NY Times Proudly Proclaims America Should be Governed by Mob Rule

the poor would love a capital opportunity to pay any taxes they can afford; a fifteen dollar an hour minimum wage and unemployment compensation for simply being unemployed, ensures potential Labor can pay taxes at every capital opportunity.

It's called welfare. We already have it.
we need a more cost effective social safety net; welfare should be for those for whom solving for a simple poverty of money, may not be enough. the rest, unemployment compensation for simply being unemployed should be enough.
 
In al
It's was bad then, and it's still bad now. Bart O'Kavanaugh is not only a lying rapist he's also the least popular nominee ever.
Well damn. I bet no one told him it was a popularity contest. Maybe he'd have brought a few beers to shore up some support.

In all seriousness, liberals like you are wretched uses of otherwise good oxygen. Someone who calls another a rapist with no proof is just garbage.
In all seriousness there is far too much smoke for there to be no fire. You just refuse to see because you are a rwnj hack.
Nope. Even her own witnesses and friend do not corroborate her story.
Not smoke. Empty hot air.
 
the poor would love a capital opportunity to pay any taxes they can afford; a fifteen dollar an hour minimum wage and unemployment compensation for simply being unemployed, ensures potential Labor can pay taxes at every capital opportunity.

It's called welfare. We already have it.
we need a more cost effective social safety net; welfare should be for those for whom solving for a simple poverty of money, may not be enough. the rest, unemployment compensation for simply being unemployed should be enough.

What you want is an increase in welfare. We've been over this.
 
the poor would love a capital opportunity to pay any taxes they can afford; a fifteen dollar an hour minimum wage and unemployment compensation for simply being unemployed, ensures potential Labor can pay taxes at every capital opportunity.

It's called welfare. We already have it.
we need a more cost effective social safety net; welfare should be for those for whom solving for a simple poverty of money, may not be enough. the rest, unemployment compensation for simply being unemployed should be enough.

What you want is an increase in welfare. We've been over this.
Higher paid labor pays more in taxes and creates more in demand. Yes, we keep going over this.
 
The Avalon Project : The Federalist Papers No. 10

From this view of the subject it may be concluded that a pure democracy, by which I mean a society consisting of a small number of citizens, who assemble and administer the government in person, can admit of no cure for the mischiefs of faction. A common passion or interest will, in almost every case, be felt by a majority of the whole; a communication and concert result from the form of government itself; and there is nothing to check the inducements to sacrifice the weaker party or an obnoxious individual. Hence it is that such democracies have ever been spectacles of turbulence and contention; have ever been found incompatible with personal security or the rights of property; and have in general been as short in their lives as they have been violent in their deaths. Theoretic politicians, who have patronized this species of government, have erroneously supposed that by reducing mankind to a perfect equality in their political rights, they would, at the same time, be perfectly equalized and assimilated in their possessions, their opinions, and their passions.

A republic, by which I mean a government in which the scheme of representation takes place, opens a different prospect, and promises the cure for which we are seeking. Let us examine the points in which it varies from pure democracy, and we shall comprehend both the nature of the cure and the efficacy which it must derive from the Union.

The two great points of difference between a democracy and a republic are: first, the delegation of the government, in the latter, to a small number of citizens elected by the rest; secondly, the greater number of citizens, and greater sphere of country, over which the latter may be extended.
Wags Wearing Wigs

The Federalist Papers were anti-majority propaganda written by elitist-snob bootlicking lawyers for the 1%. Whoever supports their Constitution gets a pathetic and imaginary feeling of power and superiority over all others tyrannically stuck in his own excluded hereditary class. He maintains the childish and unaware attitude of someone who hates his Daddy for not getting rich and spoiling him.
Noted............that's what you think of the Founding Fathers and their words.........who da fuck cares....

Hmm.........you feel better now.
Inferior People Love Supremacy Documents

Because of the inadequacy of their own fathers, Postmodern Americans have a desperate need to deify historical figures, treating the Constitution the way Fundies treat the Bible and its Framers as the 12 Apostles. But the real Founding Fathers were the pioneers out on the frontier, not the wannabe nobility in the cities.
 
the poor would love a capital opportunity to pay any taxes they can afford; a fifteen dollar an hour minimum wage and unemployment compensation for simply being unemployed, ensures potential Labor can pay taxes at every capital opportunity.

