Now that we know it was the Dems and not the Russians who tried to manipulate the election

[busybee01]

Can any Hillary voters address why it's OK for Hillary to get debate questions in advance from CNN, but not Trump?

Specifically, how is that OK? how does that show that CNN is an impartial news source?

It isn’t OK. Political Parties have a rule that whoever gets the most votes wins. That is basically the only real rule there is. Outside of that, the party elders, bosses, operatives, etc…. conspire to keep folks who are unelectable in the General like Ron Paul, Jerry Brown, and Bernie Sanders off the ticket. Their only interest is winning. There was a reason the RNC had sit-downs with Trump prior to his getting the nomination as early as March 2016. HRC was a Democrat and has been for years. Bernie Sanders was not a Democrat and still isn’t. He entered the Democratic Party Primary; that’s it. Much in the same way that you could enter a contest or a open golf tournament. If the DNC wanted to just anoint her as their candidate, they could have done so at any time before, during, or after the convention; not held a convention at all, or not fielded a candidate at all. It’s a private organization. The exact same thing could be said about the GOP.

What most low information dumbasses do not get is that the states have basically outsourced primary elections to the parties. This is why you see some deviation between the dates of the GOP and DNC primaries and caucuses, different rules on how delegates are rewarded, and sometimes awkward outcomes. For example, as I recall when HRC won Texas in 2008, she was awarded as many delegates as BHO received for winning Idaho because the margin in Texas was so close and the Idaho contest was a blowout in his favor. The role the State’s play is basically certifying that the elections were carried out competently, fairly, and lawfully.

The General Election is put on by the State itself which is why you often have a different polling place for it than the primary.

As for CNN and it’s impartiality, if you were to be impartial yourself, you’d find that most of the media is pretty much down the middle. One of the constant chants I heard growing up in the South was that “blacks are always looking for ways to be offended”. Basically the average conservative has taken on that role themselves all the way up to the unfortunate dope who is Trump’s press secretary.

That is not true. The dates of primaries have been traditionally left to the states. However both parties have worked to protect Iowa, NH, SC and Nevada's place as the first 4 contests. The Democrats went the farthest in 2008 when they stripped Michigan and Florida of all of their delegates for going early. Democrat rules require proportional representation in their primaries. Caucuses have a little more leeway.

The fact is that Clinton won because she got more votes than Sanders. Clinton was able to flip 9 states that Obama won in 2008. Sanders was able to flip only 1 state that went Clinton in 2008. In addition, Clinton clobbered Sanders in Florida and Texas wing both states by 2-1 margins. Clinton lost a string of deep south states that ran from Virginia to Mississippi to Obama. Sanders was able to only get around 20% of the vote in these states. Worth noting that in 2008, Texas Democrats held a two-step process. Clinton narrowly edged Obama in the primary but Obama swamped Clinton in the caucuses held that night.

The problem with fringe candidates is that they have a limited amount of appeal. Ronald Reagan was opposed by the establishment but he nearly beat Ford in 1976 and won the nomination in 1980.

 

[jc456]

Who should be the first to go to jail?

The investigation into allegations the Russian government tried to interfere in our election has been going on since the DNC hack a year ago, and yet not one piece of evidence has been produced to indicate the Russia government has done anything. Based on the facts in evidence the only logical conclusion is that the entire Russian narrative was invented by the Obama administration to try to influence the election in favor of Clinton. The important question now is not who will go to prison but how do we prevent future governments from repeating the Obama administration's assault on our democratic institutions.

You are the ones who are assaulting our democratic institutions. 17 intelligence agencies concluded that the Russians did interfere in our elections. These are people who are working to protect us yet you attack them because you don't like their conclusion. A former FBI agent testified before the Senate Intelligence Committee and talked about Russian attempts to interfere in our elections since 2009.

Even now we have seen several Russian attempts to interfere in other countries' elections. Brexit in England and Presidential elections in the Netherlands and France. In France, we have even seen hacking attacks used against their favored candidate's opponent.

The fact remains that there is not one fact in evidence to support Obama's Russia narrative. How can this be? All these people from the Obama administration promoting the Russia narrative and yet not one of them can produce a single fact to support it. Now, a year after the investigation began, based on the facts in evidence a reasonable person will conclude the whole Russia narrative was just an invention of the Obama administration to try to influence the election in Clinton's favor, and will want to hold to account all those who misused our intelligence services for political purposes.

Let me explain something called classified information. It basically means that for reasons such as potential interference in an investigation, or tipping off the subject of the investigation, the public cannot be told certain information.

Many investigations have taken years before anything definite was found, but a year of investigation is almost never enough time to uncover the full truth, especially when a majority of the president's colleagues have reason to be obstructing the investigation.

lol Do you actutally believe any of that? You say, "Many investigations have taken years before anything definite was found, but a year of investigation is almost never enough time to uncover the full truth, especially when a majority of the president's colleagues have reason to be obstructing the investigation." Which means you consider it possible that there is no evidence at the present time to support these allegations. But if there is no evidence to support the allegations, why has the Obama administration been talking about them as if they are proven facts. An investigation that cannot produce a single fact in evidence after a year is called a witch hunt.

I understand you really want all of these allegations to be true, but there was never a single fact in evidence to suggest there was a legitimate for any investigation. Unless you are just a true believer who has no use for facts or evidence, the only reasonable conclusion at this point is the the entire Russia narrative was invented by the Obama administration to try to influence the election in favor of Clinton.

and last night Tucker Carlson again reiterated, not one piece of evidence has been submitted for the american people to decide. not one. NOT FKING ONE!!!!!!

 

[easyt65]

ANATAMOY OF A FALSE NARRATIVE-GENERATED SNOWFLAKE FAKE SCANDAL:

DEMOCRATS CHEAT TO HELP THE WORST PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE IN US HISTORY WIN THEIR NOMINATION AND RUN FOR PRESIDENT.

