Number do not comfort a Trump campaign

[JakeStarkey]

The numbers continue to roll in. As long as Obama's approval rating is over 50, HRC seems to be in a very good place.

General Election: Trump vs. Clinton Gravis* Clinton 50, Trump 48 Clinton +2
President Obama Job Approval Gallup Approve 51, Disapprove 45 Approve +6
General Election: Trump vs. Clinton IBD/TIPP Clinton 44, Trump 40 Clinton +4
General Election: Trump vs. Clinton Rasmussen Reports Clinton 39, Trump 43 Trump +4
General Election: Trump vs. Clinton PPP (D) Clinton 48, Trump 44 Clinton +4
General Election: Trump vs. Clinton Reuters/Ipsos Clinton 42, Trump 32 Clinton +10
General Election: Trump vs. Clinton vs. Johnson vs. Stein IBD/TIPP Clinton 37, Trump 36, Johnson 9, Stein 5 Clinton +1
General Election: Trump vs. Clinton vs. Johnson vs. Stein PPP (D) Clinton 45, Trump 41, Johnson 5, Stein 2 Clinton +4
General Election: Trump vs. Clinton vs. Johnson vs. Stein Reuters/Ipsos Clinton 42, Trump 31, Johnson 5, Stein 4 Clinton +11
Iowa: Trump vs. Clinton Loras College Clinton 48, Trump 34 Clinton +14
Iowa: Trump vs. Clinton vs. Johnson vs. Stein Loras College Clinton 44, Trump 31, Johnson 6, Stein 2 Clinton +13
New York: Trump vs. Clinton Siena Clinton 54, Trump 31 Clinton +23

 

[Lucy Hamilton]

The numbers continue to roll in. As long as Obama's approval rating is over 50, HRC seems to be in a very good place.

General Election: Trump vs. Clinton Gravis* Clinton 50, Trump 48 Clinton +2
President Obama Job Approval Gallup Approve 51, Disapprove 45 Approve +6
General Election: Trump vs. Clinton IBD/TIPP Clinton 44, Trump 40 Clinton +4
General Election: Trump vs. Clinton Rasmussen Reports Clinton 39, Trump 43 Trump +4
General Election: Trump vs. Clinton PPP (D) Clinton 48, Trump 44 Clinton +4
General Election: Trump vs. Clinton Reuters/Ipsos Clinton 42, Trump 32 Clinton +10
General Election: Trump vs. Clinton vs. Johnson vs. Stein IBD/TIPP Clinton 37, Trump 36, Johnson 9, Stein 5 Clinton +1
General Election: Trump vs. Clinton vs. Johnson vs. Stein PPP (D) Clinton 45, Trump 41, Johnson 5, Stein 2 Clinton +4
General Election: Trump vs. Clinton vs. Johnson vs. Stein Reuters/Ipsos Clinton 42, Trump 31, Johnson 5, Stein 4 Clinton +11
Iowa: Trump vs. Clinton Loras College Clinton 48, Trump 34 Clinton +14
Iowa: Trump vs. Clinton vs. Johnson vs. Stein Loras College Clinton 44, Trump 31, Johnson 6, Stein 2 Clinton +13
New York: Trump vs. Clinton Siena Clinton 54, Trump 31 Clinton +23

With the exception of the Reuters/Ipsos poll, all the other General Election numbers are within the MOE and if you add them together to get a sort of Poll of Polls, Hillary at + 3.1 is still within the MOE.

So therefore, statistically not a great revelation as to what's going to occur in 5 months time.

The Reuters/Ipsos poll is just whacked out.

 

[JakeStarkey]

That's your weak opinion, Lucy. Trump's problem remains that the numbers consistently come down on HRC's side, particularly in the battle ground states.

Kasich would have so easily beaten her.

If Trump is elected, he will not mass deport, no wall will be built, immigrants will still pour in, and the TPP will continue.

 

[Meathead]

I wonder what happened to the 20-point lead of yesteryear when the Beast was inevitable.

 

[Lucy Hamilton]

That's your weak opinion, Lucy. Trump's problem remains that the numbers consistently come down on HRC's side, particularly in the battle ground states.

Kasich would have so easily beaten her.

If Trump is elected, he will not mass deport, no wall will be built, immigrants will still pour in, and the TPP will continue.

No I'm meaning those polls are all within the MOE, it's not my "weak opinion", it's an actuality as stated.

How are Hillary's Favourable/Unfavourable ratings? I'm not seeing any.

Kasich is a RINO, even more of one than Jeb Bush.

How do you know what The Donald is going to do or not do? Do you have a Hotline or something?

