PredFan
Diamond Member
99.99999% of cops are good people doing a mostly thankless job. I would like to see them weed out the bad ones on their own, but I'm always going to give them the benefit of the doubt.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
99.99999% of cops are good people doing a mostly thankless job. I would like to see them weed out the bad ones on their own, but I'm always going to give them the benefit of the doubt.
What the hell is"color of authority? "Did you mean "cover of authority? You are right if the rest be true.What is "color of authority" and why should I care? Don't know what your point is, but unless it's about "The Boy Who Cried Wolf", I don't agree.This poor excuse for a "public servant" needs to be fired, and sued for denying this woman her civil rights under color of authority.
What a complete asshole,and he'd better hope he never needs emergency medical service because I guarantee you, that it will take a little longer to help him.
Embedded media from this media site is no longer available
The nurse was following the law. The cop demanded that she violate the law to appease him. She couldn't. Thus his placing her under arrest is a felony, specifically False Imprisonment. He may not get arrested for that crime, but she will file a lawsuit under Federal Code Title 18 Section 243,, Denial of Civil Rights Under Color Of Authority. That cop is fucked. She gets to go after all of his assets, and he can't use the public taxpayer to help pay for his defense. He gets to foot the whole bill.
In seven or eight years she will own his house.
The cop wanted a drug test from someone left in a coma after a collision. The evidence would disappear before a warrant can be obtained.
The nurse should have obeyed to cop. If the "search" was illegal, let a judge decide that later. You don't get to disobey police because of your policy. You don't get to disobey a cop because you think he's making a mistake.
The cop wanted a drug test from someone left in a coma after a collision. The evidence would disappear before a warrant can be obtained.
The nurse should have obeyed to cop. If the "search" was illegal, let a judge decide that later. You don't get to disobey police because of your policy. You don't get to disobey a cop because you think he's making a mistake.
How does that matter? A time critical issue does not violate an agreement the police had with the Hospital, nor the right to violate the Nurse's rights. She was being extremely patient and reasonable.The cop wanted a drug test from someone left in a coma after a collision. The evidence would disappear before a warrant can be obtained.
The nurse should have obeyed to cop. If the "search" was illegal, let a judge decide that later. You don't get to disobey police because of your policy. You don't get to disobey a cop because you think he's making a mistake.
How does that matter? A time critical issue does not violate an agreement the police had with the Hospital, nor the right to violate the Nurse's rights. She was being extremely patient and reasonable.The cop wanted a drug test from someone left in a coma after a collision. The evidence would disappear before a warrant can be obtained.
The nurse should have obeyed to cop. If the "search" was illegal, let a judge decide that later. You don't get to disobey police because of your policy. You don't get to disobey a cop because you think he's making a mistake.
A cop does not have the legal authority to force you to violate the law.
The cop wanted a drug test from someone left in a coma after a collision. The evidence would disappear before a warrant can be obtained.
The nurse should have obeyed to cop. If the "search" was illegal, let a judge decide that later. You don't get to disobey police because of your policy. You don't get to disobey a cop because you think he's making a mistake.
Recognizing that is so is a good reason not to remark upon the matter.there may be important information we don't get from this video
99.99999% of cops are good people doing a mostly thankless job. I would like to see them weed out the bad ones on their own, but I'm always going to give them the benefit of the doubt.
I used to live in SLC and know that hospital well. It's a fantastic hospital with excellent staff. U of U Hospital also is sort of a Mormon hold out, considered a liberal establishment. Bet that cop is Mormon. Just sayin'.
the law in UTAH is screwed up------if the attending Doc thinks there is a need to check blood chemistries-----
then the blood should be drawn
The cop wanted a drug test from someone left in a coma after a collision. The evidence would disappear before a warrant can be obtained.
The nurse should have obeyed to cop. If the "search" was illegal, let a judge decide that later. You don't get to disobey police because of your policy. You don't get to disobey a cop because you think he's making a mistake.
I think the cops of today are of much better quality and better trained than the cops of the old days.Now that we have cell phone and body cams everywhere, we are finding out all the abuses people were talking about all these years that were denied by the cops were actually happening.Agreed, that guy should be gone.
Police must police their own better.
Agreed, but I would still say 95% of cops are good people and try to do the job as it is supposed to be done! Problem is those same good cops turn a blind eye to those that are not on the up and up. So maybe that makes them bad to, don't know but it is a bad situation.
the law in UTAH is screwed up------if the attending Doc thinks there is a need to check blood chemistries-----
then the blood should be drawn
I'm guessing this is a DWI case and the cops got pissed because they couldnt collect evidence.
the law in UTAH is screwed up------if the attending Doc thinks there is a need to check blood chemistries-----
then the blood should be drawn
I'm guessing this is a DWI case and the cops got pissed because they couldnt collect evidence.
It's not. The facts of the case are known.
They've even been posted in this thread. But why bother reading, when you've got uninformed opinions to share?
What the hell is"color of authority? "Did you mean "cover of authority? You are right if the rest be true.What is "color of authority" and why should I care? Don't know what your point is, but unless it's about "The Boy Who Cried Wolf", I don't agree.This poor excuse for a "public servant" needs to be fired, and sued for denying this woman her civil rights under color of authority.
What a complete asshole,and he'd better hope he never needs emergency medical service because I guarantee you, that it will take a little longer to help him.
Embedded media from this media site is no longer available
The nurse was following the law. The cop demanded that she violate the law to appease him. She couldn't. Thus his placing her under arrest is a felony, specifically False Imprisonment. He may not get arrested for that crime, but she will file a lawsuit under Federal Code Title 18 Section 243,, Denial of Civil Rights Under Color Of Authority. That cop is fucked. She gets to go after all of his assets, and he can't use the public taxpayer to help pay for his defense. He gets to foot the whole bill.
In seven or eight years she will own his house.