'INCIDENTAL COLLECTION' OF TRUMP / TRUMP TEAM DATA - PROVING NO CRIMINAL ACTIVITY AND HAVING NO FOREIGN INTEL VALUE - USED TO JUSTIFY POLITICAL ESPIONAGE AGAINST OPPOSING PARTY CANDIDATE (WATERGATE 2) AND TO COLLECT INFO THAT COULD BE USED TO UNDERMINE TRUMP IF HE SHOULD WIN THE ELECTION

DNC E-MAILS ARE EASILY HACKED DUE TO POOR DNC CYBER-SECURITY
- DNC PERSONAL E-MAILS ARE LEAKED EXPOSING THEY RIGGED THEIR PRIMARIES, CHEATED IN DEBATES, AND THAT THEIR E-MAILS WERE FILLED WITH RACIST, SEXIST, HOMOPHOBIC, AND ANTI-SEMITIC CONTENT...
- DNC CREATES FAKE NEWS STORY THAT RUSSIANS 'HACKED THE ELECTION' TO DISTRACT FROM ALL OF THIS AND AS AN EXCUSE FOR THEIR WORST CANDIDATE EVER LOSING

NSA AND FBI DIRECTORS TESTIFIED INCIDENTAL COLLECTION REVEALED NO CRIMINAL ACTIVITY, COLLECTED INFORMATION HAD NO FOREIGN INTEL VALUE - NO CRIME

- PROTECTED CLASSIFIED PERSONAL INFO THAT HAD ZERO FORIGN INTEL VALUE THEN DISTRIBUTED TO OBAMA HOLDOVERS IN 16 INTEL AGENCIES WHERE IT WAS ILLEGALLY LEAKED TO PRESS

--- FBI AND NSA DIRECTORS TESTIFIED ILLEGAL LEAK OF THIS INFO BY OBAMA HOLDOVERS CONSTITUTE FELONY ESPIONAGE


RICE REVEALED AS ‘UN-MASKER’


CNN Goes on Rampage Against Susan Rice Bombshell, Instructs Viewers to Ignore Story

-- https://news.grabien.com/story-cnn-goes-rampage-against-susan-rice-bombshell-instructs-view


Fresh evidence the Russia ‘scandal’ is a Team Obama operation

- http://nypost.com/2017/04/03/fresh-evidence-the-russia-scandal-is-a-team-obama-operation/


Obama ADMINISTRATION WAS USING THE COVER OF LEGITIMATE SURVEILLANCE ON FOREIGN TARGETS TO SPY ON PRESIDENT-ELECT TRUMP…

• http://hotair.com/archives/2017/03/23/nsa-could-provide-smoking-gun-proof-obama-admin-was-spying-on-trump-by-friday/

IT'S ALL BLOWING UP IN THEIR FACES

 

[busybee01]

The investigation into allegations the Russian government tried to interfere in our election has been going on since the DNC hack a year ago, and yet not one piece of evidence has been produced to indicate the Russia government has done anything. Based on the facts in evidence the only logical conclusion is that the entire Russian narrative was invented by the Obama administration to try to influence the election in favor of Clinton. The important question now is not who will go to prison but how do we prevent future governments from repeating the Obama administration's assault on our democratic institutions.

You are the ones who are assaulting our democratic institutions. 17 intelligence agencies concluded that the Russians did interfere in our elections. These are people who are working to protect us yet you attack them because you don't like their conclusion. A former FBI agent testified before the Senate Intelligence Committee and talked about Russian attempts to interfere in our elections since 2009.

Even now we have seen several Russian attempts to interfere in other countries' elections. Brexit in England and Presidential elections in the Netherlands and France. In France, we have even seen hacking attacks used against their favored candidate's opponent.

The fact remains that there is not one fact in evidence to support Obama's Russia narrative. How can this be? All these people from the Obama administration promoting the Russia narrative and yet not one of them can produce a single fact to support it. Now, a year after the investigation began, based on the facts in evidence a reasonable person will conclude the whole Russia narrative was just an invention of the Obama administration to try to influence the election in Clinton's favor, and will want to hold to account all those who misused our intelligence services for political purposes.

Let me explain something called classified information. It basically means that for reasons such as potential interference in an investigation, or tipping off the subject of the investigation, the public cannot be told certain information.

Many investigations have taken years before anything definite was found, but a year of investigation is almost never enough time to uncover the full truth, especially when a majority of the president's colleagues have reason to be obstructing the investigation.

lol Do you actutally believe any of that? You say, "Many investigations have taken years before anything definite was found, but a year of investigation is almost never enough time to uncover the full truth, especially when a majority of the president's colleagues have reason to be obstructing the investigation." Which means you consider it possible that there is no evidence at the present time to support these allegations. But if there is no evidence to support the allegations, why has the Obama administration been talking about them as if they are proven facts. An investigation that cannot produce a single fact in evidence after a year is called a witch hunt.

I understand you really want all of these allegations to be true, but there was never a single fact in evidence to suggest there was a legitimate for any investigation. Unless you are just a true believer who has no use for facts or evidence, the only reasonable conclusion at this point is the the entire Russia narrative was invented by the Obama administration to try to influence the election in favor of Clinton.

and last night Tucker Carlson again reiterated, not one piece of evidence has been submitted for the american people to decide. not one. NOT FKING ONE!!!!!!

Tucker Carlson is a part of state run media and has no credibility.

Mike Pence received a intelligence briefing during the campaign and agreed that the evidence showed that the Russians were interfering in our elections. He said there should be severe consequences for any country that does that.

VP nominee Mike Pence contradicts Donald Trump, says Russia is behind the political hacks

 

[jc456]

You are the ones who are assaulting our democratic institutions. 17 intelligence agencies concluded that the Russians did interfere in our elections. These are people who are working to protect us yet you attack them because you don't like their conclusion. A former FBI agent testified before the Senate Intelligence Committee and talked about Russian attempts to interfere in our elections since 2009.

Even now we have seen several Russian attempts to interfere in other countries' elections. Brexit in England and Presidential elections in the Netherlands and France. In France, we have even seen hacking attacks used against their favored candidate's opponent.

The fact remains that there is not one fact in evidence to support Obama's Russia narrative. How can this be? All these people from the Obama administration promoting the Russia narrative and yet not one of them can produce a single fact to support it. Now, a year after the investigation began, based on the facts in evidence a reasonable person will conclude the whole Russia narrative was just an invention of the Obama administration to try to influence the election in Clinton's favor, and will want to hold to account all those who misused our intelligence services for political purposes.

Let me explain something called classified information. It basically means that for reasons such as potential interference in an investigation, or tipping off the subject of the investigation, the public cannot be told certain information.