 

[JakeStarkey]

I wonder what happened to the 20-point lead of yesteryear when the Beast was inevitable.

A victory is a victory, of course, and if Trump (not necessarily when) is nominated, which his numbers start dropping even more. HRC was told yesterday she was not going to have criminal charges forwarded to the AG.

Lucy is crying about the inevitable. Clinton is continually ahead in most of the battle ground states. If that continues in FL and WI, she wins, easily.

 

[Lucy Hamilton]

I wonder what happened to the 20-point lead of yesteryear when the Beast was inevitable.

A victory is a victory, of course, and if Trump (not necessarily when) is nominated, which his numbers start dropping even more. HRC was told yesterday she was not going to have criminal charges forwarded to the AG.

I hope you have a plan, you know in the event that Hillary doesn't win, you need a plan, just in case because you're going to have to have a coping mechanism already in place, if not, you might just head off the rails like the other Hillary fans

Actually, the other Hillary fans need to read this, nobody wants to have to deal with Mega Freak-Out Fall Out

 

[miketx]

obastard is not 50 percent. Few people approve of him except libtards. Clinton is not leading Trump, no matter what your lying polls say.

 

[Meathead]

A victory is a victory, of course, and if Trump (not necessarily when) is nominated, which his numbers start dropping even more. HRC was told yesterday she was not going to have criminal charges forwarded to the AG.

What is this, a train wreck of premises and grammar?

 

[JakeStarkey]

Obama is continually at 50 and above in almost all polls, and miketx and meathead continue in denial.

My life goes on with Donnie or Hillary as president, a very good life.

Many here on the Board thinks life ends with the election of either of them: idiots.

I will vote for Johnson.

 

[Meathead]

Obama is continually at 50 and above in almost all polls, and miketx is in denial.

My life goes on with Donnie or Hillary as president, a very good life.

Many here on the Board thinks life ends with the election of either of them: idiots.

I will vote for JOhnson.

Jakey, you obviously need another life. Get one before it's too late1

 

[miketx]

Obama is continually at 50 and above in almost all polls, and miketx and meathead continue in denial.

My life goes on with Donnie or Hillary as president, a very good life.

Many here on the Board thinks life ends with the election of either of them: idiots.

I will vote for Johnson.

Spin smoke gag...

 

[JakeStarkey]

Obama is continually at 50 and above in almost all polls, and miketx is in denial.

My life goes on with Donnie or Hillary as president, a very good life.

Many here on the Board thinks life ends with the election of either of them: idiots.

I will vote for JOhnson.

Jakey, you obviously need another life. Get one before it's too late1

I have a great life. How about you? Are you going to jump off a building when Trump loses?

miketx continues in denial of the numbers as well.

And the hysteria is creeping into the far right commentary.

 

[DarkFury]

That's your weak opinion, Lucy. Trump's problem remains that the numbers consistently come down on HRC's side, particularly in the battle ground states.

Kasich would have so easily beaten her.

If Trump is elected, he will not mass deport, no wall will be built, immigrants will still pour in, and the TPP will continue.

No I'm meaning those polls are all within the MOE, it's not my "weak opinion", it's an actuality as stated.

How are Hillary's Favourable/Unfavourable ratings? I'm not seeing any.

Kasich is a RINO, even more of one than Jeb Bush.

How do you know what The Donald is going to do or not do? Do you have a Hotline or something?

Jake is forgetting the part where people are lying to poll takers so not to be harassed.

"Could the polls be underestimating Donald Trump’s support? That’s the conclusion of what I’ll call the “shy Trump-ers” theory, which holds that public opinion surveys undersell Trump because some of his supporters are unwilling to admit they’re backing The Donald. The supposed evidence for this comes from comparing different types of polls: Through much of this Republican presidential primary, Trump did worse in polls that used live, human interviewers than in polls that don’t...."
Trump Supporters Probably Aren’t Lying To Pollsters | #follownews

"FRUSTRATED AMERICANS ARE LESS LIKELY TO SUPPORT TRUMP THAN ANGRY AMERICANS - Amy Walter: “Americans aren’t actually any angrier at government today than they were a year ago, or even four years ago. In fact,according to data from the Pew Research Center, the percent of Americans who say they are ‘angry at the federal government’ has remained rather consistent over the last six years...’So, why the obsession with anger? Well, like just about everything else we talk about this year, it has an association with Donald J. Trump….f you interview or focus on only ‘angry’ people, you get a very biased sample of the overall electorate and who they are likely to support….[T]hose who were the most likely to think Trump would be great were angry voters and those who thought he’d be terrible were ‘content’ or ‘frustrated’ voters...In other words, people who are angry with government (21 percent of all voters) have their candidate - Trump. People who are content with government (20 percent of all voters) have theirs - Clinton. But, for the vast majority who are frustrated, Clinton has a small edge. Or more accurately, those who are frustrated with government view Trump more negatively than they do Clinton"
HUFFPOLLSTER: Trump Supporters Are Angrier And More Risk-Accepting Than Clinton Supporters

Every islamic attack by Jakes buddies raises numbers.
Every illegal import of Jakes terrorist buddies raises numbers.
The press here talks to the people who support what the globalists want NOT the people.

