Obama actually did lose Iraq, Graham explains the negotiations.

[JakeStarkey]

The far RW propaganda machine has no impact on 90% of America.

 

[NotfooledbyW]

Do not underestimate the effect of RW pro-ISIS propaganda over the past two years since RWers received a huge boost from the ISIS assault in Iraq prior to the midterm elections of 3014. ISIS terror gave Republicans a huge boost in 2024 and their propaganda machine took maximum use of terrorists running over 40% of Iraq by exaggerating in favor of ISIS that IRAQ HAS BEEN LOST.

The ten percent that are influenced solely by RW pro-ISIS propaganda combined with the idiot Republican faithful that blindly believe anything that tells them that ISIS is winning in Iraq and Obama is to blame develops a combination that drives afalse opinion about Obama anti-ISIS policy to a majority of Anericans polled.

Poll: Most disapprove of Obama handling of ISIS - CNNPolitics.com

Informed patriotic Anericsns knew at the start that ISIS could not achieve their goal of conquering all of Iraq and that Americans need not fight in direct combat with ISIS killers because only Iraqis should do their part.

Obama's policy in Iraq is defeating ISIS, but the crown jewel of RW propaganda will never admit like most wingnuts here that Obama has been proven right about Iraq and the Nationsl Review was exceedinly wrong;

. To defeat ISIS, the administration will have to send a much larger number of U.S. troops to Iraq, and it will have to allow them to accompany Iraqi forces into battle. Only in this manner can the United States restore Sunni confidence, reduce Iranian influence, and rebuild Iraq’s security forces. As Obama made clear again in his Pentagon address, he has no intention of moving in this direction.

Read more at: Obama’s Never-Ending Middle East Blame Game, by Mark Moyar, National Review


It is RW propaganda such as the above that does not mention that Obsma's Iraq policy was showing signs of progress without US troops

.
Disapproval over Obama’s handling of terrorism continues to rise, from 51 percent in May to 60 percent in December. Obama initiated a large coalition of nations to strike ISIS territory in Iraq and Syria in August last year and has deployed a number of special operations forces to the region to help with vital intelligence and assassination operations against top ISIS targets.

The poll showed 68 percent also believe that the U.S. military’s response to the rise of ISIS has not been aggressive enough. Some 60 percent feel that the U.S. military action to combat ISIS is going badly, a decrease of 7 percentage points on October (67 percent).

MAJORITY OF AMERICANS WANT U.S. GROUND TROOPS TO FIGHT ISIS: POLL
BY JACK MOORE ON 12/7/15 AT 4:23 PM

 

[JakeStarkey]

Do not underestimate the effect of RW pro-ISIS propaganda over the past two years since RWers received a huge boost from the ISIS assault in Iraq prior to the midterm elections of 3014. ISIS terror gave Republicans a huge boost in 2024 and their propaganda machine took maximum use of terrorists running over 40% of Iraq by exaggerating in favor of ISIS that IRAQ HAS BEEN LOST.

The ten percent that are influenced solely by RW pro-ISIS propaganda combined with the idiot Republican faithful that blindly believe anything that tells them that ISIS is winning in Iraq and Obama is to blame develops a combination that drives afalse opinion about Obama anti-ISIS policy to a majority of Anericans polled.

Poll: Most disapprove of Obama handling of ISIS - CNNPolitics.com

Informed patriotic Anericsns knew at the start that ISIS could not achieve their goal of conquering all of Iraq and that Americans need not fight in direct combat with ISIS killers because only Iraqis should do their part.

Obama's policy in Iraq is defeating ISIS, but the crown jewel of RW propaganda will never admit like most wingnuts here that Obama has been proven right about Iraq and the Nationsl Review was exceedinly wrong;

. To defeat ISIS, the administration will have to send a much larger number of U.S. troops to Iraq, and it will have to allow them to accompany Iraqi forces into battle. Only in this manner can the United States restore Sunni confidence, reduce Iranian influence, and rebuild Iraq’s security forces. As Obama made clear again in his Pentagon address, he has no intention of moving in this direction.