Many investigations have taken years before anything definite was found, but a year of investigation is almost never enough time to uncover the full truth, especially when a majority of the president's colleagues have reason to be obstructing the investigation.

lol Do you actutally believe any of that? You say, "Many investigations have taken years before anything definite was found, but a year of investigation is almost never enough time to uncover the full truth, especially when a majority of the president's colleagues have reason to be obstructing the investigation." Which means you consider it possible that there is no evidence at the present time to support these allegations. But if there is no evidence to support the allegations, why has the Obama administration been talking about them as if they are proven facts. An investigation that cannot produce a single fact in evidence after a year is called a witch hunt.

I understand you really want all of these allegations to be true, but there was never a single fact in evidence to suggest there was a legitimate for any investigation. Unless you are just a true believer who has no use for facts or evidence, the only reasonable conclusion at this point is the the entire Russia narrative was invented by the Obama administration to try to influence the election in favor of Clinton.

and last night Tucker Carlson again reiterated, not one piece of evidence has been submitted for the american people to decide. not one. NOT FKING ONE!!!!!!

Tucker Carlson is a part of state run media and has no credibility.

Mike Pence received a intelligence briefing during the campaign and agreed that the evidence showed that the Russians were interfering in our elections. He said there should be severe consequences for any country that does that.

VP nominee Mike Pence contradicts Donald Trump, says Russia is behind the political hacks

dude, too funny. there is absolutely nothing!!!! Nothing NOTHING!!!! but hey fking nice try. you still lose.

 

[EvMetro]

Who should be the first to go to jail?

Might as well start with Susan Rice, but there are plenty more. We need a lock up list.

Susan Rice
Hillary
Obama
Ben Rhodes
+more

 

[EvMetro]

OP is a lie and the usual low-info fools line up to agree.

Prove it.

OP ask who should be locked up. A question can't be a lie.

 

[busybee01]

ANATAMOY OF A FALSE NARRATIVE-GENERATED SNOWFLAKE FAKE SCANDAL:

DEMOCRATS CHEAT TO HELP THE WORST PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE IN US HISTORY WIN THEIR NOMINATION AND RUN FOR PRESIDENT.

'INCIDENTAL COLLECTION' OF TRUMP / TRUMP TEAM DATA - PROVING NO CRIMINAL ACTIVITY AND HAVING NO FOREIGN INTEL VALUE - USED TO JUSTIFY POLITICAL ESPIONAGE AGAINST OPPOSING PARTY CANDIDATE (WATERGATE 2) AND TO COLLECT INFO THAT COULD BE USED TO UNDERMINE TRUMP IF HE SHOULD WIN THE ELECTION

DNC E-MAILS ARE EASILY HACKED DUE TO POOR DNC CYBER-SECURITY
- DNC PERSONAL E-MAILS ARE LEAKED EXPOSING THEY RIGGED THEIR PRIMARIES, CHEATED IN DEBATES, AND THAT THEIR E-MAILS WERE FILLED WITH RACIST, SEXIST, HOMOPHOBIC, AND ANTI-SEMITIC CONTENT...
- DNC CREATES FAKE NEWS STORY THAT RUSSIANS 'HACKED THE ELECTION' TO DISTRACT FROM ALL OF THIS AND AS AN EXCUSE FOR THEIR WORST CANDIDATE EVER LOSING

NSA AND FBI DIRECTORS TESTIFIED INCIDENTAL COLLECTION REVEALED NO CRIMINAL ACTIVITY, COLLECTED INFORMATION HAD NO FOREIGN INTEL VALUE - NO CRIME

- PROTECTED CLASSIFIED PERSONAL INFO THAT HAD ZERO FORIGN INTEL VALUE THEN DISTRIBUTED TO OBAMA HOLDOVERS IN 16 INTEL AGENCIES WHERE IT WAS ILLEGALLY LEAKED TO PRESS

--- FBI AND NSA DIRECTORS TESTIFIED ILLEGAL LEAK OF THIS INFO BY OBAMA HOLDOVERS CONSTITUTE FELONY ESPIONAGE


RICE REVEALED AS ‘UN-MASKER’


CNN Goes on Rampage Against Susan Rice Bombshell, Instructs Viewers to Ignore Story

-- https://news.grabien.com/story-cnn-goes-rampage-against-susan-rice-bombshell-instructs-view


Fresh evidence the Russia ‘scandal’ is a Team Obama operation

- http://nypost.com/2017/04/03/fresh-evidence-the-russia-scandal-is-a-team-obama-operation/


Obama ADMINISTRATION WAS USING THE COVER OF LEGITIMATE SURVEILLANCE ON FOREIGN TARGETS TO SPY ON PRESIDENT-ELECT TRUMP…

• http://hotair.com/archives/2017/03/23/nsa-could-provide-smoking-gun-proof-obama-admin-was-spying-on-trump-by-friday/

IT'S ALL BLOWING UP IN THEIR FACES


View attachment 120220

- WHILE DEMOCRATS SHOULD HAVE THEIR HEADS EXAMINED FOR WANTING CLINTON, SHE WON 34 STATES TO 23 FOR SANDERS WHILE CLINTON GOT 55% OF THE VOTE. HOW IS TT CHEATING?

-THERE WAS NO ESPIONAGE AND TRUMP HAS PROVEN NO ESPIONAGE DESPITE THE FACT THAT HE RUNS THE GOVERNMENT AND CAN RELEASE THE INFORMATION. THE FACT IS THAT THERE IS NO PROOF THAT THIS WAS INCIDENTAL. NUNES RECEIVED THIS INFORMATION FROM THE WHITE HOUSE.

-EVEN IF THE DNC HAD POOR SECURITY THAT DOES NOT JUSTIFY THE HACKS. IT IS A CRIME.

-MIKE PENCE RECEIVED A INTELLIGENCE BRIEFING DURING THE CAMPAIGN AND AGREED THAT THE RUSSIANS WERE INTERFERING IN OUR ELECTIONS. ID HE A PART OF THE DNC?

-THE FACT IS THAT SUSAN RICE COMMITTED NO CRIME. SHE WAS A PART OF OBAMA'S FOREIGN POLICY TEAM AND HAD A RIGHT TO RECEIVE THE INFORMATION.