 

[Meathead]

Obama is continually at 50 and above in almost all polls, and miketx is in denial.

My life goes on with Donnie or Hillary as president, a very good life.

Many here on the Board thinks life ends with the election of either of them: idiots.

I will vote for JOhnson.

Jakey, you obviously need another life. Get one before it's too late1

I have a great life. How about you? Are you going to jump off a building when Trump loses?

miketx continues in denial of the numbers as well.

And the hysteria is creeping into the far right commentary.

Pathologically damaged people normally do not have a "great" life. A Clinton victory is not going to make yours any better.

 

[Lucy Hamilton]

That's your weak opinion, Lucy. Trump's problem remains that the numbers consistently come down on HRC's side, particularly in the battle ground states.

Kasich would have so easily beaten her.

If Trump is elected, he will not mass deport, no wall will be built, immigrants will still pour in, and the TPP will continue.

No I'm meaning those polls are all within the MOE, it's not my "weak opinion", it's an actuality as stated.

How are Hillary's Favourable/Unfavourable ratings? I'm not seeing any.

Kasich is a RINO, even more of one than Jeb Bush.

How do you know what The Donald is going to do or not do? Do you have a Hotline or something?

Jake is forgetting the part where people are lying to poll takers so not to be harassed.

"Could the polls be underestimating Donald Trump’s support? That’s the conclusion of what I’ll call the “shy Trump-ers” theory, which holds that public opinion surveys undersell Trump because some of his supporters are unwilling to admit they’re backing The Donald. The supposed evidence for this comes from comparing different types of polls: Through much of this Republican presidential primary, Trump did worse in polls that used live, human interviewers than in polls that don’t...."
Trump Supporters Probably Aren’t Lying To Pollsters | #follownews

"FRUSTRATED AMERICANS ARE LESS LIKELY TO SUPPORT TRUMP THAN ANGRY AMERICANS - Amy Walter: “Americans aren’t actually any angrier at government today than they were a year ago, or even four years ago. In fact,according to data from the Pew Research Center, the percent of Americans who say they are ‘angry at the federal government’ has remained rather consistent over the last six years...’So, why the obsession with anger? Well, like just about everything else we talk about this year, it has an association with Donald J. Trump….f you interview or focus on only ‘angry’ people, you get a very biased sample of the overall electorate and who they are likely to support….[T]hose who were the most likely to think Trump would be great were angry voters and those who thought he’d be terrible were ‘content’ or ‘frustrated’ voters...In other words, people who are angry with government (21 percent of all voters) have their candidate - Trump. People who are content with government (20 percent of all voters) have theirs - Clinton. But, for the vast majority who are frustrated, Clinton has a small edge. Or more accurately, those who are frustrated with government view Trump more negatively than they do Clinton"
HUFFPOLLSTER: Trump Supporters Are Angrier And More Risk-Accepting Than Clinton Supporters

Every islamic attack by Jakes buddies raises numbers.
Every illegal import of Jakes terrorist buddies raises numbers.
The press here talks to the people who support what the globalists want NOT the people.

These are good points, many Trump supporters already get verbally abused or even physically assaulted just for supporting The Donald, so I also think that a number of people would be reluctant because of this to openly express support for him.

Isn't that wonderful? Getting verbally abused and/or physically assaulted for supporting a political candidate?

 

[JakeStarkey]

No one is being intimidated by poll takers.

I agree that many Trump supporters are damaged mentally: witness darkfisted, lucy, and meathead.

So you all agree that the numbers do not comfort Trump supporters: wise of you.

 

[Lucy Hamilton]

No one is being intimidated by poll takers.

I agree that many Trump supporters are damaged mentally: witness darkfisted, lucy, and meathead.

So you all agree that the numbers do not comfort Trump supporters: wise of you.

"I agree that many Trump supporters are damaged mentally: witness darkfisted, lucy, and meathead."

 

[DarkFury]

That's your weak opinion, Lucy. Trump's problem remains that the numbers consistently come down on HRC's side, particularly in the battle ground states.

Kasich would have so easily beaten her.

If Trump is elected, he will not mass deport, no wall will be built, immigrants will still pour in, and the TPP will continue.

