy reading comprehension.Because I just provided multiple quotes from Thomas Jefferson which prove you are wrong and I am right.Why should i take you seriously?
our wars on crime, drugs, poverty, and terror; are defense?You're right - the federal government being explicitly limited to 18 enumerated powers applies to the common defense. 18 powers only - no matter how you attempt to slice it chief.It also applies to the common defense, not just the general welfare.
Incidentally, perhaps you need to Google the term "defense"? All of the unconstitutional sectors that the federal government has its hands in has nothing to do with "defense". The National Endowment for the Arts certainly doesn't. Obamacare certainly doesn't.
equal protection of the law regarding employment at will for unemployment compensation purposes, could end "wage slavery" on an at-will basis in our at-will employment States.The question has to be asked
----Why should one kill themselves for low wages for 60 years and die? There's more to life and liberal policies consider that.----
Only the super rich that want to use us and spit us out believe in otherwise.
You have lousy arguments once you get obliterated with facts.you have lousy reading comprehension.Because I just provided multiple quotes from Thomas Jefferson which prove you are wrong and I am right.Why should i take you seriously?