-MORE TRUMP SYCOPHANTS TRYING TO DIVERT ATTENTION FROM RUSSIA




-

 

[The Original Tree]

Picture of Obama's First Day In Prison

 

[Scorpion]

The investigation into allegations the Russian government tried to interfere in our election has been going on since the DNC hack a year ago, and yet not one piece of evidence has been produced to indicate the Russia government has done anything. Based on the facts in evidence the only logical conclusion is that the entire Russian narrative was invented by the Obama administration to try to influence the election in favor of Clinton. The important question now is not who will go to prison but how do we prevent future governments from repeating the Obama administration's assault on our democratic institutions.

You are the ones who are assaulting our democratic institutions. 17 intelligence agencies concluded that the Russians did interfere in our elections. These are people who are working to protect us yet you attack them because you don't like their conclusion. A former FBI agent testified before the Senate Intelligence Committee and talked about Russian attempts to interfere in our elections since 2009.

Even now we have seen several Russian attempts to interfere in other countries' elections. Brexit in England and Presidential elections in the Netherlands and France. In France, we have even seen hacking attacks used against their favored candidate's opponent.

The fact remains that there is not one fact in evidence to support Obama's Russia narrative. How can this be? All these people from the Obama administration promoting the Russia narrative and yet not one of them can produce a single fact to support it. Now, a year after the investigation began, based on the facts in evidence a reasonable person will conclude the whole Russia narrative was just an invention of the Obama administration to try to influence the election in Clinton's favor, and will want to hold to account all those who misused our intelligence services for political purposes.

Let me explain something called classified information. It basically means that for reasons such as potential interference in an investigation, or tipping off the subject of the investigation, the public cannot be told certain information.

Many investigations have taken years before anything definite was found, but a year of investigation is almost never enough time to uncover the full truth, especially when a majority of the president's colleagues have reason to be obstructing the investigation.

lol Do you actutally believe any of that? You say, "Many investigations have taken years before anything definite was found, but a year of investigation is almost never enough time to uncover the full truth, especially when a majority of the president's colleagues have reason to be obstructing the investigation." Which means you consider it possible that there is no evidence at the present time to support these allegations. But if there is no evidence to support the allegations, why has the Obama administration been talking about them as if they are proven facts. An investigation that cannot produce a single fact in evidence after a year is called a witch hunt.

I understand you really want all of these allegations to be true, but there was never a single fact in evidence to suggest there was a legitimate for any investigation. Unless you are just a true believer who has no use for facts or evidence, the only reasonable conclusion at this point is the the entire Russia narrative was invented by the Obama administration to try to influence the election in favor of Clinton.

Watergate took years. The basis of the alegations is circumstantial evidence. Not enough to be sure, but enough to raise suspicion.

But, but,
Evelyn Farkas said it would be a VERY SHORT TIME until he would face impeachment.

 

[Aquarius Luna]

The fact remains that there is not one fact in evidence to support Obama's Russia narrative. How can this be? All these people from the Obama administration promoting the Russia narrative and yet not one of them can produce a single fact to support it. Now, a year after the investigation began, based on the facts in evidence a reasonable person will conclude the whole Russia narrative was just an invention of the Obama administration to try to influence the election in Clinton's favor, and will want to hold to account all those who misused our intelligence services for political purposes.

Let me explain something called classified information. It basically means that for reasons such as potential interference in an investigation, or tipping off the subject of the investigation, the public cannot be told certain information.

Many investigations have taken years before anything definite was found, but a year of investigation is almost never enough time to uncover the full truth, especially when a majority of the president's colleagues have reason to be obstructing the investigation.

lol Do you actutally believe any of that? You say, "Many investigations have taken years before anything definite was found, but a year of investigation is almost never enough time to uncover the full truth, especially when a majority of the president's colleagues have reason to be obstructing the investigation." Which means you consider it possible that there is no evidence at the present time to support these allegations. But if there is no evidence to support the allegations, why has the Obama administration been talking about them as if they are proven facts. An investigation that cannot produce a single fact in evidence after a year is called a witch hunt.

I understand you really want all of these allegations to be true, but there was never a single fact in evidence to suggest there was a legitimate for any investigation. Unless you are just a true believer who has no use for facts or evidence, the only reasonable conclusion at this point is the the entire Russia narrative was invented by the Obama administration to try to influence the election in favor of Clinton.

and last night Tucker Carlson again reiterated, not one piece of evidence has been submitted for the american people to decide. not one. NOT FKING ONE!!!!!!

Tucker Carlson is a part of state run media and has no credibility.

Mike Pence received a intelligence briefing during the campaign and agreed that the evidence showed that the Russians were interfering in our elections. He said there should be severe consequences for any country that does that.

VP nominee Mike Pence contradicts Donald Trump, says Russia is behind the political hacks

dude, too funny. there is absolutely nothing!!!! Nothing NOTHING!!!! but hey fking nice try. you still lose.

Then disprove the article. Just because you say there's no evidence, doesn't mean it's true.

 

[EvMetro]

 

[toomuchtime_]

The investigation into allegations the Russian government tried to interfere in our election has been going on since the DNC hack a year ago, and yet not one piece of evidence has been produced to indicate the Russia government has done anything. Based on the facts in evidence the only logical conclusion is that the entire Russian narrative was invented by the Obama administration to try to influence the election in favor of Clinton. The important question now is not who will go to prison but how do we prevent future governments from repeating the Obama administration's assault on our democratic institutions.

You are the ones who are assaulting our democratic institutions. 17 intelligence agencies concluded that the Russians did interfere in our elections. These are people who are working to protect us yet you attack them because you don't like their conclusion. A former FBI agent testified before the Senate Intelligence Committee and talked about Russian attempts to interfere in our elections since 2009.

Even now we have seen several Russian attempts to interfere in other countries' elections. Brexit in England and Presidential elections in the Netherlands and France. In France, we have even seen hacking attacks used against their favored candidate's opponent.

The fact remains that there is not one fact in evidence to support Obama's Russia narrative. How can this be? All these people from the Obama administration promoting the Russia narrative and yet not one of them can produce a single fact to support it. Now, a year after the investigation began, based on the facts in evidence a reasonable person will conclude the whole Russia narrative was just an invention of the Obama administration to try to influence the election in Clinton's favor, and will want to hold to account all those who misused our intelligence services for political purposes.

