Oath Keepers Vow To Protect Kim Davis From U.S. Marshall Service

[Vigilante]

Vigilante is deflecting.

Kim Davis was oppressing and her legal butt kicked.

She does it again? It will be done again.

JakeAss stepd into the fray, and will get his butt kicked...again!

 

[JakeStarkey]

Silly you, Vigilante. You can't kick your way out of a wet bag. She is an oppressor. You know that. She is a government employee hired to serve all customers. End of story. Since Trump is not a conservative or a fan of far right religious crazies, he would not do anything.

 

[ogibillm]

More Liberal, and BTGL logic!

what's hilarious is that you somehow think the constitution changed, or that kim davis took an oath only to uphold those laws in effect at the time of her oath.

That's right, her RELIGIOUS FREEDOM RIGHTS, which ARE in the Constitution were violated!

no, they weren't. she's free to believe whatever batshit crazy thing she wants. she is not free and never was free to impose those beliefs on the peope of her county by using the power of government. she is not free to violate the rights of others and use 'religious freedom' as a shield.

She's not imposing her beliefs on anyone, she is following her own RELIGIOUS BELIEFS as covered in the Constitution! You do see FREED OF RELIGION, but NOTHING about marriage of queers, do you...and because some black robed, unelected idiots said so, is NOT ENOUGH to invalidate the Constitution. Apparently since Adams Vs Jefferson on court appointments, the court took this role upon themselves and it's TIME for "WE THE PEOPLE" to stop them!

she is denying people in her county their constitutional rights because she thinks it's sinful.
she's welcome to disagree with gay marriage all she wants, but she still has taken an oath to uphold the constitution.

 

[nuhuh]

 

[Vigilante]

More Liberal, and BTGL logic!

what's hilarious is that you somehow think the constitution changed, or that kim davis took an oath only to uphold those laws in effect at the time of her oath.

That's right, her RELIGIOUS FREEDOM RIGHTS, which ARE in the Constitution were violated!

no, they weren't. she's free to believe whatever batshit crazy thing she wants. she is not free and never was free to impose those beliefs on the peope of her county by using the power of government. she is not free to violate the rights of others and use 'religious freedom' as a shield.

She's not imposing her beliefs on anyone, she is following her own RELIGIOUS BELIEFS as covered in the Constitution! You do see FREED OF RELIGION, but NOTHING about marriage of queers, do you...and because some black robed, unelected idiots said so, is NOT ENOUGH to invalidate the Constitution. Apparently since Adams Vs Jefferson on court appointments, the court took this role upon themselves and it's TIME for "WE THE PEOPLE" to stop them!

she is denying people in her county their constitutional rights because she thinks it's sinful.
she's welcome to disagree with gay marriage all she wants, but she still has taken an oath to uphold the constitution.

Then, like the baker, go to another Clerk...easy fucking answer, and YOU don't VIOLATE her religious rights which are, because they are ENUMERATED in the Constitution more powerful than queer marriage!

 

[JakeStarkey]

Vigi, Vigi, Vigi, you dumb fuck. She would not allow her clerks to issue them.

 

[bodecea]

what's hilarious is that you somehow think the constitution changed, or that kim davis took an oath only to uphold those laws in effect at the time of her oath.

That's right, her RELIGIOUS FREEDOM RIGHTS, which ARE in the Constitution were violated!

no, they weren't. she's free to believe whatever batshit crazy thing she wants. she is not free and never was free to impose those beliefs on the peope of her county by using the power of government. she is not free to violate the rights of others and use 'religious freedom' as a shield.

She's not imposing her beliefs on anyone, she is following her own RELIGIOUS BELIEFS as covered in the Constitution! You do see FREED OF RELIGION, but NOTHING about marriage of queers, do you...and because some black robed, unelected idiots said so, is NOT ENOUGH to invalidate the Constitution. Apparently since Adams Vs Jefferson on court appointments, the court took this role upon themselves and it's TIME for "WE THE PEOPLE" to stop them!

she is denying people in her county their constitutional rights because she thinks it's sinful.
she's welcome to disagree with gay marriage all she wants, but she still has taken an oath to uphold the constitution.

Then, like the baker, go to another Clerk...easy fucking answer, and YOU don't VIOLATE her religious rights which are, because they are ENUMERATED in the Constitution more powerful than queer marriage!

Poor Viggie. She was the clerk for that county. And she wouldn't let others in her office do their job....religious tyranny...forcing her religious beliefs onto others.

 

[ogibillm]

what's hilarious is that you somehow think the constitution changed, or that kim davis took an oath only to uphold those laws in effect at the time of her oath.

That's right, her RELIGIOUS FREEDOM RIGHTS, which ARE in the Constitution were violated!

no, they weren't. she's free to believe whatever batshit crazy thing she wants. she is not free and never was free to impose those beliefs on the peope of her county by using the power of government. she is not free to violate the rights of others and use 'religious freedom' as a shield.