Read more at: Obama’s Never-Ending Middle East Blame Game, by Mark Moyar, National Review


It is RW propaganda such as the above that does not mention that Obsma's Iraq policy was showing signs of progress without US troops

.
Disapproval over Obama’s handling of terrorism continues to rise, from 51 percent in May to 60 percent in December. Obama initiated a large coalition of nations to strike ISIS territory in Iraq and Syria in August last year and has deployed a number of special operations forces to the region to help with vital intelligence and assassination operations against top ISIS targets.

The poll showed 68 percent also believe that the U.S. military’s response to the rise of ISIS has not been aggressive enough. Some 60 percent feel that the U.S. military action to combat ISIS is going badly, a decrease of 7 percentage points on October (67 percent).

MAJORITY OF AMERICANS WANT U.S. GROUND TROOPS TO FIGHT ISIS: POLL
BY JACK MOORE ON 12/7/15 AT 4:23 PM

And? You want American men and women to die because the Arabs, Turks, and Kurds won't do their own fighting? Only they can win their freedom only if they will fight to the last drop.

 

[NotfooledbyW]

Do not underestimate the effect of RW pro-ISIS propaganda over the past two years since RWers received a huge boost from the ISIS assault in Iraq prior to the midterm elections of 3014. ISIS terror gave Republicans a huge boost in 2024 and their propaganda machine took maximum use of terrorists running over 40% of Iraq by exaggerating in favor of ISIS that IRAQ HAS BEEN LOST.

The ten percent that are influenced solely by RW pro-ISIS propaganda combined with the idiot Republican faithful that blindly believe anything that tells them that ISIS is winning in Iraq and Obama is to blame develops a combination that drives afalse opinion about Obama anti-ISIS policy to a majority of Anericans polled.

Poll: Most disapprove of Obama handling of ISIS - CNNPolitics.com

Informed patriotic Anericsns knew at the start that ISIS could not achieve their goal of conquering all of Iraq and that Americans need not fight in direct combat with ISIS killers because only Iraqis should do their part.

Obama's policy in Iraq is defeating ISIS, but the crown jewel of RW propaganda will never admit like most wingnuts here that Obama has been proven right about Iraq and the Nationsl Review was exceedinly wrong;

. To defeat ISIS, the administration will have to send a much larger number of U.S. troops to Iraq, and it will have to allow them to accompany Iraqi forces into battle. Only in this manner can the United States restore Sunni confidence, reduce Iranian influence, and rebuild Iraq’s security forces. As Obama made clear again in his Pentagon address, he has no intention of moving in this direction.

Read more at: Obama’s Never-Ending Middle East Blame Game, by Mark Moyar, National Review


It is RW propaganda such as the above that does not mention that Obsma's Iraq policy was showing signs of progress without US troops

.
Disapproval over Obama’s handling of terrorism continues to rise, from 51 percent in May to 60 percent in December. Obama initiated a large coalition of nations to strike ISIS territory in Iraq and Syria in August last year and has deployed a number of special operations forces to the region to help with vital intelligence and assassination operations against top ISIS targets.

The poll showed 68 percent also believe that the U.S. military’s response to the rise of ISIS has not been aggressive enough. Some 60 percent feel that the U.S. military action to combat ISIS is going badly, a decrease of 7 percentage points on October (67 percent).

MAJORITY OF AMERICANS WANT U.S. GROUND TROOPS TO FIGHT ISIS: POLL
BY JACK MOORE ON 12/7/15 AT 4:23 PM

And? You want American men and women to die because the Arabs, Turks, and Kurds won't do their own fighting? Only they can win their freedom only if they will fight to the last drop.

No, I don't. That is my point, here it is again:

The ten percent that are influenced solely by RW pro-ISIS propaganda combined with the idiot Republican faithful that blindly believe anything that tells them that ISIS is winning in Iraq and Obama is to blame develops a combination that drives afalse opinion about Obama anti-ISIS policy to a majority of Anericans polled

I have been in full support of Obama's 'no direct combat troops in Iraq' policy from the start. Obama is right, ISIS is being defeated by 99.9999% Iraqis. And the Right Wing propaganda machine is wrong.

But I recognize RW propaganda and recognize that it worked to convince the majority of Americans to falsely believe that American Trooos need to go into Iraq and kill and be killed is the only way to defeat ISIS.