Let me explain something called classified information. It basically means that for reasons such as potential interference in an investigation, or tipping off the subject of the investigation, the public cannot be told certain information.

Many investigations have taken years before anything definite was found, but a year of investigation is almost never enough time to uncover the full truth, especially when a majority of the president's colleagues have reason to be obstructing the investigation.

lol Do you actutally believe any of that? You say, "Many investigations have taken years before anything definite was found, but a year of investigation is almost never enough time to uncover the full truth, especially when a majority of the president's colleagues have reason to be obstructing the investigation." Which means you consider it possible that there is no evidence at the present time to support these allegations. But if there is no evidence to support the allegations, why has the Obama administration been talking about them as if they are proven facts. An investigation that cannot produce a single fact in evidence after a year is called a witch hunt.

I understand you really want all of these allegations to be true, but there was never a single fact in evidence to suggest there was a legitimate for any investigation. Unless you are just a true believer who has no use for facts or evidence, the only reasonable conclusion at this point is the the entire Russia narrative was invented by the Obama administration to try to influence the election in favor of Clinton.

Watergate took years. The basis of the alegations is circumstantial evidence. Not enough to be sure, but enough to raise suspicion.

lol In less than one month the identity of on of the burglars was known and reported in the press. It took years to prosecute everyone involved, but in the present case, after a year of investigations we have yet to see any evidence that there were grounds for any of allegations made against the Russian government or the Trump campaign. We all saw the evidence coming out day by day in the Watergate investigations, but now we have numerous high ranking members of the Obama administration making outrageous allegations without being able to provide a single piece of evidence to support them.

Again, there were never any facts in evidence to support the claims the Russian government hacked the DNC or carried out any other covert operations to influence the election and there were never any facts in evidence for the outrageous claims of collusion between the Trump campaign and the Russian government, not a single fact.

 

[Reasonable]

Who should be the first to go to jail?

You... for lying.

 

[toomuchtime_]

You are the ones who are assaulting our democratic institutions. 17 intelligence agencies concluded that the Russians did interfere in our elections. These are people who are working to protect us yet you attack them because you don't like their conclusion. A former FBI agent testified before the Senate Intelligence Committee and talked about Russian attempts to interfere in our elections since 2009.

Even now we have seen several Russian attempts to interfere in other countries' elections. Brexit in England and Presidential elections in the Netherlands and France. In France, we have even seen hacking attacks used against their favored candidate's opponent.

The fact remains that there is not one fact in evidence to support Obama's Russia narrative. How can this be? All these people from the Obama administration promoting the Russia narrative and yet not one of them can produce a single fact to support it. Now, a year after the investigation began, based on the facts in evidence a reasonable person will conclude the whole Russia narrative was just an invention of the Obama administration to try to influence the election in Clinton's favor, and will want to hold to account all those who misused our intelligence services for political purposes.

Let me explain something called classified information. It basically means that for reasons such as potential interference in an investigation, or tipping off the subject of the investigation, the public cannot be told certain information.

Many investigations have taken years before anything definite was found, but a year of investigation is almost never enough time to uncover the full truth, especially when a majority of the president's colleagues have reason to be obstructing the investigation.

lol Do you actutally believe any of that? You say, "Many investigations have taken years before anything definite was found, but a year of investigation is almost never enough time to uncover the full truth, especially when a majority of the president's colleagues have reason to be obstructing the investigation." Which means you consider it possible that there is no evidence at the present time to support these allegations. But if there is no evidence to support the allegations, why has the Obama administration been talking about them as if they are proven facts. An investigation that cannot produce a single fact in evidence after a year is called a witch hunt.

I understand you really want all of these allegations to be true, but there was never a single fact in evidence to suggest there was a legitimate for any investigation. Unless you are just a true believer who has no use for facts or evidence, the only reasonable conclusion at this point is the the entire Russia narrative was invented by the Obama administration to try to influence the election in favor of Clinton.

and last night Tucker Carlson again reiterated, not one piece of evidence has been submitted for the american people to decide. not one. NOT FKING ONE!!!!!!

Tucker Carlson is a part of state run media and has no credibility.

Mike Pence received a intelligence briefing during the campaign and agreed that the evidence showed that the Russians were interfering in our elections. He said there should be severe consequences for any country that does that.

VP nominee Mike Pence contradicts Donald Trump, says Russia is behind the political hacks

And yet there is not a single fact in evidence to support these allegations.

 

[Reasonable]

Trump's a lot closer to being sent to prison than Hillary is.

 

[EvMetro]

Trump's a lot closer to being sent to prison than Hillary is.

That's not what it looks like in that picture...

 

[Wyatt earp]

ANATAMOY OF A FALSE NARRATIVE-GENERATED SNOWFLAKE FAKE SCANDAL:

DEMOCRATS CHEAT TO HELP THE WORST PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE IN US HISTORY WIN THEIR NOMINATION AND RUN FOR PRESIDENT.

'INCIDENTAL COLLECTION' OF TRUMP / TRUMP TEAM DATA - PROVING NO CRIMINAL ACTIVITY AND HAVING NO FOREIGN INTEL VALUE - USED TO JUSTIFY POLITICAL ESPIONAGE AGAINST OPPOSING PARTY CANDIDATE (WATERGATE 2) AND TO COLLECT INFO THAT COULD BE USED TO UNDERMINE TRUMP IF HE SHOULD WIN THE ELECTION

DNC E-MAILS ARE EASILY HACKED DUE TO POOR DNC CYBER-SECURITY
- DNC PERSONAL E-MAILS ARE LEAKED EXPOSING THEY RIGGED THEIR PRIMARIES, CHEATED IN DEBATES, AND THAT THEIR E-MAILS WERE FILLED WITH RACIST, SEXIST, HOMOPHOBIC, AND ANTI-SEMITIC CONTENT...
- DNC CREATES FAKE NEWS STORY THAT RUSSIANS 'HACKED THE ELECTION' TO DISTRACT FROM ALL OF THIS AND AS AN EXCUSE FOR THEIR WORST CANDIDATE EVER LOSING

NSA AND FBI DIRECTORS TESTIFIED INCIDENTAL COLLECTION REVEALED NO CRIMINAL ACTIVITY, COLLECTED INFORMATION HAD NO FOREIGN INTEL VALUE - NO CRIME

