the first amendment forbid the govt from establishing A religion…not from establishing if something is a religionSo, the Govt can pick and choose which religions are "real" and which are not.
That is almost the same as establishing them
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
the first amendment forbid the govt from establishing A religion…not from establishing if something is a religionSo, the Govt can pick and choose which religions are "real" and which are not.
That is almost the same as establishing them
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof"the first amendment forbid the govt from establishing A religion…not from establishing if something is a religion
Do you believe homosexuality is a sin in the New Testament?
which means you can not deny people with a religious belief protection of the law…ie a gay couple can’t force a baker to make them a wedding cake
You're incorrect. Society is supposed to do that. In a democracy, we elect our legislators and they pass laws that reflect the values of the electorate and allow society to function. They create laws that protect and serve the interests of the public. The "public good". By what you're saying you're clearly not a Christian and you know it. I don't have to tell you that. You're playing games for the sake of argument, here on the forum.No, I do not believe so, but that is because I think the New Testament says to not judge other except when necessary.
Others being gay has no effect on me at all.
But whether or not something is a sin is really about one's belief in an after life.
No human is supposed to dictate or punish what may or may not be sinful.
Large-scale broadly-recognized... useful in minimizing the chances that any such objection is frivolous or spurious or merely an objection-of-convenience in disguise...Why is this necessary?
Does something have to be large-scale broadly-recognized for it to be a deeply held religious belief
haha no. the court has to judge, that what it does. it has to determine if something is or is my a deeply held regliooiaj belief"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof"
Any law that requires that the state decide which religions are legitimate and which are not is, very much so, a law "respecting an establishment of religion".
i didn’t say there was and she at no time said she wouldn’t be. She just said her faith doesn’t recognize gay marriage. thus she can not support it, and therefore won’t make a website for it…she was happy to do anything else for themWrong.
There is absolutely no religion that says, "thou shalt not be employed by gays".
The web designer has absolutely no valid religious clam in any way.
In fact, her condemning a gay marriage is incredibly sinful.
Is the design of the Apple logo separate from the content?
OMG, Obama sucks ass and is awful and we're better off without him.![]()
OMG, Obama sucks ass and is awful and we're better off without him.
![]()
Gay sex is great and even stodgy Republicans have to admit they love themselves some girl-on-girl action so gays should get married.
![]()
There is no large-scale broadly-recognized religion on earth whose texts nor traditional teachings stipulate that it is a Sin to be Black.
There are, however, three (3) Abrahamic religions ( Judaism, Christianity and Islam) that hold that homosexuality is a Sin - an abomination before God, Man and Nature.
Thank you for sharing your personal opinion on the subject.Wrong.
You are obviously not well-read in either the history of the Abrahamic religions nor the traditional interpretation of their individual and collective teachings.The Abrahamic religions teach that it is up to God to punish sins, and that the laws of man are only supposed to be in defense of individual rights.
Tell that to the mullahs in Iran. Or Saudi Arabia for that matter.The Abrahamic religions teach that it is a sin to try to punish homosexuality.
So you say.It is the mob mentality that get it wrong.
And yet learned Islamic scholars preside over such executions.For example, many people in Islamic countries believe adulterers are supposed to be stoned, and that is totally false. Mohammad forbid stoning.
Relativism, in defense of homosexuality. No Sale. Sorry.Am I saying that most people do not even know the religion they claim to belong to? Absolutely. Almost no one knows anything at all about any religion.
Fun, ain't it?There is a deep history of Christianity in America being used to justify racial segregation, and even slavery.
Amendment I
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.
Sorry, but nothing about cakes, nothing about web pages and nothing about flowers.
That makes no sense.
If a news commentator has to announce that there has been a murder, that does not mean the commentator agrees with murder.
What you do as a business does not at all "express an opinion" at all, in any way.
But denying service does "express an opinion", and that is illegal.
That is deliberately trying to harm someone over their beliefs that you do not agree with.
Totally illegal coercion.
The Old AND New Testament declare homosexuality is sin. Therefore, you can easily understand how a Christian can justify their religious beliefs regarding same-sex. Many people who claim to be Christian don't believe their Bible, but that doesn't mean that the Christians who do believe their Bible shouldn't be protected in their beliefs.No, I do not believe so, but that is because I think the New Testament says to not judge other except when necessary.
Others being gay has no effect on me at all.
But whether or not something is a sin is really about one's belief in an after life.
No human is supposed to dictate or punish what may or may not be sinful.
Sorry, you lost.
All of the Bible can be ignored because none of it is an absolute dictate, but just recommendations for what is the best life choices to make, in order to get into heaven.
And none of the Bible says you are supposed to do anything to anyone else for what they choose to do.
In fact, the Bible says to be passive.
Which means you do not try to punish gay marriage by refusing their request for a web site.
{...
"O.P.P." is a song by American hip hop group Naughty by Nature, released in August 1991 by Tommy Boy as the lead single from the group's self-titled second album, Naughty by Nature (1991). It was one of the first rap songs to become a pop hit when it reached No. 6 on the US Billboard Hot 100 and No. 35 on the UK Singles Chart. Its declaration, "Down wit' O.P.P", was a popular catchphrase in the US in the early 1990s. David Bellochio aka "Dave Drop a Load on Em" appears in the video and played and programmed all the keyboard and drum parts at his studio Marion Recording Studios in Fairview, NJ. Van Romaine overdubbed live drums there as well.
...}
First of all, it is not against their religion, but nice employers simply have someone else do it.
That is because medicine and health is really quite complicated, and religions are incredibly ignorant.
Wrong.
I am an ACTUAL Christian, and not a pretender who would do evil things like burning witches, crusades, inquisitions, etc.
Real Christians refrain from harming others unless absolutely necessary.
There was no reason at all to deny the gay wedding web site.
Christian are not supposed to judge others.