Liability is quite correct. The possibility of a very serious result, and death toll, from the nuclear plants is still high enough that the situation is totally bad cess. As it stands now, there is a certainty that some of the people exposed to the present high levels of radiation at the plant will develop cancers as a result of that exposure. The people working to prevent further disaster realize this and are to be commended for their bravery and dedication to duty.
Denying the seriousness of the situation, and denigrating those who express concern over it may do something for your self image, but to others, it gives you the appearance of a total fool.
Where exactly are You digging up this garbage,..?
Where are Your usual stupid URLs?...Or are You making all this shit up Yourself...
Where does it say that 2 technicians will develop cancer?...
Nobody has or will die from radiation, that has been ascertained and reported by everyone from Reuters, BBC etc etc.
Fukushima Daiichi was the oldest reactor and was only 2 weeks away from being shut down and replaced when the quake hit.
The quake resulted in NO DAMAGE TO ANY OF THE REACTORS...that is now also known and has been reported in EVERY MAJOR NEWS OUTLET.
The System automatically responded in each reactor even though they were outdated EXACTLY as it should have initiated a power shut down.
After the power shut down the stand by Diesel Generators went on line to supply power to the cooling pumps.
Then the tsunami hit, drowned the Diesel Engines, and the cooling pumps stopped.
So, the 8.9 Mag. earthquake had ABSOLUTELY NO IMPACT...other than initiating the auto-shut down procedure!
It was the DIESEL EMERGENCY POWER-PLANT THAT FAILED NOT THE NUCLEAR REACTORS
Power to the cooling pumps has been restored since then and all cooling pumps are now working.
None of the 4 reactors have any internal damage...that has now also bee confirmed
There was and there will be no "melt-down" as assholes like You were hoping.
The hydrogen gas explosions had NOTHING TO DO WITH THE REACTORS, BUT WRE CAUSED BY THE EXTRA > 1200 FUEL RODS IN THE STORAGE PONDS!
and again, that was because the DIESEL PLANT FAILED AFTER IT HAD BEEN DROWNED under sea water!
The "contamination" did not come from the reactors, but from the external cooling ponds.
And the "contamination" in closest vicinity of the plant was Iodine which has a half life of only 8 days.
Also the U.N.-W.H.Org has long since reported that these level were too low to pose any serious health risk.
This crisis is already over, and retards like You keep on yapping as if the "worst is still to come"..
Meanwhile the rest of the press aside from reporting on Libya is now writing articles concerning the outrageous exaggerations which had been published concerning this "nuclear catastrophe" in Japan.
...which in the final analysis was not a nuclear reactor failure at all, but a diesel power-plant failure...and that in turn came to play, because no-one had considered that diesel engines close to the coast can`t run when submerged under sea water after an earthquake triggered tsunami sweeps ashore!
So cut the crap about how "unsafe" nuclear reactors are