She's not imposing her beliefs on anyone, she is following her own RELIGIOUS BELIEFS as covered in the Constitution! You do see FREED OF RELIGION, but NOTHING about marriage of queers, do you...and because some black robed, unelected idiots said so, is NOT ENOUGH to invalidate the Constitution. Apparently since Adams Vs Jefferson on court appointments, the court took this role upon themselves and it's TIME for "WE THE PEOPLE" to stop them!

she is denying people in her county their constitutional rights because she thinks it's sinful.
she's welcome to disagree with gay marriage all she wants, but she still has taken an oath to uphold the constitution.

Then, like the baker, go to another Clerk...easy fucking answer, and YOU don't VIOLATE her religious rights which are, because they are ENUMERATED in the Constitution more powerful than queer marriage!

no. that's putting an undue burden on the people of her county.
if she can no longer honor her oath of office she has but one lawful option

 

[Vigilante]

Vigi, Vigi, Vigi, you dumb fuck. She would not allow her clerks to issue them.

Part of her religious freedom! She is the one that has to SIGN the certificates, NOT her c

Vigi, Vigi, Vigi, you dumb fuck. She would not allow her clerks to issue them.

Of course not you stupid fuck, they are VOID UNLESS she SIGNS them as being the elected official, which her clerks aren't!

JakeASS, have a NEW picture for the Manchurian Republican....

 

[Vigilante]

That's right, her RELIGIOUS FREEDOM RIGHTS, which ARE in the Constitution were violated!

no, they weren't. she's free to believe whatever batshit crazy thing she wants. she is not free and never was free to impose those beliefs on the peope of her county by using the power of government. she is not free to violate the rights of others and use 'religious freedom' as a shield.

She's not imposing her beliefs on anyone, she is following her own RELIGIOUS BELIEFS as covered in the Constitution! You do see FREED OF RELIGION, but NOTHING about marriage of queers, do you...and because some black robed, unelected idiots said so, is NOT ENOUGH to invalidate the Constitution. Apparently since Adams Vs Jefferson on court appointments, the court took this role upon themselves and it's TIME for "WE THE PEOPLE" to stop them!

she is denying people in her county their constitutional rights because she thinks it's sinful.
she's welcome to disagree with gay marriage all she wants, but she still has taken an oath to uphold the constitution.

Then, like the baker, go to another Clerk...easy fucking answer, and YOU don't VIOLATE her religious rights which are, because they are ENUMERATED in the Constitution more powerful than queer marriage!

Poor Viggie. She was the clerk for that county. And she wouldn't let others in her office do their job....religious tyranny...forcing her religious beliefs onto others.

Repeating for another mindless liberal that doesn't understand that as the ELECTED OFFICIAL she is the ONLY ONE able to sign the cert. or they are VOID... Go suck your girlfriend's .......

 

[ogibillm]

Vigi, Vigi, Vigi, you dumb fuck. She would not allow her clerks to issue them.

Part of her religious freedom! She is the one that has to SIGN the certificates, NOT her c

Vigi, Vigi, Vigi, you dumb fuck. She would not allow her clerks to issue them.

Of course not you stupid fuck, they are VOID UNLESS she SIGNS them as being the elected official, which her clerks aren't!

JakeASS, have a NEW picture for the Manchurian Republican....

so it's your belief that a county clerk can deny rights to people based on their own religious beliefs? are we all to be subject to the religious beliefs of our elected officials?

isn't that counter to the first amendment?

 

[Preacher]

Don't need to run mouth when guns does the talking for ya. I know that's why u faggots hate the 2nd amendment.

it's funny, they must have the same erroneous ideas about how the constitution works you do.
kim davis is the only one breaking her oath. why would so -called oath keepers support and defend that? because that's not what they are. they're just anti-government goons.

Yawn...stop getting your panties in a wad butt fucker. There is no one breaking an oath other than that judge. There is NO MARRIAGE LAW right now the legislatures have to go back to work writing new ones since old ones were found to be unconstitutional and SC can't make laws.

Do you honestly think they are going to intervene with US Marshals if they come to arrest Davis again? They are mugging for the camera just like Cruz and Huckabee. They want to be a part of the circus.

Yep. They haven't backed down before to thugs and they ain't gonna start now. This could get VERY interesting.

I hope it doesn't get interesting. I hope the whole thing turns out rather dully.

it will. they're happy to spout their mouths off but nothing will come of it.

and yet there they are, running their mouths.

if they decide to use force to 'protect' davis, they had better enjoy going to con college.

I am sure they are scared of your stupid threats...

 

[Vigilante]

That's right, her RELIGIOUS FREEDOM RIGHTS, which ARE in the Constitution were violated!

no, they weren't. she's free to believe whatever batshit crazy thing she wants. she is not free and never was free to impose those beliefs on the peope of her county by using the power of government. she is not free to violate the rights of others and use 'religious freedom' as a shield.

