Cold kills far more humans than heat does

[MarathonMike]

I have two wells on my property. The closest one to my house is about 3/4 mile away. The other is further and just feeds a ground tank for the cattle. The water is so alkaline that I get my drinking water from a RO outlet in St Johns and keep 150 gal jugs filled with that. I do use my well water for my plants and I'm the house tank. But I buffer it with sulfuric acid whenever I fill the tanks.
There is a capped well on another parcel I own closer to Navajo springs. But it was capped because it showed too high a radiation content. It was capped when I bought that parcel.

Very interesting thanks for sharing that.

 

[ozro]

Very interesting thanks for sharing that.

No problem.

 

[mamooth]

Talk is cheap.

Never a problem. Remember, you're not talking to a fellow cult imbecile. You're talking to me, so it's a given I can always back up what I say. Years of humiliation should have taught you that, but you're a slow learner. It will be amusing to see all of your excuses now.

Valuing the Global Mortality Consequences of Climate Change Accounting for Adaptation Costs and Benefits*

Abstract. Using 40 countries’ subnational data, we estimate age-specific mortality-temperature relationships and extrapolate them to countries without data

academic.oup.com

Summarized in this table:

https://academic.oup.com/view-large/413145435

It says that, even with increased income and adaption reducing the number of additional heat deaths, the net change due to global warming is still slightly towards more net deaths. (Yes, with a fairly high uncertainty.)

Point is, that kills the denier "DERP! WARMING WILL SAVE SO MANY LIVES!" talking point. Not that having their points debunked by science has ever gotten deniers to stop parroting the debunked point.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

Ding adores being humulitated for his faith.

It's like a horsehair under shirt he wears next to his skin.

It's similar to self flagellation he does to himself.

It's what he is.

 

[ding]

Never a problem. Remember, you're not talking to a fellow cult imbecile. You're talking to me, so it's a given I can always back up what I say. Years of humiliation should have taught you that, but you're a slow learner. It will be amusing to see all of your excuses now.

Valuing the Global Mortality Consequences of Climate Change Accounting for Adaptation Costs and Benefits*

Abstract. Using 40 countries’ subnational data, we estimate age-specific mortality-temperature relationships and extrapolate them to countries without data

academic.oup.com

Summarized in this table:

https://academic.oup.com/view-large/413145435

It says that, even with increased income and adaption reducing the number of additional heat deaths, the net change due to global warming is still slightly towards more net deaths. (Yes, with a fairly high uncertainty.)

Point is, that kills the denier "DERP! WARMING WILL SAVE SO MANY LIVES!" talking point. Not that having their points debunked by science has ever gotten deniers to stop parroting the debunked point.

Dear, how many people in India die from the heat as opposed to the cold? That was what you were discussing, right?

 

[strollingbones]

cold and heat are both sneaky killers....but lets point out...if you are found cold and dead...they will warm
you up...no one is dead until they are warm....no way back with the heat death

what amazes me is people thinking to die in the cold it has to be freezing...it does not ...

hypothermia temperature - Google Search