The majority is wrong and now they have been proven wrong - so those who know the facts need to tell it to everyone they can.

For gods sake the biggest Republican idiot they could find to run for President has proposed bombing Iraq's oil infrastructure so ISIS doesn't have it.

ISIS never had it and never will and it's been obvious for over a year.

That's how badly informed the majority of Americans are on the current situation in Iraq.

ISIS is being methodically and steadily defeated.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Thank you for making that clear.

I don't even support the boots on the ground presence we have there now.

The majority of Americans are wrong, period.

 

[NotfooledbyW]

Wasn't the mission of Iraq War their self-governance under a democratic government?

That was not the purpose reason or justification for the invasion. The original mission and purpose was to remove the threat of a hidden arsenal of the most lethal weapons ever devised and to preemptively take away the regime’s capacity to provide lethal weapon capability to terrorist organizations such as the one that attacked us on September 11 2001.

The US military was not trained, equipped, prepared, funded or staffed going in for a nation building mission. They had to figure it out while conducting the original mission which turned out to be wholly wrong and unnecessary.

 

[KissMy]

The far RW propaganda machine has no impact on 90% of America.

The problem is the RW propaganda cause wars that cost 100% of US $24 Trillion Debt!!!

 

[CrusaderFrank]

The far RW propaganda machine has no impact on 90% of America.

The problem is the RW propaganda cause wars that cost 100% of US $24 Trillion Debt!!!

You have to thank the handlers behind Bush and Obama for that.

At the end of Clinton/Gingrich, the USA was on a glide path to world peace and budget surpluses, when - suddenly! brown people in a cave in Pashtun (don't laugh) planned, all on their own without any help form any Intelligence agencies (I see you snickering in the back) the 9/11 attacks - and suddenly we're in a 20 year war against Terror the end result of which is unconscionable debt, a police state that would make Orwell cry himself to sleep, a "refugee crisis" that put most of Europe on their way to becoming Islamic nations.

 

[NotfooledbyW]

You have to thank the handlers behind Bush and Obama for that.

At the end of Clinton/Gingrich, the USA was on a glide path to world peace and budget surpluses, when - suddenly! brown people in a cave in Pashtun (don't laugh) planned, all on their own without any help form any Intelligence agencies (I see you snickering in the back) the 9/11 attacks - and suddenly we're in a 20 year war against Terror the end result of which is unconscionable debt, a police state that would make Orwell cry himself to sleep, a "refugee crisis" that put most of Europe on their way to becoming Islamic nations.

alQaeda, Saddam Hussein and the attack on 9/11/01 had nothing to do with Bush’s decision in 2003 to invade Iraq based on his bold faced lie about WMD being hidden from inspectors.

Obama was opposed to Bush starting a dumb war.

None of what you described happens with no invasion into Iraq and concentrating on the true al Qaeda 9/11/01 war In Afghanistan.

You are wrong to lump Obama in with the scoundrel Iraq war decider Bush.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

You have to thank the handlers behind Bush and Obama for that.

At the end of Clinton/Gingrich, the USA was on a glide path to world peace and budget surpluses, when - suddenly! brown people in a cave in Pashtun (don't laugh) planned, all on their own without any help form any Intelligence agencies (I see you snickering in the back) the 9/11 attacks - and suddenly we're in a 20 year war against Terror the end result of which is unconscionable debt, a police state that would make Orwell cry himself to sleep, a "refugee crisis" that put most of Europe on their way to becoming Islamic nations.

alQaeda, Saddam Hussein and the attack on 9/11/01 had nothing to do with Bush’s decision in 2003 to invade Iraq based on his bold faced lie about WMD being hidden from inspectors.

Obama was opposed to Bush starting a dumb war.

None of what you described happens with no invasion into Iraq and concentrating on the true al Qaeda 9/11/01 war In Afghanistan.

You are wrong to lump Obama in with the scoundrel Iraq war decider Bush.

Born in Kenya Obama was every bit a puppet like Bush

 

[NotfooledbyW]

Born in Kenya Obama was every bit a puppet like Bush

Can’t deny what I wrote is true I see.