It's called welfare. We already have it.
we need a more cost effective social safety net; welfare should be for those for whom solving for a simple poverty of money, may not be enough. the rest, unemployment compensation for simply being unemployed should be enough.

What you want is an increase in welfare. We've been over this.
Higher paid labor pays more in taxes and creates more in demand. Yes, we keep going over this.

Paying people who are not working and who have not qualified for unemployment insurance payments is welfare. That's the bottoms line. Be honest, you want to get money from somewhere even if you can work but choose not to.
 
the poor would love a capital opportunity to pay any taxes they can afford; a fifteen dollar an hour minimum wage and unemployment compensation for simply being unemployed, ensures potential Labor can pay taxes at every capital opportunity.

It's called welfare. We already have it.
we need a more cost effective social safety net; welfare should be for those for whom solving for a simple poverty of money, may not be enough. the rest, unemployment compensation for simply being unemployed should be enough.

What you want is an increase in welfare. We've been over this.
Higher paid labor pays more in taxes and creates more in demand. Yes, we keep going over this.

Paying people who are not working and who have not qualified for unemployment insurance payments is welfare. That's the bottoms line. Be honest, you want to get money from somewhere even if you can work but choose not to.
it is more cost effective than welfare. and employment is at-will. it is equal protection of the law.
 
It's called welfare. We already have it.
we need a more cost effective social safety net; welfare should be for those for whom solving for a simple poverty of money, may not be enough. the rest, unemployment compensation for simply being unemployed should be enough.

What you want is an increase in welfare. We've been over this.
Higher paid labor pays more in taxes and creates more in demand. Yes, we keep going over this.

Paying people who are not working and who have not qualified for unemployment insurance payments is welfare. That's the bottoms line. Be honest, you want to get money from somewhere even if you can work but choose not to.
it is more cost effective than welfare. and employment is at-will. it is equal protection of the law.

No, it's welfare. Be honest.
 
we need a more cost effective social safety net; welfare should be for those for whom solving for a simple poverty of money, may not be enough. the rest, unemployment compensation for simply being unemployed should be enough.

What you want is an increase in welfare. We've been over this.
Higher paid labor pays more in taxes and creates more in demand. Yes, we keep going over this.

Paying people who are not working and who have not qualified for unemployment insurance payments is welfare. That's the bottoms line. Be honest, you want to get money from somewhere even if you can work but choose not to.
it is more cost effective than welfare. and employment is at-will. it is equal protection of the law.

No, it's welfare. Be honest.
ok. The Power to provide for the General Welfare is in our Constitution; stop appealing to emotion regarding the Term welfare; be Patriotic.
 
What you want is an increase in welfare. We've been over this.
Higher paid labor pays more in taxes and creates more in demand. Yes, we keep going over this.

Paying people who are not working and who have not qualified for unemployment insurance payments is welfare. That's the bottoms line. Be honest, you want to get money from somewhere even if you can work but choose not to.
it is more cost effective than welfare. and employment is at-will. it is equal protection of the law.

No, it's welfare. Be honest.
ok. The Power to provide for the General Welfare is in our Constitution; stop appealing to emotion regarding the Term welfare; be Patriotic.

Call it what it is. Being honest about that is your first step back to sanity.
 
The Article will disappoint the Founding Fathers---who set up a Republic precisely with the intention of avoiding Mob Rule.

Is the person who wrote it a Suck-Ass Liberal Pinhead? Well, he wrote for the NYT so I guess I know the answer to that question.
Who said we've got "mob rule?" That's what you're going to call the left, now, when they protest, huh, "mobs?" Oh, that will bring over a few Independents and Democrats for sure.

Well, unless we claw at the doors of federal buildings, wailing and gnashing our teeth like damned souls in Hell, we're not likely to repulse Independents anything like you lefties have. So I think we're good. And I KNOW we don't want any tips from the likes of you on how to win over voters.
 
It's was bad then, and it's still bad now. Bart O'Kavanaugh is not only a lying rapist he's also the least popular nominee ever.

Damned shame for you people that the Supreme Court is designed to thumb its nose at popularity, then, isn't it?
 
