Marener
Platinum Member
- Jul 26, 2022
- 28,519
- 13,381
Youre a moron.Lying under oath is perjury not a legal strategy.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Youre a moron.Lying under oath is perjury not a legal strategy.
Just stop. You have no idea what you’re talking about.No, it isn't. It is perjury, full stop.
Just stop. You have no idea what you’re talking about.
It’s not even sworn testimony you dope.I'm an expert witness, moron. I know perjury when I see it.
It is for witnesses, dope.The Hearing is, you dope.
People who testify in legal hearings or court proceedings are under oath, troll. You are a moron who can't find his own ass with both hands. Run along junior, adults are conversing.It is for witnesses, dope.
It’s not testimony, dope. It’s a legal argument.People who testify in legal hearings or court proceedings are under oath, troll. You are a moron who can't find his own ass with both hands. Run along junior, adults are conversing.
Really. Go ahead and tell me how a legal argument is testimony given under oath.You have no clue.
Really. Go ahead and tell me how a legal argument is testimony given under oath.
Dipshit. You watch too much Perry Mason. This has nothing to do with testimony.
Lawyers standing in front of a judge aren’t sworn in me offer their arguments as a matter of their opinion to persuade the judge.Tell us how a Court Hearing is NOT done under oath?
Lawyers standing in front of a judge aren’t sworn in me offer their arguments as a matter of their opinion to persuade the judge.
A legal argument isn’t testimony given under oath.
Please, educate yourself on the function of the judiciary before you start running your mouth.
Or at least have a little humility.
There is no perjured testimony. You invented it.
You are seriously funny. Yes, in a Motion before the Bench, you are correct, the lawyers aren't sworn in. That is true, however, if the lawyer is arguing for a Motion that is ONLY supported by perjured testimony, that is grounds for immediate disbarrement for violation of judicial ethics.
DURRRRRR
You are seriously funny. Yes, in a Motion before the Bench, you are correct, the lawyers aren't sworn in. That is true, however, if the lawyer is arguing for a Motion that is ONLY supported by perjured testimony, that is grounds for immediate disbarrement for violation of judicial ethics.
DURRRRRR
There is no perjured testimony. You invented it.
Lawyers are allowed to make arguments that fail. Lord knows that Nunes does it all the time. His lawyers aren’t immediately disbarred.
What testimony are you claiming is going to be perjured?And the
Lawyers are not allowed to make motions based on perjured testimony you tard.
It is ILLEGAL. A violation of judicial ethics, and grounds for immediate disbarrement as just happened in a case in Oregon.
That lawyer is now looking at being Federally indicted too.
I won't name the case because the charges are imminent.
What testimony are you claiming is going to be perjured?
It doesn’t exist, moron.
And now everyone gets to see that you’re a moron who is full of shit.
Read the second word of the OP.It’s not testimony, dope. It’s a legal argument.
A lawsuit is a legal argument. They’re not testimony.Read the second word of the OP.