GuyPinestra
Senior Member
- Jan 29, 2012
- 6,905
- 673
- 48
Dante read the linked to article. You obviously have issues with reading and comprehension.The NRA did not want this debate. The NRA has members who are considering controls they would not have a few months back.
This is what happens when people take data and polls out of context and build a partisan case....they look stupid and defensive
Dante, you're a prime example of "look(ing) stupid and defensive"...
Had you bothered to READ the Forbes article you would know that there is NO 'out of context', there is NO 'partisan case'.
Assuming you are a follower of right wing noise machine propaganda...you probably wet your pants over the words "objective data" as you are unused to see that come out of your side.
While data is usually objective, how it is put together and put forth in an arguments is usually anything but 'objective'
"Here are some other interesting observations from the data" = subjective opinion
........................
And here is where you fail, but at least you're a CONSISTENT failure...
I'm not a 'follower' of EITHER side. I skewer Democrats and Republicans with equal vigor. BOTH 'sides' have the same goal, the subjugation of the people under the bootheel of Big Government.