Higher paid labor pays more in taxes and creates more in demand. Yes, we keep going over this.

Paying people who are not working and who have not qualified for unemployment insurance payments is welfare. That's the bottoms line. Be honest, you want to get money from somewhere even if you can work but choose not to.
it is more cost effective than welfare. and employment is at-will. it is equal protection of the law.

No, it's welfare. Be honest.
ok. The Power to provide for the General Welfare is in our Constitution; stop appealing to emotion regarding the Term welfare; be Patriotic.

Call it what it is. Being honest about that is your first step back to sanity.
I am advocating for, promoting and providing for the general welfare to solve the problem of Capitalism's natural rate of unemployment that merely benefits capitalists and not Labor.
 
The Article will disappoint the Founding Fathers---who set up a Republic precisely with the intention of avoiding Mob Rule.

Is the person who wrote it a Suck-Ass Liberal Pinhead? Well, he wrote for the NYT so I guess I know the answer to that question.
Who said we've got "mob rule?" That's what you're going to call the left, now, when they protest, huh, "mobs?" Oh, that will bring over a few Independents and Democrats for sure.

Why? Who would want to join a screaming mob, except the screaming mob? They look like the idiots they are.
Riots are more likely..........seems the Dems protest riot police and buses to haul off those to jail are needed every time. It is one thing to protest PEACEFULLY and entirely another to use violence as a means for political ends............

Time and time again the left use intimidation and fear tactics on their protests..........when they don't get their way or when they are offended and they try to trample the Freedom of those who speak against them............ANTIFA and BLM being prime examples..........brandishing metal clubs with homemade body armor going to crack heads of those they disagree with............

That isn't a Peaceful Protest................that is an intent to incite violence.
:boohoo:
Wake up. It's both sides. You all will be back with your AR's on your shoulders as soon as you lose.
phoenix0530.jpg

Wake up. It's only ONE side that has convinced the middle to be afraid of them, and it ain't us. It also ain't gonna BE us, no matter how many memes you post, so long as you leftists get to own the likes of Antifa and the loonbags screeching in DC the last few weeks.

You're not going to be able to explain this away, no matter how much you convince yourself that you're "really good people, honest".
 
Paying people who are not working and who have not qualified for unemployment insurance payments is welfare. That's the bottoms line. Be honest, you want to get money from somewhere even if you can work but choose not to.
it is more cost effective than welfare. and employment is at-will. it is equal protection of the law.

No, it's welfare. Be honest.
ok. The Power to provide for the General Welfare is in our Constitution; stop appealing to emotion regarding the Term welfare; be Patriotic.

Call it what it is. Being honest about that is your first step back to sanity.
I am advocating for, promoting and providing for the general welfare to solve the problem of Capitalism's natural rate of unemployment that merely benefits capitalists and not Labor.

And you took a step backwards. You're advocating for more welfare. Remember, being honest about that is your first step.
 
What you want is an increase in welfare. We've been over this.
Higher paid labor pays more in taxes and creates more in demand. Yes, we keep going over this.

Paying people who are not working and who have not qualified for unemployment insurance payments is welfare. That's the bottoms line. Be honest, you want to get money from somewhere even if you can work but choose not to.
it is more cost effective than welfare. and employment is at-will. it is equal protection of the law.

No, it's welfare. Be honest.
ok. The Power to provide for the General Welfare is in our Constitution; stop appealing to emotion regarding the Term welfare; be Patriotic.
It does NOT mean what you claim it means.
 
it is more cost effective than welfare. and employment is at-will. it is equal protection of the law.

No, it's welfare. Be honest.
ok. The Power to provide for the General Welfare is in our Constitution; stop appealing to emotion regarding the Term welfare; be Patriotic.

Call it what it is. Being honest about that is your first step back to sanity.
I am advocating for, promoting and providing for the general welfare to solve the problem of Capitalism's natural rate of unemployment that merely benefits capitalists and not Labor.

And you took a step backwards. You're advocating for more welfare. Remember, being honest about that is your first step.
sorry; i am not appealing to emotion regarding welfare. i gave you every opportunity to prove your economic points.

only social points now;

how would anyone in our republic be worse off by solving for simple poverty?

you are welcome to any social thought exercises you want. you have no economic argument.
 

Forum List

Back
Top