No I'm meaning those polls are all within the MOE, it's not my "weak opinion", it's an actuality as stated.

How are Hillary's Favourable/Unfavourable ratings? I'm not seeing any.

Kasich is a RINO, even more of one than Jeb Bush.

How do you know what The Donald is going to do or not do? Do you have a Hotline or something?

Jake is forgetting the part where people are lying to poll takers so not to be harassed.

"Could the polls be underestimating Donald Trump’s support? That’s the conclusion of what I’ll call the “shy Trump-ers” theory, which holds that public opinion surveys undersell Trump because some of his supporters are unwilling to admit they’re backing The Donald. The supposed evidence for this comes from comparing different types of polls: Through much of this Republican presidential primary, Trump did worse in polls that used live, human interviewers than in polls that don’t...."
Trump Supporters Probably Aren’t Lying To Pollsters | #follownews

"FRUSTRATED AMERICANS ARE LESS LIKELY TO SUPPORT TRUMP THAN ANGRY AMERICANS - Amy Walter: “Americans aren’t actually any angrier at government today than they were a year ago, or even four years ago. In fact,according to data from the Pew Research Center, the percent of Americans who say they are ‘angry at the federal government’ has remained rather consistent over the last six years...’So, why the obsession with anger? Well, like just about everything else we talk about this year, it has an association with Donald J. Trump….f you interview or focus on only ‘angry’ people, you get a very biased sample of the overall electorate and who they are likely to support….[T]hose who were the most likely to think Trump would be great were angry voters and those who thought he’d be terrible were ‘content’ or ‘frustrated’ voters...In other words, people who are angry with government (21 percent of all voters) have their candidate - Trump. People who are content with government (20 percent of all voters) have theirs - Clinton. But, for the vast majority who are frustrated, Clinton has a small edge. Or more accurately, those who are frustrated with government view Trump more negatively than they do Clinton"
HUFFPOLLSTER: Trump Supporters Are Angrier And More Risk-Accepting Than Clinton Supporters

Every islamic attack by Jakes buddies raises numbers.
Every illegal import of Jakes terrorist buddies raises numbers.
The press here talks to the people who support what the globalists want NOT the people.

These are good points, many Trump supporters already get verbally abused or even physically assaulted just for supporting The Donald, so I also think that a number of people would be reluctant because of this to openly express support for him.

Isn't that wonderful? Getting verbally abused and/or physically assaulted for supporting a political candidate?

When government leaders can meet in public and block the public you know its crooked. That Lynch/Clinton meeting took place just a few hours BEFORE the Lynch meeting with the press where she said she expected NO charges. She has since taken that statement back but it does show voters just how dirty the Clinton's are.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

The numbers continue to roll in. As long as Obama's approval rating is over 50, HRC seems to be in a very good place.

General Election: Trump vs. Clinton Gravis* Clinton 50, Trump 48 Clinton +2
President Obama Job Approval Gallup Approve 51, Disapprove 45 Approve +6
General Election: Trump vs. Clinton IBD/TIPP Clinton 44, Trump 40 Clinton +4
General Election: Trump vs. Clinton Rasmussen Reports Clinton 39, Trump 43 Trump +4
General Election: Trump vs. Clinton PPP (D) Clinton 48, Trump 44 Clinton +4
General Election: Trump vs. Clinton Reuters/Ipsos Clinton 42, Trump 32 Clinton +10
General Election: Trump vs. Clinton vs. Johnson vs. Stein IBD/TIPP Clinton 37, Trump 36, Johnson 9, Stein 5 Clinton +1
General Election: Trump vs. Clinton vs. Johnson vs. Stein PPP (D) Clinton 45, Trump 41, Johnson 5, Stein 2 Clinton +4
General Election: Trump vs. Clinton vs. Johnson vs. Stein Reuters/Ipsos Clinton 42, Trump 31, Johnson 5, Stein 4 Clinton +11
Iowa: Trump vs. Clinton Loras College Clinton 48, Trump 34 Clinton +14
Iowa: Trump vs. Clinton vs. Johnson vs. Stein Loras College Clinton 44, Trump 31, Johnson 6, Stein 2 Clinton +13
New York: Trump vs. Clinton Siena Clinton 54, Trump 31 Clinton +23

With the exception of the Reuters/Ipsos poll, all the other General Election numbers are within the MOE and if you add them together to get a sort of Poll of Polls, Hillary at + 3.1 is still within the MOE.

So therefore, statistically not a great revelation as to what's going to occur in 5 months time.

The Reuters/Ipsos poll is just whacked out.

..and that's BEFORE her post indictment bounce!

Starkey <3 Hillary