- Thread starter
- #21
Obama: " I’ve got one television station that is entirely devoted to attacking my administration."
As he does with metronomic regularity, he lies.
Although this is nothing new....let's document that.
4. From September 8 through October 16, 2008, 40% of Fox News stories on Obama were negative. So were 40% of Fox News stories on McCain.
The Color of News
5. Now, here is the sort of press response that Obama demands:
"The press also gave some candidates measurably more favorable coverage than others. Democrat Barack Obama, the junior Senator from Illinois, enjoyed by far the most positive treatment of the major candidates during the first five months of the year—followed closely by Fred Thompson, the actor who at the time was only considering running. Arizona Senator John McCain received the most negative coverage—much worse than his main GOP rivals."
The Invisible Primary – Invisible No Longer
46.7% of the Obama news was positive in tone.
12. 4% of the McCain news was positive in tone.
Ibid.
This was the same press corp (read 'corpse,' Obama style) that called him "God," and 'the messiah,' and compared him to Jesus.
True story.
6. Be clear: for the Obamunists, only media praise is acceptable, and any criticism is illegitimate.
" What I think is fair to say about Fox — and certainly it’s the way we view it — is that it really is more a wing of the Republican Party. They take their talking points, put them on the air; take their opposition research, put them on the air. And that’s fine. But let’s not pretend they’re a news network the way CNN is." Anita Dunn, Obama White House Communications Director, CNNinterview, October 12, 2009.
The Obama administration offered little evidence to back this up.
But, of course, facts, and evidence are unnecessary.
And the two individuals quoted in the OP.....they march, unquestioningly, as good lock-step Liberals.
What could be better for a dictatorship?
Folks who see themselves as subjects rather than citizens.
As he does with metronomic regularity, he lies.
Although this is nothing new....let's document that.
4. From September 8 through October 16, 2008, 40% of Fox News stories on Obama were negative. So were 40% of Fox News stories on McCain.
The Color of News
5. Now, here is the sort of press response that Obama demands:
"The press also gave some candidates measurably more favorable coverage than others. Democrat Barack Obama, the junior Senator from Illinois, enjoyed by far the most positive treatment of the major candidates during the first five months of the year—followed closely by Fred Thompson, the actor who at the time was only considering running. Arizona Senator John McCain received the most negative coverage—much worse than his main GOP rivals."
The Invisible Primary – Invisible No Longer
46.7% of the Obama news was positive in tone.
12. 4% of the McCain news was positive in tone.
Ibid.
This was the same press corp (read 'corpse,' Obama style) that called him "God," and 'the messiah,' and compared him to Jesus.
True story.
6. Be clear: for the Obamunists, only media praise is acceptable, and any criticism is illegitimate.
" What I think is fair to say about Fox — and certainly it’s the way we view it — is that it really is more a wing of the Republican Party. They take their talking points, put them on the air; take their opposition research, put them on the air. And that’s fine. But let’s not pretend they’re a news network the way CNN is." Anita Dunn, Obama White House Communications Director, CNNinterview, October 12, 2009.
The Obama administration offered little evidence to back this up.
But, of course, facts, and evidence are unnecessary.
And the two individuals quoted in the OP.....they march, unquestioningly, as good lock-step Liberals.
What could be better for a dictatorship?
Folks who see themselves as subjects rather than citizens.