- PROTECTED CLASSIFIED PERSONAL INFO THAT HAD ZERO FORIGN INTEL VALUE THEN DISTRIBUTED TO OBAMA HOLDOVERS IN 16 INTEL AGENCIES WHERE IT WAS ILLEGALLY LEAKED TO PRESS

--- FBI AND NSA DIRECTORS TESTIFIED ILLEGAL LEAK OF THIS INFO BY OBAMA HOLDOVERS CONSTITUTE FELONY ESPIONAGE


RICE REVEALED AS ‘UN-MASKER’


CNN Goes on Rampage Against Susan Rice Bombshell, Instructs Viewers to Ignore Story

-- https://news.grabien.com/story-cnn-goes-rampage-against-susan-rice-bombshell-instructs-view


Fresh evidence the Russia ‘scandal’ is a Team Obama operation

- http://nypost.com/2017/04/03/fresh-evidence-the-russia-scandal-is-a-team-obama-operation/


Obama ADMINISTRATION WAS USING THE COVER OF LEGITIMATE SURVEILLANCE ON FOREIGN TARGETS TO SPY ON PRESIDENT-ELECT TRUMP…

• http://hotair.com/archives/2017/03/23/nsa-could-provide-smoking-gun-proof-obama-admin-was-spying-on-trump-by-friday/

IT'S ALL BLOWING UP IN THEIR FACES


View attachment 120220

- WHILE DEMOCRATS SHOULD HAVE THEIR HEADS EXAMINED FOR WANTING CLINTON, SHE WON 34 STATES TO 23 FOR SANDERS WHILE CLINTON GOT 55% OF THE VOTE. HOW IS TT CHEATING?

-THERE WAS NO ESPIONAGE AND TRUMP HAS PROVEN NO ESPIONAGE DESPITE THE FACT THAT HE RUNS THE GOVERNMENT AND CAN RELEASE THE INFORMATION. THE FACT IS THAT THERE IS NO PROOF THAT THIS WAS INCIDENTAL. NUNES RECEIVED THIS INFORMATION FROM THE WHITE HOUSE.

-EVEN IF THE DNC HAD POOR SECURITY THAT DOES NOT JUSTIFY THE HACKS. IT IS A CRIME.

-MIKE PENCE RECEIVED A INTELLIGENCE BRIEFING DURING THE CAMPAIGN AND AGREED THAT THE RUSSIANS WERE INTERFERING IN OUR ELECTIONS. ID HE A PART OF THE DNC?

-THE FACT IS THAT SUSAN RICE COMMITTED NO CRIME. SHE WAS A PART OF OBAMA'S FOREIGN POLICY TEAM AND HAD A RIGHT TO RECEIVE THE INFORMATION.

-MORE TRUMP SYCOPHANTS TRYING TO DIVERT ATTENTION FROM RUSSIA




-

ANATAMOY OF A FALSE NARRATIVE-GENERATED SNOWFLAKE FAKE SCANDAL:

DEMOCRATS CHEAT TO HELP THE WORST PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE IN US HISTORY WIN THEIR NOMINATION AND RUN FOR PRESIDENT.

'INCIDENTAL COLLECTION' OF TRUMP / TRUMP TEAM DATA - PROVING NO CRIMINAL ACTIVITY AND HAVING NO FOREIGN INTEL VALUE - USED TO JUSTIFY POLITICAL ESPIONAGE AGAINST OPPOSING PARTY CANDIDATE (WATERGATE 2) AND TO COLLECT INFO THAT COULD BE USED TO UNDERMINE TRUMP IF HE SHOULD WIN THE ELECTION

DNC E-MAILS ARE EASILY HACKED DUE TO POOR DNC CYBER-SECURITY
- DNC PERSONAL E-MAILS ARE LEAKED EXPOSING THEY RIGGED THEIR PRIMARIES, CHEATED IN DEBATES, AND THAT THEIR E-MAILS WERE FILLED WITH RACIST, SEXIST, HOMOPHOBIC, AND ANTI-SEMITIC CONTENT...
- DNC CREATES FAKE NEWS STORY THAT RUSSIANS 'HACKED THE ELECTION' TO DISTRACT FROM ALL OF THIS AND AS AN EXCUSE FOR THEIR WORST CANDIDATE EVER LOSING

NSA AND FBI DIRECTORS TESTIFIED INCIDENTAL COLLECTION REVEALED NO CRIMINAL ACTIVITY, COLLECTED INFORMATION HAD NO FOREIGN INTEL VALUE - NO CRIME

- PROTECTED CLASSIFIED PERSONAL INFO THAT HAD ZERO FORIGN INTEL VALUE THEN DISTRIBUTED TO OBAMA HOLDOVERS IN 16 INTEL AGENCIES WHERE IT WAS ILLEGALLY LEAKED TO PRESS

--- FBI AND NSA DIRECTORS TESTIFIED ILLEGAL LEAK OF THIS INFO BY OBAMA HOLDOVERS CONSTITUTE FELONY ESPIONAGE


RICE REVEALED AS ‘UN-MASKER’


CNN Goes on Rampage Against Susan Rice Bombshell, Instructs Viewers to Ignore Story

-- https://news.grabien.com/story-cnn-goes-rampage-against-susan-rice-bombshell-instructs-view


Fresh evidence the Russia ‘scandal’ is a Team Obama operation

- http://nypost.com/2017/04/03/fresh-evidence-the-russia-scandal-is-a-team-obama-operation/


Obama ADMINISTRATION WAS USING THE COVER OF LEGITIMATE SURVEILLANCE ON FOREIGN TARGETS TO SPY ON PRESIDENT-ELECT TRUMP…

• http://hotair.com/archives/2017/03/23/nsa-could-provide-smoking-gun-proof-obama-admin-was-spying-on-trump-by-friday/

IT'S ALL BLOWING UP IN THEIR FACES


View attachment 120220

- WHILE DEMOCRATS SHOULD HAVE THEIR HEADS EXAMINED FOR WANTING CLINTON, SHE WON 34 STATES TO 23 FOR SANDERS WHILE CLINTON GOT 55% OF THE VOTE. HOW IS TT CHEATING?