She's not imposing her beliefs on anyone, she is following her own RELIGIOUS BELIEFS as covered in the Constitution! You do see FREED OF RELIGION, but NOTHING about marriage of queers, do you...and because some black robed, unelected idiots said so, is NOT ENOUGH to invalidate the Constitution. Apparently since Adams Vs Jefferson on court appointments, the court took this role upon themselves and it's TIME for "WE THE PEOPLE" to stop them!

she is denying people in her county their constitutional rights because she thinks it's sinful.
she's welcome to disagree with gay marriage all she wants, but she still has taken an oath to uphold the constitution.

Then, like the baker, go to another Clerk...easy fucking answer, and YOU don't VIOLATE her religious rights which are, because they are ENUMERATED in the Constitution more powerful than queer marriage!

no. that's putting an undue burden on the people of her county.
if she can no longer honor her oath of office she has but one lawful option

No, it's not, it's what YOU make up, and you're GUANO in my book, and have NO AUTHORITY to tell anyone anything. It's TIME for a Republican Congress, and a Republican President to take AWAY the unelected POWER of Scotus, and simply have them, as intended by the Founders to make OPINION on the Constitutionality of laws from Congress! Any law deemed by SCOTUS unconstitutional was supposed to be sent BACK TO CONGRESS to amend, NOT amended into law by 9 UNELECTED and BIASED civilians!

 

[JakeStarkey]

Vigi, that fuck, said she could give it to another clerk to sign then signs no she has to sign it when corrected.

Trump will dump you and your kind in a heart beat when he can.

You are useful idiots, nothing more.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Vigi, that dumb fuck writes, "Any law deemed by SCOTUS unconstitutional was supposed to be sent BACK TO CONGRESS to amend, NOT amended into law by 9 UNELECTED and BIASED civilians!"

Who says? Where is it written? What an idiot.

 

[ogibillm]

Don't need to run mouth when guns does the talking for ya. I know that's why u faggots hate the 2nd amendment.

Yawn...stop getting your panties in a wad butt fucker. There is no one breaking an oath other than that judge. There is NO MARRIAGE LAW right now the legislatures have to go back to work writing new ones since old ones were found to be unconstitutional and SC can't make laws.
Yep. They haven't backed down before to thugs and they ain't gonna start now. This could get VERY interesting.

I hope it doesn't get interesting. I hope the whole thing turns out rather dully.

it will. they're happy to spout their mouths off but nothing will come of it.

and yet there they are, running their mouths.

if they decide to use force to 'protect' davis, they had better enjoy going to con college.

I am sure they are scared of your stupid threats...

what threats? just reality. when you break the law and threaten law enforcement you typically go to jail.

 

[Vigilante]

Vigi, that fuck, said she could give it to another clerk to sign then signs no she has to sign it when corrected.

Trump will dump you and your kind in a heart beat when he can.

You are useful idiots, nothing more.

Try again, dumbass, read what you wrote and correct it into understandable English!

 

[JakeStarkey]

Vigi, that fuck, said she could give it to another clerk to sign then signs no she has to sign it when corrected.

Trump will dump you and your kind in a heart beat when he can.

You are useful idiots, nothing more.

Try again, dumbass, read what you wrote and correct it into understandable English!

It's what you wrote then backed up on.

Anyone in her office can issue the certificates and sign them.

That her name is on the forms is meaningless.

She cannot oppress others religiously.

 

[Preacher]

Don't need to run mouth when guns does the talking for ya. I know that's why u faggots hate the 2nd amendment.

I hope it doesn't get interesting. I hope the whole thing turns out rather dully.

it will. they're happy to spout their mouths off but nothing will come of it.

and yet there they are, running their mouths.

if they decide to use force to 'protect' davis, they had better enjoy going to con college.

I am sure they are scared of your stupid threats...

what threats? just reality. when you break the law and threaten law enforcement you typically go to jail.

Eh the judge didn't go to jail so guess not....when u have power behind u,u can get away with almost anything. Feds backed down from the Bundy ranch folks in Nevada same will happen here unless they want to start a war over our religious rights.

 

[ogibillm]

Don't need to run mouth when guns does the talking for ya. I know that's why u faggots hate the 2nd amendment.

it will. they're happy to spout their mouths off but nothing will come of it.

and yet there they are, running their mouths.

if they decide to use force to 'protect' davis, they had better enjoy going to con college.

I am sure they are scared of your stupid threats...

what threats? just reality. when you break the law and threaten law enforcement you typically go to jail.

Eh the judge didn't go to jail so guess not....when u have power behind u,u can get away with almost anything. Feds backed down from the Bundy ranch folks in Nevada same will happen here unless they want to start a war over our religious rights.

the bundy situation was a travesty. those people are lucky they didn't end up planted in the ground.
and this is a pretty clear sign you're batshit crazy - you view those jackasses as in the right as well.