EconChick
Gold Member
- Feb 15, 2014
- 4,678
- 828
- 190
- Thread starter
- #281
Why don't you stick to the matter at hand?
If the Iraqis with an army of half a million can't or won't stop ISIS's few thousand fighters,
why should Americans go and die in their place? Why is that our obligation?
You libs are pathetic in every way. You're stupid. You lie. When I post something serious and you low lives turn it personal....then I fire back....all of a sudden I'M THE ONE NOT STICKING to the matter at hand. Pathetic hypocrites. You wreak of desperation.
I love you ppl keep putting it in writing.
You do realize some of us copy these threads and disseminate to people who are actually interested in knowing facts, don't you?
You want to stick to the topic, then stop going to the gutter.
Obama has admitted failure just like the title says. Now THAT's the matter at hand.
Let me repeat the question:
If the Iraqis with an army of half a million can't or won't stop ISIS's few thousand fighters,
why should Americans go and die in their place? Why is that our obligation?
I wonder why Econchick so scrupulously avoids this issue?
If you can't make a good argument for defending a nation that refuses to defend itself, despite its obvious capability to do so,
what's the justification for doing it?
I wonder why you have to be told 50 times the answer. Their military leaders abandoned them.
I could have sworn you said you were ex military. Either you're a liar or quite the idiot to have this explained to you.
So were you military or not?
That has nothing to do with my question. I asking why Americans should die in place of Iraqis who are fleeing the field of battle.
What's the justification?
THAT question is a fair debate. That's not the question I responded to.