-THERE WAS NO ESPIONAGE AND TRUMP HAS PROVEN NO ESPIONAGE DESPITE THE FACT THAT HE RUNS THE GOVERNMENT AND CAN RELEASE THE INFORMATION. THE FACT IS THAT THERE IS NO PROOF THAT THIS WAS INCIDENTAL. NUNES RECEIVED THIS INFORMATION FROM THE WHITE HOUSE.

-EVEN IF THE DNC HAD POOR SECURITY THAT DOES NOT JUSTIFY THE HACKS. IT IS A CRIME.

-MIKE PENCE RECEIVED A INTELLIGENCE BRIEFING DURING THE CAMPAIGN AND AGREED THAT THE RUSSIANS WERE INTERFERING IN OUR ELECTIONS. ID HE A PART OF THE DNC?

-THE FACT IS THAT SUSAN RICE COMMITTED NO CRIME. SHE WAS A PART OF OBAMA'S FOREIGN POLICY TEAM AND HAD A RIGHT TO RECEIVE THE INFORMATION.

-MORE TRUMP SYCOPHANTS TRYING TO DIVERT ATTENTION FROM RUSSIA




-

What you forgot already how the DNC rigged the nomination?

Let's refresh your memory

 

[jc456]

ANATAMOY OF A FALSE NARRATIVE-GENERATED SNOWFLAKE FAKE SCANDAL:

DEMOCRATS CHEAT TO HELP THE WORST PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE IN US HISTORY WIN THEIR NOMINATION AND RUN FOR PRESIDENT.

'INCIDENTAL COLLECTION' OF TRUMP / TRUMP TEAM DATA - PROVING NO CRIMINAL ACTIVITY AND HAVING NO FOREIGN INTEL VALUE - USED TO JUSTIFY POLITICAL ESPIONAGE AGAINST OPPOSING PARTY CANDIDATE (WATERGATE 2) AND TO COLLECT INFO THAT COULD BE USED TO UNDERMINE TRUMP IF HE SHOULD WIN THE ELECTION

DNC E-MAILS ARE EASILY HACKED DUE TO POOR DNC CYBER-SECURITY
- DNC PERSONAL E-MAILS ARE LEAKED EXPOSING THEY RIGGED THEIR PRIMARIES, CHEATED IN DEBATES, AND THAT THEIR E-MAILS WERE FILLED WITH RACIST, SEXIST, HOMOPHOBIC, AND ANTI-SEMITIC CONTENT...
- DNC CREATES FAKE NEWS STORY THAT RUSSIANS 'HACKED THE ELECTION' TO DISTRACT FROM ALL OF THIS AND AS AN EXCUSE FOR THEIR WORST CANDIDATE EVER LOSING

NSA AND FBI DIRECTORS TESTIFIED INCIDENTAL COLLECTION REVEALED NO CRIMINAL ACTIVITY, COLLECTED INFORMATION HAD NO FOREIGN INTEL VALUE - NO CRIME

- PROTECTED CLASSIFIED PERSONAL INFO THAT HAD ZERO FORIGN INTEL VALUE THEN DISTRIBUTED TO OBAMA HOLDOVERS IN 16 INTEL AGENCIES WHERE IT WAS ILLEGALLY LEAKED TO PRESS

--- FBI AND NSA DIRECTORS TESTIFIED ILLEGAL LEAK OF THIS INFO BY OBAMA HOLDOVERS CONSTITUTE FELONY ESPIONAGE


RICE REVEALED AS ‘UN-MASKER’


CNN Goes on Rampage Against Susan Rice Bombshell, Instructs Viewers to Ignore Story

-- https://news.grabien.com/story-cnn-goes-rampage-against-susan-rice-bombshell-instructs-view


Fresh evidence the Russia ‘scandal’ is a Team Obama operation

- http://nypost.com/2017/04/03/fresh-evidence-the-russia-scandal-is-a-team-obama-operation/


Obama ADMINISTRATION WAS USING THE COVER OF LEGITIMATE SURVEILLANCE ON FOREIGN TARGETS TO SPY ON PRESIDENT-ELECT TRUMP…

• http://hotair.com/archives/2017/03/23/nsa-could-provide-smoking-gun-proof-obama-admin-was-spying-on-trump-by-friday/

IT'S ALL BLOWING UP IN THEIR FACES


View attachment 120220

- WHILE DEMOCRATS SHOULD HAVE THEIR HEADS EXAMINED FOR WANTING CLINTON, SHE WON 34 STATES TO 23 FOR SANDERS WHILE CLINTON GOT 55% OF THE VOTE. HOW IS TT CHEATING?

-THERE WAS NO ESPIONAGE AND TRUMP HAS PROVEN NO ESPIONAGE DESPITE THE FACT THAT HE RUNS THE GOVERNMENT AND CAN RELEASE THE INFORMATION. THE FACT IS THAT THERE IS NO PROOF THAT THIS WAS INCIDENTAL. NUNES RECEIVED THIS INFORMATION FROM THE WHITE HOUSE.

-EVEN IF THE DNC HAD POOR SECURITY THAT DOES NOT JUSTIFY THE HACKS. IT IS A CRIME.

-MIKE PENCE RECEIVED A INTELLIGENCE BRIEFING DURING THE CAMPAIGN AND AGREED THAT THE RUSSIANS WERE INTERFERING IN OUR ELECTIONS. ID HE A PART OF THE DNC?

-THE FACT IS THAT SUSAN RICE COMMITTED NO CRIME. SHE WAS A PART OF OBAMA'S FOREIGN POLICY TEAM AND HAD A RIGHT TO RECEIVE THE INFORMATION.

-MORE TRUMP SYCOPHANTS TRYING TO DIVERT ATTENTION FROM RUSSIA




-

ANATAMOY OF A FALSE NARRATIVE-GENERATED SNOWFLAKE FAKE SCANDAL:

DEMOCRATS CHEAT TO HELP THE WORST PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE IN US HISTORY WIN THEIR NOMINATION AND RUN FOR PRESIDENT.

