Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
They're wrong. Dead wrong.According to the religious right it is unless married to whomever your partner is!
I agree but to each their own, just so they do not effect others negatively.Morality is still good even if that couple does not practice it
No, they are all messed up as much as a junky hooked on heroinWoke has nothing to do with it. Are you calling that married couple woke now?
They're wrong. Dead wrong.
Half the characters in the Bible believed in and practiced plural marriage. Mormons do.
If this is the best some dimocrap scumbag can come up with re; hypocritical Christians, it's pretty sad.
Which describes dimocraps pretty well.
They have affected others in a negative wayI agree but to each their own, just so they do not effect others negatively.
They need to save themselves instead of spending so much time trying to save others. HYPOCRITES.No, they are all messed up as much as a junky hooked on heroin
But they can still save themselves if they truly repent
There's nothing in the Bible about it, moron.No pointing out the amoral and hypocritical right is all!
They hid their addiction just as some druggies can maintain for years before being exposedGood, so is that couple woke? They certainly didn't act or speak like that before getting caught. In fact the opposite. I noticed you failed to answer that part!
Agreed.No, they are all messed up as much as a junky hooked on heroin
But they can still save themselves if they truly repent
I think they have probably lost any positive influence they once hadThey need to save themselves instead of spending so much time trying to save others. HYPOCRITES.
Except it is the reprehensible right that keeps calling these kinds of things amoral while clutching tightly to their Bible.There's nothing in the Bible about it, moron.
You're just pulling it out of your ass.
As usual.
Fortunately, nobody can tell the difference.
I dont know them well enough to say more than what little we knowAgreed.
Would you call them amoral then?
Because this doesn't sound as though it was a 1 time thing.
I am Christian and I have nothing against a plural lifestyle. None of my, or your, goddamn business.No pointing out the amoral and hypocritical right is all!
Edgetho, who are you to say they are dead wrong. They may be right, they may be wrong. Those who think they know for sure what God wants and defines it to others, is playing God. You are not God.They're wrong. Dead wrong.
Half the characters in the Bible believed in and practiced plural marriage. Mormons do.
If this is the best some dimocrap scumbag can come up with re; hypocritical Christians, it's pretty sad.
Which describes dimocraps pretty well.
I am Christian and I have nothing against a plural lifestyle. None of my, or your, goddamn business.
A woman, a younger woman, has a medical issue, a serious medical issue that won't allow her to have sex any more.
What's her husband to do if he's still a young, strong, vital Man (which you wouldn't understand anyway)?
Should he desert her and say, "Even though I will love you till my dying day, I won't break some bullshit, made-up rule, so I have to leave you to fend for yourself. Good luck."
Sex is for the people involved in it. Nobody else.
The old-time Bible didn't want people screwing everything that moved for practical reasons -- STD's. They didn't have penicillin in those days. In fact, most of the Old Testament is just telling people how to live. Don't murder your neighbor, don't screw his Ol' Lady, don't eat pork (trichinosis, doncha know)
There were many plural marriages because Men often died much sooner than women. Especially during times of War.
The biggest problem with dims is -- You just don't think. You're incapable of it. Without the DISGUSTING FILTH in the LSM, without your Masters telling you what to think and do, you're lost.
Try thinking for yourselves every now and then. It's contagious
Like who(m)? TV Evangelists? Those clowns are one step removed from campaigning for a southern dimocrap.Except it is the reprehensible right that keeps calling these kinds of things amoral while clutching tightly to their Bible.
That's what you thinkEdgetho, who are you to say they are dead wrong. They may be right, they may be wrong. Those who think they know for sure what God wants and defines it to others, is playing God. You are not God.
I think everybody should focus on cleaning up their own house before they spend time telling others how they should clean up their house.Are you suggesting that conservatives should throw in the towel and join the libs by supporting child porn?
What constitutes a marriage? A Church? A State? Two or more people?I am using the reprehensible rights words not mine or yours. Do those Bible thumping freaks NOT say that extramarital sex is immoral? Of course they do and you know they do!
Like who(m)? TV Evangelists? Those clowns are one step removed from campaigning for a southern dimocrap.
What people do in the privacy of their own home is nobody's business. It is very telling that the side which keeps telling us that are the ones condemning what is done in the privacy of a person's home.
Now let's talk about hypocrisy.. Waddya say?