'INCIDENTAL COLLECTION' OF TRUMP / TRUMP TEAM DATA - PROVING NO CRIMINAL ACTIVITY AND HAVING NO FOREIGN INTEL VALUE - USED TO JUSTIFY POLITICAL ESPIONAGE AGAINST OPPOSING PARTY CANDIDATE (WATERGATE 2) AND TO COLLECT INFO THAT COULD BE USED TO UNDERMINE TRUMP IF HE SHOULD WIN THE ELECTION

DNC E-MAILS ARE EASILY HACKED DUE TO POOR DNC CYBER-SECURITY
- DNC PERSONAL E-MAILS ARE LEAKED EXPOSING THEY RIGGED THEIR PRIMARIES, CHEATED IN DEBATES, AND THAT THEIR E-MAILS WERE FILLED WITH RACIST, SEXIST, HOMOPHOBIC, AND ANTI-SEMITIC CONTENT...
- DNC CREATES FAKE NEWS STORY THAT RUSSIANS 'HACKED THE ELECTION' TO DISTRACT FROM ALL OF THIS AND AS AN EXCUSE FOR THEIR WORST CANDIDATE EVER LOSING

NSA AND FBI DIRECTORS TESTIFIED INCIDENTAL COLLECTION REVEALED NO CRIMINAL ACTIVITY, COLLECTED INFORMATION HAD NO FOREIGN INTEL VALUE - NO CRIME

- PROTECTED CLASSIFIED PERSONAL INFO THAT HAD ZERO FORIGN INTEL VALUE THEN DISTRIBUTED TO OBAMA HOLDOVERS IN 16 INTEL AGENCIES WHERE IT WAS ILLEGALLY LEAKED TO PRESS

--- FBI AND NSA DIRECTORS TESTIFIED ILLEGAL LEAK OF THIS INFO BY OBAMA HOLDOVERS CONSTITUTE FELONY ESPIONAGE


RICE REVEALED AS ‘UN-MASKER’


CNN Goes on Rampage Against Susan Rice Bombshell, Instructs Viewers to Ignore Story

-- https://news.grabien.com/story-cnn-goes-rampage-against-susan-rice-bombshell-instructs-view


Fresh evidence the Russia ‘scandal’ is a Team Obama operation

- http://nypost.com/2017/04/03/fresh-evidence-the-russia-scandal-is-a-team-obama-operation/


Obama ADMINISTRATION WAS USING THE COVER OF LEGITIMATE SURVEILLANCE ON FOREIGN TARGETS TO SPY ON PRESIDENT-ELECT TRUMP…

• http://hotair.com/archives/2017/03/23/nsa-could-provide-smoking-gun-proof-obama-admin-was-spying-on-trump-by-friday/

IT'S ALL BLOWING UP IN THEIR FACES


View attachment 120220

- WHILE DEMOCRATS SHOULD HAVE THEIR HEADS EXAMINED FOR WANTING CLINTON, SHE WON 34 STATES TO 23 FOR SANDERS WHILE CLINTON GOT 55% OF THE VOTE. HOW IS TT CHEATING?

-THERE WAS NO ESPIONAGE AND TRUMP HAS PROVEN NO ESPIONAGE DESPITE THE FACT THAT HE RUNS THE GOVERNMENT AND CAN RELEASE THE INFORMATION. THE FACT IS THAT THERE IS NO PROOF THAT THIS WAS INCIDENTAL. NUNES RECEIVED THIS INFORMATION FROM THE WHITE HOUSE.

-EVEN IF THE DNC HAD POOR SECURITY THAT DOES NOT JUSTIFY THE HACKS. IT IS A CRIME.

-MIKE PENCE RECEIVED A INTELLIGENCE BRIEFING DURING THE CAMPAIGN AND AGREED THAT THE RUSSIANS WERE INTERFERING IN OUR ELECTIONS. ID HE A PART OF THE DNC?

-THE FACT IS THAT SUSAN RICE COMMITTED NO CRIME. SHE WAS A PART OF OBAMA'S FOREIGN POLICY TEAM AND HAD A RIGHT TO RECEIVE THE INFORMATION.

-MORE TRUMP SYCOPHANTS TRYING TO DIVERT ATTENTION FROM RUSSIA




-

What you forgot already how the DNC rigged the nomination?

Let's refresh your memory





View attachment 120245

 

[Wyatt earp]

You are the ones who are assaulting our democratic institutions. 17 intelligence agencies concluded that the Russians did interfere in our elections. These are people who are working to protect us yet you attack them because you don't like their conclusion. A former FBI agent testified before the Senate Intelligence Committee and talked about Russian attempts to interfere in our elections since 2009.

Even now we have seen several Russian attempts to interfere in other countries' elections. Brexit in England and Presidential elections in the Netherlands and France. In France, we have even seen hacking attacks used against their favored candidate's opponent.

The fact remains that there is not one fact in evidence to support Obama's Russia narrative. How can this be? All these people from the Obama administration promoting the Russia narrative and yet not one of them can produce a single fact to support it. Now, a year after the investigation began, based on the facts in evidence a reasonable person will conclude the whole Russia narrative was just an invention of the Obama administration to try to influence the election in Clinton's favor, and will want to hold to account all those who misused our intelligence services for political purposes.

Let me explain something called classified information. It basically means that for reasons such as potential interference in an investigation, or tipping off the subject of the investigation, the public cannot be told certain information.

Many investigations have taken years before anything definite was found, but a year of investigation is almost never enough time to uncover the full truth, especially when a majority of the president's colleagues have reason to be obstructing the investigation.

lol Do you actutally believe any of that? You say, "Many investigations have taken years before anything definite was found, but a year of investigation is almost never enough time to uncover the full truth, especially when a majority of the president's colleagues have reason to be obstructing the investigation." Which means you consider it possible that there is no evidence at the present time to support these allegations. But if there is no evidence to support the allegations, why has the Obama administration been talking about them as if they are proven facts. An investigation that cannot produce a single fact in evidence after a year is called a witch hunt.

I understand you really want all of these allegations to be true, but there was never a single fact in evidence to suggest there was a legitimate for any investigation. Unless you are just a true believer who has no use for facts or evidence, the only reasonable conclusion at this point is the the entire Russia narrative was invented by the Obama administration to try to influence the election in favor of Clinton.

and last night Tucker Carlson again reiterated, not one piece of evidence has been submitted for the american people to decide. not one. NOT FKING ONE!!!!!!

Tucker Carlson is a part of state run media and has no credibility.

Mike Pence received a intelligence briefing during the campaign and agreed that the evidence showed that the Russians were interfering in our elections. He said there should be severe consequences for any country that does that.

VP nominee Mike Pence contradicts Donald Trump, says Russia is behind the political hacks